13-Attachment N - Score Sheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MK26-1 Pre-Employment Transtion Services
- Solicitation number
- MK26-1
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This document is a Draft Evaluation Scoresheet for a Pre-Employment Transition Services Request for Proposal (RFP #MK26-1) issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and the Department of Workforce Services. The solicitation seeks vendors to provide Pre-Employment Services to students who are eligible or potentially eligible for Vocational Rehabilitation Services, with an anticipated multiple contract award approach. The contract will have a four-year term, during which vendors must guarantee their pricing for one year, and contracts will be awarded to proposals receiving the highest points until available funding is allocated.
The scoresheet outlines a comprehensive evaluation process with mandatory minimum requirements and technical criteria, including five key assessment areas: Experience/Performance/References, Contractor Staffing, Program Services, Collaboration, and Budget. Vendors must be authorized to do business in Utah, demonstrate professional experience with Pre-Employment Transition Services for youth, agree to department policy authority, and be capable of providing services across 19-29 Utah counties. The technical evaluation requires a minimum threshold of 70% (560 points out of 800 possible points), with each technical criterion weighted between 18.8% and 25% of the total possible points.
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Pre-Employment Transition Services | ||||||||||
| SOLICITATION #MK26-1 | ||||||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||||||
| DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Division of Purchasing. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson | ||||||||||
| This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2). | ||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | ||||||||
| 1 | Vendor must be authorized to do business in the State of Utah as of the date of your response. | |||||||||
| 2 | The Vendor must have demonstrated and significant professional experience with Pre-Employment Transition Services and service delivery for youth. | |||||||||
| 3 | The Vendor must agree that the Department shall be the final authority in matters of policy, procedures and approval of any materials/services. If the Department determines that the Contractor’s work is not satisfactory or is outside the scope of Pre-ETS, the Contractor may not be paid for services provided. | |||||||||
| 4 | The Vendor must be able to provide services in at least 19-29 counties in Utah. | |||||||||
| 0 | ||||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Experience, Performance References, and Reputation | 30 | 18.8% | 150.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | Contractor Staffing | 30 | 18.8% | 150.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | Program Services | 40 | 25.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 4 | Collaboration | 30 | 18.8% | 150.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5 | Budget | 30 | 18.8% | 150.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 800.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | ||||
| 70% | 560.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||
| Cost will be scored as technical criterion #5. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .