Amendment_0001_Section_J_Attachments.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 2019 Billings/ Portland Construction MATOC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 18-102-SOL-00015
About this file
Section J Attachments Revised
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Section J, Attachment 1: Request for Proposal for Seed Project -
Your firm is requested to submit a proposal on the Scope of Work that is being considered for inclusion into the above referenced solicitation.
This is not a Notice to Proceed with this work; it is only a Request for Proposal (RFP).
General Instructions:
The title of this project is: IPC Demonstration Space / Cooling Optimization and IT UPS The estimated days it will take to complete this project are: 120 days from issuance of Notice to Proceed (NTP) The magnitude of this project is: Between $500,000 and $1,000,000 Infection Control: Contractor’s shall comply with the infection control permit applicable to this project, specifically the Class III requirements, 1 thru 11.
Clauses/Provisions are incorporated into this RFP:
· FAR 52.222-6 Construction Wage Rates Requirements (May 2014) – WA180045 dated 9/21/2018 is applicable to this project.
· FAR 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee (Sep 1996) – 20% of Proposal Price, or $3 million, whichever is less
· FAR 52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds – Construction (Oct 2010) – apply to this project
· FAR 52.236-27 – SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALT I (FEB 1995)
Date: September 18, 2018 October 16, 2018at 1pm PST
Location: Indian Health Service - Yakama Service Unit (Enter at Main Entrance) 401 Buster Road Toppenish, WA 98948
Note: There will be a short presentation prior to each site visit. Please register by emailing andrew.hart@ihs.gov a list of attendees at least two (2) working days prior to the site visit.
Additional Attached Documents to this attachment:
J.1.1 Specifications Package titled: “IHS, YAKAMA, WA IPC DEMONSTRATION SPACE”
J.1.2 Drawing Package titled “IPC DEMONSTRATION SPACE
J.1.3 Specification package titled “COOLING OPTIMIZATION AND IT UPS”
J.1.4 Drawing Package titled “COOLING OPTIMIZATION AND IT UPS
J.1.5 Infection Control Permit
J.1.6 Wage Determination: WA180045 9/21/2018 WA45
End of Attachment
SECTION J, ATTACHMENT 2
Bid Schedule
*Provided separately via MS Excel
SECTION J, ATTACHMENT 3
DHHS/ IHS Contractor’s Application for Payment
*Provided separately via MS Excel
SECTION J, ATTACHMENT 4
1. SELF-PERFORMED WORK AND LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING
This procurement is a 100% Small Business set-aside. FAR 52.219-14 (JAN 2017) is incorporated herein by reference. Offerors are to complete and submit with their proposals the worksheet provided below.
The prime contractor shall self-perform a minimum of 15% of the work under this Task Order (Seed Project).
2. OFFEROR’s SELF PERFORMANCE WORKSHEET:
Offeror’s are required to complete this Worksheet for this Task Order.
| 1. Offeror’s total proposed price | $ | |
| 1. Subtract profit or fees | $ | |
| 1. Subtract cost of materials | $ |
1. Offeror’s total estimated cost of contract performance for personnel (a-b-c=d) $
1. Offeror’s total estimated self-performed cost of contract performance incurred for personnel who are Offeror’s employees or the employees of other Small Business Contractor’s (Self-Performed) $
1. Offeror’s percentage of self-performed work (e/d X 100 = %) %
List of Proposed Subcontractors for this project /Value of those subcontracts:
Subcontractor $Value
Subcontractor $Value
Subcontractor $Value
Subcontractor $Value
Subcontractor $Value List of “Self-Performed” work activities by the Small Business:
At completion of this Task Order, the awardee shall complete and submit the following calculations to the Contracting Officer for the actual results achieved.
| 1. Offeror’s total proposed price | $ | |
| 1. Subtract profit or fees | $ | |
| 1. Subtract cost of materials | $ |
1. Offeror’s total cost of contract performance for personnel (a-b-c=d) $
1. Offeror’s total self-performed cost of contract performance incurred for personnel who are Offeror’s employees or the employees of other Small Business Contractor’s (Self-Performed)
1. Offeror’s percentage of self-performed work (e/d X 100 = %) %
Definitions: (from 13 CFR 125.6):
Cost of the contract. All allowable direct and indirect costs allocable to the contract, excluding profit or fees.
Cost of contract performance incurred for personnel. Direct labor costs and any overhead which has only direct labor as its base, plus the concern's General and Administrative rate multiplied by the labor cost.
Cost of materials. Includes costs of the items purchased, handling and associated shipping costs for the purchased items (which includes raw materials), off-the-shelf items (and similar proportionately high-cost common supply items requiring additional manufacturing or incorporation to become end items), special tooling, special testing equipment, and construction equipment purchased for and required to perform on the contract. In the case of a supply contract, the acquisition of services or products from outside sources following normal commercial practices within the industry are also included.
Personnel. Individuals who are “employees” under §121.106 of this chapter except for purposes of the HUBZone program, where the definition of “employee” is found in §126.103 of this chapter.
Subcontracting. That portion of the contract performed by a firm, other than the concern awarded the contract, under a second contract, purchase order, or agreement for any parts, supplies, components, or subassemblies which are not available off-the-shelf, and which are manufactured in accordance with drawings, specifications, or designs furnished by the contractor, or by the government as a portion of the solicitation. Raw castings, forgings, and moldings are considered as materials, not as subcontracting costs. Where the prime contractor has been directed by the Government to use any specific source for parts, supplies, components subassemblies or services, the costs associated with those purchases will be considered as part of the cost of materials, not subcontracting costs.
Section J, Attachment 5 Contractor Surety Limitations
OFFEROR INSTRUCTIONS: Section A shall be completed by Offeror and submitted to Surety requesting they complete and return to Offeror and included in the RFP offer with guarantee bond.
SECTION A:
Prospective Contractor for which information is being requested:
| Contractor Name: | ___________________________________________ | ||
| Address: | ___________________________________________ | ||
| ___________________________________________ | |||
| Point of Contact: | ___________________________________________ | ||
| Telephone: | ___________________________________________ | ||
| E-mail: | ___________________________________________ |
SURETY INSTRUCTIONS: SECTION B shall be completed by Surety and returned to the Offeror such that it is included with their RFP offer with guarantee bond. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, you are advised that Federal Acquisition Regulation FAR-15.506 prohibits the release of the names of individuals providing reference information about Offeror’s bonding limits.
SECTION B:
How long have you provided bonding for the above contractor? _________ YEARS What is the contractor’s rating? ________________________ Bonding Limit for a single project? $______________________________ Aggregate amount? $ ___________________________________________
| Have you ever had to complete a project for the contractor? | [ ] YES [ ] NO | ||||
| Has liability insurance ever been refused? | [ ] YES [ ] NO | ||||
| Have there been complaints of non-payment by subcontractor/suppliers? | [ ] YES [ ] NO | ||||
| Has the surety had to pay subcontractors/suppliers? | [ ] YES [ ] NO | ||||
| Surety Name: | ________________________________________ | ||||
| Surety Address: | ________________________________________ | ||||
| ________________________________________ | |||||
| Telephone: | _______________ Facsimile: ________________ | ||||
| E-mail: | ________________________________________ |
Signature: ________________________________________
Section J, Attachment 6
CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET
Project No. (check one) : |_| CON #1 |_| CON #2 |_| CON #3 |_| CON #4 |_| CON #5
1. Experience for: |_| Offeror |_| Joint-Venture |_| Other (Explain)
Firm Name:
Address:
Phone Number:
DUNS Number:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain)
Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Number: Delivery/Task Order Number:
Title:
Location:
4. Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
5. Type of work:
|_| New Construction |_| Renovation |_| Repair |_| Alteration |_| Other (explain):
6. Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)
|_| Firm-Fixed Price |_| Cost/Time and Material |_| Other (explain):
Complete Block 7 for Construction Projects.
7. Construction Project:
Award Amount: Final Price:
Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)
|_| Design-Build |_| Design-Bid-Build |_| Delivery/Task Order (IDIQ) |_| Other (explain):
If Design-Build, identify the Lead Design Firm:______________________________________________
8. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, square footage, construction methods).
9. Provide a detailed description of what work your firm self-performed on this project:
10. If using experience information of a JV partner, subcontractor, or any other entity (name, DUNS, and/or address is not exactly as stated on the Cover Letter), describe the nature of the relationship of the entity to the Offeror, and clearly explain how that entity will have meaningful involvement in the performance of this contract, including the resources it will contribute.
SECTION J, ATTACHMENT 7
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
| 1. Contractor Information | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
| Address: | DUNs Number: |
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: |_| Firm Fixed Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work |_| High |_| Med |_| Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: IHS DES REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/ Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
| a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) |
| E VG S M U N |
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
| a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below) |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract |
| E VG S M U N |
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
| a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication) |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Overall customer satisfaction |
| E VG S M U N |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
| a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Government Property Control |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel |
| E VG S M U N |
| e) Utilization of Small Business concerns |
| E VG S M U N |
| f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines |
| E VG S M U N |
| g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes |
| E VG S M U N |
| h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) |
| E VG S M U N |
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns) |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. |
| Yes No |
| e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below. |
| Yes No |
| f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. |
| Yes No |
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
| a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.) |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. |
| E VG S M U N |
7. GENERAL
| a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues). |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) |
| Yes No |
| d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| E VG S M U N |
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
File details come from the government source that posted it.