25253003- RFP.pdf
PDF 865 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFP # 25253003
- Issued by
- Juneau City and Borough, Alaska
About this file
This document is a Scope of Services for the JNU Egan Yandukin Intersection Improvements project, issued by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT&PF). The project aims to address traffic safety, connectivity, and reliability issues at the intersection of Egan Drive and Yandukin Drive in Juneau, Alaska. The scope of services includes the design of a partial signalization of the intersection, pedestrian crossing accommodations, traffic island channelization, drainage design, and coordination with environmental staff and utility providers. The project is funded with $7.5 million in construction funding planned for obligation in Federal Fiscal Year 2026. The Scope of Services outlines a phased approach to the project, with an initial notice to proceed (NTP) through the pre-environmental review stage, and additional NTPs to be issued as the project scope is refined. The Scope also details review meetings, comment resolution processes, and quality control documentation requirements.
The Scope of Services indicates that the Contractor will be required to submit monthly invoices and progress reports, and that all work products must be prepared by or under the supervision of a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in Alaska. The document also provides administrative requirements, including drafting standards, units of measurement, and guidelines for correspondence, document formatting and submittal.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
rfp-a (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 Part B - RFP Page 1 of 2
Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities PART
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PACKAGE
(Procurement per Article 3 of AS 36.30) A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Form 25A270, Part A - Request for Proposals (RFP) Proposed Statement of Services " " Part B - Submittal Checklist " " Part C - Evaluation Criteria " " Part D - Proposal Form
Certification of Eligibility (Ethics Act) Form 25A257, Pre-Audit Statement Form 25A269, Indemnification & Insurance
Other: Additional information may be available for review on the DOT&PF Website:
http://www.dot.state.ak.us/rfpmgr/lg.cfm
ISSUING OFFICE
Agency Contact & Phone No............. : Jenny Huntley, Chief of Contracts, (907) 465-4420 Contracting Division .......................... : State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Southcoast Region, Design and Engineering Services
PROJECT
RFP NUMBER ........................................ : 25253003
Project Numbers-State/Federal ............... : SFHWY00601 N/A Project Site (City, Village, etc.) ................ : Juneau Project Title & Contract Description ........ : JNU Egan Yandukin Intersection Improvements- Design Services
The department intends to seek design services for the installation of a partial signal at the Egan/Yandukin intersection located in Juneau, Alaska. The Contractor will provide Design services including a complete design of the partialized signal and pedestrian accommodations. The Contractor shall provide assistance with design information necessary to complete the project’s environmental document and permitting processes and will also provide support services necessary for conducting public and stakeholder involvement.
SCHEDULE & PAYMENT
Anticipated period for performance-Begin/End: October 01, 2024 to December 31, 2026
Estimated amount of proposed contract:
Less than $200,000 $200,000 to $250,000 $250,000 to $500,000 $500,000 to $1,000,000 $1,000,000 or greater
Proposed Method(s) of Payment: Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) Fixed Price Plus Expenses (FPPE) Other:
SUBMITTAL DEADLINE AND LOCATION
OFFERORS ARE RESPONSIBLE TO ASSURE DELIVERY PRIOR TO DEADLINE (2 AAC 12.250).
ONLY PROPOSALS RECEIVED PRIOR TO THE FOLLOWING DATE AND TIME WILL BE OPENED.
PREVAILING TIME: 4:00 PM DATE: August 28, 2024
HAND DELIVER PROPOSALS TO:
ATTN: Jenny Huntley Chief of Contracts Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 6860 Glacier Highway Juneau, AK 99801-7999
Email to srdotpfcontracts@alaska.gov *Received files will not be opened until after the submittal deadline passes.
*If you have questions regarding submitting proposals, email or call Jenny Huntley at (907) 465-4420.
*When submitting proposals, please identify the project title and RFP number in the subject line of your email, or the outer envelope of the submittal package IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you downloaded this solicitation from the State’s Website, you must self-register for the Plan Holders list to receive subsequent addenda. Failure to register may adversely affect your proposal. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that he has received all addenda affecting this RFP.
http://www.dot.state.ak.us/rfpmgr/lg.cfm mailto:srdotpfcontracts@alaska.gov rfp-a (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 Part A - RFP Page 2 of 4
PART
SELECTION PROCEDURE A
1. Competitive Sealed Proposals will be evaluated by a committee (2 AAC 12, Article 4). Evaluation of responses to criteria set forth in Part C results in a numerical score for each proposal. Each criterion in Part C has an assigned weight for this RFP which demonstrates its relative importance. The total of all weights is 100 (100%). Each one- percent weight equates to a range of 0-5 points per Evaluator. The maximum points (score) obtainable for any proposal is equal to the product of 500 multiplied by the number of Evaluators.
2. Scoring of proposals will be accomplished as follows:
2.1 Each Evaluator will individually read and rate each Offeror's response to each criterion described in Part C - Section I - Technical Proposal. Ratings will be based solely on contents of proposal and in compliance with the Contracting Agency's standard Instructions for Evaluation Committee. Except as may be stated within any criterion description in Part C, a rating of "5" = Best Response from all Offerors; “4” to “1” = Progressively Less Responsive;
“0” = Non-Responsive. Ratings are multiplied by the assigned weights for each criterion to obtain criteria scores.
2.2 After completion of individual ratings in Part C, Section 1, Technical Proposal, the Evaluation Committee will meet to discuss proposals. Evaluators may then alter their ratings; however, any changes shall be based solely on the criteria set forth in Part C.
2.3 After scoring Part C - Section I - Technical Proposal, criteria scores for Part C - Section II - Preferences, and Section III - Price (if applicable), will be calculated based on criteria descriptions.
2.4 The total score for each Offeror will be obtained by summing the scores determined for each criterion in Sections I, II and III of Part C. The order of ranking for negotiations shall be as follows: highest scored Offeror will be ranked first, next highest scored second, and etcetera.
3. Evaluators may discuss factual knowledge of, and may investigate Offerors' and proposed Subcontractors' prior work experience and performance, including projects referenced in proposal, available written evaluations, etcetera, and may contact listed references or other persons knowledgeable of a Contractor's and/or a Subcontractor's past performance.
Factors such as overall experience relative to the proposed contract, quality of work, control of cost, and ability to meet schedules may be addressed. If any issues of significant concern to the proposed contract are discovered, the Committee may:
3.1 Provide written recommendations for consideration during contract negotiations;
3.2 Conduct discussions in accordance with paragraph 4, below.
4. The Committee may decide to conduct discussions (or "interviews") with responsible Offerors whose proposals are determined to be reasonably susceptible of being selected for award for the purpose of clarification to assure full understanding of, and responsiveness to, the solicitation requirements (AS 36.30.240 & 2 AAC 12.290). Offerors selected by the Committee for discussions may be permitted to submit Best and Final Offers (BAFO) for final Committee Evaluation.
After discussions and any BAFOs, Evaluators will determine the final scoring and ranking for contract negotiations by evaluating written and oral responses using only the criteria set forth in Part C of this RFP (2 AAC 12.260(b)).
5. All Offerors will be advised of the Offeror selected for negotiation and, after completion of negotiations, a Notice of Intent to Award will be provided to all Offerors. If contract negotiations are unsuccessful with Offeror(s) selected for negotiation, the Contracting Agency may either cancel the solicitation or negotiate with other Offerors in the order of ranking.
rfp-a (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 Part A - RFP Page 3 of 4
NOTICES
1. The Contracting Agency is an equal opportunity employer. A
2. Copies of contract documents are available for review at the Contracting Agency's office. Offerors located outside the general vicinity of the Contracting Agency's office may telephone the Agency Contact identified on page one of this Part A for a discussion of such items.
General Conditions of the Professional Services Agreement are contained in the Small Procurement Standard Provisions Booklet, which is located on the Department’s website under “Procurement.”
The General Conditions are the same for both Competitive Sealed Proposals and Small Procurements.
3. Offerors are specifically advised that a contract shall not be in effect until a written agreement is executed by an authorized agent of the Contracting Agency. The Contracting Agency shall not be liable for any cost incurred by an Offeror in response to this solicitation, including any work done, even in good faith, prior to execution of a contract and issuance of a Notice to Proceed.
4. The Contracting Agency expressly reserves the right to waive minor informalities, negotiate changes or reject any and all proposals and to not award the proposed contract, if in its best interest. "Minor Informalities" means matters of form rather than substance which are evident from the submittal, or are insignificant matters that have a negligible effect on price, quantity, quality, delivery, or contractual conditions and can be waived or corrected without prejudice to other Offerors (2
AAC 12.990).
5. All proposals shall be open for public inspection (AS 36.30.230) after a Notice of Intent to Award is issued. Offerors should not include proprietary information in proposals if such information should not be disclosed to the public. Any language within a submittal purporting to render all or portions of a proposal confidential will be disregarded. Proprietary information which may be provided after selection for contract negotiations will be confidential if expressly agreed to by the Contracting Agency (AS 36.30.230).
6. Substitution for any personnel named in a proposal may result in termination of negotiations.
7. If it is discovered that a selected Offeror is in arrears on taxes due the State of Alaska, a contract may not be awarded until the Alaska Department of Revenue approves the payment provisions for the contract.
8. Offerors and proposed subcontractors shall be in compliance with the statutory requirements for Alaska business licensing and professional registrations included in the certification statement on Page 2 of Part D in this RFP package.
9. PRICE COMPETITION: Price cannot be an Evaluation Criterion in accordance with Article 3 of AS 36.30 for services that must be performed only by Architects, Engineers, Land Surveyors, or Landscape Architects (A/E, LS or LA)) licensed in the State of Alaska, UNLESS the provisions of AS 36.30.270(d) apply; i.e., unless the services required are repetitious in nature, and the nature and amount of services required are thoroughly defined by measurable and objective standards to reasonably enable firms or persons making proposals to compete with a clear understanding and interpretation of the services required. If price is a factor, a majority of the evaluation committee must be registered in Alaska to perform architectural, engineering, or land surveying services.
9.1 If the services performed do not require an A/E, LS or LA, then all Offerors including any A/E, LS or LA must provide Price Proposals in accordance with AS 36.30.270(b) and 2 AAC 12.260(c).
9.2 Price (or any estimate of labor hours) cannot be an Evaluation Criterion for contracts that will receive Federal-aid highway program funding per 23 CFR 172.7 and FAA Airport Improvement Program funding per AC 150/5100-14E, 2.1. For FAA exceptions: see AC 150/5100/14E, 2.4.
10. An audit of the selected Offerors' and proposed Subcontractors' cost accounting systems and business records may be required to ascertain if systems are adequate for segregating contract costs; to establish a maximum allowable Indirect Cost Rate for the Agency's negotiator; and to investigate the accuracy of proposed labor rates and unit prices. In order not to unduly delay contract negotiation or award, be prepared to submit Pre-Audit Statement, DOT&PF Form 25A257 immediately for your firm and any subcontract that may exceed $250,000.
rfp-a (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 Part A - RFP Page 4 of 4
For contract amounts less than $250,000, the Contracting Agency may require the Offeror and proposed Subcontractor to submit the Pre-Audit Statement if deemed necessary to determine allowable costs under Title 23 CFR requirements. If selected for negotiation, failure to submit properly completed Pre-Audit Statement(s) in a timely manner may disqualify an Offeror from further consideration. Information from Pre- Audit Statements and any Audit conducted for the Contracting Agency is considered proprietary and will be confidential.
A
11. Standard insurance provisions for Worker's Compensation, General and Automobile Liability, and Professional Liability are contained in DOT&PF Form 25A269, Indemnification and Insurance. Coverages may be modified under very limited circumstances. Offeror should not assume any modification of coverages.
12. Professional Liability Insurance for the proposed contract: is not required is required as shown on DOT&PF Form 25A269.
13. The proposed contract will will not be a Federally Assisted Program of the U.S. Department of Transportation. If it will be an assisted program, then the Offeror shall insert the following notification in all subcontract solicitations for bids or proposals pertinent to this RFP:
“In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 USC 2000d to 2000d-4 and Title 49, CFR, U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT), Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the U.S. DOT issued pursuant to such Act, in any Subcontract entered into pursuant to this RFP, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise firms will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids or proposals and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin, in consideration for an award.
14. Pre-proposal Conference: None As follows:
rfp-a (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 Part A - RFP Page 5 of 4
15. Special Notices:
15.1 Per Alaska Statute (AS) 36.30.210(e): An Alaska Business License is required of Contractors who do business in Alaska at time of award. To qualify for the Alaska Offerors’ Preference, under AS 36.30.321, an Offeror shall have a valid Alaska business license as a prerequisite to proposal. Information regarding applying for an Alaska Business License can be found on-line at https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/cbpl/BusinessLicensing.aspx or by calling 1-907- 465-2550. The business license must be in the name of the company under which the proposal is submitted.
15.2 Effective May 8, 2015, the Department, in coordination with the U.S. Department of Transportation, adopted a Race-Neutral Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program for its federal-aid program. The Race-Neutral DBE program applies to federally-funded construction-related professional services solicitations, with the exception of FAA-funded projects located within the boundaries of the Department’s Northern Region, which remain under a Race- Conscious DBE program. The Department encourages contractors to utilize DBEs in all Federal-aid projects to ensure the Department meets its overall DBE Utilization Goal. All DBE participation will count towards the Race-Neutral program.
If you have any questions about this notice or the Department’s DBE program, please contact the Civil Rights Office at
(907) 269-0851 or refer to their website http://www.dot.alaska.gov/cvlrts/index.shtml.
15.3 In light of the current health situation, the Department will accept an electronic (email) submission of proposals for this solicitation. Proposals should be submitted to srdotpfcontracts@alaska.gov prior to the date and time shown on page 1. Offerors are responsible to assure timely delivery, and receipt of their proposal. Offerors are cautioned that due to mailbox restrictions, we cannot receive proposals over 20MB in size. The Contracting Agency will either print out proposals in color for distribution, or email a PDF to the Evaluation Committee.
15.4 Compensation under this Agreement may include various methods of cost reimbursement payment as indicated on page 1 of rfp-a, and as negotiated with the Department. The compensation terms of the Agreement (Appendix C-1) will itemize current audited indirect cost rates (IDCRs) for the firms named in the agreement. The Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Internal Review section is typically the responsible section for conducting these audits.
If the top scoring Offeror selected for negotiations does not have a current audit, they will be required to submit the necessary paperwork to DOT&PF’s Internal Review section in a timely fashion. In addition, any proposed subcontractors that may receive more than $250,000 under the proposed contract, or any proposed subcontractors who may receive more than $250,000 cumulatively under contracts with the State, will be required to submit a complete and executed copy of the DOT&PF Form 25A257, Pre-Audit Statement, unless any such Subcontractors have been audited by the Department within the last year.
By submitting a response to this RFP, Offerors acknowledge the audit requirements and commit to furnishing all required audit information to DOT&PF’s audit staff in an expedited manner as required by the Department for their entire team, including any identified subcontractors. Failure of an Offeror to satisfy this requirement for their team may result in unsuccessful contract negotiations. And, in the event contract negotiations are unsuccessful with the top ranked Offeror, the Contracting Agency may negotiate with the next ranked Offeror or cancel the solicitation.
Termination by Default By signature on their proposal/bid, the offeror/bidder certifies that they will not support or participate in a boycott of the State of Israel. Failure to comply with this requirement may cause the state to reject the proposal as non-responsive or cancel the contract.
https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/cbpl/BusinessLicensing.aspx http://www.dot.alaska.gov/cvlrts/index.shtml mailto:srdotpfcontracts@alaska.gov rfp-a (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 Part B - RFP Page 1 of 2
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Offeror may use left margin to check off items when completed. B An Alaska Business License is required of Contractors who do business in Alaska at time of award (AS 36.30.210(e)).
[ ] 1. Offerors must carefully review this RFP Package for defects and questionable material and become familiar with submittal requirements. Submit written comments to the address shown under "Submittal Deadline and Location" on page 1 of Part A - RFP. Substantive issues will be addressed in a written addendum to all RFP recipients on record.
Failure to comply with directions may result in lower score and may eliminate a submittal from consideration. Protests based on alleged improprieties or ambiguities in a solicitation may be disallowed at the discretion of the Contracting Agency if the protest is not received in writing at least ten Agency work days prior to the Submittal Deadline (AS 36.30.565).
[ ] 2. Review Part A - RFP and the proposed Statement of Services and any other attached or referenced materials. If no Statement of Services is attached, telephone the Agency contact person identified on page 1 of Part A.
[ ] 3. Review Part C - Evaluation Criteria. Read each criterion in light of the proposed Statement of Services. Note any project specific criteria which may have been added or any changes to standard criteria descriptions which may have been made. Be aware of the assigned weight for each criterion. If a weight is not entered for any criterion on Part C, notify the Agency contact person. Plan your proposal to address the applicable criteria. Criteria Responses shall not exceed the number of pages stated below. Note: If weight is applied to Criterion #11, Alaska Bidder (Offeror) Preference, that box must be checked on page 1 of Part D, rfp-d.
[ ] 4. Prepare a distinct Response for each criterion that has a weight more than zero. Failure to respond directly to any criteria weighted more than zero will result in an evaluation score of zero for that criteria. Any Responses to criteria weighted zero will be disregarded. Acceptable Responses must be specific and directly related to the Contracting Agency's proposed Statement of Services. Marketing brochures, federal SF330s, marketing resumes, and other non-project specific materials will be discarded without evaluation and should not be submitted.
[ ] 5. Each criterion Response must be titled, numbered and assembled in the order in which the criteria are listed in Part C, so the criterion to which information applies shall be plainly evident. Material not so identified or assembled may be discarded without evaluation.
[ ] 6. Price is is not an evaluation criterion for the proposed contract.
If Price is a Criterion, prepare Billing Rates and/or Price Proposals as described in Criteria #12 and/or #13.
[ ] 7. Complete all entries on Part D - Proposal Form. Note the statutory requirements for Alaska business licenses and professional registrations, and be sure to sign and date the Certification. Copies of licenses and registrations may be provided with submittal, and will not count in the requirements of #8 below.
[ ] 8. Attach Criteria Responses (except any Billing Rates or Price Proposals) to Part D - Proposal Form. The maximum number of attached pages (each printed side equals one page) for Criteria Responses shall not exceed:
Ten (10). Attached page limit does not include the four-page Part D - Proposal Form, or any Billing Rates or Price Proposals.
Criteria Responses shall be presented in 8-1/2" X 11" format, except for a minimal number of larger sheets (e.g., 11" x 17") that may be used (e.g., for schedules) if they are folded to 8-1/2" X 11" size. Large sheets will count as multiple pages at 93.5 square inches or fraction thereof per page, unless otherwise noted.
CAUTION: Criteria Responses which do not comply with the required page limit or presentation size, may result in disqualification. Further, small print or typeface that is difficult to read may negatively influence evaluation of your submittal and affect scoring for "Quality of Proposal."
CHECKLIST IS CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
rfp-b (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 RFP Part B - Submittal Checklist Page 2 of 2
B
[ ] 9.
[ ] 10. Parts A, B and C of Form 25A270 and the proposed Statement of Services shall not be returned to the
Contracting Agency. Submittals shall consist of the following applicable items assembled as follows and in the order listed:
[ ] 10.1 Completed Part D - Proposal Form (generally at least one copy with original signature) and Responses to all evaluation criteria -- except Billing Rates, Price Proposals – attached. Each copy shall be fastened with one staple in the upper left corner. No other form of binding shall be used and no cover and no transmittal letter will be included.
CAUTION: Failure to comply with this instruction will negatively influence evaluation of Submittal.
[ ] 10.2 Number of copies of Part D (all pages) and Criteria Responses (except Billing Rates, and Price Proposals) required is: One (1).
[ ] 10.3 If Billing Rates and/or Price Proposals are required, one copy bound with one staple in the upper left corner separately enclosed in a sealed envelope marked on the outside to identify it as a Billing Rates or Price Proposal and the names of the Project and Offeror. Each Billing Rates or Price Proposal must be signed and dated by the person who prepares it (may be different signatures for each Subcontractor).
[ ] 10.4 If Item 9, above, is completed for this RFP Package, any submittal items described therein. Unless otherwise stated, one copy only, bound appropriately.
[ ] 10.5 Pre-Audit Statement, DOT&PF Form 25A257, shall not be provided with Submittal. (See Notice #10 on page 3 of Part A - RFP.)
[ ] 10.6 CAUTION: If you replicate (other than by photocopy) Part D or any form in lieu of completing the forms provided by the Contracting Agency, provide a signed certification that lists such forms and attests that they are exact replicas of that issued by the Contracting Agency. Changed forms may result in rejection at the Contracting Agency's discretion. Any alteration – other than completion of the required entries – may be cause for rejection without recourse.
[ ] 11. Deliver submittals in one sealed package to the location and before the submittal deadline cited in Part A -
RFP. Mark the outside of the package to identify the Project and the Offeror. Proposals must be received prior to the specified date and time. Late proposals will not be opened (2 AAC 12.250).
rfp-c (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 RFP Part C - Evaluation Criteria Page 1 of 6
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Criteria with a weight of zero are not applicable and should be disregarded. If a weight is not indicated for any criterion, telephone the Agency Contact person identified at the top of page 1 of Part A - RFP. C
SECTION I - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
1. Objectives and Services 1. Weight: 15 Response must demonstrate your comprehension of the objectives and services for the proposed contract. Do not merely duplicate the Statement of Services provided with this RFP. Also, consider if Statement of Services is sufficiently explicit; are expressed or implied schedules attainable/economically feasible; etcetera? Explain. Define any assumptions made in formulating Criteria Response. If design services for a construction project are included, express any opinions regarding alternative design considerations that could impact construction costs.
2. Methods 2. Weight: 25 Response must outline the methods for accomplishing the proposed contract or, if methodology is contained in the proposed Statement of Services, address its adequacy. Describe what, when, where, how, and in what sequence the work will be done. Address how proximity to the Project site, particular geographic familiarity, experience, and capabilities of your firms (Offeror and Proposed Subcontractors) and Project Staff might specifically contribute to the proposed methods.0F1 Identify the amount and type of work to be performed by any Subcontractors. Consider how each task may be carried out; what services or interaction required from/with the Contracting Agency; etcetera. Suggest alternatives, if appropriate. Identify any distinct and substantive qualifications for undertaking the proposed contract such as the availability of specialized equipment or unique approaches or concepts relevant to the required services which the firms may use.
3. Management 3. Weight: 15 Response must describe the administrative and operational structures that will be used for performing the proposed contract. For example consider: who will have overall responsibility for the contract? Who will have direct responsibility for specific disciplines? What will the lines of authority be? For any individual who would be in "responsible-charge" (reference AS 08.48) as an Architect, Engineer, Land Surveyor or Landscape Architect, so state and list his/her Alaska professional registration number. A graphic depiction is preferred in your response to this criterion. Additionally, the Contracting Agency may want to inspect work products in progress and have a close ongoing working relationship with your Project Staff. Accordingly, your response should also identify where the various contract services will be performed, in proximity to the Contracting Agency’s office 1F2, and how communications will be maintained between your Project Staff, the Contracting Agency, and (as applicable) any other government agencies or the public.
4. Proposed Project Staff 4. Weight: 15 Response must name the individuals to perform the following FUNCTIONS plus any other professional/technical functions you deem essential to perform the services:
1. Contract Management (contract compliance)
2. Project Management (single point-of-contact directly engaged in contract performance)
3. Design Lead
4. Public Involvement Specialist
*All personnel acting in responsible charge for all Architectural, Engineering, Land Surveying, and Landscape Architecture functions require an Alaska Registration and must be identified in your proposal.
Continued Next Page
1 Delete sentence beginning with “Address how proximity. …” if any federal funds unless performed by licensed Architects, Engineers or Land Surveyors.
2 Delete sentence beginning with “Accordingly, your response…” if any federal funds unless performed by licensed Architects, Engineers or Land Surveyors.
rfp-c (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 RFP Part C - Evaluation Criteria Page 2 of 6
C
Describe the work to be performed by the individuals you name to perform essential functions and detail their specific qualifications and substantive experience directly related to the proposed contract. A response prepared specifically for this proposal is required. Marketing resumes often include non-relevant information which may detract from the evaluation of proposal. Lists of projects are not useful. Focus on individual's specific duties and responsibilities and how project experience is relevant to the proposed contract.
For each person named, identify their: employer, professional discipline or job classification and state of residency. List at least 3 professional references (contact persons and telephone numbers) for each person.
5. Workload and Resources 5. Weight: 10
Response must: (1) discuss both current and potential time commitments of your proposed Project Staff to all clients; (2) discuss the projected workload of each firm (Offeror and Proposed Subcontractors) for all clients; and (3) demonstrate adequate support personnel, facilities and other resources to provide the services required. Provide a list of current contracts with the Contracting Agency in which your proposed Project Staff are participating. Include all contracts statewide with regions, divisions, etc., of the Contracting Agency.
Briefly address capabilities for providing additional services and/or services under an accelerated schedule. Address capacity to reassign personnel, equipment and facilities whenever the proposed contract would not require such capabilities or was delayed.
6. Past Performance & Quality Control 6. Weight: 5
Response must describe previous projects the project team has worked on that are related in size and scope to this project.
Describe the dollar amount of the projects and a brief narrative of the successes of the projects. Address how the experience will help your team to perform under this contract. Provide references (contact name and phone number) for each project.
Indicate which of the proposed firms and project staff was involved in each project. The State reserves the right to investigate referenced projects, contact references and research other projects that the respondent has worked on.
Include in your response a description of your firm’s quality control process and how this process has affected the quality of your deliverables. Use specific examples.
7. Quality of Proposal 7. Weight: 5
Offerors do not respond to this criterion. Committee members will rate this criterion based on their perception of the clarity, completeness and presentation of submittal. Note: This criterion is NOT used to evaluate color, graphics or other visual techniques except as they may detract from legibility.
rfp-c (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 RFP Part C - Evaluation Criteria Page 3 of 6
C
8. Pre-Environmental Review Workflow (30% Plan Review) 8. Weight: 10
Describe the important goals and steps to get there of a successful pre-environmental review. How will assure these goals are achieved?
9. 9. Weight: 0 rfp-c (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 RFP Part C - Evaluation Criteria Page 4 of 6
SECTION II - PREFERENCES C
10. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises 49 CFR 26 10. Weight: 0
Option #1 This solicitation is being conducted under the Department’s Race Neutral Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program for construction related professional services solicitations. Therefore, there is no DBE goal for this solicitation and the criterion has a weight of zero (0).
See rfp-a, section 15. Special Notices, paragraph 15.2.
Option #2 Generally, weight shall be at least “10” for FAA funded contracts.
A DBE goal has been established for the RFP.
Proposed DBE participation will count towards the Department’s Race-Conscious DBE program, or Proposed DBE participation will count towards the Department’s Race-Neutral DBE program.
To be granted this preference, Offeror's response must identify a certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise firm(s) (DBEs) in their proposal that will participate in the proposed contract services. The proposed DBE must be certified in the category of work proposed as listed in the DBE AUCP Directory in order to be credited for the services in the proposal and given the DBE preference and the DBE certification must be effective as of the proposal due date. Failure to submit adequate information pertaining to the percentage of work proposed to be completed by the DBE when this preference has been given weight may result in “0” points. Offerors should propose a single percentage number. Specifying a range of percentages (for example 5-8%) is not acceptable. If a range of percentages is proposed, the lowest number will be utilized in the calculation to determine the criterion score.
Certified DBE firms are listed in a DBE Directory which is available from the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities at its regional Design and Construction Offices in Juneau, Anchorage and Fairbanks or by mail from the Civil Rights Office, ADOT/PF, Box 196900, Anchorage, AK 99519 (telephone 907-269-0851) or at their internet address http://www.dot.state.ak.us/cvlrts/directory.shtml.
Response will be scored: Rating x Number of Evaluators x Weight = Criterion Score. Rating will be as follows:
"5" More than 5% DBE Participation;
"3" - 5% DBE Participation;
"1" - Less than 5% but more than 0 % DBE participation;
"0" - No DBE participation.
11. Alaska Bidder (Offeror) Preference 23 CFR 172.7(a)(1)(iii)(C), AC 150/5100-14E, and 2 AAC 12.260(e)
11. Weight: 0
Weight shall be “0” if any federal funding, otherwise weight shall be at least “10”.
To be granted this preference:
Offeror must claim the Alaska Bidder (Offeror) Preference on page one of Part D Proposal Form. In claiming the Alaska Bidder (Offeror) Preference on page one of Part D, the Offeror is certifying that they meet the following requirements per AS 36.30.990:
(A) Firm holds a current Alaska Business License;
(B) Proposal is submitted under the name as appearing on the Firm's current Alaska Business License;
(C) Firm has maintained a place of business within Alaska, staffed by the Firm or an employee of the Firm, for a period of six months immediately preceding the date of the offer;
(D) Firm is incorporated or qualified to do business under the laws of the State of Alaska, is a sole proprietorship, and the proprietor is a resident of Alaska, is a limited liability company organized under AS 10.50 and all members are residents of Alaska, or is a partnership under AS 32.06, or AS 32.11 and all partners are residents of Alaska; and
(E) If the Firm is a Joint Venture, it is composed entirely of entities that qualify under (A) - (D).
Alaska Bidder (Offeror) Preference will be scored: Rating x Number of Evaluators x Weight = Criterion Score.
http://www.dot.state.ak.us/cvlrts/directory.shtml rfp-c (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 RFP Part C - Evaluation Criteria Page 5 of 6
Rating will be as follows:
An Alaska Offeror’s preference (i.e., a Rating of 5) will be assigned to the proposal of an Offeror who certifies (by claiming the preference on page one of Part D) that they are an Alaska Bidder (Offeror) as described above.
No Alaska Offeror’s preference (i.e., a Rating of 0) will be assigned to the proposal of an Offeror who does not certify (by failure to claim the preference on page one of Part D) that it qualifies as an Alaska Bidder (Offeror) as described above.
No narrative response to this criterion is required within the Offeror’s Proposal.
rfp-c (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 RFP Part C - Evaluation Criteria Page 6 of 6
SECTION III - PRICE C
If price is not an Evaluation Criterion, weights for both Criterion #12 and #13 shall be “0”. If price is an Evaluation Criterion, the sum of weights for Criterion #12 and #13 shall be at least “10”, and all Offerors shall submit Price Proposals in the specified format(s).
See item #9, under Notices in Part A – RFP, regarding statutory and regulatory provisions about price competition and item #10.3, in Part B – Submittal Checklist, regarding procedure for submittal of Billing Rates and/or Price Proposals. Cost terminology is explained on page 2 of the Pre-Audit Statement (DOT&PF Form 25A257).
CAUTION: Submittal of Offeror's or Subcontractor's "standard" rate schedules or other pricing documents which are not in required format will be non-responsive if they do not allow direct comparison with other responsive proposals.
Rates and costs proposed by the Offeror selected for contract negotiations may be investigated for reasonableness and allowability in accordance with AS 36.30.400, .420 & .480, 2 AAC 12.550 and the contract cost principles in 48 CFR Part
31. Unsupported rates and costs may be disallowed or result in termination of negotiations, or contract award. All proposed rates and the negotiated contract rates will be public information.
12. Labor Billing Rates (Required Format) 12. Weight: 0
Provide a proposed total hourly Billing Rate (i.e., inclusive of Direct Cost of Direct Labor, all Indirect Costs, and Fee) only for each of the job FUNCTIONS listed below. Note: Some of these functions may be performed by one or more employees of the Offeror or Subcontractors; consequently, an individual might be billed under the contract at different rates appropriate to the functions performed. Only the maximum rate paid to any individual for each listed job function – regardless of employer (Offeror or Subcontractor) – must be provided and will be considered for this response. Rates for lower paid individuals or for other job functions, if any, will be addressed during contract negotiations.
1. Contract Management (Estimated at % of total labor effort)
2. Project Management (Estimated at % of total labor effort)
3. (Estimated at % of total labor effort)
4. (Estimated at % of total labor effort)
5. (Estimated at % of total labor effort)
*In accordance with the submittal Checklist (‘rfp-b’), item 10.3, Billing Rates must be signed and dated by the person who prepares it (may be different signatures for each Subcontractor)
Response will be scored as follows: The maximum hourly rates proposed for the job functions listed above will be multiplied by the percentage of total labor effort (estimated above) and then summed to obtain an aggregate rate for each Offeror. If more than one rate is provided for any job function, only the highest rate will be used. Each Offeror's score will be calculated using the following equation – except that the score will be zero if a rate for each listed function is not provided by an Offeror.
(Lowest aggregate rate from all Offerors) x (MPP*) = Offeror's Criterion Score (Offeror's aggregate rate)
*MPP = Maximum Possible Points = (5) x (Number of Evaluators) x (Weight)
If no federal funding, then per AS 36.30.250(b), aggregate rates shall be reduced for the above calculation by the following applicable percentages when the rates are from Offerors that designate preferences on page one of Part D.
- ALASKA BIDDER (OFFEROR) PREFERENCE [2 AAC 12.260(d)]............................................................ 5%
- ALASKA VETERAN-OWNED BUSINESS PREFERENCE [AS 36.30.175] (maximum $5000) .................. 5% and only ONE of the following:
- EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM PREFERENCE [AS 36.30.170(c)] ................................................................. 15%
- DISABLED SOLE PROPRIETOR OR 50% DISABLED EMPLOYEES [AS 36.30.170(e & f)] .................... 10% To claim employment or disabled preference, Offeror must be on the appropriate Alaska Division of Vocational Rehabilitation list at the time designated for opening (i.e., receipt) of proposals.
rfp-c (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 RFP Part C - Evaluation Criteria Page 7 of 6
C
13. Total Price Proposal (Required Format) 13. Weight: 0
Provide proposed costs for all labor, subcontracts, equipment, expenses, etc., and a proposed amount for Fee. Submit a separate price proposal in the following format for the Offeror and for each Subcontract (first, second, third tier, etc.) that may exceed $25,000. Each price proposal must be signed and dated by the person who prepares it. Note that the PRICES of the next lower tier subcontracts must be listed as COSTS in Item #4 (Other Direct Costs) of the price proposal for the next higher tier contractor so that the price of all subcontracts "roll-up" into the Offeror's total price proposal.
1. Show project title, project number, and Offeror or Subcontractor Name.
2. Direct Costs of Direct Labor (DCDL) Show the estimated costs for each job classification of employees proposed for the contract. List under the following headings. Names required only for key staff and/or persons in "responsible-charge" (Ref: AS 08.48). Hourly Rates must not include Indirect Costs or Fee.
Job Classification Name Total Hours Rate($/hr) Proposed Costs ($)
Total DCDL: $
3. Indirect Costs (IDC)
These costs include what are generally referred to as 1) Fringe Benefits and 2) Overhead (including direct and indirect costs of Indirect Labor). Show the Proposed IDC Rate as a percentage of Direct Costs of Direct Labor and the product (IDC Amount) of that Rate multiplied by the total DCDL.
IDC Rate: % IDC Amount: $
4. Other Direct Costs (ODC)
These costs include: subcontracts, equipment (company owned or rented), and reimbursable expenses (e.g., transportation, food and lodging, reproduction) – if not included in Indirect Costs. List proposed costs under the following headings. If multiples of an item required, list the proposed quantity, unit rate, and total cost for each.
Costs must be based on actual costs to the offeror or the subcontractor, without any profit or other markup.
Item Quantity Cost ($/Unit) Proposed Costs ($)
Total ODC: $
5. Total Proposed Cost
Sum of DCDL + IDC + ODC Total Cost: $
6. Proposed Fee
List a proposed amount (Contract Fee is generally negotiated using a structured Fee analysis of proposed costs).
Proposed Fee: $
7. Total Proposed Price Sum of Total Proposed Cost plus Proposed FEE. Total Price: $
8. In accordance with the Submittal Checklist (‘rfp-b’), item 10.3, Price Proposals must be signed and dated by the person who prepares it (may be a different signature for each subcontractor).
Response will be scored as follows: (Lowest Total Proposed Price) x (MPP*) = Criterion Score (Offeror's Total Proposed Price)
*MPP = Maximum Possible Points = (5) x (Number of Evaluators) x (Weight) If no federal funding, then per AS 36.30.250(b), total price shall be reduced for the above calculation by the following applicable percentages when the prices are from Offerors designate preferences on page one of Part D.
- ALASKA BIDDER (OFFEROR) PREFERENCE [2 AAC 12.260(d)] .................................................................... 5%
- ALASKA VETERAN-OWNED BUSINESS PREFERENCE [AS 36.30.321(f)] (maximum $5,000) ...................... 5% and only ONE of the following:
- EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM PREFERENCE [AS 36.30.321(b)] ......................................................................... 15%
- DISABLED SOLE PROPRIETOR [AS 36.30.321(d) / (k)] ................................................................................... 10% To claim employment or disabled preference, Offeror must be on the appropriate Alaska Division of Vocational Rehabilitation list at the time designated for opening (i.e., receipt) of proposals.
rfp-d (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 Part D - Proposal Form Page 1 of 3
Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities PART
PROPOSAL FORM
THIS FORM MUST BE THE FIRST PAGE OF PROPOSAL. Attach criteria responses as explained in Part B - Submittal Checklist. No transmittal letter or cover sheet will be used. D
PROJECT
Project Numbers-State/Federal.................... : SFHWY00601/N/A Project Title .................................................. : JNU Egan Yandukin Intersection Improvements- Design Services RFP No. ....................................................... : 25253003
OFFEROR (CONTRACTOR)
Contractor ..................................................... :
Street ............................................................ :
P.O. Box ....................................................... :
City, State, Zip .............................................. :
Alaska Business License Number .............. :
Federal Tax Identification No. ...................... :
DOT&PF DBE Certification No. (if any) ....... :
Individual(s) to sign contract ........................ :
Title(s) .......................................................... :
Type of business enterprise (check one) ..... : [ ] Corporation in the state of . :
[ ] Individual [ ] Partnership [ ] Other(specify) .................... :
ALASKA STATUTORY PREFERENCES (IF NO FEDERAL FUNDING)
Check the applicable preferences that you claim for the proposed contract (reference Criteria 11, 12 & 13 in Part C):
[ ] Alaska Bidder (Offeror) AND>> [ ] Veterans AND>> [ ]Employment Program or [ ] Disabled Persons
PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTOR(S)
Service, Equipment, etc. Subcontractor & Office Location AK Business DOT&PF DBE
License No. Certification No.
CERTIFICATIONS
I certify: that I am a duly authorized representative of the Contractor; that this Submittal accurately represents capabilities of the Contractor and Subcontractors identified herein for providing the services indicated; and that the requirements of the Certifications on page 2 and 3 of this Part D for 1) Alaska Licenses/Registrations, 2) Insurance, 3) Federal-Aid Contracts exceeding $100,000, 4) Cost and Pricing Data, 5) Trade Restrictions/Suspension/Debarment, 6) Foreign Contracting, 7) DBE Commitment, and 8) Former Public Officer – will be complied with in full. These Certifications are material representations of fact upon which reliance will be placed if the proposed contract is awarded. Failure to comply with these Certifications is a fraudulent act. The Contracting Agency is hereby authorized to request any entity identified in this proposal to furnish information deemed necessary to verify the reputation and capabilities of the Contractor and Subcontractors. This proposal is valid for at least ninety days.
Signature ..................... :
Name ........................... : Date:
Title .............................. : Telephone (voice):
(fax):
Email Address:
rfp-d (January 2018) DOT&PF Form 25A270 Part D - Proposal Form Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATION FOR ALASKA BUSINESS LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS
Contractor and all Subcontractors shall comply with the following applicable requirements of Alaska Statutes: D
1. Alaska Business License (Form 08-070 issued under AS 43.70) at the time contract is awarded as required by AS 36.30.210(e) for Contractor and all Subcontractors. In accordance with Administrative Manual, Section 81.120, proof of application for an Alaska Business license will satisfy this requirement. Per AAM 81.120, acceptable evidence that the offeror possesses a valid Alaska business license consists of any one of the following:
a. Copy of the Alaska business license.
b. A canceled check that demonstrates payment for the Alaska business license fee.
c. A copy of the Alaska business license application with a receipt stamp from the State's business license office.
d. A sworn notarized affidavit that the bidder/offeror applied and paid for the Alaska business license.
e. Other forms of evidence acceptable to the Department of Law.
2. Certificate of Registration for each individual to be in "responsible charge" (AS 08.48.341(11-14)) for Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, or Landscape Architecture (Form 08-2407 issued under AS 08.48.211) issued prior to submittal of proposal. Associates, consultants, or specialists under the supervision of a registered individual in "responsible charge" are exempt from registration requirements (AS 08.48.331).
3. Certificate of Authorization for Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, and Limited Liability Partnerships for Contractors and Subcontractors for Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, or Landscape Architecture (Form 08-2407 issued under AS 08.48.241). Entities offering to provide Architectural, Engineering or Land Surveying services do not need to be registered for such disciplines at the time proposal is submitted provided they obtain registration prior to contract award (AS 08.48.241).
4. Certificate of Incorporation (Alaska firms) or Certificate of Authorization for Foreign Firm ("Out-of-State" firms). All corporations, regardless of type of services provided, must have one of the certificates (AS 10.06.218 and other sections of Title 10.06 - Alaska Corporations Code).
5. Current Board of Director's Resolution for incorporated Contractors and incorporated Subcontractors for Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying or Landscape Architecture (reference AS 08.48.241) that names the person(s) designated in "responsible charge" for each discipline. Such persons shall be licensed in Alaska and shall participate as project staff in the Contract/Subcontracts.
6. All partners in a Partnership to provide Architectural, Engineering, Land Surveying, or Landscape Architecture must be legally registered in Alaska prior to submittal of proposal for at least one of those disciplines (AS 08.48.251) which the Partnership offers.
7. Joint Ventures, regardless of type of services provided, must be licensed/registered in the legal name of the Joint Venture as used in this proposal (AS 43.70.020 and 43.70.110(4)).
8. Contracts for Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, or Landscape Architecture may not be awarded to individuals, corporations or partnerships not in compliance, respectively, with the provisions of paragraph 2, 3, and 6, above (AS 36.90.100).
For information about licensing, Offerors may contact the Alaska Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, Division of Corporations, Business and Professional Licensing at P.O.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .