A22W912P918R0019Amendment02.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912P918R0019
About this file
SOLICITATION AMENDMENT 02
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W912P918R0019
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of this amendment is to clarify the time period for submitting questions on subject RFP. See page 2 for details.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 25
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 23-May-2018
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912P918R0019
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
18-May-2018
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
23-May-2018
CODE
CONTRACTING DIVISION
US ARMY ENGR DIST ST LOUIS
1222 SPRUCE STREET, RM 4.207
ST LOUIS MO 63103-2833
W912P9 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 02
The purpose of this amendment is to change the following language in Part 1 – Proposal Submission Instructions, Notice to Offerors 4. Submission of Inquiries:
From: Proposals for this solicitation will be accepted until the date and time indicated on Standard Form 33.
Prospective offerors should submit inquiries related to this solicitation only by e-mail to:
E-MAIL ADDRESS: angie.l.grimes@usace.army.mil
Include the solicitation number, and project title with any questions/clarifications. Written questions must be received by this office not later than 10 calendar days prior to the date set for receipt of offers. TELEPHONE
INQUIRIES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
To: Proposals for this solicitation will be accepted until the date and time indicated on Standard Form 33. Prospective offerors should submit inquiries related to this solicitation only by e-mail to:
Include the solicitation number, and project title with any questions/clarifications. Written questions must be received by emailed to Angie Grimes, Contract Specialist at angie.l.grimes@usace.army.mil no later than 10 am local time on May 30, 2018. TELEPHONE INQUIRIES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
INSTRUCTIONS, TO BDDERS
PART I - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, NOTICE TO OFFERORS
SECTION L
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
This solicitation is to provide one indefinite delivery, five year service contract (one year base and four one year option periods) at the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant (IAAAP) Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) site for the continued support of Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste (HTRW) investigations and environmental remediation programs and projects managed by the St. Louis District of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). It is provided to ensure that the selection is made in accordance with the acquisition plan, the Request for Proposals (RFPs), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15, and any corresponding Agency regulations. Geographic proximity includes: FUSRAP sites managed by the St. Louis District located at the IAAAP in Burlington, Iowa. The IAAAP FUSRAP site contain depleted uranium (DU) contaminated material. This Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Remedial Action (RA) will proceed in accordance with the signed Operable Unit-8 (OU-8) Record of Decision (ROD) (USACE 2011) that presents the selected remedy for remediation of soil and structures in designated areas at IAAAP. The environmental services under this replacement Single-Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) are similar to those currently performed for the IAAAP FUSRAP site.
This is a best-value competitive acquisition for the award of a SATOC, set-aside for 8(a) Competitive utilizing the tradeoff source selection process. Award will be made to the best overall proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government. Evaluation methodology for the instant procurement consists of four factors.
The four (4) factors for this solicitation are outlined below.
FACTORS AND RELATIVE ORDER OF IMPORTANCE
FACTOR
NUMBER
FACTOR
RELATIVE ORDER OF IMPORTANCE
Technical Approach
More important than Factors 2 and 3
2 Past Performance Equal to Factor 3
Management Approach
Subfactor (A) – Key Personnel Subfactor (B) – Schedule
Equal to Factor 2
4 Cost Factors 1, 2 and 3 combined are significantly more important than Factor 4
Oral explanations or instructions are not binding. Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation. As this is a competitive negotiation acquisition, there is no public proposal opening and no information will be given out as to the number of offerors or the results of the competition until all awards are made.
2. REQUIRED REGISTRATIONS
Offerors must have and must maintain an active registration in the following databases:
System for Award Management (SAM): Offerors must have and must maintain an active registration in the
SAM database at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ to be eligible for a Government contract award. If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), the JV entity must have valid SAM registration in the SAM database representing the JV as one business/firm/entity. If at the time of award an offeror is not actively and successfully registered in the SAM database, the Government reserves the right to award to the next prospective offeror.
On-Line Representations and Certifications: Prospective Contractors shall complete electronic representations and certifications at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ in conjunction with required registration in the
SAM.
3. DEFINITIONS
When the word ‘offeror’ is encountered throughout this Section, it is intended to mean a company, teaming arrangement, or Joint Venture seeking to do business with the Government that submits a proposal in response to this solicitation.
A ‘proposal’ is documentation prepared by the offeror and submitted to the Government for evaluation purposes in response to this solicitation.
When the word ‘Government’ is encountered throughout this Section, it is intended to mean the USACE, St. Louis District (MVS).
4. SUBMISSION OF INQUIRIES
Proposals for this solicitation will be accepted until the date and time indicated on Standard Form 33. Prospective offerors should submit inquiries related to this solicitation only by e-mail to:
Include the solicitation number, and project title with any questions/clarifications. Written questions must be received by emailed to Angie Grimes, Contract Specialist at angie.l.grimes@usace.army.mil no later than 10 am local time on May, 2018. TELEPHONE INQUIRIES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
5. DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTINGPROPOSALS
A. Offers must be placed in envelopes/packages, sealed and marked and addressed as follows: MARK PACKAGES:
Solicitation Number: W912P9-18-R-0019 Offer Closing Date: 19 June 2018 Offer Closing Time: 010:00 am Local St. Louis time
ADDRESSPACKAGESTO:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) St. Louis District, CEMVS-CT-X
Angie Grimes 1222 Spruce Street – 4th Floor Room
4.101 St. Louis, MO 63103-2833
Additional Instructions Pertaining to Hand Carried Offers: Hand-carried offers must be delivered to the above address. Proposals must be properly marked package(s) and given to a member of the Contracting Division no later than the time specified above.
B. File Packaging
All the proposed files shall be compressed (zipped) into one file entitled proposal zip using WinZip version 6.2 or later, or as separate uploads in their native format, i.e. doc., xls., ppt., etc. and provided on CD’s or DVD’s. Zip disk are not permitted. Files shall be read only format, using PDF files. All price breakdown information to aide in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel Read/Write format and viewable in Microsoft Excel 2007.
Each disc shall be externally labeled with the volume number, date, and the offeror’s name.
**Please note – Self extracting exe files are not acceptable.** If the hard copy proposal differ from the electronic version, the hard copy will govern.
Contract Requirement. All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Each file of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the narrative discussion.
The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Propriety information shall be clearly marked.
PROPOSALS SUBMITTED AFTER THE DATE AND TIME
ESTABLISHED FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE
EVALUATED.
6. ELECTRONIC OFFERS
Electronic proposals, and their applicable modifications or cancellations, will not be accepted. However, proposals may be withdrawn in writing by letter or e-mail. Any written notice to withdraw an offer sent to this office must be received in the office designated in the RFP for receipt of offers not later than the exact date and time set for receipt of proposals.
7. PROPOSALS SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN THE FOLLOWING FORMAT
VOLUME 1: Technical Proposal
PROPOSAL PACKAGE: Original
Copies
CD
FACTOR 1 – Technical Approach
FACTOR 2 – Past Performance
Past Performance shall also include the following:
• Letters of Commitment from Sub-Contractors (if applicable)
• Teaming Arrangements (if applicable)
• Joint Venture Agreements (if applicable)
FACTOR 3 – Management Approach
Subfactor (A) – Key Personnel
Subfactor (B) – Schedule
VOLUME 2: FACTOR 4 – Cost Proposal
PROPOSAL PACKAGE: Original Copies CD
1 2 1 Cost Proposal shall also include the following:
• Signed Standard Form 33 and all Amendments, signed and dated
• Section B Bid Schedule
• SAM Representations and Certification
• Offeror’s e-mail address and cell phone number
• Name, Address, DUNS, CAGE Code, and TAX Identification Numbers of Contractor submitting proposal
The Government will not make assumptions concerning intent, capabilities, or experience. Clear identification of proposal details shall be the sole responsibility of the offeror. The Government may reject incomplete proposals after initial evaluation without further consideration. Complete proposals shall meet the basic requirements identified in the RFP.
8. PROPOSALSUBMISSIONREQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS
a. REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE TECHNICAL AND COST PROPOSALS.
DO NOT MIX CONTENTS OF VOLUME 1 (Technical) AND VOLUME 2 (Cost) IN THE
SAME BINDER.
(1) Each offeror must submit a Technical Proposal and a Cost Proposal. The Technical Proposal and the Cost Proposal must be submitted as separate volumes. Both the Technical and Cost Proposal shall be paginated (contain consecutive page numbers on each page).
(2) The outside cover of each separate volume (Vol 1 – Technical; Vol 2 – Cost) must be clearly marked to indicate its contents and the identity of the Offeror. Additionally, identify the “original” Technical proposal and the “original” Cost/Cost proposal on the outside cover.
(3) Both the Technical Proposal and the Cost Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.
(4) Pricing Schedule, Vol 2, shall be completed in full.
(5) Do not include any dollar amounts in the Technical Proposal that are taken from the Cost Proposal.
(6) All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted within the Technical Proposal. Do not cross-reference material in the Cost Proposal, or vice versa. Also, do not include links to websites in your proposal. Technical Proposals will not be provided to the Cost team and Cost Proposals will not be provided to the technical team. Therefore, information submitted in the wrong Volume could lead to the proposal being determined “unacceptable” if materially incomplete in any aspect.
(7) Do not attempt to modify the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or
Cost proposal or add conditions or qualifications to your offer. Should the offeror include terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the Solicitation, the offer may be determined "unacceptable" and thus ineligible for award. Any questions related to specific terms and conditions contained within the Solicitation should be resolved prior to submission of the offer. Notwithstanding the above, the offeror must clearly describe on the Proposal Cover Sheet submitted with the Cost Proposal any modifications to the contractual and/or technical terms and conditions of the solicitation contained in the Offer.
(8) Failure to submit required documents or failure to properly complete documents may result in rejection of the offer without further evaluation. Therefore, offerors are urged to follow instructions carefully and to speak with the Contracting Officer if the offeror does not understand any part of the Solicitation.
b. DISCUSSIONS.
The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to hold discussions if it determines that discussions are necessary. Therefore, proposals should be submitted on the most favorable terms that the offeror can submit to the Government.
c. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.
Submit only the documents specifically required in this section. Do not submit excess information;
do not include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc.
Use only 8 ½ by 11 inch paper or A4 paper for hard copy submissions, unless another paper size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use fold-outs (e.g., 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” sheets). Do not use a font size smaller than Times New Roman, 10, or an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. All page margins must be at least one inch wide, but may include headers and footers. All pages must be numbered.
The preferred method for assembling your proposal is to use three-ring binders; however, the use of pressboard or other report covers with compression or other type fasteners is acceptable.
Do not use spring clamps or exceed the recommended capacity of the fastener or binder. Do not use plastic multi-hole/spiral binding systems, heat binding systems, or other systems which do not facilitate the ready insertion of additional pages. Do not include loose papers.
References to “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must clearly mark their proposals in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors— Competitive Acquisition,” paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data .”
In the case of an offeror that is part of a large, multi-segmented business concern, provide information directly pertaining to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) that will perform work under the prospective contract.
For submissions with page limitations, the pages will be counted as follows: One side of the paper is one page; information on both the back and front of one sheet of paper will be counted as two pages. Pages furnished for organizational purposes only, such as a “Table of Contents” or divider tabs, are not included in the page limitation.
9. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF JOINT VENTUREAGREEMENTS
a. A Joint Venture offeror must submit with its technical proposal a copy of the joint venture agreement upon which the Joint Venture organization has been formed. The joint venture agreement must indicate that the Joint Venture is in existence as of the date and time that proposals are due to be submitted; or, alternatively, that the Joint Venture will automatically take legal effect immediately upon notification to the joint venture of contract award.
b. The joint venture agreement must be signed by a representative of each Joint Venture partner who has the requisite authority to bind the partner to the agreement, with the chief executive of each entity identified.
c. To be acceptable to the Government, the joint venture agreement must clearly state within its terms that each member of the Joint Venture is jointly and severally liable for all of the obligations of the Joint Venture itself with respect to completion of all work and services under the contract expected to result from the Solicitation.
d. The terms of the Joint Venture must detail, in terms of percentages, where appropriate, the relationship of the Joint Venture parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, and profit distribution or loss sharing.
e. Additionally, the joint venture agreement must specify who among the joint venture partners is authorized to sign the Solicitation's Standard Form 33, acknowledge the amendments to the Solicitation, if any, and bind the entire Joint Venture to its obligations under any contract which may result from the Solicitation.
10. SUB-CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORS
a. If an offeror wishes to receive credit for the experience or past performance of a Sub-Contractor, including a firm that is a proposed Sub-Contractor to the prime Contractor or a Joint Venture partner, the offeror must submit a letter of commitment to subcontract under the proposed project, signed both by the Sub-Contractor and the offeror.
b. For purposes of this Solicitation, such a Sub-Contractor shall be considered to be a “qualified Sub-
Contractor.”
c. The commitment letter must be submitted even if the Sub-Contractor is in some way affiliated with a Joint Venture partner (for example, the Sub-Contractor is a subsidiary of a Joint Venture partner, or a subsidiary of a firm to which the Joint Venture partner is also a subsidiary).
d. Include letters of commitment in Volume 1, Factor 2 Past Performance.
11. TEAMING ARRANGEMENT
If a contractor wishes to receive credit for the experience or past-performance from a teaming arrangement with another small business, provide the complete information on the arrangement, to include any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner.
12. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
a. Number of Copies of the Technical Proposal. Submit an ORIGINAL and six (6) additional copies of the Technical Proposal, with each set in a separate binder along with a CD containing the entire Technical and Cost Proposal. Each binder shall be clearly labeled with it Title and copy number (e.g.
copy 1 of 6)
b. Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. Each technical proposal shall be organized using the tabs specified in the following chart
Note: The main tabs directly correlate to the evaluation factors identified in Section M of the RFP.
TAB CONTENTS OF
THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
PAGE
LIMITS
TAB 1
Factor 1
Technical Approach
TAB 2
Factor 2
Past Performance
25 Prime Contractor
Plus 5 each for Subcontractors
(excluding PPQs)
TAB 3
Factor 3
Management Approach Subfactor A Key Personnel Subfactor B Schedule
TAB 4
Factor 4
Cost
No Limit
Pages submitted which exceed limitations listed above will not be evaluated. Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.
13. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOLUME 2 – COST PROPOSAL
a. Number of Copies of the Cost Proposal. Submit the ORIGINAL and two copies of the Cost Proposal in a binder. Also furnish Cost Proposal on CD.
b. Size Restrictions and Page Limits. Use only 8 ½” x 11” or A4 pages and a font size no smaller than Time New Roman 10. There are no page limits set for the Cost Proposal. However, please provide only the information required by this solicitation. Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation.
c. Format and Contents of the Cost Proposal and List of Tabs. The Cost Proposal shall be appropriately labeled and shall be organized and tabbed as indicated in the following chart.
TAB
CONTENTS OF THE COST PROPOSAL
TAB 1
The Proposal Cover Sheet, to include the offeror’s e-mail address, cell phone number, Name, Address, DUNS, CAGE Code and Tax Identification Numbers
TAB 2
Signed Standard Form 33 and all Amendments (signed and dated)
TAB 3
Section B, Bidding Schedule
TAB 4
SAM Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of the Offeror
If the Offeror is a Joint Venture, each Joint Venture partner or entity must complete and attach the Online Representations and Certifications for its own organization, in addition to the “Reps and Certs” completed and submitted on behalf of the joint venture offeror.
14. PROPOSALFORMAT – VOLUME 1
TAB 1 – FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES (30 page limit)
The Offeror shall present their technical approach to the components identified in the PWS. The Offeror must demonstrate the capability to perform environmental compliance, environmental monitoring, radiological and environmental investigations along with remediation verification services using laboratory analyses relating to FUSRAP and HTRW or similar work with low-level radioactive contamination. The Offeror shall present capability to perform construction remedial action operations (i.e. excavation, soil sorting, backfilling, site restoration, decontamination, coordination of shipping and disposal and demolition) relating to FUSRAP and HTRW or similar work. Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the technical requirements or the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform.
Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and an accurate evaluation of each proposal.
TAB 2 – FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE (25 page limit)
The Proposal must include no more than five (5) projects of similar size, scope and complexity representing the offeror’s relevant Past Performance using the attached Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) forms. The PPQ forms consist of five
(5) Pages (do not include Adjectival Ratings and Definitions).
(1) To be considered for evaluation, a submitted PPQ form must describe a project that is relevant to the project described in the solicitation, and has been completed within the last ten (10) years of the RFP issue date.
(2) Relevant Past Performance is defined as past performance on projects that show the contractor’s ability to perform the required PWS. A relevant effort is defined as services that are the same as or similar to the effort required by the RFP.
(3) Offerors shall ensure the PPQs provided contain: contract name/title; client point-of-contact(s) with confirmed correct phone numbers and email addresses; geographic location of contract; date contract was substantially complete; final US dollar contract value; description of the contract including scope, dimensions, scale and quality parameters of the contract; and description of the offeror’s involvement with the performance of the contract.
(4) While the Government will consider past performance information on relevant projects performed for state and local Governments, as well as in the commercial sector, past performance conducted within the DoD will receive greater consideration when assigning a past performance confidence assessment rating than those for work performed for organizations other than the DoD.
The PPQ included in this solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2. Completed PPQs must be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first two (2) pages of the PPQ which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. OFFERORS SHALL NOT INCORPORATE BY REFERENCE INTO THEIR PROPOSAL PPQs PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FOR OTHER REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.
TAB 3 – FACTOR 3: MANAGEMENT APPROACH (15 page limit)
Subfactor (A) – Key Personnel:
The proposal shall contain an Organization Chart and description of roles for this contract showing/discussing home office support, on-site management and technical specialists, and the responsible chain of command.
Offeror shall submit resumes of key management personnel and their organizational structure for this contract. The resumes should clearly display job title, education, special qualifications and experience record showing title, specific duties, responsibilities and assignments.
The Offeror shall discuss the availability, professional qualifications of construction, engineering and other technical abilities of key personnel within the last five years for related to environmental response actions associated with investigation, design, removal, and construction activities involving sites contaminated with radiological waste. Emphasis should be placed on personnel related to this type of remedial work. Offeror shall submit resumes of key personnel. The resumes should clearly display job title, education, special qualifications and experience record showing title, specific duties, responsibilities and assignments.
The offeror shall provide information proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE Code, DUNS Number and type of work to be performed by citing the applicable Government PWS subparagraph number. The proposal should provide a diagrammed organizational chart showing staff and subcontractor’s relationships and lines of authority.
Subfactor (B) – Schedule:
The schedule shall address major tasks, durations, identified resources, relationships between tasks (i.e.
predecessors and successors) for scheduled increments of work, and other pertinent information. The proposed schedule shall include as a minimum:
(1) Pre-construction actions (major preconstruction submittals, Trailers & Con-Ex boxes, setup of data management system, etc.);
(2) Mobilization, and site preparation;
(3) Installation of Soil Sorter System;
(4) Calibration and Verification of Soil Sorter System
(5) Excavation of Contaminated material per each Area locations as identified in the RFP
(6) Removal, shipment and disposal of Contaminated Material offsite.
(7) Seasonal shifts (assume work during the months of April thru November) (Milestones)
(8) Provide, prepare and submit an annual Report for Remedial Action Summary (RAS) concerning each field season. (Assume three iterations)
(9) Contract completion reports (as-builts, inspections, punch-lists, closeout submittals, etc.).
Any additional pertinent activities not listed should also be included. The schedule shall define the work shift duration, number of shifts per day, and the number of work days per week for the various tasks, activities and features. In addition, the schedule should communicate the offeror’s understanding of the linear nature of the work and sequencing required to accommodate the technical requirements with regards to spacing, verticality, and permeability as well as the overriding and concurrent complications of the sequencing associated with panel construction. Allowable weather days shall be accounted for in the project schedule (SECTION 00 08 00).
PROPOSAL FORMAT – VOLUME 2 TAB 1 – FACTOR 4: COST
The offeror shall submit the Solicitation Cost Proposal Schedule with their proposal. The offeror’s Cost shall contain all costs to complete the work to include profit, all overhead (to include office and field overhead), labor burden, insurance, adjustments to listed Costs, general and administrative expenses, Sub-Contractor mark-up, mobilization and demobilization, and all other costs including, but not limited to, compliance with environmental laws, permits, preparation of reports, correspondence and documentation required by law or these specifications, tax laws, protection and/or moving of Government property and engineering services.
Engineering services include those services that are incidental to construction, and completing submittals for construction work.
The Costs shall also include costs necessary to interface with Government representatives, and coordination with occupants and other Contractors, as necessary. For more information see the Summary of Work.
Information to be provided in Volume 2:
(1) Proposal Cover Sheet (see instructions below)
(2) Standard Form 33 “Solicitation, Offer and Award” and all amendments to the solicitation signed and dated
(3) Section B Bid Schedule
(4) Copy of SAM’s Representations and Certifications for offeror
(ii) VOLUME 2 – Cost. This volume shall consist of all information, required to support proposed costs and prices. Certified cost and pricing data are required IAW FAR 15.403 and shall comply with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2 (Instructions for Submitting Cost/Price Proposals When Certified Cost or Pricing Data Are required) and the requirements set forth below. There are no page limitations for this volume.
(1) The proposal shall set forth a summary of the total estimated costs by cost element and shall provide a breakdown of the proposed estimated costs, including all direct and indirect charges and fees. In order to maintain a minimum level of commonality between proposals, each offeror is required to complete (in entirety) the cost summary sheet provided at Attachment 1 and the cost summary sheet and shall be provided for the base effort. All documentation furnished to support the cost summaries are to be provided in a format chosen by the offeror that is easily traceable to the cost summary sheets.
(2) The disciplines provided on the cost summary sheets (Attachments 1) are disciplines that have historically provided the greatest benefit for this effort. However; Offeror may use these disciplines and/or propose other disciplines that gives the greatest benefit to the Government for this effort. If other disciplines are proposed than what is provided in the cost summary sheets, offeror shall provide an explanation in their cost proposal.
(3) The specific direct labor rates utilized to price the proposal must be identified in the cost and pricing proposal only. The proposal shall set forth a complete breakdown of the direct and indirect rates by category and the rationale thereof. Provisions for overtime and shift differential charges shall be clearly addressed on a per- hour basis.
(4) Direct labor hours and rates shall be delineated by labor category by contract year for the offeror and each subcontractor. The labor hour delineation must be directly traceable to the same information proposed in the Technical Volume.
(5) Indirect expense rates shall be proposed in the same manner as direct labor rates, i.e., by contract year with the methodology used to derive any composite rates proposed.
(6) Offerors shall provide a copy of their Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) approve Forward Price Rate
Agreement. (FPRA).
(7) Offerors are reminded to identify any uncompensated or partially compensated overtime included in the proposal – per FAR 52.237-10.
(8) Pursuant to the Service Contract Labor Standards (SCLS), the determination by the Secretary of Labor as to the applicable minimum monetary wage and fringe benefits will be made part of any resulting contract. For evaluation purposes only, the Government has incorporated the applicable Area Wage Determinations and the Collective Bargaining Agreement (if applicable) as Attachment 10 of this RFP. The offeror shall provide a crosswalk of the proposed labor categories against the Area Wage Determinations.
(9) In order to expedite the evaluation, offerors (prime and sub) are requested to provide a copy of their cost and pricing proposal, in the same format required by this RFP, to their cognizant DCAA office upon submission of the proposal to the Contracting Officer. The offeror shall provide information regarding its cognizant DCAA office, to include point of contact, telephone number and email address.
(10) Offerors are reminded of the requirements of Section 39 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Act (41 U.S.C. 1127, formerly 41 U.S.C. 435), as amended, which limits allowable costs for senior executive personnel compensation to $693,951 per year.
(11) For proposal preparation purposes, the expected or approximate date for initiation of contract performance is 01 July 2018 (or later).
(12) The offeror shall submit a complete breakdown of costs by major subcontractor. A major subcontractor is defined as a member of the offeror’s overall team who is expected to perform 20% or more of the proposed effort.
1. Section 1 – Fully Burden Contract (Base and all option periods) Labor Rates – Cost Summary Sheet (Attachment 1)
The Government will review the rates proposed for reasonableness. The Offeror shall submit the Fully Burden Labor rate on the cost summary sheets in this section. Offerors will submit loaded labor rates for each of these disciplines. The loaded rates will include basic labor rate, payroll burden and fringes. The contractor will be requested to provide these loaded labor rates for the entire contract period. The loaded labor rates for the sample task order shall be the same loaded rates provided in the base year.
2. Section 2 – Cost Summary Sheet (Attachment 1)
All offeror shall submit on cost summary spreadsheet (Attachment 1), the loaded labor rates, materials, and other direct costs, labor overhead, general and administrative overhead and any other costs based on the PWS provided with the seed task order.
(a) The remedial work is based upon radiological remediation operations at the IAAAP St. Louis FUSRAP Site that represents the type of work contemplated for the SATOC. The Offerors will be utilizing the proposed labor rates from their proposed cost summary sheet, referenced above, for home office and field office personnel. Labor rates, materials, other direct costs, labor overhead, general and administrative overhead and any other costs that may be associated with this project will be compared to the Independent Government Estimate (IGE) and evaluated by a cost evaluation team to determine cost realism, reasonableness and distribution of costs relative to the work to be performed as outlined in the task order.
Section 3: Cost Accounting System
Cost reimbursable task orders will be awarded as a result of this contract. The successful contractor will be required to have a Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audit. As a result of the DCAA audit, the contractor will have an approved accounting system. This system is required for a contractor to participate in a Federal Government cost reimbursable task order.
To be eligible for award an Offeror shall have an adequate cost accounting system in accordance with FAR 16.301-3(a) (3). The contracting officer will ensure that the contractor’s accounting system will permit timely development of all necessary cost data in the form required by the proposed contract type. Offerors must maintain a cost accounting system determined adequate for determining costs applicable to contract by their cognizant auditing agency. Each Offeror shall complete the SF 1408 Pre-award Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System form (attachment 2) and Financial Reference Questionnaire (attachment 3).
Section 4: Financial Information
In accordance with FAR 9.103, contracts shall be awarded to responsible prospective contractors only. To be determined responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104, a prospective contractor must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them. Offerors shall complete the Financial Information Questionnaire (attachment 5) and submit the questionnaire with their proposal. In addition, offerors shall submit a copy of the written letter to their financial institution(s) authorizing the financial institution to discuss the offeror’s financial information with the Contracting Officer or designated representative. Publicly traded companies may submit a copy of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K instead of the document and the letter to the financial institution.
PROPOSAL COVER SHEET
1. Solicitation Number.
2. The offeror’s name, address, office and cell phone numbers and e-mail address.
3. A statement certifying that the enclosed proposal conforms to all terms, conditions, and provisions of the solicitation and a promise to furnish all items and services at the fixed price which the offeror has set opposite each item or service, or a statement specifying any exceptions contained in the offeror’s proposal to the technical standards and cost/price standards set forth in the solicitation, including any exceptions to the requirements of this solicitation inherent in the offeror’s standard terms and conditions.
4. Names, titles, land line and cell phone numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation.
5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of the agent’s authority to bind the offeror, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.
6. Offeror’s DUNS, CAGE Code and TAX Identification Numbers.
ATTACHMENT A
DATA SHEET FOR PERFORMANCE SURVEY
PURPOSE: The purpose of this acquisition is to provide one indefinite delivery, five year service contract (one year base and four one year option periods) with a total capacity of $25 million for the continued support of Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste (HTRW) investigations and environmental remediation programs and projects managed by the St. Louis District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
Government RFP Point of Contact (POC): Angie Grimes Commercial Phone: (314) 331- 8965 Fax Number: (314) 331-8746 INSTRUCTIONS TO PRIME OFFEROR: Offerors shall complete one of these attachments for yourself and one for each division(s), major subcontractor(s), teaming partner(s), joint venture partner(s), or key person(s) the offeror wants the government to consider in the performance evaluation. YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, AS THE PRIME OFFEROR, MUST APPEAR IN BLOCK 1 BELOW. Enter the name and address of the firm or individual you want surveyed in Block 2. If no name appears, only the firm or individual in Block 1 will be surveyed.
NOTE 1: Offerors shall complete a separate data sheet for each contract for itself (minimum of 3 up to a maximum of 5) and each additional entity the offeror wants the government to consider (up to a maximum of 5 for each entity). *For Key Personnel to be evaluated project information in the same format below shall be provided--resumes will not be evaluated.
NOTE 2: Offerors shall submit this information with Volume I of their proposal. Offerors are encouraged, but not required, to provide copies to the Contracting Officer before the RFP closing date.
NOTE 3: Subcontractor consent release shall be completed for every major subcontractor(s), teaming partner(s), joint venture partner(s) or key person(s) whose performance the offeror wants the government to consider during the evaluation. Failure to complete the subcontractor consent form may result in information not being evaluated.
1. Name and address of Prime Contractor
REQUIRED
OFFEROR INSERT RESPONSES HERE
2. Name and address of subcontractor, team partner, joint venture or key person to be surveyed. INSERT “NONE” IF ONLY PRIME
CONTRACTOR WILL BE SURVEYED.
3. Name and address of agency holding the contract
4. Name and title of person to contact at the agency
5. Telephone number of POC in Block 4
6. Fax number of POC in Block 4
7. E-mail address of POC in Block 4, if known
8. Exact Contract/Project Title, Contract Number, and Contract Type (Firm Fixed Cost, IDIQ, Cost Type, Cost plus Fixed Fee, MACC, MATOC, etc.)
9. Brief project description including discussion as to its relevancy to this acquisition (may be expressed as a percentage of the work to be performed (i.e. 30% paving, 40% design, etc.)
10. Dollar amount of project in Block 8 (include base Cost plus all options)
11. Period of performance and final contract completion date of project
SUBCONTRACTOR CONSENT:
We are currently participating as a (circle one): subcontractor, teaming partner, joint venture or key person with the prime contractor identified above in response to the referenced RFP. We understand the government is placing increased emphasis on performance in order to obtain best value. In order to facilitate the performance evaluation process, we are signing this consent form to allow you to discuss our performance with the prime contractor.
PASTPERFORMANCE
QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
EXPERIENCE INFORMATION
(To be completed by Offeror)
1. Contractor:
Address:
2. Contract /Task Order(TO) /Purchase Order (PO) Number:
3. Contract/TO/PO Dollar Value:
4. Contract/TO/PO Status:
Active Complete
Percent (%) complete and scheduled completion date (if active):
Completion Date (if 100% complete):
5. Project Title: Prime Sub-Contractor
Location (City and Province):
6. Project Description:
Features of work that the Offeror completed, including a statement of the total dollar value of this work:
Firm Cost
PASTPERFORMANCEQUESTIONNAIRE
Note: The past performance questionnaire consists of a total of five (5) pages.
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Offeror to complete Blocks 1‐4)
1. Contractor Information
Firm Name:
CAGE Code:
Address: DUNs Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact:
Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performedas: Prime Contractor
Sub Contractor
Joint Venture
Other
(Explain)
Percent of project work performed:
If Sub‐Contractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone#):
3. Contract Information
Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Original Contract Cost (Award Amount):
Final Contract Cost (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information
Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: THE GOVERNMENTREQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. THE GOVERNMENTRESERVES
THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many of the requirements to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some of the requirements to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner.
There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the Contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that Contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the Contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when Multiple significant events occurred that the Contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF
THECONTRACTOR’SPERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse performance)
E VG S M U N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant milestones.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.