36C25718R0346-00002001.pdf
PDF Posted
- Attached to
- Design-Build Visitor Parking Garage (674-280)
- Solicitation number
- 36C25718R0346
About this file
This document contains clarifications to questions regarding a solicitation for a design-build parking garage project. The solicitation seeks proposals for the design and construction of a parking garage at the Temple VA Medical Center in Temple, Texas, with a projected proposal due date of June 29, 2018. The project scope involves providing all labor, materials, tools and equipment to demolish an existing parking lot and design and construct a new parking garage structure. The contract type will be a negotiated firm-fixed-price two-phase design-build contract with a period of performance of 365 calendar days from notice to proceed. Clarifications provided include allowing the use of teaming partners' past experience for evaluation under Factor 1, and extending the page limit for quality assurance and safety plans from 20 to 50 pages. This is a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses, with an estimated construction cost between $5-10 million.
36C25718R0346 00002 Clarifications to RFIs for 36C257-18-R-0346 Design-Build Parking Garage Phase I.pdf
View the file
Other files
Show all 49
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Clarifications to RFIs for 36C257-18-R-0346 Design-Build Parking Garage Phase I
Q1. The PPQ form that is included in the solicitation documents seems to have a page missing. Typically, there is a page included with PPQ’s for the Contractor to complete describing the project information on the work performed for the subject PPQ. There is no such page in the PPQ document. Please advise if you will post a new PPQ or if we should insert this information at our own discretion?
A1. The PPQ document is complete as provided; no pages are missing.
Q2. Reference page 19 of 68 in the solicitation, Factor 2 – items 1&2 – requiring submission of a Quality Assurance Plan and Proposed Safety Plan. Amendment 1 responses clarified the page count for Factor 2 to be 20 pages. The QA and Safety plans on our team’s other seven awarded VA and/or federal parking garages tend to be early 300 pages total. We will be unable to submit complete plans within the current page limit. Are we to submit a summary narrative only for our QA and Safety Plan in order to remain within the 20-page limit?
A2. The maximum page count for the Quality Assurance Plan and Proposed Safety Plan is changed from 20 pages to 50 pages.
Q3. Answer 10 stated "Yes" that contractor team partners past experience can be used for Factor 1, as long as the team arrangement meets the definition under FAR 9.601 and 9.603. However, under Answer 18, the government states, "As stated under Factor 1 - The technical experience shall be that of the Offeror/Prime Contractor." Please confirm that Answer 10 takes precedence and that teaming partners past experience can be used for Factor 1, as long as the team arrangement meets the definition under FAR 9.601 and 9.603.
A3. Yes, the teaming partners past experience can be used for Factor 1, as long as the team arrangement meets the definition under FAR 9.601 and 9.603.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .