Top 100 Contractors in PSC S114: Water Services, Jul 2025–Jun 2026
Parent companies by net contract obligations Jul 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2026 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 73% of PSC S114 contract dollars from July 2025 through June 2026
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $614,109,977 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded PSC S114
- Contractors
- 254 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- American Water Works Company Inc. $212 million, 34.0% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
American Water Works Company Inc.
|
$212,404,481 | ||
| 2 |
Fort Bliss Water Services Company
|
$77,543,674 | ||
| 3 |
Jacobs Government Services Company
Top agencies
|
$38,162,549 | ||
| 4 |
Oklahoma City Water Utilities Trust
|
$29,593,152 | ||
| 5 | $22,084,011 | |||
| 6 | $21,064,102 | |||
| 7 | $15,056,232 | |||
| 8 |
Base Utilities Inc.
Top agencies
|
$15,014,528 | ||
| 9 | $12,190,769 | |||
| 10 | $12,080,145 | |||
| 11 |
County of Hardin
Top agencies
|
$10,661,301 | ||
| 12 | $9,652,762 | |||
| 13 |
City of Aberdeen
Top agencies
|
$9,340,028 | ||
| 14 | $9,192,098 | |||
| 15 | $8,975,961 | |||
| 16 | $8,717,346 | |||
| 17 |
City of Wildwood City Hall
Top agencies
|
$7,138,908 | ||
| 18 | $5,806,262 | |||
| 19 | $5,614,308 | |||
| 20 | $4,958,000 | |||
| 21 |
Tama City Hall
Top agencies
|
$4,748,901 | ||
| 22 | $4,582,136 | |||
| 23 | $4,469,229 | |||
| 24 | $4,141,624 | |||
| 25 | $3,955,476 | |||
| 26 |
P D R Properties, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$3,667,346 | ||
| 27 | $3,475,667 | |||
| 28 |
Jungbu Water Supply Office
Top agencies
|
$2,852,037 | ||
| 29 |
City of Hopewell Hrwtf
Top agencies
|
$2,742,638 | ||
| 30 |
City of Aliceville
Top agencies
|
$2,556,623 | ||
| 31 | $2,145,000 | |||
| 32 | $1,923,652 | |||
| 33 | $1,644,924 | |||
| 34 | $1,496,411 | |||
| 35 |
City of Jacksonville
Top agencies
|
$1,383,754 | ||
| 36 |
County of Lee
Top agencies
|
$1,347,930 | ||
| 37 | $1,342,287 | |||
| 38 |
City of Welch
Top agencies
|
$1,268,675 | ||
| 39 |
Public Service Commission of Yazoo City
Top agencies
|
$1,210,010 | ||
| 40 |
Kyotango City
Top agencies
|
$1,176,372 | ||
| 41 | $1,078,352 | |||
| 42 |
Town of Alderson
Top agencies
|
$1,018,067 | ||
| 43 |
Contra Costa Water District Inc
Top agencies
|
$934,618 | ||
| 44 |
Woodway Water Authority
Top agencies
|
$929,493 | ||
| 45 |
City of Florence
Top agencies
|
$913,302 | ||
| 46 |
Columbiana County
Top agencies
|
$896,329 | ||
| 47 |
Village of Saranac Lake
Top agencies
|
$876,862 | ||
| 48 | $871,711 | |||
| 49 | $868,422 | |||
| 50 |
City of Manchester
Top agencies
|
$748,529 | ||
| 51 |
City of El Reno
Top agencies
|
$735,081 | ||
| 52 |
City of Lawrence
Top agencies
|
$664,979 | ||
| 53 | $636,187 | |||
| 54 | $585,245 | |||
| 55 | $575,364 | |||
| 56 |
City of Berlin
Top agencies
|
$573,059 | ||
| 57 |
Bradford City Water Authority
Top agencies
|
$553,420 | ||
| 58 |
Fluid Handling LLC
Top agencies
|
$500,989 | ||
| 59 |
Tidewater Utilities Inc
Top agencies
|
$491,762 | ||
| 60 |
Schwarz Construction LLC
Top agencies
|
$461,620 | ||
| 61 | $422,371 | |||
| 62 |
City of Danbury CT
Top agencies
|
$390,958 | ||
| 63 |
The Navajo Nation Tribal Government
|
$379,075 | ||
| 64 | $374,190 | |||
| 65 | $365,157 | |||
| 66 | $357,480 | |||
| 67 | $313,431 | |||
| 68 |
City of Clarksburg
Top agencies
|
$283,200 | ||
| 69 | $277,470 | |||
| 70 |
City of Leavenworth
Top agencies
|
$269,180 | ||
| 71 | $253,989 | |||
| 72 | $245,520 | |||
| 73 |
Town of Emmitsburg
Top agencies
|
$238,050 | ||
| 74 | $230,503 | |||
| 75 | $227,557 | |||
| 76 |
City of Ocean Springs
Top agencies
|
$224,293 | ||
| 77 |
Seong Nam City Hall
Top agencies
|
$219,900 | ||
| 78 | $211,759 | |||
| 79 | $208,784 | |||
| 80 | $201,517 | |||
| 81 | $185,250 | |||
| 82 | $181,586 | |||
| 83 | $176,689 | |||
| 84 | $160,400 | |||
| 85 | $159,000 | |||
| 86 | $148,800 | |||
| 87 | $145,182 | |||
| 88 |
City of Philadelphia
Top agencies
|
$145,000 | ||
| 89 | $142,535 | |||
| 90 | $138,974 | |||
| 91 | $136,201 | |||
| 92 |
Seattle Sewer Dept
Top agencies
|
$135,812 | ||
| 93 | $126,816 | |||
| 94 | $122,500 | |||
| 95 | $118,005 | |||
| 96 | $116,000 | |||
| 97 | $115,209 | |||
| 98 |
County of Maui
Top agencies
|
$112,964 | ||
| 99 | $109,215 | |||
| 100 |
Eagle Butte City Office
Top agencies
|
$105,865 |
Show 75 more
100 of 254 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $625 million obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Period: the trailing 12 months end with the last month that ended at least 90 days ago, because the Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late. The list is rebuilt each night.
- Rank changes compare with Jul 2024–Jun 2025. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 PSC S114 contractors in Jul 2025–Jun 2026?
1. American Water Works Company Inc. ($212M), 2. Fort Bliss Water Services Company ($77.5M), 3. Jacobs Government Services Company ($38.2M), 4. Oklahoma City Water Utilities Trust ($29.6M), 5. Augusta-Richmond County Government ($22.1M), 6. Emerald Coast Utility Services Inc. ($21.1M), 7. Fort Riley Utility Services, Inc. ($15.1M), 8. Base Utilities Inc. ($15M), 9. Foreign Utility Consolidated Reporting ($12.2M), 10. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission ($12.1M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work