Attachment 5 PPQ .docx
DOCX document 633 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W91GDW-10-R-8002
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army
About this file
Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q A 3.pdf | ||
| Q A 2.pdf | ||
| W91GDW-10-R-8002 Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| KRG LNO PWS 16 Nov Revision 1.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers 1.pdf | ||
| W91GDW-10-R-8002 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| W91GDW-10-R-8002.pdf | ||
| Attach 2 MNF-I OVERARCHING FRAGO 09-109 Complete.pdf | ||
| Annex D Alt 1.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 6 QASP.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 KRG LNO PWS 16 Nov.pdf | ||
| Important Information to Offerors.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 Frago 09-1451 Mod.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8 dd0250.pdf | ||
| Annex C - Alt 1.ppt | PPT presentation | |
| ATTACHMENT 7-EFT Forms.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 4 PAST PERFORMANCE CONTRACT REFERENCE.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Joint Contracting Command-Iraq/Afghanistan W91GDW-10-R-8002• Nov 2009
VOLUME II – PAST PERFORMANCE
ATTACHMENT 5. PAST PERFOMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
Return via email to: whitney.brown@iraq.centcom.mil Contract/Project Name:
Contract #
Description of Services:
Contract Value:
Primary Customers:
Company/Sub Name:
Was a Government evaluation performed (CPAR or equal)?
Place of Performance:
Period of Involvement:
Respondent:
Email:
Telephone #
Position/Title:
Instructions: In the section of the questionnaire below you are asked to rate the contractor. Please indicate the rating that best applies. If you wish to elaborate on any of your answers, please provide comments at the end of this section. If more space is needed, continue your comments on a separate sheet of paper and attach it to this questionnaire prior to submission. Please include both the government and the company that sent this form to you when you submit this form. This is not mandatory but it allows companies to address any negative past performance when they submit their proposal to the government. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization. Any Fail ratings should be supplemented with an explanatory narrative in the remarks block of this survey.
Past Performance Definitions:
Pass: The offeror met or exceeded minimum standards to perform required effort.
Fail: The offeror did not meet minimum standards to perform required effort.
Neutral: Little or no relevant performance record identifiable; has no positive or negative evaluation significance. Also use this rating when the question is not applicable or you do not know.
CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIVENESS/COMPLIANCE
| 1. Rate the contractor’s ability to meet specific response times and completion dates. |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
| 2. Rate the contractor’s ability to identify and correct, and prevent potential contractual problems early, and advise before the problem becomes a delay. |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
| 3. Rate the contractor’s compliance with environmental, safety, and security requirements. |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
| 1. Rate the working relationship between the contractor, your company and your designated representative (to include inspection personnel). |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
| 2. How flexible was the contractor at satisfying customer requirements? |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
| 3. To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? How knowledgeable were key personnel of the contract requirements? |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT
| 1. (a) Rate the contractor’s ability to perform quality services by skilled and responsive key personnel. |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
| (b) Rate the contractor’s ability to manage company personnel to fully meet contract requirements. |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
| 2. Rate the offeror’s ability to recruit and maintain a fully staffed, high quality work force of polling employees. |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
| 5. (a) Rate the contractor’s ability to respond to changes in requirements? |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
| (b) Rate the contractor’s ability effectively administer their sub-contracts? |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
| Overall Past Performance rating for contractor? |
| Pass Fail Neutral |
Remarks - Please provide any objective comments/additional information for this contract or on any other contracts performed by the contractor that may be of interest:
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restrictions on the title page of this proposal image1.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .