4-SLCI27002 Attachment 4 Score Sheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 65 KB Posted Aug 21, 2026

Attached to: Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI27002 - Security Guard Services
Solicitation number: SLCI27002
Issued by: Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Sep 29, 2026

This is an RFP Evaluation Score Sheet for Salt Lake City Corporation's solicitation SLCI27002 for security guard services at the Salt Lake City Department of Airport. The score sheet is a blank template designed to evaluate multiple offerors (up to 20) based on mandatory minimum requirements and scoreable technical criteria. Mandatory requirements include verification of City Ethics Requirement compliance and certification that the offeror's proposed team possesses five years of experience relevant to the Scope of Work detailed in Attachment 2. The evaluation process accommodates five evaluators and uses a standardized scoring scale from 0 (Fail) to 5 (Excellent), with specific scoring definitions provided for each rating level.

The scoreable technical criteria comprise three weighted categories: Proposed Service (25% weight, 125 possible points), Company Experience and Financial Stability (12% weight, 60 possible points), and Experience of Proposed Personnel, Structure and Retention Plan (10% weight, 50 possible points), for a total of 235 possible technical points. Offerors must achieve a minimum technical point threshold of 164.5 points (70% of 235 points) to advance in the evaluation process. Cost evaluation accounts for 30% of the total evaluation score (100.7 possible points), with points calculated using a comparative formula where the lowest cost proposal receives full cost points and all other proposals receive points proportional to their cost relative to the lowest bid. The total possible evaluation score is 335.7 points, combining 70% technical evaluation and 30% cost evaluation.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
7-AOC Badging Office Directions.pdf	PDF	Aug 21, 2026
3-SLCI27002 Attachment 1 Sample Agreement.docx	DOCX document	Aug 21, 2026
5-SLCI27002 Attachment 2 Scope of Work.docx	DOCX document	Aug 21, 2026
2-SLCI27002 Attachment 3 cost sheet.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Aug 21, 2026
9-SLCI27002 RFP Amended.pdf	PDF	Aug 21, 2026
1-Confidential+and+Proprietary+Info+Declaration+Form.pdf	PDF	Aug 21, 2026
10-SLCI27002 Attachment 2 Scope of Work Amended.pdf	PDF	Aug 21, 2026
6-SLCI27002 RFP.pdf	PDF	Aug 21, 2026
8-SLCI27002 Security Guard Post Assignments.pdf	PDF	Aug 21, 2026

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Score Sheet

Security Guard Services

SOLICITATION # SLCI27002

RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET

	Score will be assigned as follows:
	0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
Firm Name:	1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
	2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
Evaluator:	3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
	4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
Date:	5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.

Minimum Mandatory Requirements		RFP Section	Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1	City Ethics Requirement	VII.a.i
2	Offeror certifies that Offeror's proposed team has five (5) years experience to the work described in Attachment 2: Scope of Work.	VII.a.ii

Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned

1	Proposed Service	VII.b.i	25	55.0%	125.0
2	Company Experience and Financial Stability	VII.b.ii	12	25.0%	60.0
3	Experience of Proposed Personnel, Structure and Retention Plan	VII.b.iii	10	20.0%	50.0
Scorable Technical Criteria Total				100.0%	235.0

		Possible Points	Points Earned
Total Technical Points	100.00%	235.00	0.00

Required Technical Point Threshold	RFP Section	Min Percent	Min Points Required	Points Earned	Percent Earned	Evaluation
		70%	164.5	0.0	0.0%

Cost		RFP Section	Low Cost Option	Offered Cost	Percent of Total	Points Possible	Points Earned
			$0.00	$0.00	30%	100.7	ERROR:#DIV/0!
	* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).

Total Evaluation Points	Percent of Total	Points Possible	Points Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points	70%	235.0	0.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points	30%	100.7	ERROR:#DIV/0!
Total Evaluation Points	100%	335.7	ERROR:#DIV/0!

Scoresheet Summary

Security Guard Services

SOLICITATION # SLCI27002

RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET SUMMARY

Instructions:

Enter the solicitation number and name.

Enter each Offeror name.

Enter the Criteria name for each category.

Enter the Weight in column B that corresponds to the Criteria Weight on the Score Sheet tab column J for each criterion.

Enter the Total Possible Points for each Criterion, Cost Points, and Score Summary section.

Mandatory Minimum Requirements: Evaluate each offer and enter pass or fail

Ensure that the number of evaluator lines matches the number of evaluators.

Offers not meeting the Minimum Mandatory Requirements will not be evaluated further.

Ensure that the Total Average Score formula includes all of the evaluator line items.

Technical Scores: Enter each evaluator score for each offer.

Signatures:	Date:
Evaluator 1	__________________
Evaluator 2	__________________
Evaluator 3	__________________
Evaluator 4	__________________
Evaluator 5	__________________

Minimum Mandatory Requirements

Offeror A

Offeror B

Offeror C

Offeror D

Offeror E

Offeror F

Offeror G

Offeror H

Offeror I

Offeror J

Offeror K

Offeror L

Offeror M

Offeror N

Offeror O

Offeror P

Offeror Q

Offeror R

Offeror S

Offeror T

Weight	Technical Scores	Offeror A	Offeror B	Offeror C	Offeror D	Offeror E	Offeror F	Offeror G	Offeror H	Offeror I	Offeror J	Offeror K	Offeror L	Offeror M	Offeror N	Offeror O	Offeror P	Offeror Q	Offeror R	Offeror S	Offeror T
	Criteria #1
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #2
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #3
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #4
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = XX) Minimum Threshold = XX	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
Total Cost Points	Cost Scores	Offeror A	Offeror B	Offeror C	Offeror D	Offeror E	Offeror F	Offeror G	Offeror H	Offeror I	Offeror J	Offeror K	Offeror L	Offeror M	Offeror N	Offeror O	Offeror P	Offeror Q	Offeror R	Offeror S	Offeror T
	Cost
0.0	Cost Points	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Score Summary	Offeror A	Offeror B	Offeror C	Offeror D	Offeror E	Offeror F	Offeror G	Offeror H	Offeror I	Offeror J	Offeror K	Offeror L	Offeror M	Offeror N	Offeror O	Offeror P	Offeror Q	Offeror R	Offeror S	Offeror T
	Total Technical Points (Total Possible = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Total Cost Points (Total Possible = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Grand Total Points (Total Possible = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

image1.png image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Sep 29, 2026.