Top 100 Contractors in PSC S114: Water Services, Aug 2025–Jul 2026
Parent companies by net contract obligations Aug 1, 2025 – Jul 31, 2026 Code page on GovTribe
The latest 12 months. See the newest fiscal year's list: Top Contractors in PSC S114: Water Services, FY2025.
The top 10 won 79% of PSC S114 contract dollars from August 2025 through July 2026
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $627,535,734 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded PSC S114
- Contractors
- 252 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- American Water Works Company Inc. $221 million, 34.7% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV · Free to reuse with credit to GovTribe (CC BY 4.0)
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
American Water Works Company Inc.
|
$221,208,718 | ||
| 2 |
American States Water Company
|
$129,679,159 | ||
| 3 |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Top agencies
|
$41,320,856 | ||
| 4 |
Oklahoma City Water Utilities Trust
|
$29,593,152 | ||
| 5 | $22,803,829 | |||
| 6 |
Base Utilities Inc.
Top agencies
|
$15,014,528 | ||
| 7 | $13,206,938 | |||
| 8 | $11,897,134 | |||
| 9 | $10,913,216 | |||
| 10 | $9,652,762 | |||
| 11 |
County of Hardin
Top agencies
|
$9,422,116 | ||
| 12 |
City of Aberdeen
Top agencies
|
$8,752,210 | ||
| 13 | $8,717,346 | |||
| 14 | $6,350,902 | |||
| 15 |
City of Wildwood City Hall
Top agencies
|
$5,700,937 | ||
| 16 | $5,559,229 | |||
| 17 | $4,958,000 | |||
| 18 | $4,753,804 | |||
| 19 |
Tama City Hall
Top agencies
|
$4,748,901 | ||
| 20 | $3,562,923 | |||
| 21 | $3,523,429 | |||
| 22 | $3,221,624 | |||
| 23 | $3,155,476 | |||
| 24 |
P D R Properties, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$2,916,015 | ||
| 25 | $2,865,500 | |||
| 26 |
Jungbu Water Supply Office
Top agencies
|
$2,307,405 | ||
| 27 |
City of Aliceville
Top agencies
|
$2,056,303 | ||
| 28 |
City of Hopewell Hrwtf
Top agencies
|
$1,875,226 | ||
| 29 | $1,644,924 | |||
| 30 | $1,500,534 | |||
| 31 |
City of Jacksonville
Top agencies
|
$1,383,754 | ||
| 32 | $1,181,020 | |||
| 33 |
Kyotango City
Top agencies
|
$1,176,372 | ||
| 34 |
City of Welch
Top agencies
|
$1,156,590 | ||
| 35 |
Public Service Commission of Yazoo City
Top agencies
|
$1,148,010 | ||
| 36 | $1,131,460 | |||
| 37 | $1,078,352 | |||
| 38 |
Town of Alderson
Top agencies
|
$967,235 | ||
| 39 |
Lee County VA
Top agencies
|
$952,435 | ||
| 40 |
Contra Costa Water District Inc
Top agencies
|
$941,017 | ||
| 41 |
City of Florence
Top agencies
|
$920,479 | ||
| 42 |
Village of Saranac Lake
Top agencies
|
$876,862 | ||
| 43 |
Columbiana County
Top agencies
|
$862,805 | ||
| 44 |
Woodway Water Authority
Top agencies
|
$857,986 | ||
| 45 |
City of Berlin
Top agencies
|
$780,858 | ||
| 46 |
City of Manchester
Top agencies
|
$767,286 | ||
| 47 |
The Navajo Nation Tribal Government
|
$760,718 | ||
| 48 |
City of Prestonsburg
Top agencies
|
$752,150 | ||
| 49 | $739,470 | |||
| 50 |
City of Lawrence
Top agencies
|
$664,979 | ||
| 51 | $636,187 | |||
| 52 |
City of El Reno
Top agencies
|
$596,081 | ||
| 53 | $585,245 | |||
| 54 | $575,364 | |||
| 55 |
Evoqua Water Technologies LLC
Top agencies
|
$499,186 | ||
| 56 |
Tidewater Utilities Inc
Top agencies
|
$491,762 | ||
| 57 |
Bradford City Water Authority
Top agencies
|
$467,966 | ||
| 58 |
Schwarz Construction LLC
Top agencies
|
$461,620 | ||
| 59 | $422,371 | |||
| 60 | $388,658 | |||
| 61 | $374,190 | |||
| 62 | $357,480 | |||
| 63 | $308,799 | |||
| 64 | $290,000 | |||
| 65 |
City of Clarksburg
Top agencies
|
$283,200 | ||
| 66 | $277,470 | |||
| 67 | $253,989 | |||
| 68 | $250,000 | |||
| 69 | $245,520 | |||
| 70 |
Town of Emmitsburg
Top agencies
|
$238,050 | ||
| 71 | $227,557 | |||
| 72 |
City of Ocean Springs
Top agencies
|
$224,293 | ||
| 73 |
Seong Nam City Hall
Top agencies
|
$219,900 | ||
| 74 | $208,784 | |||
| 75 | $201,517 | |||
| 76 |
City of Danbury CT
Top agencies
|
$190,958 | ||
| 77 | $181,586 | |||
| 78 | $176,689 | |||
| 79 | $176,201 | |||
| 80 | $161,503 | |||
| 81 | $160,400 | |||
| 82 | $159,000 | |||
| 83 | $154,200 | |||
| 84 | $147,729 | |||
| 85 | $146,636 | |||
| 86 | $145,182 | |||
| 87 |
City of Philadelphia
Top agencies
|
$145,000 | ||
| 88 | $142,535 | |||
| 89 | $138,974 | |||
| 90 |
Seattle Sewer Dept
Top agencies
|
$135,812 | ||
| 91 | $127,783 | |||
| 92 | $126,816 | |||
| 93 | $118,005 | |||
| 94 | $116,000 | |||
| 95 | $113,296 | |||
| 96 |
County of Maui
Top agencies
|
$112,964 | ||
| 97 | $109,215 | |||
| 98 |
Eagle Butte City Office
Top agencies
|
$105,865 | ||
| 99 |
City of Albany
Top agencies
|
$100,000 | ||
| 100 |
County of Berkeley
Top agencies
|
$99,552 |
Show 75 more
100 of 252 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $638 million obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. An awardee whose own actions mostly name no parent, and that no other company's actions name as their parent, rolls up its SAM.gov registration's chain of parent companies: it counts under the first company there that other companies' actions name as their parent, or under the parent most of a company's own actions name, whichever comes first; with neither, under the highest company in the chain with federal contracts of its own. Joint ventures stay companies of their own. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Period: the trailing 12 months end with the last month that ended at least 90 days ago, because the Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late. The list is rebuilt each night.
- Rank changes compare with Aug 2024–Jul 2025. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 PSC S114 contractors in Aug 2025–Jul 2026?
1. American Water Works Company Inc. ($221M), 2. American States Water Company ($130M), 3. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ($41.3M), 4. Oklahoma City Water Utilities Trust ($29.6M), 5. Augusta-Richmond County Government ($22.8M), 6. Base Utilities Inc. ($15M), 7. Foreign Utility Consolidated Reporting ($13.2M), 8. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission ($11.9M), 9. Clear Lake City Water Authority ($10.9M), 10. Central Coast Water Authority ($9.65M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work