4-SLCI26119 Attachment 4 - Score Sheet.pdf
PDF 182 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SLCI26119 Historic Exhibit Advisory, Design, Production, Fabrication and Installation Services
- Solicitation number
- SLCI26119
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation score sheet for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the City of Salt Lake City, Utah (Solicitation #SLCI26119) for Historic Exhibit Advisory, Design, Production, Fabrication and Installation Services. The project involves the creation of a museum-quality historic exhibit on the third floor of the historic Salt Lake City & County Building that presents an inclusive narrative of Salt Lake City and the building's history with equitable representation of the City's diverse residents and their experiences. The evaluation framework establishes weighted scoring categories across technical criteria (70 percent weight for a maximum of 337.2 points) and cost proposals (30 percent weight for a maximum of 144.5 points), with a minimum mandatory requirement threshold of 70 percent or 236.0 technical points to proceed to cost evaluation.
The score sheet establishes six primary evaluation categories with specific point allocations: RFP Section 1 (100 points, 30.8 percent weight), RFP Section 2 (50 points, 15.4 percent weight), RFP Section 3 (25 points, 7.7 percent weight), and RFP Section 4 (150 points, 46.2 percent weight), plus three attachment-based criteria (Attachment 1 IV.C.1, IV.C.2, and IV.C.4, each worth 4.06 points at 1.25 percent weight). Scoring utilizes a 0-5 scale where 0 represents failure to address requirements and 5 represents exceeding all requirements. Cost points are awarded using a competitive formula where the lowest proposed price receives 100 percent of available cost points, with all other offerors receiving proportional points based on the ratio of the lowest price to their proposed price. The total possible evaluation points across technical and cost categories is 481.7 points, with mandatory compliance assessments including the City's Ethics Requirements and Generative AI Policy.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-SLCI26119 Attachment 1 - Sample Agreement.pdf | ||
| 3-SLCI26119 Attachment 3 - Cost Proposal Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 6-SLCI26119 RFP.pdf | ||
| 5-SLCI26119 Attachment 5 - Confidential Form.pdf | ||
| 2-SLCI26119 Attachment 2 - Scope of Work.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or ca 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in so 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria describ
RFP Section Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-5) Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
Minimum Required
1 20 30.8% 100.0 0.0 2 10 15.4% 50.0 0.0 3 5 7.7% 25.0 0.0 4 30 46.2% 150.0 0.0
100.0% 325.0 0.0 0.0
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-5) Available
Points Possible Points Points Earned
1 Attachment 1 IV.C.1 0 1.25% 4.06 0.00 2 Attachment 1 IV.C.2 0 1.25% 4.06 0.00 4 Attachment 1 IV.C.4 0 1.25% 4.06 0.00
5.00% 12.19 0.00
Possible Points Points Earned
100.00% 337.19 0.00
RFP Section Min Percent Min Points Required
Points Earned
Percent Earned Evaluation
70% 236.0 0.0 0.0%
RFP Section Low Cost Option
Offered Cost
Percent of Total Points Possible Points Earned
$0.00 $0.00 30% 144.5 #DIV/0!
Percent of Total Points
Possible Points Earned
70% 337.2 0.0
30% 144.5 #DIV/0!
100% 481.7 #DIV/0!Total Evaluation Points Total Cost Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Cost
Qualifications
Risk
Local Small Business Policy Criteria Total
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Documented Experience of Services
Statement of Approach & Timeline
Total Technical Points
Sustainability Disadvantaged business enterprise
Scorable Technical Criteria Total
Policy Criteria
Historic Exhibit Advisory, Design, Production, Fabrication and Installation Services
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
SOLICITATION #SLCI26119
City's Ethics Requirements Gen AI Policy
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Required Technical Point Threshold
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .