11-08. Freeway Data Collection Sensors Technical Score Sheet- AMENDED.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 30 KB Posted

Attached to
UDOT RFP- Freeway Data Collection Sensors
Solicitation number
UDOT250294MP
Issued by
Utah

About this file

The document is a Technical Score Sheet for Freeway Data Collection Sensors, prepared for the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) through a Request for Proposal (RFP). The solicitation seeks qualified vendors to provide non-intrusive freeway traffic data collection sensors, with a comprehensive evaluation process that scores potential vendors across ten key technical categories including references, physical properties, cable and connectors, cabinet equipment, installation, software, configuration, detection accuracy, data reporting, maintenance, warranty, and product support. The contract is structured for multiple awards with a 5-year term and no renewal options, aiming to procure detection systems capable of collecting vehicle speed, lane occupancy, count, and classification data across all travel lanes.

The scoring sheet reveals a detailed technical evaluation methodology with a total of 760 possible points, encompassing critical performance metrics such as sensor ruggedization, environmental resilience, cable connectivity, installation ease, data accuracy, and technical support capabilities. While no specific pricing information is included in this technical scoring document, the comprehensive evaluation suggests UDOT is prioritizing technical capability, reliability, and comprehensive performance over lowest-cost solutions. The solicitation encourages vendors to submit innovative approaches and additional features beyond the minimum requirements, indicating an openness to advanced technological solutions in traffic data collection sensor technology.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Freeway Sensor Technical Documents Evaluation Scoring Sheet

Vendor Name:

Evaluator Name:
I. REFERENCES
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1Quality of FHWA reporting references provided (see Technical Submittals 1.)2550
2Quality of public agency references provided (see Technical Submittals 2.)2040
II. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND TESTING
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1What standards does the sensor meet for water tightness?2550
2Describe how the sensor is ruggedized for continual use at a roadside environment.2550
3What environmental conditions, including temperature, humidity, and other relevant factors, are the sensors and cabinet equipment designed to withstand?2040
4What operation and functional testing occurs during the manufacturing process to ensure a quality product? Is a testing certification provided with the product?2550
III. CABLE AND CONNECTORS
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1What cable is required to connect the sensor to equipment in the cabinet? Is it generic or proprietary?1020
2What is the maximum home-run cable distance for reliable operation of the sensor? Are there options to increase the distance?2550
3Ease of cable termination at the equipment in the cabinet.1530
4Describe the connection point at the sensor. How is water intrusion prevented?2550
IV. CABINET EQUIPMENT
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1Describe the surge protection including if it is internal or external and if it is replaceable. If the surge protection is replaceable, what is the process (e.g. replace in situ, send to manufacturer for replacement)?2040
2Ease of reaching communication ports.510
3Dimension of cabinet hardware to determine if it fits well in standard cabinets.204
4Describe how a technician can locally access the system for monitoring or configuration.1530
V. INSTALLATION
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1List all the devices required for a complete installation.1530
2Ease of the installation process including aiming the sensor.2550
3What mounting options are available?1530
4What are the ideal mounting locations in relation to the roadway? Under what circumstances does the device perform the worst?2040
5Quality of the mount.1020
VI. SOFTWARE
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1What software functions are available including export/save and import/restore and including file types.2040
2Are licenses required for software use? Is it renewed annually or a one-time license?1020
VII. CONFIGURATION
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1Ease of software navigation to configure detection.2040
2Describe the configuration process including manual configuration and if the sensor can automatically configure the detection zones. What circumstances are needed for automatic configuration?2040
3How many detection zones can a single sensor support?1530
VIII. DETECTION AND DATA ACCURACY
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1How many lanes of traffic can be detected by a single sensor when mounted no higher than 35 ft above the roadway?2040
2How far can the farthest detection zone be located from the sensor without significant data degradation?2040
3Report the data accuracy of the following in good weather conditions and how the data accuracy is affected as lanes are added: a. Volume data for each direction of travel, b. Average speed data, c. Percentage of per-vehicle speeds captured, d. Occupancy data, e. Vehicle length2550
4How much is the data accuracy degraded by occlusion from barriers, guardrails, and large vehicles? How does this change as lanes are added or the distance from the sensor increases?2550
IX. DATA REPORTING AND STORAGE
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1What metrics (volume, length, axle, speed, occupancy, etc.) are available for binned data and event (per vehicle) data? Provide details about the data including timestamp format.204
2Ease of reading and understanding reports.102
3What is the data storage capacity on the sensor in the event that communications is lost?204
4How is the timestamp integrity maintained even when power is disconnected for extended periods of time?204
5File types meet our needs?153
X. MAINTENANCE
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1What are the specific maintenance requirements needed to ensure continued optimal performance of the sensors without voiding the warranty?204
2Describe calibration process(es) and how often they are needed.153
XII. WARRANTY AND LIFE EXPECTANCY
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1What is the length and coverage of the warranty? Does the warranty start from product receiving or installation?153
2What is the life expectancy of the sensor and how was this determined?204
XIII. PRODUCT SUPPORT AND LEAD TIME
Criteria No.DescriptionPossible PointsScore (1-5)Weighted MultiplierScored Points
1What specific product training is offered?153
2Quality of the installation and user manuals/guides.204
3What are the hours of operation for call-in technical support and troubleshooting?102
4What is the typical time frame between receiving an order and delivering the product?255

Total Points 760 0

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .