3-Attachment B RFP - Score Sheet - Automated Teller Currency Exchange 2026.pdf
PDF 162 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Salt Lake City Department of Airports Automated Teller and Currency Exchange Machine Services
- Solicitation number
- SLCAIR26016
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet prepared by the Salt Lake City Department of Airports for the procurement of automated teller machine (ATM) and currency exchange machine services at Salt Lake City International Airport under solicitation number SLCAIR26016. The RFP seeks qualified firms to provide and operate ATM and currency exchange services at the airport facility. Specific response dates, due dates, site visit requirements, bidders' conferences, and award timelines are not detailed in this scoresheet document. The contract term and any renewal options are not specified in this evaluation form.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes a 500-point scoring methodology comprised of 325 technical points (65% of total) and 175 cost points (40% of total). Technical evaluation criteria include proposal approach, past performance and experience of personnel, schedule, qualification to provide service in Utah, and good standing with the City, weighted at 25, 25, 10, and unspecified percentages respectively. A minimum mandatory requirement of two years of experience providing ATM and currency exchange services is established. Cost points are awarded based on a competitive formula wherein the lowest-priced proposal receives 100% of cost points, with other proposals receiving proportional points calculated as: Cost Points × (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). The scoresheet indicates zero points have been earned to date, suggesting this is a blank template prepared prior to proposal submissions and evaluations.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
RFP Section Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 3.B.1 2 3.B.2 3 3.B.3
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-5) Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible
Points Earned
1 9.A.1 25 38.5% 125.0 0.0 2 9.A.2 25 38.5% 125.0 0.0 3 9.A.4 10 15.4% 50.0 0.0
92.3% 325.0 0.0
Possible Points Points Earned
100.00% 325.00 0.00
RFP Section Low Cost Option
Offered Cost
Percent of Total
Points Possible Points Earned
9.A.3 $0.00 $0.00 40% 175.0 0.0
Percent of Total Points
Possible Points Earned
65% 325.0 0.0 40% 175.0 0.0
100% 500.0 0.0
Total Evaluation Points
Total Technical Evaluation Points Total Cost Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
Total Technical Points
Cost
Compensation to City
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Scorable Technical Criteria Total
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Proposal Approach Past performance and experience of personnel Schedule
Qualified to provide service in Utah Good standing with the City
Evaluator:
Date:
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Two (2) Years of experience providing service
AUTOMATED TELLER CURRENCY EXCHANGE RFP
SOLICITATION # SLCAIR26016
RFP/RFQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Submittal 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .