47QMCB26R0006_Amendment0002_Questions_Received_2026-07-10.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 91 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USFK TMC Services
- Solicitation number
- 47QMCB26R0006
- Issued by
-
GSA Federal Acquisition Service
About this file
This file is a Questions and Answers document containing 36 clarifications received from prospective offerors regarding RFQ 47QMCB26R0006 for USFK Travel Management Company services, issued July 10, 2026.
The questions address critical operational and compliance matters spanning personnel eligibility, technical infrastructure, pricing assumptions, and reporting requirements. Key clarifications include: (1) Korean-national contractor personnel may perform required TMC functions using USFK installation passes, DBIDS, CAC/DoD credentials, ECA certificates, Foreign Nation tokens, or other approved access procedures per USFK Regulation 190-7, with the AMC/PE GATES system being the only CAC-protected system; (2) offerors must submit pricing in Attachment 10 inclusive of Korean VAT, with the Government providing workspace, desks, power, Government-furnished PC hardware for AMC/PE transactions, Government LAN/Internet connectivity, network access, and phone lines, while contractors are responsible for commercial LAN/Internet connectivity and phone lines; (3) contractors must comply with all applicable Korean labor laws regarding working-time limits, overtime, night work, holiday work, and rest periods when providing after-hours or surge support; (4) the Government does not provide call data breakouts between core hours and after-hours, requiring offerors to use their own estimates; (5) monthly reporting deadlines for TMC data, commercial lodging revenue, and itemized activity reports are due by the 7th calendar day after month-end; (6) Service Contract Act and wage determinations do not apply to services performed overseas; and (7) the Korean firm must be legally registered in Korea, act as prime contractor, and maintain active SAM registration by proposal due date. Three questions resulted in RFQ amendments clarifying slide limits for oral presentations, due dates for monthly submissions, and providing missing attachments related to CBA reconciliation processes and pay grade codes.
View the file
Other files
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions Received
| Question Number | RFQ Section | Question | GSA (Contracting) or DTMO (Technical) Responsible for Response? | Answer | Will the RFQ Change? | Issued as Amendment #? |
| 1 | Is there any incumbent/recompete or this is a brand-new project? If yes, could you please provide us with their award number or even if the customer bought similar services in the past. | GSA | These services are currently being provided under Task Order 47QMCB21F0001 on MAS Contract GS-33F-0027P. | No | 1 | |
| 2 | As we work to complete Attachment 1, PNR Validation Worksheet, we are reviewing the technical setup required under PWS 1.8.7 and related clauses concerning Branch/Bridge access to Government entities, including DTMO, the Government-Designated Help Desk, DoD OBT, and Travel Daily Reporting. |
To ensure that we can accurately complete the validation setup and coordinate the required Branch/Bridge access, we respectfully request any Government-side PCC/SID or equivalent routing information that will be required for the PNR validation process, to the extent such information is intended to be provided to offerors for this purpose.
If those identifiers or routing details will instead be provided later as part of the live validation coordination process, we would appreciate confirmation of that as well.
| We are requesting this information only to ensure accurate and timely completion of Attachment 1 and the associated validation process. | DTMO | PCC(s) necessary to the PNR Validation will be provided to the offering TMCs, once the offerors have sent in their completed PNR Validation forms. | No | 1 |
| 3 | PWS 1.7.3.2.1, U.S.-Citizen Personnel, SOFA / IC-TR Status, and FKAQ Coordination | Korean-firm eligibility, U.S.-citizenship requirement, and SOFA / IC-TR framework |
The solicitation states that eligibility is limited to Korean firms under USFK Regulation 700-19 and the US-ROK SOFA framework. PWS 1.7.3.2.1 appears to require U.S.-citizen personnel for certain CAC-dependent or protected-system duties, including duties at remote sites.
Please clarify how the Government intends this U.S.-citizenship requirement to operate in a procurement that is restricted to Korean firms.
Specifically, if any required contract functions must be performed in Korea by U.S.-citizen contractor personnel, please clarify whether the contract will be designated for SOFA / IC-TR purposes and whether the Contracting Officer / Government will coordinate any required SOFA, FKAQ, Sponsoring Agency, Responsible Officer, installation-access, and personnel-designation process. Alternatively, please confirm whether Korean-national/local-national contractor personnel may perform required TMC functions through applicable USFK installation-pass, DBIDS, CAC/DoD credential, ECA certificate, Foreign Nation token, or other approved access procedures where permitted by the applicable installation-security office and system owner.
| This clarification is needed because the solicitation appears to be limited to Korean firms on the basis that the requirement is performable by Korean contractors, while a mandatory U.S.-citizen contractor staffing requirement for required functions may require a separate SOFA / IC-TR or lawful work-authority analysis. | GSA | The Government will permit vetted Korean-national/local-national contractor personnel to receive the limited installation access, sponsorship, CAC/DoD credential access, DBIDS access, ECA certificate, Foreign Nation token, or other system-specific permissions necessary to perform required TMC functions, subject to applicable USFK, installation-security, system-owner, and background-investigation procedures as outlined in PWS 1.7.3.12.4.1 and United States Forces Korea, Regulation 190-7, Military Policy – INSTALLATION ACCESS | |
| CONTROL (27 September 2017). Korean-national/local-national contractor personnel may perform required TMC functions through applicable USFK installation-pass, DBIDS, CAC/DoD credential, ECA certificate, Foreign Nation token, or other approved access procedures where permitted by the applicable installation-security office and system owner. | No | 1 | |
| 4 | PWS 1.7.3.2.1, U.S.-Citizen Personnel, SOFA / IC-TR Status, and FKAQ Coordination | Contracting Officer responsibility for SOFA / FKAQ coordination |
USFK published guidance indicates that contract-level SOFA designation is requested and coordinated through the Government contracting process and USFK/FKAQ, rather than being independently obtained by the contractor.
| Has the Contracting Officer already coordinated with USFK/FKAQ regarding whether this solicitation requires any contract-level SOFA / IC-TR framework for U.S.-citizen contractor personnel? If not, please clarify how offerors should structure and price staffing for any CAC-dependent, protected-system, or remote-site roles that the Government considers to require U.S.-citizen contractor personnel. | GSA | The Government will permit vetted Korean-national/local-national contractor personnel to receive the limited installation access, sponsorship, CAC/DoD credential access, DBIDS access, ECA certificate, Foreign Nation token, or other system-specific permissions necessary to perform required TMC functions, subject to applicable USFK, installation-security, system-owner, and background-investigation procedures as outlined in PWS 1.7.3.12.4.1 and United States Forces Korea, Regulation 190-7, Military Policy – INSTALLATION ACCESS CONTROL (27 September 2017) | No | 1 |
| 5 | PWS 1.7.3.2.1, U.S.-Citizen Personnel, SOFA / IC-TR Status, and FKAQ Coordination | Local-national access model for Korean-firm performance |
Historically, this type of USFK TMC requirement has been performed by Korean-national contractor personnel under a local-national operating model. In addition, Korean-national personnel working under USFK requirements may, where approved, receive access credentials or system permissions necessary to perform daily mission duties.
If the Government does not intend to establish SOFA / IC-TR status for U.S.-citizen contractor personnel under this solicitation, please confirm whether the requiring activity will permit vetted Korean-national/local-national contractor personnel to receive the limited installation access, sponsorship, CAC/DoD credential access, DBIDS access, ECA certificate, Foreign Nation token, or other system-specific permissions necessary to perform required TMC functions, subject to applicable USFK, installation-security, system-owner, and background-investigation procedures.
| If not, please explain the Government’s intended alternative performance model. | GSA | The Government will permit vetted Korean-national/local-national contractor personnel to receive the limited installation access, sponsorship, CAC/DoD credential access, DBIDS access, ECA certificate, Foreign Nation token, or other system-specific permissions necessary to perform required TMC functions, subject to applicable USFK, installation-security, system-owner, and background-investigation procedures as outlined in PWS 1.7.3.12.4.1 and United States Forces Korea, Regulation 190-7, Military Policy – INSTALLATION ACCESS | |
| CONTROL (27 September 2017) | No | 1 | |
| 6 | PWS 1.7.3.2.1, U.S.-Citizen Personnel, SOFA / IC-TR Status, and FKAQ Coordination | Government versus contractor responsibility for protected-system functions |
If the Government intends to strictly apply PWS 1.7.3.2.1 to any CAC-enabled or otherwise protected DoD-system functions associated with DoD OBT, ticketing, reservations, AMC / Patriot Express, GTR / LOPA, CBA/Unit Card reconciliation, reporting, or related remote-site activities, please identify which specific functions require U.S.-citizen contractor personnel.
| If no lawful contractor staffing path is provided for those functions under the Korean-firm structure, does the Government intend to remove those specific functions from the contractor’s on-site workflow and have them performed instead by Government personnel, U.S.-citizen Government staff, or another Government-controlled workflow? | GSA | The only CAC protected system is the AMC/PE GATES. CAC security requirements for GATES are outlined in Attachment 9 USFK GATES instruction. | No | 1 |
| 7 | Pricing and Host-Nation Labor Compliance | Pricing treatment of Korean VAT |
To ensure all offerors are bidding on a consistent basis, clarification is requested regarding the intended VAT pricing assumption for Attachment 10.
| Please confirm whether offerors should submit Attachment 10 transaction fee pricing inclusive or exclusive of Korean VAT, and whether the Government anticipates issuing any documentation relevant to VAT treatment for the successful offeror. | DTMO | Offerors should submit Attachment 10 transaction fee pricing, inclusive of Korean VAT. The U.S. Government does not anticipate issuing any documentation relevant to VAT treatment for the succesful offeror. | No | 1 |
| 8 | Pricing and Host-Nation Labor Compliance | Government-furnished workspace and IT infrastructure |
| Regarding contractor workspace and site infrastructure at Camp Casey, Yongsan/K16, Camp Humphreys, Camp Henry/Walker, Osan, and Kunsan, please clarify whether the Government will provide, at no cost to the contractor, the physical workspace, desks, power, PC hardware, LAN/internet connectivity, government network access where required, and analog/digital phone lines necessary for performance, or whether offerors are expected to price those infrastructure costs into their transaction fees. | DTMO | The U.S. Government will provide, at no cost to the contractor, the physical workspace, desks, power, Government PC Hardware (For AMC/PE Transactions), Government LAN/Internet Connectivity (for AMC/PE transactions), government network access and analog/digital phone lines (DSN). Offerors are responsible for commercial LAN/Internet Connectivity and commercial analog/digital phone lines necessary for performacne and are expected to price those commercial infrastructure costs into their transaction fees. | No | 1 |
| 9 | Pricing and Host-Nation Labor Compliance | Korean labor-law compliance for after-hours and surge support |
The Republic of Korea imposes mandatory labor-law requirements that may affect staffing for emergency, after-hours, holiday, weekend, or surge support.
| Please confirm that the Government expects contractors to staff and schedule performance in compliance with applicable Korean labor laws, including working-time limits, overtime, night work, holiday work, rest periods, and substitute staffing, when providing emergency, after-hours, or surge support under this solicitation. | DTMO | The U.S. Govenrment needs to have the RFQ requirements met or surpassed. It is the contractor's responsibility to abide by all laws/regulations of the host country. | No | 1 | |||
| 10 | I would like to ask if the oral presentation slide/page limit might be increased to 16 to match the required sections | GSA | Yes, 16 slides/pages are acceptable. The solicitation is updated to reflect the change. Please see the tracked and clean updated versions of the RFP document. | Yes | 1 | ||
| 11 | Section 1.42 defines an abandoned call as "a call, or other type of contact, made to a call /contact center that is ended while a person is on hold and before any conversation | ||||||
| occurs." | What other 'type of contact' is within this definition of a call? How can an other type of contact be considered a call? | DTMO | In PWS under definitions1.4.2 | ||||
| Abandoned Call – An abandoned call is a call, or other type of contact, made to a call / contact center that is ended while a person is on hold and before any conversation occurs. | No | ||||||
| 12 | The definitions for "Site Requested Staffed Office" and "Staffed Office" both allow support for surges to be provided at an off-site location as determined by the Contractor. | In addition to meeting surge requirements, may the contractor provide support from off-site locations for such things as phone calls, DTS queues, email request so that the onsite agents can focus on walk in travelelers and TMO requests? Must this offsite support be provided in Korea or can it be provided in the US provided the staff meets all required personnel requirements? | DTMO | Offers must be received by firms legally registered as Korean. The offeror is to provide their staffing approach to meet the requirements of the RFQ. | No | ||
| 13 | Section 1.7.3.1.1, states the Contractor personnel working on this task order require require UNCLASSIFIED access to DoD Credentials, (also known as the Common Access Card (CAC)) for physical and logical access to federally controlled facilities, military installations, and automated Information Systems (IS) containing military active duty, guard, or reservists’ Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).” Section 1.7.3.2.1 STAFFING/, requires “personnel supporting this contract who require CAC access to DoD network(s), DoD information systems with CUI/PII data or IT/Information Systems to be citizens of the United States.The citizenship requirement also applies to personnel assigned or working on the contract at any remote sites. ” However, section 1.7.3.4.2 states that hiring is not limited to only U.S. citizens. | Please clarify which personnel supporting USFK must be US citizens. Are agents working on site in Korea that will have access to DoD information systems such as GATES containing PII and/or CUI required to be US citizens? |
| Attachment 9 USFK states: "Contractor personnel that require access to Air Mobility Command/Patriot Express (AMC/PE) via the GATES system are not required to be U.S. Citizens." What other DOD information systems would contractor personnel have access to that requires US citizenship? Does the US citizenship requirement apply to employees working at a TMC office (not on base) within Korea? Are agents providing assistance, including for surge requirements, from an off base location, including in another country required to be US citizens? | DTMO | Korean-national/local-national contractor personnel may perform required TMC functions through applicable USFK installation-pass, DBIDS, CAC/DoD credential, ECA certificate, Foreign Nation token, or other approved access procedures where permitted by the applicable installation-security office and system owner IAW PWS 1.7.3.12.4.1 and United States Forces Korea, Regulation 190-7, Military Policy – INSTALLATION ACCESS | |
| CONTROL (27 September 2017) The only CAC protected system is the AMC/PE GATES. CAC security requirements for GATES are outlined in Attachment 9 USFK GATES instruction. | No | ||
| 14 | Section 1.7.3.2.1 staes that personnel supporting this contract who require CAC access to DoD network(s), DoD information systems with CUI/PII data or IT/Information Systems must be Citizens of the United States. The citizenship requirement also applies to personnel assigned or working on the contract at any remote sites." | If the government is providing the contractor with laptops for GATES that are on the government network, would those agents require a CAC card, and if so, does the CAC card holder have to be a US citizen? |
| If anyone working on contract remotely needs to be a US citizen - does remote include an agency office in country? | DTMO | Korean-national/local-national contractor personnel may perform required TMC functions through applicable USFK installation-pass, DBIDS, CAC/DoD credential, ECA certificate, Foreign Nation token, or other approved access procedures where permitted by the applicable installation-security office and system owner IAW PWS 1.7.3.12.4.1 and United States Forces Korea, Regulation 190-7, Military Policy – INSTALLATION ACCESS CONTROL (27 September 2017) | No | |||
| 15 | Section 1.7.3.8.4 states that “Personnel required to obtain a CAC may be issued Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) (e.g., computer/laptop, etc.).” | Please clarify the purpose of providing computer/laptops to contractor personnel. Is the purpose for only accessing DoD information networks and if yes, which ones? If the government is providing computers/laptops, will the contractor be able to load any applications on this equipment? | DTMO | The only CAC protected system is the AMC/PE GATES. CAC security requirements for GATES are outlined in Attachment 9 USFK GATES instruction. GATES Access is determined by Local Installations. Government Furnished equipment cannot have any additional applications uploaded without proper authorization. | No | |
| 16 | 1.8.1 Provide customer service 24 hours a day, seven (7) days a week and 365 days a year. | |||||
| 1.8.1.1 Provide dedicated Government Support. | Please clarify what support must be dedicated (i.e., solely working on the USFK task order? Is it only the on-site agents? Is USFK requiring a fully dedicated team 24x7x365? Fully dedicated for core and after hours, all OBT support, email, etc.? Or does "dedicated to Government Support" mean that the servicing teams can be shared but must be dedicated to government vs. commercial travel (e.g., remote locations providing after hours support)? | DTMO | The Government requires all proposed staffing to be dedicated to this Contract; however, staffing at after-hours service centers do not need to be dedicated to this Contract as long as support requirements are met. | No | ||
| 17 | 1.84 has SLA for abandoned calls for both core and after hours - "Maintain an abandoned call percentage rate at or below 5% of total monthly calls. | Does the defintion of abandon call include calls that abandon before the Service Level is breached (e.g., in the first 30 seconds before connected to an agent)? | DTMO | Abandoned calls include all calls to includes calls that were abandoned in the first 30 seconds before connected to an agent. | No | |
| 18 | Section 1.8.4 establishes the service level agreements for core hours and after hours. Attachment 14 establishes financial incentives/disincentives for thesde SLAs | As the contractor will be held responsible for these SLAs for both core hours and after hours, including potential financial incentives/disincentives, please provide the breakout of calls or transactions handled during core hours and for after hours. Attachment 8 USFK Historical Workload only provides total transactions per location and provides no breakout by core hours and after hours. Or is the contractor to use its own estimates? | DTMO | The Government does not provide any telephone call data nor does it provide any breakout for core hours and after hours in Attachment 8. The offeror shall use their own estimates. | No | |
| 19 | Section 1.8.11 requires the contractor to " Provide the capability for in-transit passenger visibility during contingencies, national emergencies, accident investigations, aircraft recovery teams, evacuations, rescue operations, civil disturbances, disasters, military peacetime and wartime contingency operations, exercises, personal emergencies, and mass casualties (human remains). Submit via contractor-generated email to the COR within one (1) hour upon request by the Government. The following data elements shall be included: |
a. Traveler first name
b. Traveler last name
c. Traveler status (e.g., at airport, terminal, in transit, connecting, arrived, etc.)
d. Travel Date
e. Traveler Origin
| f. Traveler Destination | Traveler tracking applications can track where the traveler is expected to be based upon the itinerary booked with the contractor. However, we are not aware of any traveler tracking application that tracks an individual's location at any given time. Please clarify the requirement. | DTMO | Traveler Status (e.g. at airport, terminal, in transit, connecting, arrived, etc.) is based on where the traveler is expected to be based upon the itinerary booked with the traveler. | No | ||
| 20 | 1.9.3.1 Book and ticket reservations in foreign currency if the airline only issues tickets in foreign currency. | Is the government requiring the contractor to issue in USD at in country locations? | DTMO | It is the responsibility of the offeror to provide their approach and must comply with the IATA or BSP and local laws and regulations. | No | |
| 21 | 1.9.31 Make arrangements and issue documents for authorized excess baggage in accordance with carrier/industry standards and provide the traveler with the carrier’s excess baggage rules and fees via phone, fax, in person or via contractor-generated email. | What is the volume of excess baggage that is processed directly by the TMC for USFK today? | DTMO | No information is available. The Government cannot provide that data. | No | |
| 22 | This section stated: Submit TMC Monthly data elements to the COR via SCP NLT the 7th calendar day after the end of each month. However, Section 1.30.1 Table 4 shows NLT the 15th calendar day after the end of each month. | Please clarify the due date. | DTMO | Due date is 7th Calendar day after the end of each month. Updated PWS. | Yes | |
| 23 | The workload data template and format provided for the contractor’s use in Attachment 11 -USFK- Workload Data Report Example Template does not match with the data elements listed in sections 1.13.8- 1.13.8.1 of the RFP. | Please clarify what is required. | DTMO | Udpated PWS data elements in RFP to match Attachment 11 Workload Data Report Example . | Yes | |
| 24 | Data elements in sections 1.13.15-1.13.15.1 includes item j. Type of transaction (e.g. non-air/rail). | This type of transaction (e.g. non-air/rail) is not applicable on a report based on ticketed record. Please clarify what is being requested. | DTMO | Definition of TMC Assist Non-Air/Rail Transaction – Any transaction in which the services of the TMC are used to complete one DoD travel authorization, which may include one or more of the following: hotel, rental car, and ferry arrangements | No | |
| 25 | The three (3) parts itemized, summary and refund activity report appear to be a duplicate of the data elements listed under sections 1.13.15-1.13.15.1 of the RFP. | Please clarify what is being requested. | DTMO | 1.13.15 Itemized Activity Requirements are separate reports and are not duplicated reports. | No | |
| 26 | Item states "Submit consolidated report(s) monthly in Microsoft Excel file format via contractor-generated email to the COR NLT the 7th calendar day after the end of each month and reflect data from the previous month." However, Section 1.30.1 Table 4 shows NLT the 15th calendar day after the end of each month. | Please clarify the due date. | DTMO | Due date is 7th Calendar day after the end of each month. Updated PWS. | Yes | |
| 27 | Under the data elements in sections 1.13.18-1.13.18.1 of the RFP, it included items g. Gross amount and h. Total daily sales - both items appear to be the same as the sales amount. | Please clarify. | DTMO | Gross Amount is the number of transactions. | No | |
| 28 | Section 1.16.3.2 requires the contractor to "Provide temporary staffed office(s) at remote ticketing sites within 24 hours after notification from the CO. The Contractor shall assume the sites/locations may be in CONUS (West Coast) and OCONUS (Korea). The CO may require multiple sites in each geographic area." | How often has the government requested Emergency Staffed Offices for this contract in the past 1 - 2 years? Have the emergency offices been requested for Korea, or remote elsewhere in the world? | DTMO | The government has not requested any Emergency Staffed Offices for this contract in the past 2 years. | No | |
| 29 | Section 1.18 identifies the key personnel under this contract. | Are the key personnel required to be on site? Are the key personnel required to be located in Korea? | DTMO | Offers must be received by firms legally registered as Korean. Operations and Front/Line Unit Managers are required to be located in Korea. The offeror is to provide their staffing approach to meet the requirements of the RFQ. | No | |
| 30 | Section 1.18.1 states that “the Contractor agrees to assign to this contract those key persons whose resumes were submitted with the proposal necessary to fulfill the requirements of the contract.” | Please clarify if resumes for the key personnel identified in item 1.18 are required to be submitted with proposals. | DTMO | Removing Resumes Requirements from PWS. | Yes | |
| 31 | Table 4 under deliverable title: Commercial Lodging Revenue Report(s) of Section 1.13.16.1 showed Submit report(s) monthly in Microsoft Excel file format to the COR via contractor-generated email NLT the 15th calendar day after the end of each month. However, Sections 1.13.16-1.13.16.1 stated: Submit consolidated report(s) monthly in Microsoft Excel file format via contractor-generated email to the COR NLT the 7th calendar day after the end of each month and reflect data from the previous month. | Please clarify the due date. | DTMO | Due date is 7th Calendar day after the end of each month. Updated PWS. | Yes | |
| 32 | Section 4.6.4 states: "Wage Determinations for locations with staffed offices identified in Table 3 - On Site |
Staffing are included as Attachment 16 - USMC Worldwide Service Contract Labor Standards Wage Determinations. Additional Wage Determinations may be added at
| contract award based on the awardee’s staffed location(s). | There was no attachment 16 included. Please confirm that the Service Contract Act and wage determinations do not apply to services performed overseas. | GSA | Service Contract Act and wage determinations do not apply to services performed overseas. Section 4.6.4 has been revised accordingly. | Yes | 2 | ||
| 33 | Section 6.0 states award will be made on a “best-value basis to the Korean firm exhibiting the best value to the Government” and that “Offerors are ineligible for award if they are not a Korean firm.” | We assume that the reference to a Korean firm means that offeror must be legally registered to do business in Korea and that the offer must be in the name of that Korean company. Is that a correct assumption? Is the Korean firm required to be on the GSA Multiple Award Master Contract to in order to submit an offeror? Is the Korean firm required to be registered in the Government System for Award Management? If yes, by which time must the firm be registered in SAM? | GSA | Offers must be received by firms legally registered as Korean. The Korean company must be acting as the prime in completion of the work. The Korean firm is not required to be a GSA Multiple Award Master Contract holder. This requirement is being pursued as a standalone, single award firm fixed price contract. The Korean firm must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) in order to receive award. The Korean firm must exhibit an active registration in SAM the date proposals are due. (If there are any issues receiving an active SAM registration status by the date proposals are due, please contact the Contracting Officer.) | No | 2 | |
| 34 | The following attachments are missing under this section of the RFP:Attachment 7 - USFK - USAF Part 1 USAF CBA Reconciliation Process | ||||||
| Attachment 7 - USFK - ARMY Part_2_CBARs Reconciliation Process System | Please provide these attachments or confirm they do not apply. | DTMO | Attachment 7 - USFK - USAF Part 1 USAF CBA Reconciliation Process | ||||
| Attachment 7 - USFK - ARMY Part_2_CBARs Reconciliation Process System Provided | Yes | ||||||
| 35 | Missing the following: |
Added pay grade codes:* TPC DoDEA overseas educators and administrators in the Teaching Position (TP) pay plan – Civilian
* TPM DoDEA overseas educators and administrators in the Teaching Position (TP) pay plan – Military Member
* WGC Special craft workers in WG pay plan - Civilian
* WGM Special craft workers in WG pay plan – Military Members
* WLC Special craft leaders in WG pay plan – Civilian
* WLM Special craft leaders in WG pay plan – Military Members
* WSC Special craft supervisors in WG pay plan – Civilian
| * WSM Special craft supervisors in WG pay plan – Military Members | Please clarify. | DTMO | Updated Attachment 3 - USFK TMC Data Requirement Guide | Yes | ||
| 36 | This column identifies the total number of transactions as 10.354. This is a much higher number than has been identified in other military task orders. | Can the government explain why the number of GTR/LOPA transactions is so high? Are the GTRs/LOPA made out to the airlines for payment or the TMC? If the TMC, can the government provide a total value of these 10,354 GTR/LOPA transactions? Because the contractor must front the monies to the airlines for these transactions and seek reimbursement from the government, there are costs associated with these "accounts receivables" that must be factored into our proforma. | DTMO | The contractor is required to follow the instructions in Attachment 13 GTR LOPA instructions. Attachment 8 - Workload has been updated to FY25 reflecting minimal GTR/LOPA transactions | Yes |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .