Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire_REV B.pdf
PDF 766 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NOAA SHIP FAIRWEATHER DRY DOCKING Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1305M223QNMAN0143
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluating contractors under solicitation number 1305M223QNMAN0143 for dry docking services for the NOAA ship FAIRWEATHER. The questionnaire includes sections to rate a contractor's quality of service, schedule, and management on a scale of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. Ratings should be accompanied by comments. The completed questionnaire must be sent to bridget.cofo@noaa.gov no later than August 4, 2023. The solicitation is for the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to perform dry docking of the NOAA ship FAIRWEATHER.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF 30 AMENDMENT 0006.doc | DOC document | |
| 2019 Valve list NOAA Fairweather Dry docking.docx | DOCX document | |
| SF 30 AMENDMENT 0005.doc | DOC document | |
| SF 30 AMENDMENT 0004.doc | DOC document | |
| SF 30 AMENDMENT 0003.doc | DOC document | |
| SF 30 AMENDMENT 0003.doc | DOC document | |
| SF 30 AMENDMENT 0002.doc | DOC document | |
| FA-S4801-11_SEWAGE AND PLUMBING DRAIN PIPING SYSTEM Rev - (Revised with comments).pdf | ||
| SF 30 AMENDMENT 0001.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire_REV A.pdf | ||
| Attachment V - AIR Process_REV A.pdf | ||
| Attachment I - Specification_REV A.pdf | ||
| Attachment VI - Subcontracting Plan Outline.pdf | ||
| Attachment IV - Price Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ 1305M223QNMAN0143.pdf | ||
| Attachment V - AIR Process.pdf | ||
| Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Attachment I- Specification.pdf | ||
| Attachment II - Past Performance Information Form.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: _______________________________
(the contract the evaluation is based on)
Evaluator’s Name: ___________________________
Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________ Evaluator’s
Agency or Company Name: ____________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to jim.vannatta@noaa.gov no later than August 29, 2023 4:00 PM
ET QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Attachment III
1305M223QNMAN0143
mailto:bridget.cofo@noaa.gov
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Attachment III
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Attachment III
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name:
Rater’s Signature:
Date:
Send Completed Questionnaire to bridget.cofo@noaa.gov no later than August 4, 2023 2:00 PM ET.
Attachment III
1305M223QNMAN0143
mailto:bridget.cofo@noaa.gov
| 1. QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| 2. SCHEDULE |
| 3. MANAGEMENT |
| ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY: |
| Untitled |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .