Amendment 36C24825R0042 0001.pdf

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED

BPA NO. 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 11/2016)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office. is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30 PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

(Type or print) (Type or print)

(Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

(If other than Item 6)

(Specify type of modification and authority)

(such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X)

CHECK

ONE

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

1 10

0001 04-11-2025

675-23-801

36C248

Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 8 (NCO 8) Orlando VA Healthcare System 13800 Veterans Way Orlando FL 32827

36C248

Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 8 (NCO 8) Orlando VA Healthcare System 13800 Veterans Way Orlando FL 32827

To all Offerors/Bidders

36C24825R0042

03-24-2025

X

X X

X 1

Project Title: Bid-Build (BB) Improve Lake Baldwin Electrical Project Number: 675-23-801

1. The purpose of this amendment 0001 is to provide RFI responses, refer to page 2.

2. Proposal due date and time is April 23, 2025 at 1:00 PM EST, attention to elizabeth.romero@va.gov.

3. The period of questions and answers has close. See attached site visit sign-in sheet and respective files.

4. All Offerors are required to acknowledge receipt of this amendment.

Elizabeth Romero Contracting Officer

VA-VHA-RPOE-2022-365342

mailto:elizabeth.romero@va.gov

CONTINUATION PAGE

Solicitation Number: 36C24825R0042 Project Title: Bid-Build (BB) Improve Lake Baldwin Electrical Distribution Project Number: 675-23-801

RFI

NBR. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

1. EP-101: From MV-XF-ENG/Service Disconnect to existing Power Pole #2 states a 6-4” PVC Concrete duct bank to be provided. At the 3/31/25 Site Walkdown, the request was for Directional Boring to be provided. Does the Directional Boring require 6-4” HDPE Conduits?

VA

Response

Yes.

2. Solicitation states the Period of Performance is 270 Calendar Days [9 months] from NTP. The concern is the projected long lead time for the required MV-Transformers & MV-LBS’S. The actual procurement process may impact the 270-day Performance. Can the VA verify that a time extension based on long lead times will be granted?

VA

Response

Yes.

3. The possibility of forthcoming Tariffs being issued and enforced. A change in the price of an item of material shall be considered significant when the price of an item increases 5 percent or greater between the date of the subcontract and the date of on-site installation. Due to the large Gear Package Procurement for this project: Tariffs may become a real pricing delta: Who would be responsible for the pending Tariff Pricing Delta?

VA

Response

Buy America Act and follow FAR 52.229-3; "Federal, State, and Local Taxes" - Tariffs General In light of the recent announcement regarding additional tariffs, I would like to draw your attention to FAR 52.229-3.

The tax provisions outlined in FAR 52.229-3 may offer an effective remedy to address the tariff issue, at least initially. FAR 52.229-3, titled "Federal, State, and Local Taxes," allows for a price increase for after-imposed taxes that a contractor is "required to pay or bear as the result of legislative, judicial, or administrative action taking effect after the contract date." Covered taxes include" any new or increased Federal excise tax or duty" as mentioned in FAR 52.229- 3(a), which likely encompasses the new tariffs. However, it is important to note that this clause should apply only to tariffs that the contractor pays directly. If tariffs indirectly drive up domestic supply costs, an adjustment may not be warranted. Additionally, for a tariff to be considered a newly imposed tax, it must be implemented after the bid opening date or, for a negotiated contract or modification, after the effective date of the contract or modification.

4. EP-101: At the Site Walkdown, the existing Wooden Pole #1 for the Service Disconnect was asked to be removed & replaced. Can the VA please confirm the removal and replacement of this pole?

VA

Response

Remove and replace the Wooden Pole.

5. EP-602: At the Site Walkdown, the ATS No. 2; ATS No. 3; and ATS No. 4 replacements will need to conform to the existing ATS Footprint. Can the VA please provide the Product Data/Submittal of these ATSs so this exact footprint can be secured?

VA

Response

Information provided. Refer to Solicitation Attachment #5, Section No. 26 13 13 Medium- Voltage Circuit Breaker Switchgear & 26 13 16 Medium-Voltage Fusible Interrupter Switches.

6. Solicitation – Factor 2 - Specialized Experience and Technical Competence – The typical VA Specialized Experience Forms that are used in VISN 8 are three (3) pages in length per project.

Can the VA allow 3 pages per project (a total of 15 pages for this Factor) so we can use the VA’s standard forms for this?

VA

Response

Yes.

7. Solicitation – Factor 2 – Specialized Experience and Technical Competence – If the Prime Contractor does not have five (5) relevant construction projects, can they submit their Electrical Subcontractor’s completed relevant projects in lieu of providing their own?

VA

Response

Yes.

8. Solicitation – Factor 4 – Specialized Experience and Technical Competence – If the Prime Contractor does not have five (5) relevant past performance projects, can they submit their Electrical Subcontractor’s completed projects in lieu of providing their own?

VA

Response

Yes.

9. Sections 03 47 01 SITE CONCRETE WORK, 32 11 24 Lime rock, 32 11 30 Subgrade Stabilization, 32 12 12 Asphalt Concrete Paving, 32 13 13 Civil Concrete Paving, 32 13 35 Sealants for Civil Concrete paving and Joints and 32 92 23 Sodding to name many do not appear to be standard TIL sections to name a few that were provided. Is there a reason the engineer provided sections not included in the TIL?

VA

Response

Follow TIL.

10. The sections 32 11 24 Lime rock and 31 23 19 Dewatering were included in the spec book. Can the VA provide the geotechnical report that reflects the need for encountering lime rock and potentially needing to dewater?

VA

Response

If the information is needed, the responsibility falls onto the contractor.

11. The specs reference a Geotechnical Engineer, employed by the Contractor, who shall be required to monitor the work. Can the VA confirm this?

VA

Response

The contractor is responsible for their Subcontractors.

12. What is the liquidated damages amount?

VA

Response

Liquidated Damages for Data Breach amount is $37.50 per affected individual.

13. It was mentioned at the pre-bid site visit that the power pole near building 500 was to be replaced. Please clarify.

VA

Response

Building 3129 power pole needs to be installed and Building 3132 power pole needs to be replaced.

14. It was mentioned at the pre-bid site visit that existing equipment at the Lakemont site needs to be relocated. Drawing AE103 Detail 4 shows “EXISTING ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT TO REMAIN”. Please verify that existing equipment will remain in place at this location.

VA

Response

Yes.

15. Will the bid due date be extended?

VA

Response

Unfortunately, the VA is unable to issue an amendment to extend the proposal due date any further than April 23, 2025, at 1:00 PM EST.

16. On EP-602 Keynote #19 states the following for a total of (2) new Medium Voltage Transformers to either be replaced or newly installed. (PROVIDE FUSED PRIMARY

ISOLATION SWITCH AT TRANSFORMER PRIMARY. SWITCH SHALL BE OPERATED

THROUGH THE USE OF A HOTSTICK AND CAPABLE OF DE-ENERGIZING THE

TRANSFORMER. FUSE SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 150% AND NOT MORE THAN

175% OF THE FULL LOAD AMPERAGE RATING OF THE TRANSFORMER.)

During the site walk it was mentioned that it would be preferred for the Transformers to have load break switching ability so that it would be possible to de-energize the secondary C side of the Transformers while maintaining feed-through power from the primary A and B side of the medium voltage feeds, reducing downstream outages. Please confirm if the VA prefers optional features for these transformers to include secondary load break switching, and if so, please provide acceptable specifications or manufacturers. Please see attached example reference cutsheets describing these optional features (attachments #1 and #2).

VA

Response

Yes. The attached document options are acceptable.

17. On EP-602 Keynote #24 states the following for a total (3) Medium Voltage ATSs to be replaced.

(PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW MEDIUM VOLTAGE, 15KV, 3 POLE AUTOMATIC

TRANSFER SWITCH. USE EXISTING CONCRETE PAD. RE-CONNECT EXISTING

INCOMING AND OUTGOING FEEDERS. RECONNECT EXISTING GENERATOR

START SIGNAL WIRE. PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED ACCESSORIES TO INCORPORATE

ATS INTO EXISTING ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.)

During the site walk it was mentioned that the preferred replacement ATS units are to match the model previously used to replace ATS (MV-ATS-NO.1 located at Building 502).

Please confirm if the intent is to provide the same manufacturer and model for these (3) MV ATS units, and whether alternates would be accepted. Please see attached reference documents of the mentioned preferred gear. (attachments #3 and #4)

VA

Response

Preferred one.

18. On EP-602 Keynote #10 states the following. (REPLACE TIEBREAKER AND PROVIDE

KIRK KEY. KIRK KEY SHALL USE THE SAME KEY AS THE MAIN BREAKERS

WITHIN SWITCHBOARDS 3 AND 4. TIE BREAKER TO MATCH EXISTING, 65KAIC.

TEST BREAKER AND KIRK KEY OPERATIONS SUCH THAT BREAKER POSITION

DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH UPSTREAM GENERATOR CONTROL OR

OPERATION.)

During the site walk it was discussed that the Tie Breaker at SWBD-3 is experiencing nuisance tripping. Please confirm whether testing of the system has been completed and whether the tiebreaker has been definitively identified as the source of failure. Unless otherwise directed, we will proceed with the breaker replacement as noted on the drawings but will exclude testing of the system unless it is required to determine fault before replacement.

VA

Response

The fault needs to be determined and rectified by the contractor before replacing the breaker. If the old breaker is replaced, it needs to be sent for recertification and turned over to the VA.

19. On EP-101, it is shown that approximately 300’ of overhead 600V power lines are to be removed and rerouted into a newly installed duct bank across the road.

During the site walk, it was mentioned that the existing power pole should be replaced due to its weathered condition. The drawings only identify one new pole; no replacement of existing poles is noted. Please confirm whether any of the existing poles and anchors are to be replaced and, if so, identify them on the drawings. Please see the attached reference document for the location of the discussed pole (attachment #5).

VA

Response

Power pole one (1) needs to be replaced and power pole three (3) is new or the contractor can offer to run a circuit underground to the building 3129 location.

20. On EP-602 Keynote #1 states the following. (INTERCEPT FEEDERS FROM THE

SOUTHERN-OWNED OUC SWITCH WITHIN MANHOLE 89. RE-ROUTE TO NEW 5-

WAY 15KV SWITCH. NEW 15KV SWITCH TO BE LOCATED NEAR MANHOLE 89

MV-2WS-NO.4 AND MV-MWS-NO.4. SEE SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION.)

On the one-line drawing, it calls out to provide an S&C Vista Switch or Equal. During the site walk, it was mentioned that the purpose of this switch is to gain independent operational control of the OUC South Feed within the VA system. Please clarify if the intent of this switch is to provide both switching ability and overcurrent protection or if alternates without overcurrent protection but equal switching functionality will be accepted. Please see the attached reference showing the Vista Switch example. (attachment #6)

VA

Response

Yes. Overcurrent protection is also needed.

21. On EP-102 and EP-103, the electrical site plans show the demolition of the existing ATS, installation of two (2) junction boxes, and routing of conduits to the new ATS location at the north side under the extended canopy near the chiller yard. However, during the site walk, it was mentioned that the preferred location of the ATS would be to the south side of the chiller yard wall with a new canopy at that location. Please confirm which location is to be used (as drawn or as discussed on-site) and clarify the required conduit routing. See attached reference diagram for location clarification. (attachment #7)

VA

Response

As discussed on-site, the new location, new canopy, and fencing are required. Proper electrical distances need to be maintained. The new location will be by the side of the OUC transformer.

22. The drawing package received for this project includes a file titled: “ATTACHMENT+1+- +100+Analysis+Drawings+Lake+Baldwin+Electrical.” This file was not referenced during the site walk and does not appear cited in the narrative or other bid documents. Please clarify if the intent is for this set to be used for pricing, or if it is only for reference.

VA

Response

Use as reference.

23. On EP-101, it is shown that a total of (3) concrete-encased duct banks are to be installed two

(2) for 600V and one (1) for MV. Specifications require steel rebar within 10’ of manholes and under roadways, but no further detail is provided. Please provide a standard detail or specification on how the concrete-encased duct bank with rebar is to be constructed.

VA

Response

Follow the VA electrical design guide.

24. In reference to RFI #8, the 600V duct bank crossing under the road is shown on drawings as a concrete-encased duct bank. However, during the site walk, it was suggested that a directional drill would be preferred due to surface disruption. Please confirm whether directional boring may be used as an alternative to the concrete encasement. See attached reference showing the duct bank route. (attachment #8)

VA

Response

Directional bore.

25. During the site walk, it was mentioned that scheduling conflicts may arise due to hospital operational hours, especially regarding power outages. Please clarify what the permitted work hours and outage windows are for this project so that outage coordination and construction phasing may be properly planned.

VA

Response

Refer to Solicitation, Section III. Scheduling, Phasing, and Work Hours. Work that interferes with normal clinic functions, which includes all utility outages, shall be performed during WHEN hours (Weekends, Holidays, Evenings, and Nights).

26. Temporary Access Blocking Requirements Around Work Areas (Including ATS Replacements) (1). What specific physical access control measures are required for temporarily blocking access to active work zones during demolition, removal, and replacement of energized or previously energized components?

(2). Are lockable barriers, fencing, or warning signage required at all sites, including exterior ATS units (e.g., Lakemont chiller yard relocation)?

(3). Is there a VA standard specification or safety manual we should reference (e.g., Master Construction Specs, Division 01, or VA Physical Security Design Manual)?

VA

Response

Follow the safety and physical security manual.

27. Can Superintendent, QC, and SSHO Be covered by the same person?

VA

Response No.

28. SSHO and QA/QC Supervision Requirements During Critical Electrical Operations, Per the electrical narrative, critical operations will include the Replacement of MV ATSs (Nos. 2, 3, and 4), Work within switchboards 2 and 3 inside Building 500, Generator refeed installations at Building 504.

(1). Is a dedicated Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) required to be present full-time during all outages or energized work?

(2). Is the QA/QC Manager expected to verify tie-breaker coordination and testing of ATS programming post-installation?

(3). Should we anticipate using a VA-provided outage coordination matrix or procedures that SSHO and QA/QC must review and sign off?

VA

Response

(1). Yes.

(2). Yes.

(3). Yes

29. Secure Access During South OUC Utility Disconnect Installation (Manhole 89 and MV-MWS-

NO.3).

(1). What security or barricade systems are required when working within or adjacent to manholes and underground feeders, especially on roadways?

(2). Are there specific VA protocols or permitting processes for working near public access roads or facility ingress/egress points?

(3). Will we need to provide 24/7 guarded supervision or escort when performing utility outages in these zones?

VA

Follow VA safety requirements. Coordination can be established for safety in these areas.

30. Factor 4 Past Performance – Given the significant workload that VA Contracting Officers and CORs face. Please clarify whether CPARS completed by Government personnel are acceptable instead of having CO or COR complete new PPQs for this RFP response.

VA

Response

The PPQ is optional but highly recommended. PPQs within 12 months of the solicitation issuance date and CPARS completed by Government personnel will be acceptable.

31. Can previously submitted PPQs be submitted in lieu of new PPQs specifically for this project?

VA

Response

Refer to RFI response # 30.

32. Does the contractor have to acquire permission from OUC to access the concrete poles?

VA

Response

If the pole belongs to OUC, yes.

33. Please clarify if a superintendent can be a dual hat to cover the requirements of SSHO.

VA

Response

No.

34. If no to the question above, will the SSHO need to be full-time for this project?

VA

Response

Yes.

35. The area of work on adjacent areas going to be active with patients and VA Staff, Can you confirm the best path for ingress and egress for this area during the duration of the project?

VA

Response

This needs to be coordinated at the time that work is to commence.

36. Will the VA provide VA badging to subcontractors or as long as they have a chaperone with a VA badge will be, okay?

VA

Response

Badging is required; however, the contractor can escort subs as long as the person with the VA Badge remains with them at all times.

37. The project's SOW states that the working hours would be regular hours. Can this work be performed not during regular hours (after hours, at nighttime, or on weekends)?

VA

Response

Refer to RFI response # 25. Work is to be performed during WHEN hours (Weekends, Holidays, Evenings, and Nights).

38. During the walkthrough it was mentioned the new safety guidelines and infectious control guidelines to be followed, this intends to use specialized equipment to take particle readings, which need to be taken every 8 hours, based on the work required for this project, and the assigned magnitude of the same, this new regulations that need to be follow, will directly affect the pricing, how would the VA like to proceed with them?

VA

Response

Follow the new guide.

39. Please confirm that there are no hazardous materials such as mold and/or asbestos in the project areas.

VA

An asbestos survey will be provided.

40. Would the VA be okay to use Procore as a project record system for all project documents (Submittals, RFIs, daily reports, Correspondence, etc.)?

VA

Response

Yes. All VA personnel involved in the project will need access to the website.

41. Please provide a list of materials the VA would like to utilize to match the existing areas if they are available; or would the contractor just match as best as possible?

VA

Response

Preferred hardware cutsheets were provided

42. Where would the negative air/filter machine would be hooked to exhaust during the duration of the project? Please advise.

VA

Response

Follow the VA guide. To be discussed at the time of work to commence.

43. What would be the hours that the contractor can do noise, such as demolition and other tasks since there is a lot of activity around the work area?

VA

Response

WHEN hours. Refer to RFI response # 25.

44. Is there a designated laydown and dumpster area for the contractor?

VA

Response

This will be identified after the award.

45. Can the VA provide existing as-built drawings for the new duct bank to Manhole 89 to verify the proposed switch installation feasibility?

VA

Response

Information was provided. Refer to Solicitation Attachments. Bore shot.

46. Has the VA identified or documented the purpose and connection of the shunt trip wiring on Switchboards 2 & 3 breakers?

VA

Response

Needs to be investigated and the issue found and fixed is the responsibility of the contractor.

47. Are there any planned outages or maintenance events where the shunt trips can be tested before construction starts?

VA

Response

Can be coordinated during WHEN.

48. Can the VA confirm the final location for the relocated ATS at the Lakemont Campus chiller yard, or should the contractor propose the exact position?

VA

Response

Refer to RFI response # 21. This was discussed during the walkthrough.

49. Is the contractor responsible for any structural work related to extending the canopy at the Lakemont Campus?

VA

Yes. But a new canopy is required for the new location outside the fence.

50. Will the VA provide additional documentation for Building 504 to finalize the generator-backed power design?

VA

Response

This was provided already.

51. Can the VA clarify if any coordination is needed with the State of Florida regarding Building 503 since it feeds the Domiciliary ATS?

VA

Response

VA will coordinate the outage.

52. Are there any environmental or historical preservation restrictions applicable, especially for underground work or modifications near existing structures?

VA

Response

No.

53. Is the 270-day duration based on calendar days inclusive of WHEN work, or does it only account for standard working days?

VA

Response

The 270 days are based on calendar days. Refer to RFI response # 25.

54. Will the VA provide specifications or preferences for the new multi-way switch (manufacturer, type, ratings) to be installed at Manhole 89?

VA

Response

Please submit a proposal for hardware that would meet or exceed the requirements.

55. Are there any fire alarm interface requirements with the new ATS systems, even if no changes to the fire alarm are mentioned?

VA

Response

No changes but coordination will be required.

56. Should the existing emergency power sequence or logic be maintained as-is, or is the contractor expected to upgrade or adjust it?

VA

Response

Maintained.

57. We require clarification regarding the availability of as-built drawings for both the existing site conditions and the 2023 project modifications. Additionally, we need confirmation on the duct bank routing and the feasibility of the proposed solution per RFP 2C via Manhole 89.

Request:

(1). As-Built Drawings – Please provide the most current as-built drawings for both the existing infrastructure and the 2023 project work to ensure alignment with field conditions.

(2). Duct Bank Verification – Confirm the routing, depth, and capacity of the existing and proposed duct bank to ensure compliance with project requirements.

(3). Solution Feasibility (RFP 2C via Manhole 89) – Please verify whether the proposed solution outlined in RFP 2C is workable through Manhole 89, or if alternative solutions need to be considered."

VA

Response

Bore is the responsibility of the contractor, appropriate locates will be required and is the responsibility of the contractor. Refer to Solicitation Attachments.

58. The project documents do not clearly define delegated design responsibilities and the associated submission requirements, leading to potential gaps in design coordination and approvals.

See attached document: ATTACHMENT - Site Visit SIGN-IN SHEET.

See attached document: RFI Attachment 1 - Pad Mounted Transformer Optional Features.

See attached document: RFI Attachment 2 - Four Position Sectionalizing Load Break Switches.

See attached document: RFI Attachment 5 - Power Pole mentioned for replacement.

See attached document: RFI Attachment 3 - Existing ATS Preferred for Replacements.

See attached document: RFI Attachment 4 - Preferred GW Medium Voltage ATS Cutsheet PDF.

See attached document: RFI Attachment 6 - SC Vista Switch.

See attached document: RFI Attachment 7 - Conflicting ATS Locations.

Request: Please provide a detailed list of all delegated design tasks, specifying:

(1). The responsible party for each delegated design component.

(2). Required submissions and approval timelines.

(3). Any specific criteria or standards that must be followed.

VA

Response

There is an approved design, coordination between the contractor and AE will be required and submittals will need to be sent to both the AE and the VA

59. To ensure proper coordination and avoid delays, we require contact details for subcontractors responsible for key systems within the project.

Request: Please provide the names, contact information, and company details of any subcontractors already working at the facility as a service provider or as a sole provider of service in that facility, such as:

(1). Fire Alarm (2). Building Controls (3). Energy Management Control System (EMCS) (4). Security Systems (5). Etc.

VA

Response

This information will be provided during the kickoff meeting.

60. The current project documents do not clearly outline any additional security upgrades beyond what is specified. Confirmation is needed on whether extra security features such as cameras, PACS, fencing, and gates are required.

Request: Please confirm if the following security elements need to be included in the project scope:

(1). Additional security cameras (locations, specifications) (2). Physical Access Control System (PACS) upgrades (3). Fencing and gate modifications or additions (4). Other security measures not currently outlined"

VA

Response

A fence will be required in the new ATS location at Lakemont. Follow the VA design guide and physical security design guide.