11 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 80 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Construct T-1A Static Display Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA309925R0002
About this file
The Past/Present Performance Questionnaire is a detailed evaluation form used to assess a contractor's performance across multiple dimensions. The form provides a 1-6 rating scale with descriptors ranging from "Unsatisfactory" to "Exceptional" and includes seven specific performance criteria such as schedule adherence, personnel quality, subcontractor management, quality control, submittal timeliness, problem resolution, and project closeout. The questionnaire requires the evaluator to rate the contractor's performance in each area, provide optional comments, confirm whether liquidated damages were assessed, and indicate whether they would rehire the contractor, with space for an overall performance rating and the evaluator's signature.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
1. Contractor’s Name and Address:
2. Point of Contact:
3. Phone Number:
4. Contract Number: Contract Type:
5. Project Title:
6. Period of Performance:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)
1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:
2. Respondent’s Name:
3. Phone Number: Fax Number:
E-Mail:
4. Contract Number: Contract Type:
5. Award Amount: Final Amount:
6. Project Title:
7. Period of Performance:
C. Email COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO: Ms. Tacy Boje at tacy.boje.1@us.af.mil or to Lt Candice Arcuri at candice.arcuri@us.af.mil
THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: Proposal due date at 2:30PM Central Standard Time.
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Unsatisfactory Marginal None Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.
There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
Performance met contract requirements.
There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner
1. Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A the established schedule.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________
2. Provided experienced superintendent, managers, and supervisors, with 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________
3. Adequately controlled performance of subcontractors. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________
4. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________
5. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________
6. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________
7. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A COMMENTS/REMARKS:________________________________________________________________________
8. Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages? YES NO (If Yes, briefly explain the circumstances)
9. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? YES NO
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING ___________________________________________________
Signature of Rater: ________________________________________________________ Date: ________________
| 1 Contractors Name and Address 1: |
| 1 Contractors Name and Address 2: |
| 1 Contractors Name and Address 3: |
| 1 Contractors Name and Address 4: |
| 2 Point of Contact: |
| 3 Phone Number: |
| 4 Contract Number: |
| Contract Type: |
| e: |
| od of Performance: |
| 1: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 2 Respondents Name: |
| 3 Phone Number_2: |
| Fax Number: |
| EMail: |
| 4 Contract Number_2: |
| Contract Type_2: |
| 5 Award Amount: |
| Amount: |
| e_2: |
| od of Performance_2: |
| No record of past performance or the record s nconclusive: |
| c progress schedules and comp: |
| COMMENTSREMARKS: |
| and administrat: |
| COMMENTSREMARKS_2: |
| led performance of subcontractors: |
| COMMENTSREMARKS_3: |
| 4 Provided effective quality control wh: |
| COMMENTSREMARKS_4: |
| l researched and clearly identified the proposed item: |
| COMMENTSREMARKS_5: |
| ng for change orders and negot: |
| COMMENTSREMARKS_6: |
| COMMENTSREMARKS 1: |
| COMMENTSREMARKS 2: |
| If Yes br 1: |
| If Yes br 2: |
| OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING: |
| gnature of Rater: |
| Date: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .