J.P-9, OASIS+ Domain Qualifications Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 52 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GSA’s OASIS+ MAC Draft Request for Proposal #2
- Solicitation number
- 47QRCA21N0001
- Issued by
-
GSA Federal Acquisition Service
View the file
Other files
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
T&E - SB
| At this time, GSA projects that the minimum average annual value for a QP will be $500K for this Domain and socioeconomic RFP. | ||||
| # | RFP Section | Capability | Qualification | Max # of Credits |
| 1 | L.5.2.3.1 | QP - Relevance | Relevant QP: Each Relevant QP receives 4 evaluation credits; each non-Relevant QP receives 0 credits for this item, but can receive credit for items 2, 3, 4, and 5. | 20 |
| 2 | L.5.2.3.2 | QP - Scale | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Average annual value over $1M or 5 FTEs __Average annual value over $4M or 20 FTEs (this credit is in addition to the credit for $1M / 5 FTEs) Note that credit is provided for total annual project value and/or FTEs, not just the portion relevant to this Domain.
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 6 | |||
| 3 | L.5.2.3.3 | QP - Integrated Experience | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates one of the following: |
__Performance spanned 5 or more different Labor Categories OR __Performance spanned 3 or more distinct functional areas (ref. Attachment J.P-5, OASIS+ Functional Areas and Subareas)
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max | 5 | |||
| 4 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | Offeror receives credit for QPs demonstrating any of the following: |
__Surge Capability: providing surge support (+10% level of effort increase) with < 45 days lead time. To qualify, the offeror must demonstrate that the surge requirements were actually requested by the customer/requiring activity (unexercised options wouldn’t qualify) __Managing 3 or more first-tier subcontractors/teaming partners __Providing services that involve 5 or more personnel with individual security clearances: Secret, Top Secret, Q (DOE)
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 5 | ||||
| 5 | L.5.6 | Past Performance | Offeror receives 1 credit for 3 or more Relevant QPs with an overall positive Past Performance Rating (e.g., >3.0 on a 5 point scale). Offeror receives 2 credits under this criterion if 4 QPs are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating, and 3 credits if all 5 are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating. Offeror does not receive credit for a QP with overall satisfactory ratings, neutral (i.e., lack of past performance information), or non-relevant QPs (regardless of the Past Performance Rating), but they can still use those QPs to claim other QP-based credit IAW criteria 1 through 4. | 3 | |
| 6 | L.5.3.1 | FEP - Competition in Multiple Award Environments | Offeror receives credit for competitive task orders awarded in MA-IDIQ environment (1 for each award). Task orders are only considered competitive if 2 or more businesses submitted a proposal. Offeror may include up to 4 additional projects for this factor. | 4 | |
| 7 | L.5.3.2 | FEP - Federal Agencies | Offeror receives 1 credit for providing services in support of 3 or more distinct Federal Agencies. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 1 | |
| 8 | L.5.4.1 | Accounting System | Offeror receives 2 credits for having an adequate accounting system supported by documentation described in the RFP. | 2 | |
| 9 | L.5.4.4 | Government Facility Clearance | Offeror receives 1 credit for having one of any of the following Facility Clearance Levels: | ||
| __Top Secret __Secret FCL | 1 | ||||
| 10 | L.5.5.9 | Sustainability-Related Disclosures and Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing: |
__Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing any one of the following:
__Relevant Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
| __A science-based reduction target | 2 | |||
| 11 | L.5.5 | Other Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for having one of any of the following certifications: |
__Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) - Level 2 or higher __ISO 27001:2013 (Information Security) __ISO 9001:2015 (Quality Management)
| __ISO 22301 Business Continuity | 1 | ||
| TOTAL CREDITS AVAILABLE | 50 | ||
| DRAFT SB Qualification Threshold | 36 |
T&E - UNR
| At this time, GSA projects that the minimum average annual value for a QP will be $1M for this Domain and unrestricted RFP. | ||||
| # | RFP Section | Capability | Qualification | Max # of Credits |
| 1 | L.5.2.3.1 | QP - Relevance | Relevant QP: Each Relevant QP receives 4 evaluation credits; each non-Relevant QP receives 0 credits for this item, but can receive credit for items 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. | 20 |
| 2 | L.5.2.3.2 | QP - Scale | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Average annual value over $2.5M or 12 FTEs __Average annual value over $10M or 50 FTEs (this credit is in addition to the credit for $2.5M / 12 FTEs) Note that credit is provided for total annual project value and/or FTEs, not just the portion Relevant to this Domain.
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 6 | |||
| 3 | L.5.2.3.3 | QP - Integrated Experience | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates one of the following: |
__Performance spanned 5 or more different Labor Categories OR __Performance spanned 3 or more distinct functional areas (ref. Attachment J.P-5, OASIS+ Functional Areas and Subareas)
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max | 4 | |||
| 4 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | Offeror receives credit for QPs demonstrating any of the following: |
__Surge Capability: providing surge support (+10% level of effort increase) with < 45 days lead time. To qualify, the offeror must demonstrate that the surge requirements were actually requested by the customer/requiring activity (unexercised options wouldn’t qualify) __Managing 5 or more first-tier subcontractors/teaming partners __Providing services that involve 5 or more personnel with individual security clearances: Secret, Top Secret, Q (DOE)
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 5 | ||||
| 5 | L.5.6 | Past Performance | Offeror receives 1 credit for 3 or more Relevant QPs with an overall positive Past Performance Rating (e.g., >3.0 on a 5 point scale). Offeror receives 2 credits under this criterion if 4 QPs are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating, and 3 credits if all 5 are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating. Offeror does not receive credit for a QP with overall satisfactory ratings, neutral (i.e., lack of past performance information), or non-relevant QPs (regardless of the Past Performance Rating), but they can still use those QPs to claim other QP-based credit IAW criteria 1 through 4. | 3 | |
| 6 | L.5.6 | Past Performance / SB Utilization | Offeror receives 1 credit if Past Performance across QPs shows an average rating of Very Good or above (>4.0 out of 5) for SB subcontracting rating element (formerly called Utilization of Small Business). If entity performing project was a small business concern at the time of award of project, that project does not factor into the overall average rating. If all QPs were performed as a small business concern, Offeror can claim credit for this element. | 1 | |
| 7 | L.5.3.1 | FEP - Competition in Multiple Award Environments | Offeror receives credit for competitive task orders awarded in MA-IDIQ environment (1 for each award). Task orders are only considered competitive if 2 or more businesses submitted a proposal. Offeror may include up to 4 additional projects for this factor. | 4 | |
| 8 | L.5.3.2 | FEP - Federal Agencies | Offeror receives 1 credit for providing services in support of 3 or more distinct Federal Agencies. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 1 | |
| 9 | L.5.4 | Contractor Business Systems | Offeror receives 1 credit for having 2 of the following adequate systems or rates; Offeror receives 1 additional credit for having 3 or more adequate systems or rates: |
__Accounting System __Approved Rates (e.g., Forward Pricing/Billing) __Purchasing System __Estimating System __EVMS
| __Material Management and Accounting System __Property Management System | 2 | |||
| 10 | L.5.4.4 | Government Facility Clearance | Offeror receives 1 credit for having one of any of the following Facility Clearance Levels: | |
| __Top Secret __Secret FCL | 1 | |||
| 11 | L.5.5 | Sustainability-Related Disclosures and Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing: |
__Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing any one of the following:
__Relevant Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
| __A science-based reduction target | 2 | |||
| 12 | L.5.5 | Other Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for having one of any of the following certifications: |
__Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) - Level 2 or higher __ISO 27001:2013 (Information Security) __ISO 9001:2015 (Quality Management)
| __ISO 22301 Business Continuity | 1 | ||
| TOTAL CREDITS AVAILABLE | 50 | ||
| DRAFT UNR Qualification Threshold | 42 |
M&A - SB
| At this time, GSA projects that the minimum average annual value for a QP will be $500K for this Domain and socioeconomic RFP. | ||||
| # | RFP Section | Capability | Qualification | Max # of Credits |
| 1 | L.5.2.3.1 | QP - Relevance | Relevant QP: Each Relevant QP receives 4 evaluation credits; each non-Relevant QP receives 0 credits for this item, but can receive credit for items 2, 3, 4, and 5. | 20 |
| 2 | L.5.2.3.2 | QP - Scale | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Average annual value over $1M or 5 FTEs __Average annual value over $4M or 20 FTEs (this credit is in addition to the credit for $1M / 5 FTEs) Note that credit is provided for total annual project value and/or FTEs, not just the portion Relevant to this Domain.
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 6 | |||
| 3 | L.5.2.3.3 | QP - Integrated Experience | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates one of the following: |
__Performance spanned 5 or more different Labor Categories OR __Performance spanned 3 or more distinct functional areas (ref. Attachment J.P-5, OASIS+ Functional Areas and Subareas)
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max | 5 | |||
| 4 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | Offeror receives credit for QPs demonstrating any of the following: |
__Surge Capability: providing surge support (+10% level of effort increase) with < 45 days lead time. To qualify, the offeror must demonstrate that the surge requirements were actually requested by the customer/requiring activity (unexercised options wouldn’t qualify) __Managing 3 or more first-tier subcontractors/teaming partners __Providing services that involve 5 or more personnel with individual security clearances: Secret, Top Secret, Q (DOE)
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 5 | ||||
| 5 | L.5.6 | Past Performance | Offeror receives 1 credit for 3 or more Relevant QPs with an overall positive Past Performance Rating (e.g., >3.0 on a 5 point scale). Offeror receives 2 credits under this criterion if 4 QPs are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating, and 3 credits if all 5 are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating. Offeror does not receive credit for a QP with overall satisfactory ratings, neutral (i.e., lack of past performance information), or non-relevant QPs (regardless of the Past Performance Rating), but they can still use those QPs to claim other QP-based credit IAW criteria 1 through 4. | 3 | |
| 6 | L.5.3.1 | FEP - Competition in Multiple Award Environments | Offeror receives credit for competitive task orders awarded in MA-IDIQ environment (1 for each award). Task orders are only considered competitive if 2 or more businesses submitted a proposal. Offeror may include up to 4 additional projects for this factor. | 4 | |
| 7 | L.5.3.2 | FEP - Federal Agencies | Offeror receives 1 credit for providing services in support of 3 or more distinct Federal Agencies. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 1 | |
| 8 | L.5.4.1 | Accounting System | Offeror receives 2 credits for having an adequate accounting system supported by documentation described in the RFP. | 2 | |
| 9 | L.5.4.4 | Government Facility Clearance | Offeror receives 1 credit for having one of any of the following Facility Clearance Levels: | ||
| __Top Secret __Secret FCL | 1 | ||||
| 10 | L.5.5 | Sustainability-Related Disclosures and Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing: |
__Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing any one of the following:
__Relevant Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
| __A science-based reduction target | 2 | |||
| 11 | L.5.5 | Other Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for having one of any of the following certifications: |
__Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) - Level 2 or higher __ISO 27001:2013 (Information Security) __ISO 9001:2015 (Quality Management)
| __ISO 22301 Business Continuity | 1 | ||
| TOTAL CREDITS AVAILABLE | 50 | ||
| DRAFT SB Qualification Threshold | 36 |
M&A - UNR
| At this time, GSA projects that the minimum average annual value for a QP will be $1M for this Domain and unrestricted RFP. | ||||
| # | RFP Section | Capability | Qualification | Max # of Credits |
| 1 | L.5.2.3.1 | QP - Relevance | Relevant QP: Each Relevant QP receives 4 evaluation credits; each non-Relevant QP receives 0 credits for this item, but can receive credit for items 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. | 20 |
| 2 | L.5.2.3.2 | QP - Scale | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Average annual value over $2.5M or 12 FTEs __Average annual value over $10M or 50 FTEs (this credit is in addition to the credit for $2.5M / 12 FTEs) Note that credit is provided for total annual project value and/or FTEs, not just the portion Relevant to this Domain.
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 6 | |||
| 3 | L.5.2.3.3 | QP - Integrated Experience | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates one of the following: |
__Performance spanned 5 or more different Labor Categories OR __Performance spanned 3 or more distinct functional areas (ref. Attachment J.P-5, OASIS+ Functional Areas and Subareas)
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max | 4 | |||
| 4 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | Offeror receives credit for QPs demonstrating any of the following: |
__Surge Capability: providing surge support (+10% level of effort increase) with < 45 days lead time. To qualify, the offeror must demonstrate that the surge requirements were actually requested by the customer/requiring activity (unexercised options wouldn’t qualify) __Managing 5 or more first-tier subcontractors/teaming partners __Providing services that involve 5 or more personnel with individual security clearances: Secret, Top Secret, Q (DOE)
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 5 | ||||
| 5 | L.5.6 | Past Performance | Offeror receives 1 credit for 3 or more Relevant QPs with an overall positive Past Performance Rating (e.g., >3.0 on a 5 point scale). Offeror receives 2 credits under this criterion if 4 QPs are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating, and 3 credits if all 5 are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating. Offeror does not receive credit for a QP with overall satisfactory ratings, neutral (i.e., lack of past performance information), or non-relevant QPs (regardless of the Past Performance Rating), but they can still use those QPs to claim other QP-based credit IAW criteria 1 through 4. | 3 | |
| 6 | L.5.6 | Past Performance / SB Utilization | Offeror receives 1 credit if Past Performance across QPs shows an average rating of Very Good or above (>4.0 out of 5) for SB subcontracting rating element (formerly called Utilization of Small Business). If entity performing project was a small business concern at the time of award of project, that project does not factor into the overall average rating. If all QPs were performed as a small business concern, Offeror can claim credit for this element. | 1 | |
| 7 | L.5.3.1 | FEP - Competition in Multiple Award Environments | Offeror receives credit for competitive task orders awarded in MA-IDIQ environment (1 for each award). Task orders are only considered competitive if 2 or more businesses submitted a proposal. Offeror may include up to 4 additional projects for this factor. | 4 | |
| 8 | L.5.3.2 | FEP - Federal Agencies | Offeror receives 1 credit for providing services in support of 3 or more distinct Federal Agencies. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 1 | |
| 9 | L.5.4 | Contractor Business Systems | Offeror receives 1 credit for having 2 of the following adequate systems or rates; Offeror receives 1 additional credit for having 3 or more adequate systems or rates: |
__Accounting System __Approved Rates (e.g., Forward Pricing/Billing) __Purchasing System __Estimating System __EVMS
| __Material Management and Accounting System __Property Management System | 2 | |||
| 10 | L.5.4.4 | Government Facility Clearance | Offeror receives 1 credit for having one of any of the following Facility Clearance Levels: | |
| __Top Secret __Secret FCL | 1 | |||
| 11 | L.5.5 | Sustainability-Related Disclosures and Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing: |
__Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing any one of the following:
__Relevant Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
| __A science-based reduction target | 2 | |||
| 12 | L.5.5 | Other Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for having one of any of the following certifications: |
__Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) - Level 2 or higher __ISO 27001:2013 (Information Security) __ISO 9001:2015 (Quality Management)
| __ISO 22301 Business Continuity | 1 | ||
| TOTAL CREDITS AVAILABLE | 50 | ||
| DRAFT UNR Qualification Threshold | 42 |
ENT - UNR
| At this time, GSA projects that the minimum average annual value for a QP will be $50M for this Domain and unrestricted RFP. GSA is considering a minimum order threshold of $250M total estimated value for future task orders issued through this Domain. | |||||
| # | RFP Section | Capability | Qualification | Max # of Credits | |
| 1 | L.5.2.3.1 | QP - Relevance | Relevant QP: Each Relevant QP receives 4 evaluation credits; each non-Relevant QP receives 0 credits for this item, but can receive credit for items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. | ||
| *The Offeror may submit a maximum of 4 distinct QPs. | 16 | ||||
| 2 | L.5.2.3.2 | QP - Scale | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following (maximum of 6 credits): |
__Average annual value over $75M __Average annual value over $100M (this credit is in addition to the credit for $75M) Note that credit is provided for total annual project value, not just the portion Relevant to this Domain.
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 6 | |||
| 3 | L.5.2.3.3 | QP - Integrated Experience | - Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates the following (maximum of 4 credits): |
__Performance spanned 5 or more distinct functional areas (ref. Attachment J.P-5, OASIS+ Functional Areas and Subareas)
- Offeror receives 1 additional credit if all QPs combined demonstrate the following:
__Performance across all QPs spanned 10 or more distinct functional areas (ref. Attachment J.P-5, OASIS+ Functional Areas and Subareas)
| *GSA is considering including a minimum percentage of the overall project value for each functional area claimed. | 4 | |||
| 4 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | - Offeror receives credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following (maximum of 3 credits): |
__Surge Capability: providing surge support (+10% level of effort increase) with < 45 days lead time. To qualify, the vendor must demonstrate that the surge requirements were actually requested by the customer/requiring activity (unexercised options don't qualify) __Managing 8 or more first-tier subcontractors/teaming partners *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria
- Offeror receives 1 additional credit for having at least 2 QPs that demonstrate the following:
| __Providing services that involve 5 or more personnel with individual security clearances: Secret, Top Secret, Q (DOE) | 4 | |||
| 5 | L.5.2.3.6 | QP - Multiple & OCONUS Locations | - Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates performance in at least 3 different locations. |
- Offeror receives 1 additional credit for each QP that demonstrates performance in 5 or more different locations.
- Offeror receives 1 additional credit for each QP that demonstrates performance that involved work at an OCONUS location.
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 2 credits max | 3 | |||
| 6 | L.5.6 | Past Performance | - Offeror receives 1 credit for 2 or more Relevant QPs with an overall positive Past Performance Rating (e.g., >3.0 on a 5 point scale), or |
- Offeror receives 2 credits for 3 or more Relevant QPs with an overall positive Past Performance Rating, or
- Offeror receives 3 credits if all 4 QPs are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating.
| Offeror does not receive credit for a QP with overall satisfactory ratings (3.0 on a 5 point scale), neutral (i.e., lack of past performance information), or non-relevant QPs (regardless of the Past Performance rating), but they can still use those QPs to claim other QP-based credit IAW criteria 1 through 5. | 3 | ||||
| 7 | L.5.6 | Past Performance / SB Utilization | Offeror receives 1 credit if Past Performance across QPs shows an average rating of Very Good or above (>4.0 out of 5) for SB Subcontracting rating element (formerly called Utilization of Small Business). If entity performing project was a small business concern at the time of award of project, that project does not factor into the overall average rating. If all QPs were performed as a small business concern, Offeror can claim credit for this element. | 1 | |
| 8 | L.5.3.1 | FEP - Competition in Multiple Award Environments | Offeror receives credit for competitive task orders awarded in MA-IDIQ environment (1 for each award). Task orders are only considered competitive if 2 or more businesses submitted a proposal. Offeror may include up to 2 additional projects for this factor. | 2 | |
| 9 | L.5.3.2 | FEP - Federal Agencies | Offeror receives 2 credits for providing services in support of 3 or more distinct Federal Agencies. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 2 | |
| 10 | L.5.4 | Contractor Business Systems | - Offeror receives 1 credit for each of the following adequate systems or rates: |
__Accounting System __Approved Rates (e.g., Forward Pricing/Billing) __Purchasing System
- Offeror receives 1 additional credit for having 1 or more of the following adequate systems or credentials:
__Estimating System __EVMS __FedRAMP/Agency ATO
| __Material Management and Accounting System __Property Management System | 4 | |||
| 11 | L.5.4.4 | Government Facility Clearance | Offeror receives credit for having the following Facility Clearance Levels: |
__Secret - 1 credit OR
| __Top Secret - 2 credits | 2 | |||
| 12 | L.5.5 | Sustainability-Related Disclosures and Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing: |
__Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing any one of the following:
__Relevant Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
| __A science-based reduction target | 2 | |||
| 13 | L.5.5 | Other Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for having 2 of any of the following certifications: |
__Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) - Level 4 __ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management __ISO 22301 Business Continuity
__ISO 21508 EVM
__ISO 27001:2013 Information Security
| __ISO 28001 Supply Chain | 1 | ||
| TOTAL CREDITS AVAILABLE | 50 | ||
| DRAFT Enterprise Solutions Qualification Threshold | 45 |
FAC - SB
| At this time, GSA projects that the minimum average annual value for a QP will be $250K for this Domain and socioeconomic RFP. | ||||
| # | RFP Section | Capability | Qualification | Max # of Credits |
| 1 | L.5.2.3.1 | QP - Relevance | Relevant QP: Each Relevant QP receives 4 evaluation credits; each non-Relevant QP receives 0 credits for this item, but can receive credit for items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. | 20 |
| 2 | L.5.2.3.2 | QP - Scale | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Average annual value over $500K or 3 FTEs __Average annual value over $1M or 5 FTEs (this credit is in addition to the credit for $500K / 3 FTEs) Note that credit is provided for total annual project value and/or FTEs, not just the portion Relevant to this Domain.
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 6 | |||
| 3 | L.5.2.3.3 | QP - Integrated Experience | Offeror receives credit for QPs demonstrating any of the following: |
__Performance spanned 5 or more different Labor Categories.
__Performance spanned 4 or more sub-areas detailed in section 1.C.2.7 Facilities Domain of Attachment J.P-5, OASIS+ Functional Areas and Subareas
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max | 4 | |||
| 4 | L.5.2.3.5 | QP - Specialized Functional Experience | __Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates performance spanned 3 or more of the following specialized functional sub-areas: Building Management Services, Electrical Maintenance, HVAC Maintenance, Janitorial, Landscaping/Grounds Maintenance, Plumbing and Pipefitting. | |
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max | 5 | |||
| 5 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | Offeror receives credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Urgent Work Request/Response: Demonstrate performance where the work consisted of correcting failures that interrupted or adversely impacted building occupant operations but did not pose immediate danger during normal working hours. Response time required was within 24 hours of notification. Urgent work requests include but not limited to inoperative electrical circuits, temperature complaints, inoperative lighting above a workstation, flush valve stuck open, any malfunctions to equipment that affect the operations of building and its occupants.
__Emergency Work Request/Response: Demonstrate performance where the work consisted of correcting failures that constituted an immediate danger to personnel or property during normal working hours or after working hours. Response time required was within one hour of notification. Emergencies include but are not limited to broken water pipes, water intrusion, stalled elevators with trapped passengers, electrical power outages, electrical problems that may cause fire or shock, gas or oil leaks, major air conditioning or heating problems, etc.
__Emergency Call Back (After Hours): Demonstrate performance where the work consisted of correcting failures that constituted an immediate danger to personnel or property. Response time required was within one hour, or less, of notification. Emergency Call Back requests include, but are not limited to broken water pipes, electrical power outages, electrical problems that may cause fire or shock, gas or oil leaks, major air conditioning, heating problems or fire alarm malfunctions, etc.
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max. To qualify, the offeror must demonstrate that the urgent/emergency requirements were actually requested by the customer/requiring activity and performed by the Contractor (unexercised options/SOW requirements wouldn’t qualify) | 4 | |||
| 6 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | Offeror receives credit for QPs demonstrating any of the following: |
__Managing 2 or more first-tier subcontractors/teaming partners __Staffing personnel with individual security clearances (Secret, Top Secret, Q (DOE)).
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 2 | ||||
| 7 | L.5.6 | Past Performance | Offeror receives 1 credit for 3 or more Relevant QPs with an overall positive Past Performance Rating (e.g., >3.0 on a 5 point scale). Offeror receives 2 credits under this criterion if 4 QPs are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating, and 3 credits if all 5 are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating. Offeror does not receive credit for a QP with overall satisfactory ratings, neutral (i.e., lack of past performance information), or non-relevant QPs (regardless of the Past Performance Rating), but they can still use those QPs to claim other QP-based credit IAW criteria 1 through 7. | 3 | |
| 8 | L.5.3.1 | FEP - Competition in Multiple Award Environments | Offeror receives credit for competitive task orders awarded in MA-IDIQ environment (1 for each award). Task orders are only considered competitive if 2 or more businesses submitted a proposal. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 3 | |
| 9 | L.5.3.2 | FEP - Federal Agencies | Offeror receives 1 credit for providing services in support of 3 or more distinct Federal Agencies. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 1 | |
| 10 | L.5.5 | Sustainability-Related Disclosures and Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing: |
__Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing any one of the following:
__Relevant Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
| __A science-based reduction target | 2 | ||
| TOTAL CREDITS AVAILABLE | 50 | ||
| DRAFT SB Qualification Threshold | 36 |
FAC - UNR
| At this time, GSA projects that the minimum average annual value for a QP will be $500K for this Domain and unrestricted RFP. | ||||
| # | RFP Section | Capability | Qualification | Max # of Credits |
| 1 | L.5.2.3.1 | QP - Relevance | Relevant QP: Each Relevant QP receives 4 evaluation credits; each non-Relevant QP receives 0 credits for this item, but can receive credit for items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. | 20 |
| 2 | L.5.2.3.2 | QP - Scale | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Average annual value over $1M or 5 FTEs __Average annual value over $4M or 20 FTEs (this credit is in addition to the credit for $1M / 5 FTEs) Note that credit is provided for total annual project value and/or FTEs, not just the portion Relevant to this Domain.
