Top 100 Contractors in NAICS 922: Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, FY2024
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2024 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 88% of FY2024 NAICS 922 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $251,988,888 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded NAICS 922 or a code under it
- Contractors
- 485 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- The GEO Group, Inc. $157 million, 60.4% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $157,102,357 | |||
| 2 | $55,947,101 | |||
| 3 | $7,200,000 | |||
| 4 | $1,546,674 | |||
| 5 |
City of Livermore
Top agencies
|
$1,466,244 | ||
| 6 | $1,453,203 | |||
| 7 |
Ma Impianti S.R.L.
Top agencies
|
$1,222,576 | ||
| 8 | $1,153,370 | |||
| 9 |
Kunil M.e.c Ltd.
Top agencies
|
$1,006,848 | ||
| 10 | $783,450 | |||
| 11 | $764,682 | |||
| 12 | $733,110 | |||
| 13 | $542,623 | |||
| 14 |
County of Lincoln
Top agencies
|
$537,667 | ||
| 15 |
State Systems, LLC
Top agencies
|
$531,575 | ||
| 16 |
County of Pershing
Top agencies
|
$454,227 | ||
| 17 |
Washington State Patrol
|
$399,796 | ||
| 18 | $392,361 | |||
| 19 |
Love and Long, L.L.P.
Top agencies
|
$380,875 | ||
| 20 |
County of Woodward
|
$378,480 | ||
| 21 | $352,657 | |||
| 22 |
Dewey County
Top agencies
|
$337,474 | ||
| 23 |
City of Loma Linda
Top agencies
|
$327,473 | ||
| 24 | $318,002 | |||
| 25 |
Ellis County
Top agencies
|
$315,508 | ||
| 26 |
City of Huntington
Top agencies
|
$294,821 | ||
| 27 | $282,776 | |||
| 28 |
County of Napa
Top agencies
|
$280,890 | ||
| 29 | $279,291 | |||
| 30 |
Village of Broadview
Top agencies
|
$279,200 | ||
| 31 | $267,825 | |||
| 32 |
County of Sonoma
Top agencies
|
$248,296 | ||
| 33 | $229,345 | |||
| 34 |
Kel-Lac Uniforms Inc.
Top agencies
|
$222,464 | ||
| 35 |
Jensen Hughes, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$208,398 | ||
| 36 | $189,630 | |||
| 37 | $187,531 | |||
| 38 |
County of Calaveras
Top agencies
|
$186,473 | ||
| 39 |
County of Santa Fe
Top agencies
|
$172,853 | ||
| 40 | $167,274 | |||
| 41 | $150,000 | |||
| 42 | $148,464 | |||
| 43 |
City of Danville
Top agencies
|
$142,697 | ||
| 44 |
The Maclean Group LLC
Top agencies
|
$135,125 | ||
| 45 | $134,342 | |||
| 46 |
Johnson Controls Inc
|
$131,642 | ||
| 47 |
County of Harney
Top agencies
|
$130,777 | ||
| 48 | $130,408 | |||
| 49 |
W S Darley & Co
Top agencies
|
$129,272 | ||
| 50 |
Altius
Top agencies
|
$129,017 | ||
| 51 |
County of Grayson
Top agencies
|
$125,000 | ||
| 52 | $120,000 | |||
| 53 |
County of Osage
Top agencies
|
$120,000 | ||
| 54 | $119,951 | |||
| 55 |
County of Bell
Top agencies
|
$119,736 | ||
| 56 |
County of Mendocino
Top agencies
|
$116,326 | ||
| 57 | $115,111 | |||
| 58 |
Rydvet LLC
Top agencies
|
$113,030 | ||
| 59 |
Owyhee Group Companies
Top agencies
|
$111,583 | ||
| 60 |
County of Malheur
Top agencies
|
$107,043 | ||
| 61 |
Signet Technologies Inc.
Top agencies
|
$105,586 | ||
| 62 | $103,413 | |||
| 63 | $102,822 | |||
| 64 | $100,000 | |||
| 65 | $99,824 | |||
| 66 |
LN Curtis & Sons
Top agencies
|
$97,819 | ||
| 67 |
County of Knox
Top agencies
|
$96,300 | ||
| 68 |
Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP
|
$91,979 | ||
| 69 |
Gama-Tronik Brandschutzsysteme GMBH
|
$89,556 | ||
| 70 | $86,892 | |||
| 71 |
Advance Safety Equipment Co.
Top agencies
|
$86,824 | ||
| 72 |
Fireblast Global, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$86,035 | ||
| 73 | $85,390 | |||
| 74 |
County of Bosque
Top agencies
|
$84,410 | ||
| 75 |
County of Polk
Top agencies
|
$83,929 | ||
| 76 |
B2 Constructors, LLC
Top agencies
|
$82,571 | ||
| 77 |
Global Integration Systems Corp
Top agencies
|
$82,567 | ||
| 78 | $81,600 | |||
| 79 |
Shawnee TWP Fire Department
Top agencies
|
$80,566 | ||
| 80 | $80,000 | |||
| 81 |
J3 Enterprise LLC
Top agencies
|
$79,547 | ||
| 82 |
Sullivan, James Kevin
Top agencies
|
$79,200 | ||
| 83 |
Lu.mar. Impianti S.R.L.
Top agencies
|
$78,743 | ||
| 84 |
County of Custer
Top agencies
|
$76,360 | ||
| 85 | $75,707 | |||
| 86 |
ST Charles County
Top agencies
|
$74,763 | ||
| 87 |
County of Jefferson
Top agencies
|
$73,811 | ||
| 88 |
County of Stanislaus
Top agencies
|
$73,678 | ||
| 89 | $73,459 | |||
| 90 | $73,360 | |||
| 91 |
Eileen A Malloy
Top agencies
|
$73,000 | ||
| 92 |
City of Waco
Top agencies
|
$72,509 | ||
| 93 |
Fluid Solutions LLC
Top agencies
|
$72,133 | ||
| 94 |
County of Big Horn
Top agencies
|
$71,764 | ||
| 95 |
Supply Partner LLC
Top agencies
|
$71,450 | ||
| 96 |
County of Mesa
Top agencies
|
$70,818 | ||
| 97 |
County of Sandoval
Top agencies
|
$69,920 | ||
| 98 | $69,850 | |||
| 99 |
County of Cleburne
Top agencies
|
$69,056 | ||
| 100 | $68,879 |
Show 75 more
100 of 485 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Rankings for the codes under NAICS 922
| Code | Net obligations | Largest contractor |
|---|---|---|
| 9221 Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities | $251,988,888 | The GEO Group, Inc. |
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $260 million obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2024 ran Oct 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2024. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2023. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2023 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 NAICS 922 contractors in FY2024?
1. The GEO Group, Inc. ($157M), 2. Corecivic, Inc. ($55.9M), 3. Sacramento County Sheriffs Department ($7.2M), 4. West Metro Fire Protection District ($1.55M), 5. City of Livermore ($1.47M), 6. Grady County Criminal Justice Authority ($1.45M), 7. Ma Impianti S.R.L. ($1.22M), 8. County of Douglas ($1.15M), 9. Kunil M.e.c Ltd. ($1.01M), 10. Baykal Tekno Medikal Elektronik Iletisim Insaat Limited Sirketi ($783K).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work