36C10F21R0018 0002.docx
DOCX document 104 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36c10f21r0018
About this file
This document contains an amendment to a federal solicitation for construction services. The Department of Veterans Affairs is seeking proposals to expand the Miramar National Cemetery in San Diego, California. The amendment provides responses to offeror questions, additional drawings and documents, and revises the past performance questionnaire. Proposals are due by June 21, 2021. Anticipated award is in early September 2021 with a notice to proceed approximately 12 days later. The amendment advises offerors that excavated on-site soils may be suitable for use as fill. A 2009 geotechnical report is referenced but offerors are instructed to verify site conditions. Memorial walkway extension and landscaping/irrigation work are within scope. Minor construction underway is projected to finish in late October 2021 prior to notice to proceed.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
36C10F21R0018
5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)
CODE
7. ADMINISTERED BY
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER
CODE
6. ISSUED BY
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED
PAGE OF PAGES
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER
10B. DATED
BPA NO.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE
FACILITY CODE
CODE
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers
E. IMPORTANT:
is extended,
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
(REV. 11/2016)
is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office.
is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
15C. DATE SIGNED
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER
Contractor
16C. DATE SIGNED
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
STANDARD FORM 30
PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE
Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 (Type or print) (Type or print) (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (If other than Item 6) (Specify type of modification and authority) (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)
(If required)
(SEE ITEM 11)
(SEE ITEM 13)
(X)
CHECK
ONE
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
06-04-2021
892-037 003C4 Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Construction and Facilities Management (00CFM3B) 425 I Street NW Washington DC 20001
101F Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Construction and Facilities Management 425 I Street NW Washington DC 20001 To all Offerors/Bidders
05-18-2021
X
June 21, 2021 by 4:00 PM PST
Miramar National Cemetery Phase 2 Expansion
Amendment 002 contains responses to RFI’s and additional documents and information.
The proposal due date and time remain June 21, 2021 at 4:00 PM Pacific time.
See continuation pages
Elizabeth Monohan Contracting Officer
Amendment 0002 contains the following:
1. Miramar Pre-Proposal Conference slides (Attachment A-1)
2. Sign in sheet for Miramar Site Visit held 5-27-2021 (Attachment A-2)
3. Responses to RFI’s
4. Revised PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE. (Attachment A-3)
5. Leighton Geotech Report 04-20-09 (Attachment A-4)
6. V2-892PC2037MNC_BD_DRAWINGS_02-22-2021_Part 1 (Irrigation and landscaping) (Attachment A-5)
RFI SUBMISSSION LOG
SOLICITATION NUMBER 36C10F21R0018
RESPONSES TO PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES
MIRAMAR NATIONAL CEMETERY PHASE 2 EXPANSION
| Question No. |
| Reference (Sect/Para/Page) |
| QUESTION |
| GOVERNMENT RESPONSE |
| 1. |
| Drawings: betasam |
| Eight (8) total drawings were listed on BetaSam dated May 14, 2021, of the 8 drawings posted the following are duplicates: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 – the naming changes between the above mentioned (Volume I and Volume II) -which are accurate? |
| Drwgs: |
Vol. 1, part 1 thru Vol. 1, part 5 Vol. 2, part 1 thru Vol. 2, part 3
Gov. incorrectly attached Vol. 1, part 1_1.
Delete Vol., part 1_1.
| 2. |
| Past Performance Questionnaire – betasam |
| Past Performance posted May 14, 2021 requests submission of PPQ NOT LATER THAN MAY 28,2021, proposal is not due until June 21 is this an oversight? |
| See revised Attachment 3 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE. provided in this Amendment |
| 3. |
| Specifications |
| There is no soil report provided, please provide soil report. |
| Leighton Geotech Report 04-20-09 is provided with this Amendment. |
| 4. |
| Drawing: G-101 |
| Drawing Index is incomplete, Index on both Part 1 end drawings at drawing sheet 125, and there are a total of 243 sheets (where are remaining drawings) |
| Drwgs 1-243 are found in Volumes 1 and 2 |
| 5. |
| Drawings |
| Drawing are either marked “not for construction” or not marked at all – are these drawings ready for construction immediately upon award? |
| The dwgs marked “not for construction” applies to work needing approvals: City of San Diego must approve the plans for any improvements within the Right of Way prior to construction. City approvals are contingent upon coordination of the required easement with the landowner, currently under way. |
| 6. |
| Drawings |
| Drawings are not provided for pages 126-158, in any of the 8 provided drawings links on beta sam. Please provide missing sheets for proposal estimating. |
| See Volume 2, Part 1 drwgs. |
Two pages in Vol 2, part 1 are labeled page 127. Page 127/G102 and Page 127/I-111. Consider Page 127/G102 to be page 126/G102.
| 7. |
| Solicitation pg. 26 / Key Personnel: Scheduler |
| Total page limit for Key Personnel: 18, 3 per resume. Independent CPM Consultant calls out “provide a list of three (3) prior construction projects, for each project, provide selected PDM network diagram samples (as most schedules exceed 9+ pages) and this is being requested for 3 projects – how many pages are being requested as a sample? and how will page limitation be increased? |
| For the Independent Conventional Critical Path Method (CPM) Consultant. Provide a list of three (3) prior construction projects (of a similar size and scope as this cemetery project) on which the proposed consultant has performed complete project scheduling services. For each project, provide selected PDM network diagram samples. The PDM network diagram samples are excluded from the page count. |
| 8. |
| Soils Report |
| Is a full geotechnical report available? The Boring Logs included in the plan set are not sufficient? |
| Geotechnical Investigation by Leighton Consulting, Inc. in April of 2009 is an attachment to this Amendment |
| 9. |
| Cortege Ln |
| Is the cortege lane part of this project or the current minor being conducted? |
| The cortege lane is not a part of this project. |
| 10. |
| Gas Line |
| What is the easement (off set) for the gas line currently installed? |
| It is not clear what Gas line the questioner is referring to. There is a gas line located in 150’ SDG&E easement along the southwest property line. |
| 11. |
| Pre-Con Slides vs. Solicitation |
| Please confirm a hard copy of the proposal is NOT being requested as Pre-Con slides reference hard copy |
| Correct, all proposals are to be submitted via email only to Elizabeth.Monohan@va.gov and Evenel.Jean-Jacques@va.gov |
| 12. |
| Pre-Con Slides: Memorial Walkway |
| Pre-Con slides reference Memorial Walkway is this part of project or oversight? |
| Memorial Walk extension is a part of this project, See Sheets GC409, and LC102. |
| 13. |
| Minor Construction |
| When is the anticipated completion date for the minor construction currently being performed? Will it be completed prior to an official NTP? |
| The minor project is anticipated to be completed late October 2021. |
| 14. |
| Fill |
| Please confirm ALL excavated soils on site can be used as embankment/fill for all areas of the project? Will we be required to have a fill time geotechnical engineer on site during earthwork operations to make that determination or will the geotechnical report (when issued) provide the proper recommendations for soil suitability and placement? |
| Refer to Leighton Consulting Geotechnical Report Dated 20 April 2009 and to Specification Section 01 45 29 -Testing Laboratory Services, 3.1 -Earthwork. |
| 15. |
| Drawings |
| It appears that pertinent plan sheets related to irrigation and landscaping were not included in the initial advertisement. |
| Volume 2 -Part 1 is uploaded to the SAM.beta site with this Amendment. See VA-892PC2037MNC_BD_DRAWINGS_02_22_2021_PART 1 |
| 16. |
| Schedule |
| When is anticipated award and scheduled NTP? |
| Anticipate award is early September 2021 with NTP approximately 12 days later |
| 17. |
| Earthwork |
| Is it the Government’s intent for the project earthwork volumes to balance? If not, please confirm any excess fill/spoils can be stockpiled and left onsite. |
| The intent is to balance the earthwork. Excess, if any is to be stockpiled on site. |
| 18. |
| Topsoil |
| Is it assumed the onsite topsoil/stripping will be suitable to be reused, or will topsoil amendment will be required? |
| Refer to Specification Section 32 90 00.2.6 Planting Topsoil. |
| 19. |
| Bore Logs |
| The current boring logs are from 2009, are more recent borings available? Have the soils or topography of the site changed since 2009? |
| Leighton Geotech Report from 2009 is latest report. Subsurface conditions have not changed. Contractor is to verify site conditions. |
Attached File List Miramar Pre-Proposal Conference slides (Attachment A-1) Sign in sheet for Miramar Site Visit held 5-27-2021 (Attachment A-2) Revised PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE. (Attachment A-3) Leighton Geotech Report 04-20-09 (Attachment A-4) V2-892PC2037MNC_BD_DRAWINGS_02-22-2021_Part 1 (Irrigation and landscaping) (Attachment A-5)
END OF AMENDMENT 002
Page 1 of
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .