2-SLCI26059 Attachment 4 Score Sheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 73 KB Posted

Attached to
Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI26059 - Compensation Benchmarking and Salary Survey Management Platform
Solicitation number
SLCI26059
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Salt Lake City Corporation's solicitation SLCI26059 for a Compensation Benchmarking and Salary Survey Management Platform. The document serves as the scoring template for evaluating competitive sealed proposals from qualified vendors to provide a cloud-based SaaS platform for real-time job pricing, compensation data management, and analytics. The scoresheet is designed to accommodate up to 20 offerors and establishes a structured evaluation framework with designated spaces for multiple evaluators to assess proposals against specified criteria.

The evaluation methodology allocates 80 percent of total points (450 maximum points) to technical criteria and 20 percent (112.5 maximum points) to cost evaluation. The technical scoring encompasses four primary criteria: Qualifications (20 percent weight), Functionality (40 percent weight), Implementation/Integration Timeline (20 percent weight), and Value Added Services/Products/Knowledge (10 percent weight). Four mandatory minimum requirements must be satisfied for proposals to advance to technical evaluation: compliance with City ethics requirements, disclosure of any GenAI technology usage, SOC 2/ISO 27001 certification, and confirmation that all City data will be stored exclusively on continental United States servers. The scoresheet includes provisions for policy criteria evaluation in sustainability, business certification, apprenticeship, and local small business designations. A minimum technical point threshold of 60 percent (270 points) is required for proposals to be considered for award, with cost points calculated using a lowest-price formula where the lowest proposal receives 100 percent of cost points and other proposals receive proportional points based on their price ratio to the lowest bid.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
1-Confidential+and+Proprietary+Info+Declaration+Form.pdf PDF
5-SLCI26059.docx DOCX document
6-SLCI26059 Attachment 3 Cost Proposal Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
4-SLCI26059 Attachment 1 Sample Agreement.docx DOCX document
3-SLCI26059 Attachment 2 Scope of Work.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

Compensation Benchmarking and Salary Survey Management Platform
SOLICITATION #SLCI26059
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
Firm Name:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
Evaluator:3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
Date:5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1Compliance with City Ethics Reuirement
2Offeror shall indicate if Offeror and/or Offeror’s subcontractor(s) will be using or offering GenAI technology, model(s), service(s), or system(s)s.
3Offeror confirms that their company is SOC 2/ISO 27001 certified.
4Offeror confirms all City data will be stored exclusively on servers located within the continental United States.
Scoreable Technical CriteriaRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints
EarnedMinimum Required
1Qualifications2022.2%100.000.0
2Functionality4044.4%200.000.0
3Implementation/Integration Timeline2022.2%100.000.0
4Value Added Services/Products/Knowledge1011.1%50.000.0
Scorable Technical Criteria Total100.0%450.000.00.0
Possible PointsPoints Earned
Total Technical Points100.00%450.000.00
Required Technical Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
60%270.000.00.0%
CostRFP SectionLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
$0.00$0.0020%112.50ERROR:#DIV/0!
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points80%450.000.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points20%112.50ERROR:#DIV/0!
Total Evaluation Points100%562.50ERROR:#DIV/0!

Scoresheet Summary

TITLE OF PROJECT (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)
SOLICITATION # (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET SUMMARY
Instructions:
Enter the solicitation number and name.
Enter each Offeror name.
Enter the Criteria name for each category.
Enter the Weight in column B that corresponds to the Criteria Weight on the Score Sheet tab column J for each criterion.
Enter the Total Possible Points for each Criterion, Cost Points, and Score Summary section.
Mandatory Minimum Requirements: Evaluate each offer and enter pass or fail
Ensure that the number of evaluator lines matches the number of evaluators.
Offers not meeting the Minimum Mandatory Requirements will not be evaluated further.
Ensure that the Total Average Score formula includes all of the evaluator line items.
Technical Scores: Enter each evaluator score for each offer.
Signatures:Date:
Evaluator 1__________________
Evaluator 2__________________
Evaluator 3__________________
Evaluator 4__________________
Evaluator 5__________________
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
1
2
3
WeightTechnical ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Criteria #1
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6 - Total Points (Total Possible XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #7
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #7 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Policy CriteriaOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
WeightTechnical Scores
Policy Criteria #1: Sustainability
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #2: Business Certification
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #3: Apprenticeship
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #4: Local Small Business
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Policy Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Technical Criteria Points (Total Technical Criteria Possible Points = XX) Minimum Threshold = XX0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost PointsCost ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Cost
0.0Cost Points0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Score SummaryOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Total Technical Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Grand Total Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

image1.png image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .