4-SLCI27021 Attachment 4 Score Sheet.xls

XLS spreadsheet 366 KB Posted

Attached to
Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI27021 - Watershed Management Plan Stakeholder and Public Engagement
Solicitation number
SLCI27021
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

This is an evaluation scoresheet for Salt Lake City Corporation's Request for Proposals (RFP) No. SLCI27021, which solicits services for stakeholder and public engagement related to the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities Watershed Management Plan update. The scoresheet serves as the standardized instrument for evaluating competitive sealed proposals submitted in response to this solicitation. The evaluation framework accommodates up to twenty offerors and employs a multi-stage assessment process designed to identify the most qualified service provider.

The evaluation methodology assigns scores on a scale of 0 to 5 across multiple criteria categories, with three mandatory prerequisites that all proposals must satisfy: City Ethics Requirements compliance, demonstration that the offeror and proposed team possess a minimum of five years of relevant experience, and adherence to GenAI Technology requirements. Technical evaluation comprises five scoreable criteria weighted as follows: Offeror's Experience and Qualifications (30 percent), Statement of Understanding of the Project (20 percent), Pertinent Characteristics of Proposed Work (20 percent), Office Location and Project Manager (20 percent), and Additional Recommendations or Innovative Services (10 percent), yielding a maximum of 500 technical points. Four policy criteria—Sustainability, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Apprenticeships, and Local Small Business—collectively contribute an additional 25 points. Cost proposals account for 30 percent of the total evaluation, with 225 available points awarded based on a lowest-price formula. The total possible score is 750 points, with proposals required to achieve a minimum threshold of 367.5 technical points (70 percent) to advance to cost evaluation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
6-SLCI27021 Attachment 1 Sample Agreement.docx DOCX document
5-SLCI27021 Request for Proposals.docx DOCX document
3-SLCI27021 Attachment 2 Scope of Work.docx DOCX document
1-Confidential+and+Proprietary+Info+Declaration+Form.pdf PDF
2-SLCI27021 Attachment 3 Cost Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

Salt Lake City RFP No. SLCI27021 for Watershed Management Plan Stakeholder and Public Engagement
Attachment 4 - Score Sheet
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
Firm Name:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
Evaluator:3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
Date:5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1City Ethics RequirementPrerequisite
2Offeror and Offeror's proposed team have Five Years of ExperiencePrerequisite
3GenAI TechnologyPrerequisite
0
Scoreable Technical CriteriaRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints
EarnedMinimum Required
1Offeror's Experience & QualificationsSection VII b.i3030.0%150.00.0
2Statement of Understanding of the ProjectSection VII b.ii2020.0%100.00.0
3Pertinent Characteristics of proposed workSection VII b.iii2020.0%100.00.0
4Office Location and Project ManagerSection VII b.iv2020.0%100.00.0
5Additional Recommendations or Innovative ServicesSection VII b.v1010.0%50.00.0
Scorable Technical Criteria Total100.0%500.00.00.0
Policy CriteriaRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-5)Available PointsPossible PointsPoints Earned
1SustainabilityVII. 3. a01.25%6.250.00
2Disadvantaged business enterpriseVII. 3. b01.25%6.250.00
3ApprenticeshipsVII. 3. c01.25%6.250.00
4Local Small BusinessVII. 3. d01.25%6.250.00
Policy Criteria Total5.00%25.000.00
Possible PointsPoints Earned
Total Technical Points100.00%525.000.00
Required Technical Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
Section VIII b70%367.50.00.0%0
CostRFP SectionLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Section VIII d$0.00$0.0030%225.00.0
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points70%525.00.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points30%225.00.0
Total Evaluation Points100%750.00.0

Scoresheet Summary

TITLE OF PROJECT (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)
SOLICITATION # (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET SUMMARY
Instructions:
Enter the solicitation number and name.
Enter each Offeror name.
Enter the Criteria name for each category.
Enter the Weight in column B that corresponds to the Criteria Weight on the Score Sheet tab column J for each criterion.
Enter the Total Possible Points for each Criterion, Cost Points, and Score Summary section.
Mandatory Minimum Requirements: Evaluate each offer and enter pass or fail
Ensure that the number of evaluator lines matches the number of evaluators.
Offers not meeting the Minimum Mandatory Requirements will not be evaluated further.
Ensure that the Total Average Score formula includes all of the evaluator line items.
Technical Scores: Enter each evaluator score for each offer.
Signatures:Date:
Evaluator 1__________________
Evaluator 2__________________
Evaluator 3__________________
Evaluator 4__________________
Evaluator 5__________________
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
1
2
3
WeightTechnical ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Criteria #1
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6 - Total Points (Total Possible XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #7
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #7 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Policy CriteriaOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
WeightTechnical Scores
Policy Criteria #1: Sustainability
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #2: Business Certification
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #3: Apprenticeship
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #4: Local Small Business
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Policy Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Technical Criteria Points (Total Technical Criteria Possible Points = XX) Minimum Threshold = XX0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost PointsCost ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Cost
0.0Cost Points0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Score SummaryOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Total Technical Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Grand Total Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .