A07 AE RFI and Responses as of 07282020.pdf

ID Q3. Document: Request for Qualifications 3. GSA RESPONSES (RFQ)

AMENDMENT

NUMBER

Is there a page limitation? Under SF330, Part I, Section F - Projects, it states to list only 2 to five projects? Typically, for the SF330 projects, we list 10 projects. Also, on many occasions, I have listed a project under the required 10 projects, and it has several task orders or projects under that specific GSA contract. Area we allowed to list multiple projects under the main contract for GSA?

Offerors are instructed to review the Request for Qualifications for page limitations. Only five projects are required. A05

If we do not have an office in any of the zones, can we still submit our qualifications packages?

Yes. Offerors are instructed to review Section IV.E.2.a of the

Request for Qualifications, Geographical Considerations, which states in part "…if applicable, the Offeror's plans to establish such capabilities." A05 / A07

Under SF330, Part H, Is this where you want our technical expertise and Design

Philosophy (sic) an methods? Is Section H only 5 pages?

Offerors are instructed to review Request for Qualifications for

Technical Expertise and Design Philosophy submittal requirements.

See RFQ for page limitations. A05

4 Do we have to use the Arial font, or can we use a similar font to Arial? Refer to Request for Qualifications for font requirements. A05

5 Is there a limit on the number of resumes that we should show? Refer to Request for Qualifications for number of resumes. A05

Past Performance & Technical Expertise // We are responding to this RFQ with teaming members. Are SF330’s required for the teaming members as well? Are similar projects required to be submitted for teaming members as part of the technical qualifications (5 each), or just the prime small business A/E partner (5 total)?

Refer to Request for Qualifications for required submittals. Offerors are instructed to refer to amendment A05 for remaining questions. A05

Response Requirements // SF330 versus written qualifications package // GSA is asking for the SF 330. GSA requires the SF330 for Statement of Qualifications submittals. A05

Are you asking for the complete and extended document with resumes, and projects? or just part II? Refer to the Request for Qualifications for requirements A05

If we are submitting an SF330 and the Written Qualifications narrative, how detailed does the 330 need to be? Most of the info we include in Section H will now be in the

Written Qualifications. Refer to the Request for Qualifications for requirements A05

Written Qualifications Example Projects – Are these to be the same as the projects in Section F of the 330? See Amendment A05 A05

11 Just verifying that resumes are to be included in BOTH portions of the package. See Amendment A05 A05

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 1 of 12

NUMBER

Written Qualifications Package / Technical Qualifications Package // 1) In the

"Written Qualifications Package" section of the RFQ, there is a request for 5 Similar

Projects completed within the past six years. Our understanding is that this is in addition to the projects included in Section F.

Confirmed. Response is changed by A07 to: GSA is specfiying no more than five projects are required. A05 / A07

Are the 10 projects included in Section F of the SF330 also subject to the restriction of being completed within the last 6 years, or can these projects be completed at any time, allowing to show a greater breadth of experience in the SF330. Refer to Request for Qualifications for submittal requirements. A05

As a related question, can the 5 projects listed in the "Written Qualifications

Package" also be included as part of the 10 projects in the SF330, as long as these projects do meet the 6 year restriction? Confirmed. A05

It is noted that the "Technical Qualifications Package" is to include a "Minimum

Submission Requirements Checklist."). Is this a document that will be provided in an amendment? Answered by posting of amendment A03 A05

16 It is the first paragraph in the solicitation section listed above // Advertisement Not a question A05

17 This occurs in the 3rd paragraph following Factor 6: Description, Page 2 of 17 Not a question A05

Paragraph titled "Similar Projects:" "Requirements Under Contract:" It is the first paragraph in the solicitation section listed above Not a question A05

Provide project specific information for each CA key personnel proposed on this project Not a question A05

20 Is July 30th still the submittal date? Confirmed A05

If we submit for multiple zones, do we have to submit separate submittals for each zone or can we just mention in our cover letter which zones we are interested in?

Offerors are instructed to review amendment A05 for instructions for submitting for multiple zones. A05

It states to Ensure to include the resumes of Key Personnel for each proposed team member who will serve as Project Manager or, Designer(s) of Record/

Engineer(s) of Record (DOR and EOR), identified by individual discipline, architectural, electrical, mechanical, civil/structural, fire life safety, as well as the primary cost estimator. Can we list additional resumes and/or disciplines, such as hazardous materials, building envelope, etc.? Yes A05

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 2 of 12

NUMBER

During the presentation today, you stated that the solicitation number is now:, dated

July 7th, states 47PL0020R0002 as the solicitation number. See amendment A04 A05

I am also confused about the original public notice date that is required on SF330, Part I. The publish date is June 29, 2020. A05

You mentioned today during the presentation that the size of the project is between

$250,000 and $500,000. Is that total construction costs or A/E fees?

Estimated average Estimated Cost of Constructed range is $250,000 to $500,000. A05

Does it matter if we don't have any offices yet in any of those locations but have the capability to work at another firm's offices that are on our team?

Contractor Teaming Arrangements are encouraged. Refer to the

Request for Qualifications A05

Will we gain any points for having an existing A/E IDIQ with GSA or several of them in the past in other regions?

Offerors are instructed to review the Request for Qualifications for the criteria. A05

For SF330 Part Ii, it states the maximum page for subconsultants is six? What if we have eight subconsultants, do we not show all Part II's? Refer to amendment A05 A05

Then it states that we need to include a narrative for Labor capacity, operational control and workload, which is two pages and ability and capacity to perform with is three pages. Does this response go into SF330, Section H, additional information as well?

Offerors are instructed to review instructions in the Request for

Qualifications. A05

1) On page 12 of the RFQ, under section VIII, it states: A/E Firms submitting qualification packages under this notice must be a small business firm with a main office and/or branch office in each of the geographic zone(s) they are interested in being considered for. Failure to address all evaluation criteria and provide required data may result in rejection of the statement of qualifications. - Does this mean, for example, that if we wanted to submit for Zone B (Eastern Washington, Eastern

Oregon, and the state of Idaho) we would need to have an office in Washington, Oregon and Idaho? Likewise, if we wanted to submit for Zone C (Western

Washington and remaining area of the state of Oregon) would we need to have a main office or branch office in Washington and Oregon? Or, is it acceptable to have just 1 office in Oregon should we submit for Zone B or Zone C?

Offerors will need to meet minimum requirements for licensing, otherwise refer to Scope of Work amended by A05. A05

Can the applying firm apply for more than one zone? If so, will the applying firm need to submit 2 separate qualification packages? Yes A05

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 3 of 12

NUMBER

Do our subconsultants have to have an active registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) (www.sam.gov) at the time of offer submission? For the SF330, Part II, are subconsultants allowed to have more than one Part II? It states the maximum page for the subconsultants is six, but if we have 8 subconsultants, can we submit a Part II for each subconsultant?

Yes, subconsultants should register in the System for Award

Management A05

Under 2, Minimum staffing, you are only looking for three total from the prime? And you only want us to list our registrations for the Zones in A, B or C? Can we list other States that we are registered in? Is the minimum staffing just for the prime or can this be subconsultants too? For 3, Registration requirements, can we just check off which states your team members are registered in or does each one have to be registered in all of those states?

1. Refer to Request for Quals, section XX. Registrations for each working state. Refer to 330 for list of registrations (Part

II). Offerors may use 330 Form G (additional listings). A07 changes this response to direct interested parties to complete the Minimum Submission Requirements

Checklist as written This document to be read in context of the Request for Qualifications as a whole. A05 / A07

3. Document: Request for Qualifications

1. Is there a specific PPQ form that the GSA would prefer be used for this solicitation? Due to time constraints we have sent an example PPQ we have used on past Federal solicitations with the hope that it will be acceptable for this response.

Offerors are instructed to review Section VI.D.2. Submission

Requirement. GSA is not prescribing a past performance form of the

Request for Qualifications. A07

2. Is the PPQ to be sent in by the firm responding to the solicitation or should the

PPQs be sent directly to GSA? If sent to GSA, who should these be sent to?

Offerors are directed to review Section IX.B.4 of the Request for

Qualifications. Offerors are to submit past performance with the

Statement of Qualifications. A07

3. We would like to confirm that it is acceptable to respond for more than 1 zone?

That is our intent as we feel we are qualified for work in each zone and we would like to not be excluded from potential award in another zone should a competitor be chosen for a particular zone. We understand that only 1 award by zone is possible for a specific firm.

GSA affirms that firms may respond for more than one zone and that if selected, firms will only be assigned to one zone. A07

In Section H on the SF-330 - do the answers to these questions have to live in the

SF-330 form itself, or can we add a note saying to reference pages in our technical qualifications package?

GSA affirms that responses provided in the form of attachments to the SF 330 is acceptable. A07

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 4 of 12

NUMBER

1. In the RFQ under A. Criterion 1: Professional Qualifiations, 2. Submission

Requirements paragraph b. it states at the end of the paragraph: "Project Managers and EOR/DORs must be professionally registered or licensed, in the subject discipline, in the states for the Zone that the prime offeror is submitting qualifications. Offerors shall include at least one professionally registered, licensed, architect and engineer for the states in the secondary zones". If the Principal in

Charge is serving as the Architect of Record and the subconsultant Principal in

Charge is the Engineer of Record, is it possible to utilize a Project Manager that is not licensed in the primary and secondary zone? The documents will all be sealed by the respective discipline AOR and EORs.

GSA confirms that the team structure as described in the question is acceptable. A07

ID Q3. Document: Request for Qualifications 3. GSA RESPONSES (RFQ)

19 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

20 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

21 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

22 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

23 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

25 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

26 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

27 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

28 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

29 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

The RFI's associated with the identification numbers below are duplicate form entry's.

Posted erroneously by A05, corrected

A07

NOTE: The ID number refers to the original number for sequentially posted RFI(s)

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 5 of 12

ID 4. Document: A/E Statement of Services 4. GSA RESPONSES (A/E SOW)

NUMBER

In Section F of SF330 you ask for 2-5 projects when Section F consists of 10 projects. Are you asking that we don't include a total of 10 projects and just the 5 projects you specify?

Confirmed GSA is requesting a minimum of five (5) projects instead of ten (10). A05

Are you asking that these same 2-5 projects are also included in a separate section not within the SF330 Form? and what should the title of this section be called? See response above A05 / A07

Are you asking that our team ONLY include Architect, Mechanical, Electrical, Fire

Life Safety, Civil, Structural, and Cost Estimator, and you are not asking for any specialty service sub-consultants be a part of our submittal?

Offerors are instructed to review A/E IDIQ Scope of Work posted by amendment A06. GSA is requesting core disciplines only. A05

In the RFQ it states that Zone C is Western Washington and remaining area of the state of Oregon, but the Checklist says Zone C is Eastern

Washington/Eastern Oregon. Which one is correct as it will alter our preference if submitted as stated in the RFQ if the Checklist is correct?

Offerors are instructed to use corrected Document 2 Minimum

Submission Requirements amended by A05 A05

On page 12 of the RFQ, under section VIII, it states: A/E Firms submitting qualification packages under this notice must be a small business firm with a main office and/or branch office in each of the geographic zone(s) they are interested in being considered for. Failure to address all evaluation criteria and provide required data may result in rejection of the statement of qualifications. -

Does this mean, for example, that if we wanted to submit for Zone B (Eastern

Washington, Eastern Oregon, and the state of Idaho) we would need to have an office in Washington, Oregon and Idaho? Likewise, if we wanted to submit for

Zone C (Western Washington and remaining area of the state of Oregon) would we need to have a main office or branch office in Washington and Oregon? Or, is it acceptable to have just 1 office in Oregon should we submit for Zone B or Zone

C?

Offerors are required to at a minimum have an office within the primary zone. Refer to response 18 below. A05 / A07

If we have applied for licenses in Zone C, but are waiting for them, can we still submit for Zone C? Licenses are required to be active at time of award, if selected A05

If our company doesn't have licensed staff in the Northwest/Arctic region yet, would this disqualify us from submitting on this contract? Architectural licenses can be obtained quite quickly. Yes, licenses are required. A05

If our firm and our team are not interested in Zone A, is it ok if we show our team without licenses in Alaska? In the Checklist, under 2, minimum Staffing of the

Prime firm, it states that a minimum of 3 people need to be listed. Do all of those people have to be registered in all zones? Can one of these listed be a subconsultant from another firm?

License has to be in place in 1 state of each zone. A license is required for stamped drawings in the state where the project is located. Yes the consultant can be the licensed personnel. A05

4. Document: A/E Statement of Services

9 For the Org Chart will an 11x17 page be considered a single page.

Offerors are instructed to refer to Section IX.C.1 of the Request for

Qualifications. The page dimensions are 8.5" x 11" A07

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 6 of 12

We would like to confirm that Construction Administration experience is not being requested for the evaluation criteria. The earlier RFQ had specific evaluation requirements for this criteria that appear to have been removed in the current

RFQ.

Offerors are instructed that the Request for Qualifications modified by A03 and incoporated into A07 is the current R-FQ. A07

In SF-330 Section II - Is the unique entity identifier the same as the DUNS number? Offerors are instructed to use their DUNS number for this field. A07

Am 05, Q&A Section 3, question 2 replies "Yes" that a firm does not need to have an office in ANY of the zones, however the answer to the RFI in Section 4, question 5, states that "Offerors are required to at a minimum have an office within the primary zone." Must the offeror have an office in the primary zone or not?

Offerors are instructed to review Section IV.E.2.a of the Request for Qualifications, Geographical Considerations, which states in part "…if applicable, the Offeror's plans to establish such capabilities." A07

Many of the responses to questions provided in amendment 05 refer to amendment 05 (itself) but are not addressed in responses to other questions nor in the first 2 sheets of the amendment. 1) Is there another document coming?

Typically amendments are issued on a SF30 and 2) Can we assume that the answers to questions are binding, since they weren't issued via SF30

Regarding question 1: Amendment A07 (this document) is the last amendment to be issued. Regarding question 2: Issued amendments have the same force and effect as amendments issued using a SF30. Offerors are advised that RFI responses noted as answered by 'A05' can be interpreted to mean that the question was already asked and answered in a preceding RFI. A07

Can you please clarify the number of projects to be provided in Section F of the

SF330? The RFP issued in Amendment 03 under B.2. Submission Requirements un the heading "1. SF 330, Part 1 Sections F: Example Projects which Best

Illustrate Proposed Team's Qualifications for this Contract" paragraph a. and c.

request between 2-5 projects. In amendment 05, Section Q3, question 1 states only 5 projects are required and Section Q3, question 12 confirms that the 5 projects are in addition to the 10 projects provided in Section F of the SF330, Section 4, question 1 confirms that GSA is only requesting a minimum of 5 projects instead of 10. and Can you please answer the following questions in regards to the minimum requirements 1) For section F of the SF330 that provides space for 10 projects are we only to provide a maximum of 5?, or 2) Are we to provide 5 additional projects to the 10 projects in Section F, or 3) Are we to only provide a minimum of 5 projects in Section F and then an additional 2-5 projects somewhere else?

RFI response Q3.12 is modified to reflect the following: GSA is specfiying no more than five projects are required. A07

Can you please confirm that the term "written qualifications" is in fact the SF330 and not a document to be submitted in addition to the SF330?

The term 'Written Qualifications' is comprised of; complete SF330 form(s) and supporting documentation (responses) to the stated evaluation criteria. A07

Amendment 06: The last sentence of Paragraph 1 in file

47PL0020R0001+AE+SATOC+IDIQ+Amendment+06.pdf states "this document includes the AE Statement of Services dated 06/24/2020, that begins on page 29) can you please clarify with document "this" refers to? We cannot find a document on the current beta.sam site that has a section startingon page 29?

The scope of work for the IDIQ services are the two scopes of work posted, combined. This amendment includes the referenced page numbers. A07

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 7 of 12

Can you please confirm that all requirements for the response to the RFP are contained within the following 2 documents? 1)Submissions requirement that were issued as part of amendment 003 on July 7th along with the "minimum submission checklist" issued on July 23 as part of amendment 05?

Offerors are instructed to submit responses based on the instructions in the Request for Qualifications as amended. The

'Minimum Requirements Checklist' is in addition to the submittal requirements stated in the Request for Qualifications. A07

In the A05 list of RFI responses there appear to be conflicting responses. For RFI

ID 2 under Q3. Document: Request for Qualifications the response was "Yes" to the question "If we do not have an office in any of the zones, can we still submit our qualifications packages?". This implies we can respond for a Primary zone where we may not have a physical office. On the response to RFI #5 in 4.

Document: A/E Statement of Services it states: "Offerors are required to at a minimum have an office in the primary zone." Is it possible for our firm to pursue work in a primary zone where we may not have a physical office? We have successfully served IDIQ contracts in the past where we have not had a physical office.

Offerors are instructed to review Section IV.E.2.a of the Request for Qualifications, Geographical Considerations, which states in part "…if applicable, the Offeror's plans to establish such capabilities." A07

ID 4. Document: A/E Statement of Services 4. GSA RESPONSES (A/E SOW)

6 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

The RFI's associated with the identification numbers below are duplicate form entry's.

Posted erroneously by A05, corrected A07

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 8 of 12

ID 5. RFI - Minimum Submission Requirements

5. GSA RESPONSES, Minimum Submission Requirements (refers to checklist format posted in Word doc, need to convert to excel) AMENDMENT

NUMBER

In Section F of SF330 you ask for 2-5 projects when Section F consists of 10 projects. Are you asking that we don't include a total of 10 projects and just the 5 projects you specify? See SOW RFI (tab) A05

Are you asking that these same 2-5 projects are also included in a separate section not within the SF330 Form? and what should the title of this section be called? See previous responses regarding number of projects to be submitted. A05

Do you consider the "Written Qualifications Package" all contents of our submittal

(SF330 plus other submission requirements)? Yes A05

Under Criterion 2, item 2 under Submission Requirements - You list three narrative items related to Specialized Experience and Technical Competence be included in Section H of the SF330, are these the only three items you want to see in Section H, or can we include additional information here?

The narrative items are amplifications to the base requirements of the

SF330. Offerors are instructed to use complete the form in accordance with the instructions. The amplifications are in addition to the form. A05

For Criterion D - Past Performance, is the only items you want to see in this section are the past performance evaluations/reports from clients? You do not want the 2-5 projects shown again with each of these reports?

Offerors are instructed to review the requirements for the Request for

Qualifications. A05

Where do we insert the Minimum Submission Requirements Checklist within our final package? Cover page A05

7 Will we be able to ask questions at today's pre-proposal conference? No A05

Do we need an Alaska license for all disciplines, if we have zone B and C as primary and secondary?

Selected firms must be able to seal and sign in all zones. Firms must have evidence of licensed professionals for the primary zone A05

RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS, Paragraph 4, Technical Qualifications Package shall consist of..., 1st bullet // What exactly is the Minimum Submission

Requirements Checklist and where do I find this this checklist? See Document 2 updated for A05 A05

Special Notice 47PL0120R0036 - Response Requirements section // Will the following forms be issued during or after the June 3rd Virtual Meeting?

1) Minimum submission requirements (include one completed Minimum

Submission Requirements Checklist)

2) Completed SF 330 OBE, posted see beta.sam A05

Response Requirements // In the request for qualifications, there is a requirement to submit a Minimum Submission Requirements Checklist. Is this something that the A/E is to develop and provide, or is this a form that GSA will be providing for submission?

Return completed Document 2 with Statement of Qualifications as cover page. A05

12 Written qualifications and checklist // SF330 versus written qualifications package Not a question. Resubmit as RFI. A05

Submission instructions // Where can I find the Minimum Submission

Requirements Checklist to download? See previous response A05

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 9 of 12

ID 5. RFI - Minimum Submission Requirements

5. GSA RESPONSES, Minimum Submission Requirements (refers to checklist format posted in Word doc, need to convert to excel) AMENDMENT

NUMBER

Where it states: Discuss in the narrative how surge workload (i.e. emergencies, partial or complete redesign, secondary zone work, etc.), would be managed.

Page limit of two single sided pages for list of current projects, are you looking for a listing of the Prime's company-wide current projects or just the personnel listed in this qualifications package for the prime?

Proposed key personnel is preferred. Jessica to check back to Request for

Quals and Checklist for consistency A05

5. RFI - Minimum Submission Requirements

Do you have a schedule for when you anticipate responding to the RFI questions posed? With 1 week between the due date for RFQ questions and the final due date for the solicitation response our time will be limited so having some advance feel for when the RFI responses are available would be helpful.

This question was posted concurrent to issuance of the first set of RFI responses (A05). GSA has noted that in future actions it will include a milestone date or estimated response timeframe for RFI responses. Thank you for the suggestion. A07

The current solicitation references the solicitation number 47PL0020R0002 and is an amendment to notices posted on June 3 and June 29 with different solicitation numbers. The solicitation number posted on this form above shows

47PL0200R0001. Which one should we reference and which RFQ is the one you will be reviewing qualifications based upon? Do we rely only on the information in the one released on July 9th? Thank you!

Affirming that GSA posted multiple solicitation numbers erroneously. GSA has learned that it is constrained to update the project / solicitation number originally used in the beta.sam notice. GSA will take these issues into consideration when evaluating responses received in response to this

Request for Qualifications. A07

Can you please confirm the correct ID/IQ Solicitation number for this pursuit? All the hot links provided take us to 47PL0120R0036, Amendment 03 references

47PL0020R0002 and this RFI Form references 47PL0200R0001

Affirming that GSA posted multiple solicitation numbers erroneously. GSA has learned that it is constrained to update the project / solicitation number originally used in the beta.sam notice. GSA will take these issues into consideration when evaluating responses received in response to this

Request for Qualifications. A07

18 What procurement number are we submitting under? 47PL0020R0001 A07

ID 5. RFI - Minimum Submission Requirements

5. GSA RESPONSES, Minimum Submission

Requirements (refers to checklist format posted in

Word doc, need to convert to excel)

3 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

6 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

8 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

14 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

NOTE: The ID number refers to the original number for sequentially posted RFI(s)

Posted erroneously by A05, corrected A07

The RFI's associated with the identification numbers below are duplicate form entry's.

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 10 of 12

ID 6. RFI - General Question 6. GSA RESPONSES - RFI General Questions

NUMBER

RFQ part IX. Section B states that sections are supposed to be clearly labeled.

1. Since it is an electronic submission do you want separate title pages to define these sections or would headers and bookmarked .pdf documents suffice?

Offerors may use title pages.

A05

This section lists “Proof of Insurability” but is not defined as to what GSA expects within the RFQ response Offerors to provide evidence of insurance, commitment letter

A05

3 Should the labels also include Criterion 5: Geographical Consideration Yes A05

Will there be a list of the firms who participated/attended the online pre-proposal conference?

Yes, posted see A04

A05

5 Will the list of interested firms become available?

Interested firms are available on beta.sam.gov A05

Will you please provide information regarding what exclusions apply to an

Architect's gross revenue (for instance, can we exclude payments to sub-consultants, etc.)? Also, is this requirement for the last year's revenue, or for an average from the past 3 years?

Interested parties are advised to review the small business size standards in FAR 19 and requirements established by the Small Business

Administration

A05

Would GSA consider proposals from Engineering firms (NAICS 541330) meeting that small business threshold ($16.5M) that includes architectural services from a subconsultant.

Interested parties are advised to review the size standards for the NAICS codes. The size standard for the selected NAICS code is $8.0M A05

"Procurement Description" - Paragraph 3 (Definition of Small Business) // Will you please provide information regarding what exclusions apply to an Architect's gross revenue (for instance, can we exclude payments to sub-consultants, etc.)? Also, is this requirement for the last year's revenue, or for an average from the past 3 years?

See response above

A05

If we want to go for more than one zone, do we submit separate packages for each or can we indicate on the cover letter we’d like to be considered for more than one zone?

Offerors may submit Statement of Qualifications for more than one primary zone.

A05

10 Was the prebid call held today (6/3) at 4pm? Will a transcript be available? OBE A05

You stated in the 06/04/3030: "There are changes in the actual request for

Architect/Engineer Qualifications that is expected to be issued on approximately

June 4, 2020 and June 9, 2020." Will the June 9 change be coming soon?

OBE by A04, and now A05

A05

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 11 of 12

ID 6. RFI - General Question 6. GSA RESPONSES - RFI General Questions

NUMBER

The solicitation states "The Written Phase (Factors 1 through 3 combined) and the

Oral Presentation/Interviews Phase (Factor 6) are weighted approximately the same (50% and 50%)" . Since this adds up to 100%......this leaves out written factors 4 & 5 for any weighting. Please review

See amendment A04 and A05.

A05

6. RFI - General Question

Given the confusion and the time allowed between these answers and the due date of submissions we would request an extension of at least 7 calendar days to the submission date.

GSA has elected to not extend the response date established as July 30, 2020. A07

We would like to request an additional 2 weeks in order to process answers to questions, in light of the recent amendments.

GSA has elected to not extend the response date established as July 30, 2020. A07

Duplicate entry to 13, 14 See above A07

Duplicate entry to 13, 14 See above A07

ID 6. RFI - General Question 6. GSA RESPONSES - RFI General Questions

12 Duplicate form entry Deleted from response, duplicate

Posted erroneously by

A05, corrected

A07

The RFI's associated with the identification numbers below are duplicate form entry's.

47PL0020R0001 Request for Information (RFI) & Responses A07 - 12 of 12