B08_Attach_07_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_PastPerf_REQD.pdf

PDF 261 KB Posted

Attached to
GRCA 318719 North Rim & Springs Rehabilitation Pro
Solicitation number
140PP027R0005
Issued by
Not on record

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire form used for federal contract source selection evaluation purposes. The document serves as a structured instrument for collecting contractor performance information on past projects to assess qualifications for new solicitation opportunities under National Park Service contracts.

The questionnaire is divided into five sections requiring specific information flow: offerors complete Sections A and B (company details and contract information for the past project being referenced), transmit to a reference contact, who then completes Sections C and D (their identification and performance evaluation) before returning to the designated Contracting Officer. Section E identifies the return recipient as the National Park Service – Denver Service Center. The form requests comprehensive contract details including project title, contract number, contract type (Firm Fixed Price, Time & Materials, Cost Reimbursable, or Other), awarded and final pricing, award and completion dates, period of performance, project location, and client/owner information. Section D contains the evaluation component with five rating categories—Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory—applied across six performance areas: Quality (workmanship, quality control plan adherence, technical submittals); Schedule and Time Management (milestone achievement, responsiveness, timeliness); Cost Control (handling site conditions, modification pricing, invoicing accuracy, supplier payment); Management (oversight, subcontractor coordination, safety, location factors, owner relationships, problem-solving); Small Business Subcontracting and Labor Standards (regulatory compliance, disadvantaged business utilization, subcontracting plan adherence); and Regulatory Compliance (building and life safety codes). The form concludes with an overall recommendation question regarding the contractor's suitability for similar future contracts. All information collected is designated Source Selection Sensitive and contractors are explicitly prohibited from using questionnaire information for promotional or advertising purposes.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part7.pdf PDF
B08_140PP027R0005.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_10_GRCA_318719_Innercanyon_GIR_20250811.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_04_CLIN_Price_Sheet_-_Services.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part1.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_00_20261012_Part4.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_00_20261012_Part5.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_00_20261012_Part8.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part8.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part14.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part4.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_03_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_00_20261012_Part1.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_06_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_08_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_BidBond.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part10.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_01_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part5.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_05_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_SubKPlan_REQD.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_10_20261012.pdf PDF
Sol_140PP027R0005.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_00_20261012_Part10.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_00_20261012_Part2.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_02_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_00_20261012_Part7.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_11_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part6.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part9.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_00_20261012_Part3.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_00_20261012_Part9.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_09_GRCA_318719_GISR_20260331.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part2.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part3.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_01_Specs_Rehabilitate_North_Rim_Vol_B_(Div_02-23)_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_00_20261012_Part11.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_09_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_12_Site_Visit_Attendee_List.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_12_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_06_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_GenRefs.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_01_Specs_Rehabilitate_North_Rim_Vol_C_(Div_26-46)_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_11_GRCA_318719_North_Rim_GIR_20250811.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_08_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_04_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part15.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_00_20261012_Part6.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part13.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_03_Wage_Determintation.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part11.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_01_Specs_Rehabilitate_North_Rim__Vol_A_(Div_01)_20261012.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_North_Rim_Final_CDs_Volume_05_20261012_Part12.pdf PDF
Show all 50

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO. 140P20XXRXXXX

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

Notice to Contractor

Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

A. OFFEROR INFORMATION

Company Name Company Street Address Address City City State State Zip Code XXXXX Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM

XXXXXXX

Point of Contact Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT

EXPERIENCE)

Project Title Title Contract Number XXXXXXXXXX Contract Type Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other Awarded Contract Price $X,XXX,XXX Current / Final Price $X,XXX,XXX Contract Award Date XX/XX/XXXX Contract Completion Date XX/XX/XXXX Period of Performance XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX Project Location Park or Street address, City, State Client / Owner Company Brief description of the contract & work effort:

Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name First, Last Position / Title Title Organization Agency or Company Phone Number XXX-XXX-XXXX Email Address Email Signature Signature Date XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating Definition

Exceptional Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Evaluation Area Rating Quality Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? Choose an item.

Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? Choose an item.

Quality of informational and technical submittals? Choose an item.

Overall Quality Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management) Met project schedule milestones? Choose an item.

Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? Choose an item.

Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? Choose an item.

Promptly addressed scheduling issues? Choose an item.

Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating Choose an item.

Cost Control Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? Choose an item.

Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? Choose an item.

Submitted accurate and complete invoices? Choose an item.

Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? Choose an item.

Overall Cost Control Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management General oversight by project manager and superintendent? Choose an item.

Coordination with and control of subcontractors? Choose an item.

Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? Choose an item.

Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? Choose an item.

Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? Choose an item.

Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? Choose an item.

Overall Management Rating Choose an item.

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? Choose an item.

Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? Choose an item.

Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? Choose an item.

Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance Met building and life safety codes? Choose an item.

Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating Choose an item.

Overall Recommendation:

Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: Choose an item.

Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by Time / Date Name CO or CS name Title Contracting Officer / Contract Specialist Organization National Park Service – Denver Service Center Email First_Last@nps.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .