15-Attachment M - Rotation-of-contract-use.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MK26-1 Pre-Employment Transtion Services
- Solicitation number
- MK26-1
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This document is Attachment M detailing a contract rotation strategy for the Utah Department of Workforce Services (DWS) related to Pre-Employment Transition Services under Solicitation #MK26-1. The procurement aims to establish multiple contracts with qualified vendors to provide pre-employment services to students eligible or potentially eligible for Vocational Rehabilitation Services. The contract term is 4 years, with contracts awarded based on proposal scores and available funding allocation. The total number of contracts will be determined upon procurement completion, with vendors selected through a ranked scoring process.
The document outlines a detailed methodology for contract assignment and expansion, emphasizing fairness and effectiveness in service delivery. DWS will prioritize project assignments based on initial project performance, empirical data on service outcomes, and multiple potential selection criteria including geographic needs, vendor expertise, cost-effectiveness, and service quality. In cases of insufficient performance data, DWS may utilize rotation systems including alphabetical, numerical, or random assignment methods, or combinations of selection factors. The ultimate goal is to efficiently allocate resources while ensuring high-quality pre-employment transition services for Utah's students with disabilities.
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment M - Rotation of contract use Pre-Employment Transition Services Solicitation # MK26- 1
This procurement solicitation will result in one or more contracts, with qualified contractor(s), for the Pre-Employment Transition Services. The Utah Department of Workforce Services will not know until the completion of the procurement how many contracts will be established. Contracts will be awarded to the proposals with the highest points, until the available funding is allocated, as described in this procurement solicitation.
In situations where multiple contracts are available, Utah Code and Rule indicates DWS must declare a system for ensuring the contracts will be used in a way that will best meet DWS’ needs while still assigning work to the contracted vendors in a way that is as fair as possible under the circumstances, especially when it comes to adding funding and/or expanding projects over the 4-year term of the contracts. Adding funding and/or expanding projects shall be limited to changes that continue to align with the original intent of MK26-1 and the original intent of the vendor’s proposed project(s), as negotiated and amended for the finalized contract(s).
Options for how DWS will assign contracts for use may include, but are not limited to:
(i) The initial projects that must be completed by a specific deadline will be assigned based on the ranked scores of the RFP process (highest scores receiving priority) and the swiftness of the contracting process (contracts fully signed and executed first receiving the highest priority).
(ii) For instances where funding will be added for expanding projects:
(a) DWS will first assign these projects based on empirical data regarding the results of the initial projects (i.e., when DWS implemented the proposed ideas and completed those projects by the specific deadline, which of the projects were the most successful at achieving the desired outcomes of increasing respite services for people who have disabilities and their caregivers and achieved these results through the most efficient allocation of funding and other resources).
(b) For instances where there is insufficient data to make the determinations necessary for (a) above, DWS may use:
i. a system that ensures quality, consistency, and reliability for the citizens of Utah who use these services;
ii. a rotation system, organized alphabetically, numerically, or randomly;
iii. assignment of vendor(s) to a specified geographic area or a similar identified gap in need vs. available services;
iv. assignment of vendor(s) based on each vendor's particular expertise or field;
v. assignment of vendor(s) based on the most advantageous cost for a specific purpose;
vi. another method approved by the Utah Division of Purchasing’s Chief Procurement Officer (CPO); or
vii. a reasonable combination of the above factors.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .