EXHIBIT Z - Past Performance Questionnaire 08.23.24.pdf
PDF 184 KB Posted
- Attached to
- X1DZ--Berk Community Base Outpatient Clinic
- Solicitation number
- 36C24424R0033
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity to provide leased space for a Community Base Outpatient Clinic (CBOC) in Berk, PA. The Solicitation Number is 36C24424R0033 and the agency is the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Veterans Integrated Service Network 4.
The questionnaire is to be completed by assessors who can provide feedback on the offeror's past performance, specifically relating to quality of service, schedule, and business relations. The assessors are asked to provide ratings ranging from Exceptional/Very Low Risk to Unsatisfactory/High Risk, along with rationale for the ratings. Additional questions address the assessor's willingness to award a future contract to the offeror. The completed questionnaires are to be submitted electronically to the Contracting Office by October 10, 2024.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 77 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Subject: Past Performance Questionnaire for Berk, PA
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The NCO4 Network Contracting Office, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania has issued a solicitation to provide leased space for a Community Base Outpatient Clinic (CBOC) lease in Berk, PA.
Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO4 Network Contracting Office, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Offeror shall only submit with this proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Section A of the questionnaire as provided to the assessors.
Section B in its entirely is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than 10/10/2024. Assessor is requested to send electronically to Doretha.Jordan@va.gov. Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thankyou in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
Solicitation Number Project/Requirement Agency
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s __________________________________________________ Names and Address: __________________________________________________
2. Contractor Point of Contact __________________________________________________
3. Phone Number (with area code): __________________________________________________
4. Assessor Contract Award number: __________________________________________________
5. Description of Services provided under contract:
6. Contract award date: ___________________ Contract Amount: Initial ________ Final ___________
7. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________________
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number & Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information request in this questionnaire to NCO4
Network Contracting Office, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors).
Past Performance Evaluation Ratings E – Exceptional/Very Low Risk Offer’s past performance record provides essentially no doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the require effort.
S – Satisfactory/Low Risk Offer’s past performance record provides little doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the require effort.
M – Marginal/Moderate Risk Offer’s past performance record, although satisfactory, provides some doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
U – Unsatisfactory/High Risk Offer’s past performance record provides substantial doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
N – Neutral/Unknown Risk The offeror has no relevant past performance record. A thorough search was unable to identify any past performance. Will not rate favorably or unfavorably.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements. E S M U N
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service. E S M U N
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
1. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by E S M U N contract requirements.
3. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices. E S M U N Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
BUSUNESS RELATIONS
1. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.) E S M U N
2. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer). E S M U N
3. Rate the contractor’s ability to submit required reports and/ or invoices in a timely manner.
E S M U N
4. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution. E S M U N
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations. E S M U N
How would you feel about another contract to this contractor?
___________Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.
___________Would mostly likely award another contract to this contractor.
___________Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor, but would do so if there was no alternative existed.
___________Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.
___________Would not award another contract to this contractor.
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations) on contract being assessed.
Exceptional Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
Role Period of Involvement Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed/Name) (Organization)
(Phone Number)
| Solicitation Number: |
| ProjectRequirement: |
| Agency: |
| Prospective Government Contractors 1: |
| Prospective Government Contractors 2: |
| Prospective Government Contractors 3: |
| Prospective Government Contractors 4: |
| undefined: |
| Phone Number with area code: |
| Assessor Contract Award number: |
| Contract award date: |
| Contract Amount Initial: |
| Final: |
| Period of Performance: |
| Assessor Name: |
| Title: |
| Phone Number Email Address: |
| Network Contracting Office Pittsburgh Pennsylvania: |
| undefined_2: |
| E ExceptionalVery Low Risk: |
| S SatisfactoryLow Risk: |
| M MarginalModerate Risk: |
| U UnsatisfactoryHigh Risk: |
| N NeutralUnknown Risk: |
| Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor: |
| Would mostly likely award another contract to this contractor: |
| Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if: |
| Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor: |
| Would not award another contract to this contractor: |
| ExceptionalRow1: |
| SatisfactoryRow1: |
| MarginalRow1: |
| UnsatisfactoryRow1: |
| NeutralRow1: |
| Row1: |
| Period of InvolvementContract SpecialistContracting Officer: |
| Row2: |
| Period of InvolvementTechnical Project LeadProject Officer: |
| Row3: |
| Period of InvolvementOTHERS: |
| undefined_3: |
| Typed or PrintedName: |
| undefined_4: |
| Date: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .