Top 100 Contractors in NAICS 922: Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, FY2025
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 89% of FY2025 NAICS 922 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $270,472,655 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded NAICS 922 or a code under it
- Contractors
- 418 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- The GEO Group, Inc. $177 million, 63.1% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $177,486,802 | |||
| 2 | $56,390,478 | |||
| 3 | $7,773,754 | |||
| 4 | $1,593,074 | |||
| 5 |
City of Livermore
Top agencies
|
$1,523,412 | ||
| 6 |
Ma Impianti S.R.L.
Top agencies
|
$1,437,819 | ||
| 7 | $1,237,019 | |||
| 8 |
Kunil M.e.c Ltd.
Top agencies
|
$1,219,866 | ||
| 9 | $886,707 | |||
| 10 | $616,634 | |||
| 11 | $555,019 | |||
| 12 | $466,777 | |||
| 13 | $446,556 | |||
| 14 | $442,589 | |||
| 15 |
Washington State Patrol
|
$438,955 | ||
| 16 |
Dewey County
Top agencies
|
$414,929 | ||
| 17 | $414,562 | |||
| 18 | $391,535 | |||
| 19 |
Johnson Controls Inc
|
$389,851 | ||
| 20 | $376,424 | |||
| 21 | $361,138 | |||
| 22 |
Ellis County
Top agencies
|
$360,440 | ||
| 23 |
City of Loma Linda
Top agencies
|
$349,214 | ||
| 24 | $348,009 | |||
| 25 |
County of Pershing
Top agencies
|
$322,974 | ||
| 26 |
City of Huntington
Top agencies
|
$309,562 | ||
| 27 |
County of Lincoln
Top agencies
|
$306,465 | ||
| 28 | $293,948 | |||
| 29 |
County of Napa
Top agencies
|
$289,317 | ||
| 30 |
Broadview Village Of
Top agencies
|
$286,860 | ||
| 31 |
County of Sonoma
Top agencies
|
$281,903 | ||
| 32 |
Lane County Oregon
Top agencies
|
$279,476 | ||
| 33 | $268,090 | |||
| 34 | $219,406 | |||
| 35 |
County of Santa Fe
Top agencies
|
$200,000 | ||
| 36 | $198,551 | |||
| 37 | $197,800 | |||
| 38 |
City of Sheridan
Top agencies
|
$195,467 | ||
| 39 |
County of Calaveras
Top agencies
|
$191,585 | ||
| 40 |
Ocenco Inc.
Top agencies
|
$176,454 | ||
| 41 |
County of Bell
Top agencies
|
$165,070 | ||
| 42 | $161,369 | |||
| 43 | $154,970 | |||
| 44 |
City of Danville
Top agencies
|
$149,832 | ||
| 45 | $139,563 | |||
| 46 |
County of Cherokee
Top agencies
|
$139,240 | ||
| 47 |
Lu.mar. Impianti S.R.L.
Top agencies
|
$133,822 | ||
| 48 | $131,823 | |||
| 49 |
County of Harney
Top agencies
|
$128,141 | ||
| 50 | $122,368 | |||
| 51 |
County of Osage
Top agencies
|
$120,000 | ||
| 52 |
Baker & Mckenzie Abogados, S.C.
Top agencies
|
$118,169 | ||
| 53 |
ACM Elite, LLC
Top agencies
|
$113,520 | ||
| 54 | $112,815 | |||
| 55 |
City of Hyattsville
Top agencies
|
$109,200 | ||
| 56 | $106,497 | |||
| 57 | $105,504 | |||
| 58 | $102,956 | |||
| 59 |
Boyd Company
Top agencies
|
$102,920 | ||
| 60 | $98,945 | |||
| 61 |
NW Iowa Yes Center
Top agencies
|
$97,600 | ||
| 62 | $96,000 | |||
| 63 | $92,400 | |||
| 64 |
Bosque County
Top agencies
|
$91,641 | ||
| 65 | $91,630 | |||
| 66 |
Weber Rescue UK Ltd
Top agencies
|
$91,296 | ||
| 67 |
City of North Pole
Top agencies
|
$91,075 | ||
| 68 |
County of Oneida
Top agencies
|
$87,030 | ||
| 69 |
Advokaadiburoo Sorainen AS
Top agencies
|
$86,924 | ||
| 70 | $84,816 | |||
| 71 |
Shawnee TWP Fire Department
Top agencies
|
$83,386 | ||
| 72 |
Fluid Solutions Inc.
Top agencies
|
$83,129 | ||
| 73 |
Higgs & Johnson
Top agencies
|
$82,500 | ||
| 74 | $82,241 | |||
| 75 |
County of Polk
Top agencies
|
$80,520 | ||
| 76 |
City of Waco
Top agencies
|
$80,448 | ||
| 77 | $76,982 | |||
| 78 |
County of Stanislaus
Top agencies
|
$76,205 | ||
| 79 |
County of Jefferson
Top agencies
|
$75,572 | ||
| 80 | $75,300 | |||
| 81 |
Junhe LLP
Top agencies
|
$72,997 | ||
| 82 |
Baker & Mckenzie Limited
Top agencies
|
$72,627 | ||
| 83 |
County of Cleburne
Top agencies
|
$69,056 | ||
| 84 |
County of Benton
Top agencies
|
$67,795 | ||
| 85 |
City of Morgantown
Top agencies
|
$67,601 | ||
| 86 |
City of Madison
Top agencies
|
$67,277 | ||
| 87 |
Town of Hickory Creek
Top agencies
|
$67,246 | ||
| 88 | $66,597 | |||
| 89 |
County of Cedar Missouri
Top agencies
|
$65,000 | ||
| 90 |
County of Santa Clara
Top agencies
|
$65,000 | ||
| 91 |
ST Charles County
Top agencies
|
$64,495 | ||
| 92 |
County of Harnett
Top agencies
|
$63,800 | ||
| 93 |
Ludwig Feuerschutz GMBH
Top agencies
|
$63,708 | ||
| 94 |
County of Clinton
Top agencies
|
$61,504 | ||
| 95 |
County of Denton
Top agencies
|
$61,494 | ||
| 96 |
County of Appanoose
Top agencies
|
$61,023 | ||
| 97 | $60,435 | |||
| 98 | $60,000 | |||
| 99 | $59,500 | |||
| 100 | $59,096 |
Show 75 more
100 of 418 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Rankings for the codes under NAICS 922
| Code | Net obligations | Largest contractor |
|---|---|---|
| 9221 Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities | $270,472,655 | The GEO Group, Inc. |
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $281 million obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2025 ran Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2024. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2024 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 NAICS 922 contractors in FY2025?
1. The GEO Group, Inc. ($177M), 2. Corecivic, Inc. ($56.4M), 3. Sacramento County Sheriffs Department ($7.77M), 4. West Metro Fire Protection District ($1.59M), 5. City of Livermore ($1.52M), 6. Ma Impianti S.R.L. ($1.44M), 7. County of Benton Commissioner's Office ($1.24M), 8. Kunil M.e.c Ltd. ($1.22M), 9. County of Douglas ($887K), 10. Grady County Criminal Justice Authority ($617K).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work