Bricker Fire Alarm Upgrade - TRC HazMat Report Bid Amendment 2.pdf

230 West Monroe, Suite 630, Chicago, IL 60606 ● 616.378.6215 Phone ● www.TRCcompanies.com

Asbestos and Lead Paint Inspection

John W. Bricker Federal Office Building (OH0208) 200 North High Street Columbus, OH 43215

Inspection Date: May 2, 2019 Report Date: August 27, 2019

Prepared For

GSA

Facility Management and Services Programs 230 South Dearborn Street, Suite 200 Chicago, Illinois 60604-1696

Prepared By:

230 West Monroe, Suite 630 Chicago, IL 60606

TRC Project Number: 314614.0000.P9 i July 2019

Table of Contents

Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... ii

General Building Information

Disclaimer

List of Tables

Table 1 List of Homgenous Sample Areas (HSAs) of Suspect and Asbestos Containing

Materials (ACMs) or Presumed (not sampled) Asbestos Containing Materials by URS (2004/2005), Versar (2006) and TRC (2019)

Table 2 List of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) by URS (2004/2005), Versar (2006) and

TRC (2019)

Table 3 List of Lead Paint as sampled by URS (2004/2005), Versar (2006) and TRC (2019)

List of Appendices

Appendix A

Appendix B

Appendix C

Appendix D

Appendix E

Appendix F

Appendic G

Asbestos Containing Materials and Lead Paint Abatement Costs

TRC General Photo Log

TRC Supplemental Asbestos and Lead Lab Reports and COC May 2019

Historical ACM and Lead Reports: URS (2004/2005) & Versar (2006)

Diagrams of ACM Locations

Periodic Surveillance Form

Certifications ii

Executive Summary

In response to your request, TRC has completed the supplemental visual and limited testing of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead paint at the John W. Bricker Federal Office

Building (OH0208) Building located at 200 North High Street, Columbus, Ohio TRC met with GSA

Property Management team (Mr. Phil Ramos Facility Management and Services Programs

Environmental Engineer and Mr. Harry Sharp GSA Facility Management) for the initial kick-off meeting prior to conducting the re-inspection/visual inspection walk through. The TRC team was

Mr. Heath Howard (CIH) and Mr. Lonnie Lyro for the initial kick-off meeting.

TRC’s Mr. Lonnie Lyro was then accompanied by TRC’s Mr. Heath Howard who is a State of

Ohio-licensed, Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist (license number ES36200) for the supplemental and limited testing of suspect asbestos containing materials and lead paint inspection on May 2, 2019.

TRC reviewed, utilized and relied upon the previous inspection report completed by URS

(2004/2005) & Versar (2006) February 2006 Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey report and drawings. It should be noted that not all the inspectors associated with the asbestos inspection from Versar were licensed. It appears that the inspectors worked under the direction of one Ohio

Licensed asbestos inspector. The report can be found in Appendix D.

TRC also performed supplemental limited asbestos testing and lead paint observations on May

2, 2019(TRC 2019) and that information can be found in Appendix C. The asbestos samples were collected from the various floors. TRC also utilized various limited inspection and abatement reports provided by the Property Management Office at the building. TRC utilized that information to identify which areas of the building have had asbestos abatement activities performed in the past 14 years since the GSA report. This information and the historical reports by URS and Versar assisted TRC in creating the attached Asbestos Location Drawings that are found in Appendix E of this report.

The sample locations of TRC asbestos samples, combined with the historical asbestos and lead sampling drawings by URS and Versar can be found in Appendix E. TRC utilized the diagrams of the previous surveys and complied new diagrams noting all ACM identified on each floor.

Additional diagrams include TRC asbestos sampling locations.

The Periodic Surveillance Form can be found in Appendix F. This form notes the ACM in the building, location, quantity and condition of the material as noted by TRC in 2019.

iii

Asbestos Summary

According to the historical report by URS and Versar reviewed by TRC, and the materials verified onsite by TRC on May 2, 2019, the following asbestos containing materials are present on-site (see below Table 1 and Table 2 for locations).

• Black Mastic Associated with Tan with Streaks 12” x 12” Floor Tile

• Black Mastic Associated with Light Tan with Swirled 12” x 12” Floor Tile

• Black Mastic Associated with Brown/Tan with Swirled 12” x 12” Floor Tile

• Beige Duct Sealant

• Drywall System

• Insulating Cement – Ends of pipe

• Tank insulation

• Roofing Materials (Presumed, not sampled)

• Fire Doors (Presumed, not sampled)

• Mirror Mastics (Presumed, not sampled)

• Sink Undercoating

It should be noted that drywall system samples that were collected by Versar in 2006 of various floors of the building with the none detect, trace and one sample results reported as 2% Chrysotile on the 2nd floor lobby. TRC recommends collecting drywall system samples on every pre-alteration survey to confirm/deny the presence of asbestos

Any materials uncovered during renovation or demolition activities that are not addressed in this inspection report, or presumed asbestos containing materials, must be sampled by an accredited asbestos inspector prior to any disturbance, or they must be treated as asbestos containing (ACM). TRC recommends the GSA continue to engage qualified firms to sample for asbestos and lead paint utilizing their standard of practice of a pre-alteration survey for area-specific renovations and demolitions.

Lead Paint Summary

According to the historical report by Versar (2006), reviewed by TRC, the following Lead Containing Paints (LCP) are present on-site (see below Table 3 for locations). The drawings that depict the lead paint sampling by TRC and Versar (2006) can be found in Appendix C, TRC Supplemental Asbestos and Lead Inspection Report August 2019.

Versar

• Yellow Paint on the cooling tower platform, found on the penthouse mezzanine, reported as <0.01%, by weight.

• Gray Paint on the Floors found throughout the penthouse #1 mezzanine, reported at 0.03%, by weight.

• White Paint on the walls found on the penthouse #1 mezzanine, reported as <0.01%, by weight.

TRC

• Cream Paint on the I-beam, found in the penthouse, reported as 5,500 ppm.

• Yellow Paint on the I-beam, found in the penthouse, reported as 32,000 ppm.

• Grey Paint on the floor, found in the penthouse, reported as <230 ppm.

iv

• White Paint on the wall, found in elevator lobby near room FL7, 7th floor, reported as <89 ppm.

• Light yellow Paint on the wall, found on the 4th floor, reported as <84 ppm.

• Pink Paint on the steel, found in the parking garage, reported as 500 ppm.

Based on historical reports, age of the building, some paints sampled in the building by Versar and TRC had detectable amounts of lead and are considered Lead-Containing paints (LCP). Any paint over 5,000 ppm are considered Lead Based Paints (LBP) by definition.

Lead-based paint is defined by the United States Department of House and Urban Development (HUD) as any paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that has one mg/cm2 or more of lead or 0.5% by weight (5,000 micrograms per gram [ug\g] or 5,000 parts of lead per million [ppm]).

According the OSHA Program Directive, Lead: Exposure in Construction, "For all occupational exposure to lead occurring in the course of construction work, the standard (1926.62) does not specify a minimum amount or concentration of lead that triggers a determination that lead is present and the potential for occupational exposure exists." Therefore any paint containing less than 0.5% by weight, or less than 5,000 ppm, but greater than the laboratory detection limit is considered to be a LCP.

TRC recommends the GSA continue to engage qualified firms to sample for asbestos and lead paint utilizing their standard of practice of a pre-alteration survey for area-specific renovations and demolitions.

General Building Information John F. Bricker Federal Office Building (OH0208) 200 North High Street, Columbus, Ohio 44308

Facility Project Manager: Harry Sharp harry.sharp@gsa.gov

Type of Facility: Commercial Building – Offices: The John W. Bricker Federal Office Building located at 200 High Street, Columbus, Ohio is a seven-story concrete structure that includes: primarily offices, two penthouses, basement and, three roof levels (main, elevator and penthouse). The facility was constructed in 1977 and comprises approximately 261,257 total square feet. The interior walls and ceilings are covered with plaster, sheetrock and suspended ceiling tiles. The floors are covered with floor tile, carpet over concrete or solely painted concrete floor. Painted surfaces are located throughout the building.

mailto:harry.sharp@gsa.gov

Table 1 List of Homogenous Sample Areas (HSAs) of Suspect and Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) or Presumed (not sampled) Asbestos Containing Materials by URS (2004/2005), VERSAR (2006) and TRC (2019).

HSA #

By Versar, URS or TRC

MATERIAL

DESCRIPTION

MATERIAL LOCATION(S)

ACM or

NON -DETECT

(ND) or Presumed

% ACM and Type

TYPE OF

MATERIAL

CAT 1,

CAT 2, RACM

CONDITION

Versar

12”x12” Tan Floor

Tile w/Streaks

Penthouse -P1

ND NA Cat 1 Good 7th Floor – North Landing

6th Floor – North Landing

Black Mastic Associated w/12”x12” Tan Floor Tile w/Streaks

Penthouse -P1

ACM 5% Chrysotile Cat 1 Good 7th Floor – North Landing

6th Floor – North Landing

3 Fiberglass Pipe Run Throughout

NOT SAMPLED

PRESUMED

NEGATIVE –

GSA

Presumed – Negative NA Good

Fiberglass Pipe

Fittings Throughout

NOT SAMPLED

PRESUMED

NEGATIVE –

GSA

Presumed– Negative NA Good

Tank Insulation –

Mudd Over Fiberglass

Penthouse – P1 Tank #1

ND NA RACM Good

Tank Insulation –

Mudd Over Fiberglass

Penthouse – P1 Tank #2

ND NA RACM Good

URS

7 Spray-on Insulation

7th Floor - Corridor

ND NA RACM Good

6th Floor - Corridor 5th Floor - Corridor

3rd Floor - Corridor

Penthouse – Boiler Room

Corridor Outside Suite 407 3rd Floor - Corridor

2nd Floor – Elevator Lobby

2nd Floor – Messer Office

Basement – TCJ Equipment Room 6th Floor – GSA Office

Versar

Muffler Exhaust

Insulation P1 – Emergency Generator Room ND NA RACM Good

Chilled Water Tank

Insulation Air Handling Room – East Side

NOT SAMPLED

PRESUMED

Positive – GSA Presumed Positive RACM Good

10 Roofing Elevator Roof

NOT SAMPLED

PRESUMED

Positive – GSA

Presumed Positive Cat 2 Good

11 Roofing Penthouse Roof

NOT SAMPLED

PRESUMED

Positive – GSA

Presumed Positive Cat 2 Good

12 Roofing Main Roof

NOT SAMPLED

PRESUMED

Positive – GSA

Presumed Positive Cat 2 Good

13 Exterior Caulk Mezzanine ND NA Cat 2 Good

URS

14 Exterior Caulk Mezzanine – P1 Parapet Walls ND NA Cat 2 Good

Versar

15 Exterior Caulk – Gray Cooling Tower Piping Wrap ND NA Cat 2 Good

2’x4’ Fissured Ceiling

Tile

Telephone Room – P1 ND NA Cat 2 Good

Basement

URS

17 Duct Sealant – Tan

2nd Floor - Corridor

ACM 2%Chrysotile Cat 2 Good

6th Floor - Corridor

6th Floor - Corridor

2nd Floor – Elevator Lobby

3rd Floor - Corridor

4th Floor – Corridor Outside Room

7th Floor - Corridor

2’x2’ Smooth Ceiling

Tile/Panels

6th Floor - Corridor

ND NA Cat 2 Good 3rd Floor - Corridor

20’x60’ Fissured

Ceiling Tile(existing)

2nd Floor-Messer Office-Basement Stockpile

ND

NA Cat 1 Good 2nd Floor-Messer Office-Basement

Stockpile

7th Floor-HUD Foyer

7th Floor-HUD Foyer

7th Floor-HUD Foyer

3rd Floor-Room 307 Conference

3rd Floor-Room 307 Conference

3rd Floor-Room 307 Conference

7th Floor Corridor

Basement Elevator Lobby

2’x4’ Smooth Ceiling

Tile(New)/Ceiling Panels Per URS

Basement Elevator Lobby

ND Cat 1 Good

12’x12’ Brown/Tan Swirled Floor Tile

Throughout Building Not Sampled- Per GSA

ND ND Cat 1 Good

Mastic Associated with 12’x12’

Brown/Tan Swirled Floor Tile

7th Floor Corridor ACM 2% Chrysotile Cat 1 Good

Versar

23 Vinyl Baseboard 3rd Floor Smoking

Area/Corridor(Dining Room) Presumed Presumed Negative Cat 1 Good

URS

Vinyl Baseboard

Mastic 3rd Floor Smoking

Area/Corridor(Dining Room) ND ND Cat 1 Good

Versar

12’x12’ Bright Blue

Tile 3rd Floor Cafeteria

NOT SAMPLED

PRESUMED

NEGATIVE

Presumed Negative Cat 1 Good

Mastic Associated with 12’x12’ Bright

Blue Tile 3rd Floor Cafeteria

NOT SAMPLED

PRESUMED

NEGATIVE

Presumed Negative Cat 1 Good

3’x3’ Sheets Dark

Blue Flooring 2nd Floor Social Security Kitchen

NOT SAMPLED

PRESUMED

NEGATIVE-

Presumed Negative Cat 1 Good

Mastic Associated with 3’x3’ Sheets

Dark Blue Flooring 2nd Floor Social Security Kitchen

NOT SAMPLED

PRESUMED

NEGATIVE-

Presumed Negative Cat 1 Good

12’x12’ Gray Floor

Tile 2nd Floor Social Security Kitchen

Cat 1

Good

2nd Floor Social Security Kitchen

Mastic Associated with 12’x12’ Gray

Floor Tile

2nd Floor Social Security Kitchen

Good Throughout

1st Floor – IRS Space

31 Sink Coating 1st Floor Receiving Area Not Sampled

Presumed Positive per GSA

Presumed Good

2’x2’ Rough Ceiling

Tile 1st Floor Receiving Area

Not Sampled Presumed

Negative per

GSA

Presumed Good

Tan Vinyl Flooring

(Sheeting) Basement Gun Range(Basement

Former Firing Range)

ND ND

Non-Friable

Good

Mastic Associated with Tan Vinyl Flooring (Sheeting)

Basement-Room 42 ND ND Good

35 1’x1’ Wall Board Basement Gun Range(Basement

Former Firing Range) ND ND Good

12’x12’ Light Tan Swirl Floor Tile

Basement-Room 42 ND NA Good

Mastic Associated with 12’x12’ Light

Tan Swirl Floor Tile Basement-Room 42 ACM 8% Chrysotile Good

Storm Sewer Pipe

Fitting Insulation (on Fiberglass Pipe Run)

Basement-Room 23

ND NA Good Basement Gun Range(Basement –

Former Firing Range Storage)

7th Floor Corridor

Mastic Associated with 1’x1’ Wall Board 6th Floor Corridor ND NA Good

40 Carpet Mastic

3rd Floor Corridor

ND

(throughout the

Building)

ND

Good 2nd Floor- Messer Office

7th Floor-Corner Across From Room

4thFloor Elevator Lobby

41 Drywall System

3rd Floor Across From Room 346 Good

Penthouse- Boiler Room Good

5th Floor Corner At Room 531B Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Trace Good

4th Floor-Elevator Lobby ND ND Good

3rd Floor Corridor ND ND Friable Good

2nd Floor-Elevator Lobby ACM 2% Chrysotile Good

6th Floor-GSA Office Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Friable Good 6th Floor-Adjacent to URS Field

Office Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile

Good

6th Floor-Room 609 East Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good 5th Floor-USDA 507 Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good 5th Floor –UFS 540 Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good 4th Floor –IRS 403B Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good

4th Floor-IRS NW Corner Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good 3rd Floor- Foyer Area Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good

3rd Floor Inspector General Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good

3rd Floor- Cafeteria Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good 2nd Floor – USDA Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good

2nd Floor Social Security East wall Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good 1st Floor – US Army Recruiting Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good

1st Floor – IRS Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good 7th Floor – Column #22 Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good

7th Floor – HUD East Wall ND Good 2nd Floor - Public Health Corridor Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good 2nd Floor - Public Health Corridor Trace Trace <1% Chrysotile Good 2nd Floor - Public Health Corridor

Friable Good 2nd Floor- South Corridor ,Janitor’s

Closet Friable Good

2nd Floor- South Corridor ,Janitor’s Closet

Friable Good

2nd Floor- Restroom Friable Good 2nd Floor- Restroom Friable Good

3rd Floor-Janitor Closet Friable Good 3rd Floor-Janitor Closet Friable Good 3rd Floor-Janitor Closet Friable Good 3rd Floor-Janitor Closet Friable Good 3rd Floor-Janitor Closet Trace <1% Chrysotile Friable Good 3rd Floor-Janitor Closet

ND ND

Friable Good 3rd Floor-North Corridor Friable Good 3rd Floor-North Corridor Friable Good

3rd Floor-Women’s Restroom Friable Good 3rd Floor-Women’s Restroom Friable Good 3rd Floor-Women’s Restroom Friable Good 3rd Floor-Women’s Restroom Friable Good 3rd Floor-Women’s Restroom Friable Good 3rd Floor-Women’s Restroom Friable Good 3rd Floor-Women’s Restroom Friable Good 3rd Floor-Women’s Restroom Trace <1% Chrysotile Friable Good 3rd Floor –West Foyer Ceiling

ND ND

Friable Good 3rd Floor –West Foyer Ceiling Friable Good 3rd Floor –West Foyer Ceiling Friable Good 3rd Floor –West Foyer Ceiling Friable Good

3rd Floor Men’s Restroom Ceiling Friable Good 3rd Floor Men’s Restroom Ceiling Friable Good

2nd Floor-Vending Area Ceiling Friable Good 2nd Floor-Vending Area Ceiling Friable Good 2nd Floor-West Foyer Ceiling Friable Good 2nd Floor-West Foyer Ceiling Friable Good 2nd Floor-West Foyer Ceiling Friable Good 2nd Floor Unisex Restroom Friable Good 2nd Floor Unisex Restroom Friable Good

3rd Floor-Foyer Ceiling Friable Good 3rd Floor-Foyer Ceiling Friable Good

2nd Floor-Electric Closet B Friable Good 2nd Floor –Electric Closet B Friable Good

2nd Floor-Electric Closet #233 Friable Good 2nd Floor-Electric Closet #233 Friable Good

3rd Floor Electric Closet C-Lobby Friable Good 3rd Floor Electric Closet C-Lobby Friable Good 3rd Floor Electric Closet B-North

Corridor Friable Good

3rd Floor Electric Closet B-North Corridor

Friable Good

3rd Floor –Electric Closet A- Kitchen Friable Good 3rd Floor –Electric Closet A- Kitchen Friable Good

7th Floor Electric Closet B-North Corridor

Friable Good

7th Floor Electric Closet B-North Corridor

Friable Good

6th Floor Electric Closet -North Corridor

Friable Good

6th Floor Electric Closet North Corridor

Friable Good

6th Floor Electric Closet- 631A-South Elevator

Friable Good

6th Floor Electric Closet- 631A-South Elevator

Friable Good

5th Floor Electric Closet-531A-South Corridor

Friable Good

5th Floor Electric Closet-531A-South Corridor

Friable Good

4th Floor-Electric Closet-South Corridor

Friable Good

4th Floor-Electric Closet-South Corridor

Friable Good

Penthouse-Ceiling Friable Good Penthouse-Ceiling Friable Good Penthouse-Ceiling Friable Good Penthouse-Ceiling Friable Good

Good

Versar

Wall Seam Caulk –

Exterior

Exterior – North

ND NA Cat 2 Good Exterior – East

Exterior – West

URS

43 Boiler Breeching Boiler Room – Penthouse ACM 25% Chrysotile RACM Reported as

Abated

44 1’x1’ Ceiling Tile Room 334D – 3rd Floor

ND NA Cat 2 Good Adjacent to curved room – 4th Floor

45 Gasket

Boiler Room - Penthouse

ND NA Cat 2 Good West End of North Boiler – Penthouse

Debris on Floor of

Pipe Chase

Pipe Chase – 7th Floor

ND NA RACM NA Pipe Chase – 4th Floor

Pipe Chase – 3rd Floor

47 Wallboard Elevator Lobby – 2nd Floor ND NA Cat 2 Good

48 Diffuser Insulation Messer Office – 2nd Floor ND NA Cat 2 Good

49 Duct Tape Messer Office – 2nd Floor ND NA Cat 2 Good

Packing Material Behind Fire Door

Throughout ND NA Cat 2 Good

51 Waterproofing South Entry – 1st Floor ND NA Cat 2 Good

52 Pipe Insulation Parking Garage – 2nd Floor ND NA RACM Good

Insulating Cement –

Pipe Ends

Parking Garage – 2nd Floor ACM 3% Chrysotile RACM Good

Parking Garage – 7th Floor

54 Sealant Penthouse – AHU#2 ACM 4% Chrysotile RACM Good

55 Plaster Adhesive Lobby – 1st Floor ND NA Cat 2 Good

TRC

Black Sink

Undercoating S 200 – 2nd Floor ACM 3% Chrysotile Cat 2 Good

2 Mirror Mastic Throughout Presumed Presumed Cat 2 Good

3 Fire Door Throughout Presumed Presumed Cat 2

Table 2 List of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) by URS (2004/2005), Versar(2006) and TRC (2019) and Presumed (not sampled materials) Asbestos Containing Materials

HSA’s John W. Bricker Federal Office Building (OH0208) HSA by URS, Versar and TRC MATERIAL LOCATION(s) QUANTITY

REPORT or

CONSULTANT

TYPE CONDITION

Black mastic Associated w/12” x 12” Tan w/Streaks

Floor Tile

Elevator Entryway – Penthouse

~1,700sf Versar (2006)

Cat 1 Non-

Friable Good

All Stair Ladings

17 Duct Sealant Throughout ~12,000sf

URS

(2004/2005) Cat 2 Good

Black mastic Associated w/12” x

12” Brown/Tan Swirled Floor Tile

Throughout – Elevator Lobby’s ~6,500sf

URS

(2004/2005)

Cat 1 Non-

Friable Good

Black mastic Associated w/12” x

12” Light Tan Swirled Floor Tile

Basement – Room 42 ~650sf Versar (2006)

Cat 1 Non-

Friable Good

41 Drywall Systems Elevator Lobby – 2nd Floor ~1,000 sf

URS

(2004/2005) Cat 2 Good

Insulating Cement –

Pipe Ends Parking Garage ~1,000sf

URS

(2004/2005

Cat 2 Good

54 Duct Sealant AHU#2 – Penthouse ~2,000lf

URS

(2004/20 05 Cat 2 Good

1 Sink Undercoating Throughout Unknown

TRC

(2019) Cat 2 Good

PRESUMED ACM

9 Tank Insulation Chilled Water – Air Handling Room ~250cf Versar

(2004/2005) RACM Good

10 Roofing Elevator Equipment Room – Roof ~1,000sf Versar

(2004/2005) Cat 2

Good

11 Roofing Penthouse – Roof ~1,000sf Versar

(2004/2005) Cat 2 Good

12 Roofing Main Roof ~28,000sf Versar

(2004/2005) Cat 2 Good

2 Mirror Mastic Throughout Unknown

TRC

(2019) Cat 2 Good

3 Fire Door Throughout Unknown

TRC

(2019) Cat 2 Good

31 Sink Undercoating Throughout Unknown Versar

(2004/2005) Cat 2 Good sf = Square Foot lf = Linear Foot NA = Not Applicable

Asbestos Conclusion

TRC recommends the GSA continue to engage qualified firms to sample for asbestos and lead paint utilizing their standard of practice of a pre-alteration survey for area specific renovations and demolitions.

Subcontractors and employees working within the structures at the site should be made aware of the locations of the ACM and possibility of concealed ACMs that could be found during renovation/demolition activities. Any materials uncovered during future renovation or demolition activities that were not addressed in this inspection report, or any presumed asbestos containing materials, must be sampled by an accredited asbestos inspector prior to any disturbance, or they must be treated as ACM.

It should be noted that drywall system samples that were collected by Versar in 2006 of various floors of the building with the none detect, trace and one sample results reported as 2%

Chrysotile on the 2nd floor lobby. TRC recommends collecting drywall system samples on every pre-alteration survey to confirm/deny the presence of asbestos

Table 3 List of Lead Paint as sampled by Versar (2006) and TRC (2019)

According to reports reviewed, See Appendix D, the following paint was sampled and tested for lead.

Lead Conclusion

Based on historical reports, age of the building, some of paints sampled in the building have a detection of lead and are considered LCP. Other samples collected were below the limited of detection or less that 5,000 ppm or 0.5 % by weight reported by the lab.

Lead-based paint (LBP) is defined by the United States Department of House and Urban Development (HUD) as any paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that has one mg/cm2 or more of lead or 0.5% by weight (5,000 micrograms per gram [ug\g] or 5,000 parts of lead per million [ppm]). According the OSHA Program Directive, Lead: Exposure in Construction, "For all occupational exposure to lead occurring in the course of construction work, the standard (1926.62) does not specify a minimum amount or concentration of lead that triggers a determination that lead is present and the potential for occupational exposure exists." Therefore any paint containing less than 0.5% by weight, or <5,000 ppm, but greater than the laboratory detection limit is considered to be a LCP.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations for lead in construction apply when disturbing materials which contain any amount of lead, and such activities must be conducted according to the regulations set forth in 29 CFR 1926.62. All paints that contain any level of lead are regulated by the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard 29 CFR 1926.62, Construction work covered by this standard includes demolition or salvage f of structures where lead-containing materials are present; removal or encapsulation of lead containing materials; renovation of structures, substrates, or portions thereof that have lead-containing materials; installation of materials containing lead; lead contamination cleanup; transportation, storage, and disposal of lead containing materials; and maintenance operations associated with these construction activities.

In performing these activities, OSHA requires an initial determination that the construction activities used at the job site do not create airborne emissions of lead above the Action Level of 30ug/m3 (i.e., negative exposure assessment). This exposure assessment may include initial exposure monitoring, historical data that meet certain requirements, or objective data demonstrating that a particular produce or material containing lead or a specific process cannot result in employee exposures to lead above the Action Level.

PAINT

COLOR,

CONDITION

SUBSTRATE,

COMPONENT

SAMPLE

LOCATION

LOCATION

IN BUILDING

LEAD RESULTS

(PARTS PER

MILLION)

(OVER 5,000

PPM or >0.50% by weight IS

LEAD BASED

PAINT)

REPORT OR

CONSULTANT

Cream, Good Metal, I-Beam I-Beam Penthouse 5,500ppm TRC (2019)

Yellow, Good Metal, I-Beam I-Beam Penthouse 32,000ppm TRC (2019)

TRC recommends the GSA continue to engage qualified firms to sample for asbestos and lead paint utilizing their standard of practice of a pre-alteration survey for area-specific renovations and demolitions.

August 2019

Disclaimer

The content presented in this report is based on data collected during the Site survey, review of pertinent regulations, requirements, guidelines and commonly followed industry standards, and information provided by Client, their clients, agents, and representatives.

The work has been conducted in an objective and unbiased manner and in accordance with generally accepted professional practice for this type of work. TRC believes the data and analysis to be accurate and relevant but cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of available documentation or possible withholding of information of other parties.

This report is designed to aid the property owner, architect, construction manager, general contractor, and asbestos abatement contractor in locating ACM. This report is not intended for and may not be utilized as a bidding document or as an abatement project specification document or management plan. The listed materials and respective locations given are specific only to those areas. TRC makes no representation regarding the extent of ACM or conditions pertaining thereto of areas located outside the renovation scope of work.

TRC appreciates the opportunity to be of continued service to GSA.

Sincerely, TRC Environmental Corporation

Heath Howard, CIH, CSP Lonnie Lyro Senior Project Manager Project Manager

Mitch Pendergrass Senior Project Manager

Appendix A Asbestos Containing Materials and Lead

Paint Abatement Costs The asbestos abatement costs (below) estimates listed in this report include removal only. The quantities were obtained from the URS (2004/2005), Versar (2006) reports and site visit by TRC (2019)

OH0208 JOHN W. BRICKER FEDERAL OFFICE BUILDING

MATERIAL LOCATION QUANTITY

PRICE PER

SF, TOTAL*

Black Mastic Associated w/12”x12” Tan Floor Tile with Streaks

Entry Landing - Penthouse ~1,700 sf

$6.00 ~$10,200 Entry Landings on All Floors

Sink Undercoating

Throughout Unknown Abatement per sink ~$2,500

Duct Sealant Throughout AHUs ~12,000sf $5.00

~$51,000

Black Mastic Associated w/12”x12” Brown/Tan Floor Tile with Swirls

Elevator Lobby’s – Throughout ~6,500 sf $6.00

~$39,000

Black Mastic Associated w/12”x12” Light Tan Floor Tile with Swirls

Room 42 – Basement ~650 sf $6.00

~$3,900

Drywall Systems Elevator Lobby – 2nd Floor ~1,000 sf $10.00/sf $10,000

Insulating Cement – Pipe Ends Parking Garage ~1,000 sf $10.00

~$10,000

Duct Sealant Penthouse AHUs ~2,000sf $5.00

~$10,000

PRESUMED ACM UNTIL SAMPLED

Tank Insulation Air Handling Room ~250cf $15.00cf ~$3,750

Roofing Materials Roof ~30,000 sf $5.00, ~$150,000

Mirror Mastics Restroom Mirrors Unknown Abatement per mirror ~$2,500

Fire Doors Throughout Unknown Disposal per door ~$1,500

• Prices do not include 3rd Party Oversight Consulting Services, typically $1,250 a day

Lead Based Paint Abatement Costs

Lead Based Paint Encapsulation and/or Abatement Costs widely vary as a factor of project location, condition and location of lead-based paint within a structure, and project specific scope-of-work and typically range up to $2.00-$5.00 a square foot and do not include 3rd Party Oversight

Consulting Services, typically, $1,250 a day.

Note: If applicable, delaminating, chalking, and peeling LBP must be cleaned up and stabilized by a licensed lead abatement contractor using certified workers and supervisors, and must be done according to EPA and State of Ohio lead abatement regulations prior to any demolition activities. LBP components in good condition may be removed intact by lead trained personnel in accordance with all applicable federal state and local regulations. These requirements include, but are not limited to, the following: Exposure Assessments; Methods of Compliance (including work practices administrative, and engineering controls); Respiratory Protection; Protective

Clothing and Equipment; Housekeeping; Hygiene Facilities; Medical Surveillance; and Employee

Information and Training. The waste materials generated must be segregated accordingly and must be subjected to waste Characterization testing and appropriately disposed.

Appendix B TRC General Photo Log

July 29, 2019

OH0208 ASBESTOS SURVEY – PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample Numbers

N/A

Material Description

Vinyl Floor Tile 12" X 12" Tan

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos Detected

Positive

Asbestos Type

5% Chrysotile

Homogeneous Area

Elevator Penthouse, Entry Landing, All Stair Landings

Total Approximate Quantity

1700 SF

Condition Good

Material Type Misc.

NESHAP

Category

Cat I

Notes Not Applicable

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

Insulation Tank Chilled Water

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos Detected

Positive

Asbestos Type

Assumed

Homogeneous Area

Air Handling Room (East Side)

Total Approximate Quantity

250 CF

Condition Good

Material Type TSI

NESHAP

Category

RACM

Notes Not Applicable

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

Roofing

Accessible

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

Asbestos Detected

Positive

Asbestos Type

Assumed

Homogeneous Area

Throughout Elevator Roof

Total Approximate Quantity

1000 SF

Condition Good

Material Type Misc.

NESHAP

Category

Cat I

Notes Not Applicable

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

Roofing

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos Detected

Positive

Asbestos Type

Assumed

Homogeneous Area

Penthouse Roof

Total Approximate Quantity

1000 SF

Condition Good

Material Type Misc.

NESHAP

Category

Cat I

Notes Not Applicable

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

Roofing

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos

Positive

Asbestos Type

Assumed

Homogeneous Area

Main Roof

Total Approximate Quantity

28000 SF

Condition Good

Material Type Misc.

NESHAP

Category

Cat I

Notes Not Applicable

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

No Image Available

Duct Sealant

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos Detected

Positive

Asbestos Type

2% Chrysotile

Homogeneous Area

All Ducts And AHUs Throughout Building

Total Approximate Quantity

12000 SF

Condition N/A

Material Type N/A

NESHAP

Category

N/A

Notes Not Applicable

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

Vinyl Floor Tile 12" X 12" Brown / Tan Swirled

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos

Asbestos

2% Chrysotile (Mastic)

All Floors

Total Approximate Quantity

6500 SF

Condition Good

Material Type Misc.

NESHAP

Category

Cat I

Notes Not Applicable

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

Sink Undercoat

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos Detected

Positive

Asbestos Type

3% Chrysotile

Homogeneous Area

All Sinks Throughout Building

Total Approximate Quantity

TBD

Condition Good

Material Type Misc.

NESHAP

Category

Cat II

Notes Not found on all sinks inspected

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

Vinyl Floor Tile 12" X 12" Light Tan Swirl

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos

Asbestos

8% Chrysotile (Mastic)

Basement Room 42

Total Approximate Quantity

650 SF

Condition Good

Material Type Misc.

NESHAP

Category

Cat I

Notes Not Applicable

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

Wallboard Gypsum With Joint Compound

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos Detected

Positive

Asbestos Type

2% Chrysotile

Homogeneous Area

Throughout Building

Total Approximate Quantity

TBD

Condition Good

Material Type Misc.

NESHAP

Category

RACM

Notes Not Applicable

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

Insulating Cement - Ends Of Pipes

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos

Asbestos

3% Chrysotile

Parking Garage Ends Of Horizontal Pipe Runs

Total Approximate Quantity

100 SF

Condition Damaged

Material Type TSI

NESHAP

Category

RACM

Notes We estimate 100 sf

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

Sealant

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos Detected

Positive

Asbestos Type

4% Chrysotile

Homogeneous Area

Penthouse AHU #2

Total Approximate Quantity

2000 LF

Condition Good

Material Type Misc.

NESHAP

Category

Cat I

Notes Not Applicable

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL

Sample

01, 02, 03

Sink Undercoat Black

Accessible Material

Accessible

Reason Inaccessible

N/A

Asbestos

Asbestos

No Asbestos Detected

Suite 200

Total Approximate Quantity

TBD

Condition N/A

Material Type N/A

NESHAP

Category

Notes Not Applicable

OH0208 LCP SURVEY – LEAD CONTAINING PAINT PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

SUSPECT PAINT

Sample

L-01

Sample Location

P2 Structural Steel

Description Cream Paint

Laboratory Result

5,500 PPM – Lead-based Paint

Substrate Metal

Paint Locations

Throughout Structural Steel

Quantity of Deteriorated Paint

TBD

SUSPECT PAINT

Sample

L-02

P2 Elevator Machine Room

Description Yellow Paint

Laboratory Result

32,000 PPM – Lead-based Paint

Substrate Metal

Paint Locations

P2 Elevator Machine Room Steel

Quantity of Deteriorated Paint

TBD

SUSPECT PAINT

Sample

L-03

P2 Elevator Machine Room

Description Gray Paint

Laboratory Result

<230 PPM – No Lead

Substrate Concrete

Paint Locations

P2 Elevator Machine Room Floor

Quantity of Deteriorated Paint

TBD

SUSPECT PAINT

OH0208 LCP SURVEY – LEAD CONTAINING PAINT PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

Sample

L-04

Floor 7 Elevator Lobbg

Description White

Laboratory Result

<89 PPM – No Lead

Substrate Drywall

Paint Locations

Throughout Freight Elevator Lobbies

Quantity of Deteriorated Paint

TBD

SUSPECT PAINT

Sample

L-05

4th Floor Freight Elevator Lobby

Description Light Yellow / Tan Paint

Laboratory Result

<84 PPM – No Lead

Substrate Drywall

Paint Locations

Throughout Interior Core Walls

Quantity of Deteriorated Paint

TBD

SUSPECT PAINT

Sample

L-06

Parking Floor 7

Description Pink Paint

Laboratory Result

500 PPM – Lead-in Paint

Substrate Metal

Paint Locations

Parking Garage Steel

Quantity of Deteriorated Paint

TBD

Appendix C TRC Lab Reports and COC April 2019

OrderID: 151903190

OrderID: 151903190

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

5950 Fairbanks N. Houston Rd. Houston, TX 77040

Tel/Fax: (713) 686-3635 / (713) 686-3645 http://www.EMSL.com / houstonlab@emsl.com

151903190EMSL Order:

Customer ID: TRCE75

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Lonnie Lyro (512) 329-6080

Fax:TRC Environmental Corp. (512) 329-8750

Received Date:505 E. Huntland Dr. 05/08/2019 8:30 AM

Analysis Date:Suite 250 05/13/2019

Collected Date:Austin, TX 78752-3740 05/02/2019

Project: GSA Bricker 200 N High Street, Columbus, OH / 314614.000009

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

151903190-0001

3% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)97%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Fl 2 S. 200 - Black

Sink Coating

151903190-0002

3% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)97%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Fl 2 S. 200 - Black

Sink Coating

151903190-0003

3% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)97%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Fl 2 S. 200 - Black

Sink Coating

Analyst(s)

Jenny Drapela (2)

Wanda Porch (1)

Michelle Leggett, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim

Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Houston, TX NVLAP Lab Code 102106-0, AZ 0925, CO AL-15355, LA 04126, TX 300159

Initial report from: 05/13/2019 16:38:11

Page 1 of 1ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 5/13/2019 3:38 PM

OrderID: 161908851

OrderID: 161908851

ConcentrationAnalyzed Weight RDL LeadClient SampleDescription Collected

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

6340 CastlePlace Dr., Indianapolis, IN 46250 Phone/Fax: (317) 803-2997 / (317) 803-3047 http://www.EMSL.com indianapolislab@emsl.com

Attn: Lonnie Lyro TRC Environmental Corp.

505 E. Huntland Dr.

Suite 250 Austin, TX 78752-3740

Received: 05/09/19 9:00 AM

GSA BRICKER / COLUMBUS, OH / 314614.000009

Fax: (512) 329-8750 Phone: (512) 329-6080

Project:

5/2/2019Collected:

161908851 CustomerID: TRCE75 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Site: CREAM ON I BEAM RENTAL - PENTHOUSE 5500 ppm5/15/2019 0.2422 g

161908851-0001 21005/2/2019TRCL-01 ppm

Site: YELLOW ON BEAMS METAL - PENTHOUSE 32000 ppm5/15/2019 0.0892 g

161908851-0002 56005/2/2019TRCL-02 ppm

Site: GREY FLOOR CONCRETE - PENTHOUSE <230 ppm5/15/2019 0.0865 g

161908851-0003 2305/2/2019TRCL-03 ppm

Site: WHITE WALL FREIGHT LOBBY ELEV. ROOM FL 7 <89 ppm5/15/2019 0.2253 g

161908851-0004 895/2/2019TRCL-04 ppm

Site: LIGHT YELLOW TAN FLOOR ON DRYWALL T/O BUILDING <84 ppm5/15/2019 0.2374 g

161908851-0005 845/2/2019TRCL-05 ppm

Site: PINK PARKING GARAGE ON METAL 500 ppm5/15/2019 0.2285 g

161908851-0006 885/2/2019TRCL-06 ppm

Page 1 of 1Test Report PB w/RDL-2.0.0.0 Printed: 5/16/2019 11:02:34 AM

Doug Wiegand, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.010 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Indianapolis, IN AIHA-LAP, LLC--ELLAP 157245, OH E10040

Initial report from 05/16/2019 11:02:34 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:indianapolislab@emsl.com

Appendix D Historical ACM and Lead Reports: URS

(2004/2005) &Versar (2006)

U.S. General Services Administration

Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey

Bricker Federal Office Building 200 North High Street

Columbus, Ohio

GSA Building No.: OH-0208 GSA Location 1

Prepared By:

Versar, Inc.

100 West 22nd Street, Suite 151 Lombard, IL 60148

February 2, 2006

Versar Project Number: 104700.4971.130 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY PROTOCOL

3.1 Asbestos Information

3.2 Asbestos Survey

3.3 Asbestos Analysis

3.4 Asbestos Survey Results

4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY PROTOCOL

4.1 Lead Paint Survey

4.2 Lead Paint Analysis

4.3 Lead Paint Survey Results

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.0 STUDY LIMITATIONS

Tables

Table 1 Asbestos Survey Analytical Summary

Table 2 Asbestos Inventory and Management Assessment

Table 3 Lead-Based Paint Survey Summary

Attachments Attachment A Facility Maps: Location of ACM/Location of LBP

Attachment B Asbestos and Lead Analytical Reports

Attachment C Photographs

Attachment D Field Notes and Drawings

Attachment E Cost Estimates

Attachment F Terminology

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Versar has completed an asbestos-containing material (ACM) and lead-based paint (LBP) survey of the Bricker Federal Office Building (subject building), 200 North High Street, Columbus, Ohio.

The facility was inspected by State of Ohio Department of Health Licensed Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist and Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Licensed Asbestos and Lead Inspector and Asbestos Management Planner, Ms. Shaun Terranova (#ES34257, #100- 03064, #L-002600, respectively), and IDPH Licensed Asbestos and Lead Inspector Mr. Curtis Cannon (#100-03976, #L-001190), on October 5, 2005. The survey was conducted in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) General Industry Standard (29CFR1910.1001), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standard for Asbestos (40 CFR Part 61), applicable local and state requirements, and in conformance with the scope and limitations of U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) specifications.

The asbestos survey included identification of friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) on an area-by-area basis, assessment of friability, current condition and potential for future disturbance of the material, estimate of the amount of ACM, and overall condition rating of the material. Versar has incorporated into this report data from previous inspections conducted by URS Corporation (URS) of Columbus, Ohio. URS data incorporated in this report was collected during the period of November 2004 to October 2005. During the inspections, URS identified 26 separate asbestos homogenous sampling areas (HSAs) and collected a total of 172 samples of suspect ACMs. URS samples were analyzed by Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. (EHS) of Richmond, Virginia.

During Versar’s October 5, 2005 inspection, 29 additional HSA’s were identified and 47 samples of suspect ACMs were collected. Versar’s samples were analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc.

(EMSL) in Chicago, Illinois. Some materials were not sampled at the time of either Versar’s or URS’s surveys and are assumed to be non-ACMs or ACM’s, or until sampling proves otherwise.

HSAs 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 31, and 32 were not sampled during the surveys since sampling would have caused damage to these materials, or the materials were not suspect materials.

The following materials were found to be asbestos-containing or assumed to be ACMs:

HSA ID Material Description Location Quantity Asbestos %

HSA-2

Mastic Associated with 12"x12" Tan Floor Tile with Streaks

Elevator Penthouse Entry Landing and All Stair Landings

1700 sf 5% Chysotile

HSA-9 Chilled Water Tank Insulation Air handling Room (East Side) 250 cf Assumed Positive

HSA-10 Roofing Material - Elevator Roof Throughout Elevator Roof 1,000 sf Assumed Positive

HSA-11 Roofing Material - Penthouse Roof Throughout Penthouse Roof 1,000 sf Assumed Positive

HSA-12 Roofing Material - Main Roof Throughout Main Roof 28,000 sf Assumed Positive

HSA-17 Duct Sealant All Ducts and AHUs Throughout Building 12,000 sf 2% Chysotile

HSA-22 Mastic Associated with 12"x12" Brown/Tan Swirled Floor Tile All Floors 6,500 sf 2% Chysotile

HSA-31 Sink Coating All Sinks Throughout Building

Throughout Bldg Assumed Positive

HSA-37 Mastic Associated with 12"x12 Light Tan Swirl Floor Tile Basement – Room 42 650 sf 8% Chysotile

HSA-41 Drywall Systems Throughout Building Throughout Building 2% Chysotile

HSA-43 Boiler Breeching Penthouse Boiler Room

Removed Prior to Versar

Inspection

25% Chysotile

HSA-53 Insulating Cement - Ends of Pipe Parking Garage 1,000 sf 3% Chysotile HSA-54 Sealant Penthouse - AHU #2 2,000 lf 4% Chysotile

The lead-based paint (LBP) survey included collection of paint chip samples to provide consistent coverage based on building size, layout, and renovation/abatement history. The number and frequency of samples collected are a representation of the number of different paint colors in each building functional space (i.e., mechanical areas, office space, common areas), and total square footage of painted surfaces within that particular functional space. It should be noted that this LBP survey is not intended to be comprehensive in nature; rather is an attempt to evaluate the lead content of the predominant paint types within the building based on Versar’s observations.

Based upon lead-based paint analytical results, no LBP was identified in the samples collected at the time of this inspection. Lead-based paint is defined by the EPA as a paint that contains lead in concentrations that are equal to or in excess of 0.5 % by weight or 5,000 parts per million (ppm).

The following sections give detailed descriptions of the building, survey methodologies, analytical testing, and conclusions. The tables and attachments provide support information.

2.0 INTRODUCTION

On behalf of the General Services Administration (GSA), Versar, Inc. (Versar) conducted a survey for suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paint (LBP) at the Bricker Federal Office Building, 200 North High Street, Columbus, Ohio. The subject building has seven floors, two penthouses, basement, three roof levels (main, elevator, and penthouse roof), and comprises approximately 261,257 total square feet.

Work was conducted in accordance with Versar’s proposal to GSA, dated May 17, 2005 (in response to GSA RFQ 80755) and GSA Contract (GS05P05GAA0169). The inspection was conducted on October 5, 2005. The objective of the asbestos survey was to conduct an AHERA-type building inspection for ACMs and prepare an Asbestos Management Plan to fulfill the asbestos requirements as specified in 29 CFR Part 1910.1001 (OSHA Asbestos General Industry Standard). The lead-based paint (LBP) survey included collection of paint chip samples to provide consistent coverage based on building size, layout, and renovation/abatement history. It should be noted that this LBP survey is not intended to be comprehensive in nature; rather is an attempt to evaluate the lead content of the predominant paint types within the building based on Versar’s observations.

Versar’s State of Ohio Department of Health Licensed Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist, and Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Licensed Asbestos and Lead Inspector and Asbestos Management Planner, Ms. Shaun Terranova (#ES34257, #100-03064, #L-002600, respectively), and IDPH Licensed Asbestos and Lead Inspector Mr. Curtis Cannon (#100-03976, #L-001190) performed the inspection and collected bulk samples of interior friable and non-friable suspect ACM and LBP. Versar was escorted by GSA Project Manager, Mr. Philip Ramos. The ACM survey included a limited inspection of the facility to determine the amount, condition, and general location of suspect ACM within the facility and collection of bulk samples for laboratory analysis.

Suspect asbestos bulk samples were analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) and paint chip samples were analyzed utilizing Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) by EPA Method 6010. Versar’s samples were analyzed by trained microscopists at EMSL Analytical, Inc.

(EMSL) in Chicago, Illinois.

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY PROTOCOL

3.1 Asbestos Information

Asbestos is the generic term used to describe a group of naturally occurring silicate minerals that have the ability to separate into small, fine fibers. The most widely used types of asbestos are chrysotile and amosite. Other types include crocidolite, tremolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite.

Exposure to these fibers has been linked to a number of health problems, including asbestosis, mesothelioma, and lung cancer.

Federal regulatory agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have targeted friable asbestos as the primary source for release of and subsequent exposure to asbestos fibers. The U.S. EPA regulations define AACMs@ as materials containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos. ACMs are regulated under the U.S. EPA National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Standard for Demolition and Renovation and OSHA regulations.

A list of asbestos terms and their definitions are located in Attachment F. These are intended to provide the reader with a better understanding of the terminology used in the report.

3.2 Asbestos Survey

The ACM survey included an inspection for friable and non-friable suspect ACMs identified throughout the subject property. Friable materials (such as thermal system insulation or TSI), are those which when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure, thereby releasing airborne fibers. Non-friable materials (such as vinyl floor tile) are those typically bound within a matrix, which do not readily release airborne fibers.

Versar inspectors met with building representatives and assigned Homogeneous Sampling Areas (HSAs) based on type of material, category, and appearance. The inventory of suspect materials identified during the ACM survey includes location of each suspect ACM HSA, description of the material, quantity, and material’s friability, condition, and accessibility (Table 1 - Asbestos Survey and Analytical Summary).

Suspect ACM identified by Versar as part of this survey included:

• Floor Tile and Mastic

• Tank Insulation

• Spray-On Insulation

• Muffler Exhaust Insulation

• Roofing Materials

• Misc. Flooring Materials

• Sink Coating

• Wall Board and Mastic

• Carpet Mastic

• Drywall Systems

• Ceiling Tile

• Duct Tape

• Diffuser Inslation

• Gaskets

• Sealant

• Plastic Adhensive

• Fire Door Packing Materials

• Caulk

• Boiler Breeching

• Pipe and Fitting Insulation

• Waterproofing Material

• Insulating Cement

• Duct Sealant

• Vinyl Baseboard

In accordance with the GSA scope-of-work, roofing materials were not sampled, but were assumed to contain asbestos and therefore, were quantified and included in the report inventory.

The ACM survey did not include identification or sampling of building materials that are unlikely to contain asbestos or materials that appeared to be non-asbestos in nature (e.g., fiberglass, concrete, ceramic, and wood products).

Versar inspectors walked through all accessible areas of the subject building, inventoried materials and quantities, wrote narrative descriptions, and drew sketches of the locations of each suspect ACM.