RFP 26-016 - General Contractor - Tennis Court Upgrades

The Bibb County School District in Georgia is seeking a general contractor for RFP 26-016, a comprehensive tennis court upgrade project spanning five high schools: Central, Howard, Southwest, Rutland, and Northeast. The procurement involves renovating and resurfacing a total of 20 tennis courts (4 courts per school), with specific requirements including surface removal, preparation, new acrylic surfacing, and drainage improvements. The project demands a turn-key solution that meets USTA court standards, with specifications requiring precise court dimensions, 1% cross slope for drainage, white textured acrylic line markings, and high-quality surfacing systems like Plexipave or DecoTurf. Proposals will be evaluated across five key categories totaling 1,500 points: cost and value (500 points), relevant experience and qualifications (400 points), project approach and methodology (300 points), project timeline (200 points), and references/past performance (100 points). The proposal is due on October 23, 2025, at 8:00 am EST, with tentative board approval expected in November, and the contract will have an initial one-year term with potential for four renewals.

The district emphasizes utilizing minority and local businesses and maintaining a drug-free workplace. Bidders must provide comprehensive documentation, including company overview, project team details, safety records, licensing, insurance proof, and references. Specific insurance requirements include worker's compensation and commercial general liability coverage. Contractors must comply with E-Verify requirements, non-discrimination policies, and provide certification that they are not debarred from federal contracting. While no specific budget range is explicitly stated, the comprehensive nature of the project and the requirement to upgrade 20 tennis courts across five schools suggests a significant investment. The procurement process prioritizes "best value" for the district, meaning the award will not necessarily go to the lowest bidder but to the most responsive and responsible vendor that meets the district's comprehensive technical and qualitative requirements.