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 6 | |||
| 3 | L.5.2.3.3 | QP - Integrated Experience | Offeror receives credit for QPs demonstrating any of the following: |
__Performance spanned 5 or more different Labor Categories.
__Performance spanned 4 or more sub-areas detailed in section 1.C.2.7 Facilities Domain of Attachment J.P-5, OASIS+ Functional Areas and Subareas
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max | 4 | |||
| 4 | L.5.2.3.5 | QP - Specialized Functional Experience | __Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates performance spanned 3 or more of the following specialized functional sub-areas: Building Management Services, Electrical Maintenance, HVAC Maintenance, Janitorial, Landscaping/Grounds Maintenance, Plumbing and Pipefitting. | |
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max | 5 | |||
| 5 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | Offeror receives credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Urgent Work Request/Response: Demonstrate performance where the work consisted of correcting failures that interrupted or adversely impacted building occupant operations but did not pose immediate danger during normal working hours. Response time required was within 24 hours of notification. Urgent work requests include but not limited to inoperative electrical circuits, temperature complaints, inoperative lighting above a workstation, flush valve stuck open, any malfunctions to equipment that affect the operations of building and its occupants.
__Emergency Work Request/Response: Demonstrate performance where the work consisted of correcting failures that constituted an immediate danger to personnel or property during normal working hours or after working hours. Response time required was within one hour of notification. Emergencies include but are not limited to broken water pipes, water intrusion, stalled elevators with trapped passengers, electrical power outages, electrical problems that may cause fire or shock, gas or oil leaks, major air conditioning or heating problems, etc.
__Emergency Call Back (After Hours): Demonstrate performance where the work consisted of correcting failures that constituted an immediate danger to personnel or property. Response time required was within one hour, or less, of notification. Emergency Call Back requests include, but are not limited to broken water pipes, electrical power outages, electrical problems that may cause fire or shock, gas or oil leaks, major air conditioning, heating problems or fire alarm malfunctions, etc.
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max. To qualify, the offeror must demonstrate that the urgent/emergency requirements were actually requested by the customer/requiring activity and performed by the Contractor (unexercised options/SOW requirements wouldn’t qualify) | 2 | |||
| 6 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | Offeror receives credit for QPs demonstrating any of the following: |
__Managing 3 or more first-tier subcontractors/teaming partners __Staffing personnel with individual security clearances (Secret, Top Secret, Q (DOE)).
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 2 | ||||
| 7 | L.5.6 | Past Performance | Offeror receives 1 credit for 3 or more Relevant QPs with an overall positive Past Performance Rating (e.g., >3.0 on a 5 point scale). Offeror receives 2 credits under this criterion if 4 QPs are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating, and 3 credits if all 5 are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating. Offeror does not receive credit for a QP with overall satisfactory ratings, neutral (i.e., lack of past performance information), or non-relevant QPs (regardless of the Past Performance Rating), but they can still use those QPs to claim other QP-based credit IAW criteria 1 through 7. | 3 | |
| 8 | L.5.6 | Past Performance / SB Utilization | Offeror receives 1 credit if Past Performance across QPs shows an average rating of Very Good or above (>4.0 out of 5) for SB subcontracting rating element (formerly called Utilization of Small Business). If entity performing project was a small business concern at the time of award of project, that project does not factor into the overall average rating. If all QPs were performed as a small business concern, Offeror can claim credit for this element. | 1 | |
| 9 | L.5.3.1 | FEP - Competition in Multiple Award Environments | Offeror receives credit for competitive task orders awarded in MA-IDIQ environment (1 for each award). Task orders are only considered competitive if 2 or more businesses submitted a proposal. Offeror may include up to 4 additional projects for this factor. | 4 | |
| 10 | L.5.3.2 | FEP - Federal Agencies | Offeror receives 1 credit for providing services in support of 3 or more distinct Federal Agencies. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 1 | |
| 11 | L.5.5 | Sustainability-Related Disclosures and Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing: |
__Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing any one of the following:
__Relevant Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
| __A science-based reduction target | 2 | ||
| TOTAL CREDITS AVAILABLE | 50 | ||
| DRAFT UNR Qualification Threshold | 42 |
ENV - SB
| At this time, GSA projects that the minimum average annual value for a QP will be $250K for this Domain and socioeconomic RFP. | ||||
| # | RFP Section | Capability | Draft Revision - Qualification | Max # of Credits |
| 1 | L.5.2.3.1 | QP - Relevance | Relevant QP: Each Relevant QP receives 4 evaluation credits; each non-Relevant QP receives 0 credits for this item, but can receive credit for items 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. | 20 |
| 2 | L.5.2.3.2 | QP - Scale | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Average annual value over $500K or 3 FTEs __Average annual value over $1M or 5 FTEs (this credit is in addition to the credit for $500K / 3 FTEs) Note that credit is provided for total annual project value and/or FTEs, not just the portion Relevant to this Domain.
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 5 | |||
| 3 | L.5.2.3.3 | QP - Integrated Experience | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates one of the following (max 1 credit per QP): |
__Performance spanned 5 or more different Labor Categories OR __Performance spanned 5 or more sub-areas outlined within the Environmental Functional Area (ref. Attachment J.P-5, OASIS+ Functional Areas and Subareas)
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max | 3 | |||
| 4 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | Offeror receives credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Surge Capability: providing surge support (+10% level of effort increase) with < 45 days lead time. To qualify, the vendor must demonstrate that the surge requirements were actually requested by the customer/requiring activity (unexercised options wouldn’t qualify) __Managing 3 or more first-tier subcontractors/teaming partners
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 5 | |||
| 5 | L.5.2.3.5 | QP - Specialized Functional Experience | Offeror receives credit for a QP demonstrating any of the following specialized functional experience. Additionally, the level of effort of the specialized functional experience must be at or above the minimum value for a QP ($250K) to receive credit: |
__Remediation of PFAS/PFOA, PCBs, VOCs, or Nuclear/Radiological Contamination __Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) by Certified Personnel __Climate Change Policy and Sustainability Initiatives __Environmental Permitting __CERCLA Requirements __Environmental Community Relations
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 6 | ||||
| 6 | L.5.6 | Past Performance | Offeror receives 1 credit for 3 or more Relevant QPs with an overall positive Past Performance Rating (e.g., >3.0 on a 5 point scale). Offeror receives 2 credits under this criterion if 4 QPs are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating, and 3 credits if all 5 are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating. Offeror does not receive credit for a QP with overall satisfactory ratings, neutral (i.e., lack of past performance information), or non-relevant QPs (regardless of the Past Performance Rating), but they can still use those QPs to claim other QP-based credit IAW criteria 1 through 5. | 3 | |
| 7 | L.5.3.1 | FEP - Competition in Multiple Award Environments | Offeror receives credit for competitive task orders awarded in MA-IDIQ environment (1 for each award). Task orders are only considered competitive if 2 or more businesses submitted a proposal. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 3 | |
| 8 | L.5.3.2 | FEP - Federal Agencies | Offeror receives 1 credit for providing services in support of 3 or more distinct Federal Agencies. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 1 | |
| 9 | L.5.4 | Accounting System | Offeror receives 1 credit for having an adequate accounting system supported by documentation described in the RFP. | 1 | |
| 10 | L.5.5 | Sustainability-Related Disclosures and Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing: |
__Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing any one of the following:
__Relevant Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
| __A science-based reduction target | 2 | |||
| 11 | L.5.5 | Other Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for any of the following certifications or disclosures: |
__ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems __NSF/ANSI 391.1 General Sustainability Assessment for Professional Services
| __Certified or Registered Environmental Professional (C/REP) - at least one current employee of the contractor | 1 | ||
| TOTAL CREDITS AVAILABLE | 50 | ||
| DRAFT SB Qualification Threshold | 36 |
ENV - UNR
| At this time, GSA projects that the minimum average annual value for a QP will be $1M for this Domain and unrestricted RFP. | ||||
| # | RFP Section | Capability | Draft Revision - Qualification | Max # of Credits |
| 1 | L.5.2.3.1 | QP - Relevance | Relevant QP: Each Relevant QP receives 4 evaluation credits; each non-Relevant QP receives 0 credits for this item, but can receive credit for items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. | 20 |
| 2 | L.5.2.3.2 | QP - Scale | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Average annual value over $2.5M or 12 FTEs __Average annual value over $10M or 50 FTEs (this credit is in addition to the credit for $2.5M / 12 FTEs) Note that credit is provided for total annual project value and/or FTEs, not just the portion Relevant to this Domain.
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 5 | |||
| 3 | L.5.2.3.3 | QP - Integrated Experience | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates one of the following (max 1 credit per QP): |
__Performance spanned 5 or more different Labor Categories OR
| __Performance spanned 5 or more sub-areas outlined within the Environmental Functional Area (ref. Attachment J.P-5, OASIS+ Functional Areas and Subareas) | 3 | |||
| 4 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | Offeror receives credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Surge Capability: providing surge support (+10% level of effort increase) with < 45 days lead time. To qualify, the vendor must demonstrate that the surge requirements were actually requested by the customer/requiring activity (unexercised options wouldn’t qualify) __Managing 3 or more first-tier subcontractors/teaming partners
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 4 | |||
| 5 | L.5.2.3.5 | QP - Specialized Functional Experience | Offeror receives credit for a QP demonstrating any of the following specialized functional experience. Additionally, the level of effort of the specialized functional experience must be at or above the minimum value for a QP ($1M) to receive credit: |
__Remediation of PFAS/PFOA, PCBs, VOCs, or Nuclear/Radiological Contamination __Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) by Certified Personnel __Climate Change Policy and Sustainability Initiatives __Environmental Permitting __CERCLA Requirements __Environmental Community Relations
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 5 | ||||
| 6 | L.5.6 | Past Performance | Offeror receives 1 credit for 3 or more Relevant QPs with an overall positive Past Performance Rating (e.g., >3.0 on a 5 point scale). Offeror receives 2 credits under this criterion if 4 QPs are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating, and 3 credits if all 5 are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating. Offeror does not receive credit for a QP with overall satisfactory ratings, neutral (i.e., lack of past performance information), or non-relevant QPs (regardless of the Past Performance Rating), but they can still use those QPs to claim other QP-based credit IAW criteria 1 through 5. | 3 | |
| 7 | L.5.6 | Past Performance / SB Utilization | Offeror receives 1 credit if Past Performance across QPs shows an average rating of Very Good or above (>4.0 out of 5) for SB subcontracting rating element (formerly called Utilization of Small Business). If entity performing project was a small business concern at the time of award of project, that project does not factor into the overall average rating. If all QPs were performed as a small business concern, Offeror can claim credit for this element. | 1 | |
| 8 | L.5.3.1 | FEP - Competition in Multiple Award Environments | Offeror receives credit for competitive task orders awarded in MA-IDIQ environment (1 for each award). Task orders are only considered competitive if 2 or more businesses submitted a proposal. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 3 | |
| 9 | L.5.3.2 | FEP - Federal Agencies | Offeror receives 1 credit for providing services in support of 3 or more distinct Federal Agencies. Offeror may include up to 3 additional projects for this factor. | 1 | |
| 10 | L.5.4 | Contractor Business Systems | Offeror receives 1 credit for having 2 of the following adequate systems or rates; Offeror receives 1 additional credit for having 3 or more adequate systems or rates: |
__Accounting System __Approved Rates (e.g., Forward Pricing/Billing) __Purchasing System __Estimating System __EVMS
| __Material Management and Accounting System __Property Management System | 2 | |||
| 11 | L.5.5 | Sustainability-Related Disclosures and Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing: |
__Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
Offeror receives 1 credit for publicly disclosing any one of the following:
__Relevant Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions developed in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
| __A science-based reduction target | 2 | |||
| 12 | L.5.5 | Other Certifications | Offeror receives 1 credit for any of the following certifications or disclosures: |
__ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems __NSF/ANSI 391.1 General Sustainability Assessment for Professional Services
| __Certified or Registered Environmental Professional (C/REP) - at least one current employee of the contractor | 1 | ||
| TOTAL CREDITS AVAILABLE | 50 | ||
| DRAFT UNR Qualification Threshold | 42 |
LOG - SB
| At this time, GSA projects that the minimum average annual value for a QP will be $500K for this Domain and socioeconomic RFP. | ||||
| # | RFP Section | Capability | Qualification | Max # of Credits |
| 1 | L.5.2.3.1 | QP - Relevance | Relevant QP: Each Relevant QP receives 4 evaluation credits; each non-Relevant QP receives 0 credits for this item, but can receive credit for items 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. | 20 |
| 2 | L.5.2.3.2 | QP - Scale | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates any one of the following: |
__Average annual value over $1M or 5 FTEs __Average annual value over $4M or 20 FTEs (this credit is in addition to the credit for $1M / 5 FTEs) Note that credit is provided for total annual project value and/or FTEs, not just the portion relevant to this Domain.
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 5 | |||
| 3 | L.5.2.3.3 | QP - Integrated Experience | Offeror receives 1 credit for each QP that demonstrates one of the following: |
__Performance spanned 5 or more different Labor Categories OR __Performance spanned 3 or more distinct functional areas (ref. Attachment J.P-5, OASIS+ Functional Areas and Subareas)
| *Under this category, each QP can only achieve 1 credit max | 3 | |||
| 4 | L.5.2.3.4 | QP - Management & Staffing | Offeror receives credit for QPs demonstrating any of the following: |
__Managing 3 or more first-tier subcontractors/teaming partners __Providing services that involve 5 or more personnel with individual security clearances: Secret, Top Secret, Q (DOE)
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 5 | |||
| 5 | L.5.2.3.5 | QP - Specialized Functional Experience | Offeror receives credit for a QP demonstrating any of the following specialized functional experience: |
__Surge Capability: providing surge support (+10% level of effort increase) with < 45 days lead time. To qualify, the offeror must demonstrate that the surge requirements were actually requested by the customer/requiring activity (unexercised options wouldn’t qualify) __Contingency & Exercise Support that includes evidence of using SPOT and/or demonstration of SOFA/ACSA knowledge
| *Under this category, a QP can achieve more than one credit if it meets more than one of the criteria | 4 | ||||
| 6 | L.5.6 | Past Performance | Offeror receives 1 credit for 3 or more Relevant QPs with an overall positive Past Performance Rating (e.g., >3.0 on a 5 point scale). Offeror receives 2 credits under this criterion if 4 QPs are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating, and 3 credits if all 5 are Relevant with an overall positive Past Performance Rating. Offeror does not receive credit for a QP with overall satisfactory ratings, neutral (i.e., lack of past performance information), or non-relevant QPs (regardless of the Past Performance Rating), but they can still use those QPs to claim other QP-based credit IAW criteria 1 through 5. | 3 |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .