J.12 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Oscar Dyson FSV Midlife Extension Program
- Solicitation number
- 1305M224R0018
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire that will be used to evaluate a contractor's performance on a previous contract. The questionnaire assesses the contractor's performance in the areas of quality of service, schedule, and management. Evaluators are instructed to rate the contractor's performance using adjectival ratings ranging from "Exceptional" to "Unsatisfactory" and to provide comments to support the ratings. The completed questionnaire is to be sent to Shawn Griscom at NOAA by 4:00 PM EDT on September 2, 2024.
The related federal contract opportunity is for the Oscar Dyson FSV Midlife Extension Program, Solicitation Number 1305M224R0018, issued by the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The solicitation requires the contractor to provide products and services for the midlife extension of the Oscar Dyson Fisheries Survey Vessel. Interested parties can request reference drawings and technical manuals by emailing the contract specialist, Shawn Griscom.
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
J.12 Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: _______________________________
(the contract the evaluation is based on) Evaluator’s Name:___________________________ Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________ Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: ____________________________ Send Completed Questionnaire to Shawn.Griscom@noaa.gov no later than 4:00 PM EDT on September 2, 2024.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance). (Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the |
Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the |
Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name:
Rater’s Signature:
Date:
Send Completed Questionnaire to Shawn.Griscom@noaa.gov no later than 4:00 PM EDT on September 2, 2024.
Page of Source Selection Information
1305M219QNMAN0242
Page of Source Selection Information
1305M219QNMAN0242
1305M224R0018
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .