3-Attachment 3 Score Sheet.pdf

Score will be assigned as follows:

0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in th 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the R 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria descr

RFP Section Evaluation (Pass/Fail)

1 RFSQ document VII.a.i

2 RFSQ document VII.a.ii

3 RFSQ document VII.a.iii

4 Attachment 1 Section 5 5 RFSQ document VII.a.v

6 Attachment 1, Exhibit B

RFP Section Evaluator

Score (0-5) Criteria Weight

% of Tech Criteria

Points Possible

Points Earned

Minimum Required

RFSQ document VII.b.i 20 100.0% 100.0 0.0 100.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0

RFP Section Evaluator

Score (0-5) Available

Points Possible Points Points Earned

1 RFSQ document VII.c.i 0 1.25% 1.25 0.00 2 RFSQ document VII.c.ii 0 1.25% 1.25 0.00 3 RFSQ document VII.c.iii 0 1.25% 1.25 0.00 4 RFSQ document VII.c.iv 0 1.25% 1.25 0.00

5.00% 5.00 0.00

Possible Points Points Earned

100.00% 105.00 0.00

RFP Section Min Percent Min Points Required

Points Earned

Percent Earned Evaluation

RFSQ Objective 60% 63.0 0.0 0.0%

Percent of Total Points

Possible Points Earned

#REF! 105.0 0.0

#REF! 105.0 0.0Total Evaluation Points

Total Technical Evaluation Points

Total Evaluation Points

Contractor must have a current handyman’s license in the State of Utah. Please provide a copy of your handyman's license.

Local Small Business Apprenticeships

Policy Criteria Total

Scorable Technical Criteria Total

Required Technical Point Threshold

Please provide a resume including five (5) previous projects with references.

Please provide detail of your experience in providing the services requested herein for similar customers of similar size, with dates of performance and/or completion, customer name, contact person, and telephone number(s). By providing such references you agree that neither the City nor the clients referenced shall have any liability regarding the provision of such references or the City’s use of such references in making selections under this RFSQ.

Policy Criteria

Scoreable Technical Criteria

Total Technical Points

Sustainability Disadvantaged business enterprise

City Ethics Requirement

Contractor certifies that Contractor has reviewed and accepts the dollar limit per project as listed in Attachment “1” Sample Agreement.

Contractor certifies that Contractor has the ability to deliver all materials, complete the services requested, and provide support for any questions from the Client or the City that may arise.

Contractor certifies that Contractor is registered with Sam.gov.

Contractor certifies that Contractor can meet the insurance requirements listed in the attached Sample Agreement.

MINOR REPAIRS PROGRAM RFSQ

RFSQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET

Firm Name:

Evaluator:

Date:

Minimum Mandatory Requirements

SOLICITATION # SLCI26013

Score Sheet