W912HV-18-R-0006-Am0002.pdf

PDF 761 KB Posted

Attached to
FY18 DESC1805 Upgrade Fuel Wharf COMFLEACT Sasebo, Yokose, Japan
Solicitation number
W912HV-18-R-0006
Issued by

About this file

W912HV-18-R-0006-Am0002

View the file

Other files

Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FY18 DESC1805 Upgrade Fuel Wharf COMFLEACT Sasebo, Yokose, Japan

The purpose of this amendment is to revise Specifications.

See next page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912HV18R0006

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

21-May-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

25-Jun-2018

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE-JAPAN DISTRICT

RM 147, BLDG. 250

CAMP ZAMA

ZAMA-CITY, KANAGAWA 252-8511

JAPAN

W912HV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912HV18R0006

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT (continued)

A. CHANGES TO SPECIFICATIONS – The amendment mark “(Am-0002)” is shown on each page of the amended specification section(s).

Revised Page(s) to Project Specifications. Attached hereto are the following revised page(s) to specifications. Revised page(s) will replace like-numbered page(s) in the subject specifications. Changes are indicated by an asterisk (*) in the left margin opposite the beginning of the revision and an asterisk in the right margin opposite the end of the revision.

Section Page No(s).

Section 00 22 00 Page 15, 17 & 18 Section 00 73 00 Page 69

B. Proposal due date and time of August 6, 2018 (02:00 PM), Japan Standard Time remains unchanged.

2.3 Proposals received by the Government after the date and time set for receipt of proposals will be handled in accordance with the requirements of Provision “52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition”. Note: When hand-carrying proposal, offerors are advised they must process through the base security and should be aware of possible delays.

2.4 Offerors are required to provide information addressing all stated factors in a clear and understandable format. If an offeror does not have information relating to a specific factor, the offeror shall clearly state so in the proposal. Proposals that do not clearly address all factors may be considered unacceptable and may not receive further consideration.

3.0 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMISSION FORMAT

3.1 General Requirements: The proposal shall be clear, concise and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal shall not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather provide convincing rationale to address how the Offeror intends to meet the requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities or experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

3.2 General Format

3.2.1 Proposals shall be submitted in two (2) separate envelopes as indicated below:

3.2.1.1 Volume I shall contain the Technical Proposal and shall be clearly marked Volume I – Technical Proposal. In addition, follow instructions in Paragraph (c)(1) of Section 00 21 00, 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION.

3.2.1.2 Volume II shall contain the Price Proposal and shall be clearly marked Volume II – Price Proposal. In addition, follow instructions in Paragraph (c)(1) of Section 00 21 00, 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION.

3.2.3 Each volume shall be separate and complete in itself so that evaluation of one may be accomplished independently from evaluation of the other. It is recommended that the pages be standard 8-1/2” x 11” or A4 white bond paper using 12 characters per linear inch or equivalent as the minimum size standard for text. Volume I, Technical, shall not contain any reference to cost for this project. The total pages submitted for Volume I, Technical Proposal shall not exceed 60 pages. Any pages over the prescribed limit will not be considered for evaluation.

Each volume shall include page numbers on each page

3.2.4 The Government recognizes that offerors go to considerable expense to prepare proposals for this solicitation, so the Government prefers that proposals be practical. Elaborate format, special binders, special reproduction techniques, and the like are not necessary or desired. In short, the proposal shall completely and adequately address the requirements stated in solicitation. Proposal legibility, clarity, coherence, and contents are important. The technical proposal, Volume I of the Offeror’s proposal shall be bound and shall not exceed 60 single-spaced single sided sheets. Do not include the front and back cover of the technical proposal in the 60 sheet count. However, all other sheets, including Past Performance Questionnaire, will be included in the count. Since only the first 60 sheets of the offeror’s technical proposal will be

(Am-0002)

Volume I – Technical

Tab Documents to be Included

Cover Sheet. Follow instructions in Paragraph (c)(2) in Section 00 21 00, 52.215- 1, Instruction to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition

Attachment A - Project Information Sheet. Submit one information sheet per project. Submit at least one but not more than three projects.

Attachment B – USACE Past Performance Questionnaire. Submit one sheet for each project submitted under Factor 1 – Experience.

4. Additional Submittal Instructions

i. Project Information Sheet (Attachment A) is included in this solicitation and provided for the offeror to submit for each project included for Factor 1, Experience. Submit one information sheet per project. Submit at least one (1) but not more than three (3) projects. Factor 1, Experience, sets forth project relevancy requirements

ii. USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment B) included in this solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit information for Factor 2, Past Performance. See Factor 2 for more information.

b. Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s experience on recent and relevant projects.

1. This Factor evaluates the offeror’s experience. The Government will evaluate the experience an offeror displays on relevant projects. Projects not meeting all the relevancy criteria listed below will be considered not relevant for this factor evaluation. For purposes of evaluation of this Factor, a relevant project is a project that meets the following criteria:

i. Project was one of the following:

A. New construction, repair, or renovation of a Hydrant Fueling System with a contract award value which equaled or exceeded ¥100,000,000;

B. New construction, repair, or renovation of a Fuel Offloading and Loading Facility with a contract award value which equaled or exceeded ¥100,000,000;

C. New construction of a pier with a contract award value which equaled or exceeded ¥500,000,000; OR

D. New construction of a wharf with a contract award value which equaled or exceeded ¥500,000,000;

ii. Project must be either currently well underway (at least 50% construction progress completed) or was completed and turned over no longer than ten (10) years preceding the issuance date of this solicitation; AND

iii. Project was performed by the Offeror as the prime contractor (see below notes).

Note (1):

The Government will also consider prime contractor experience of the offeror's parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm as experience attributable to the offeror for evaluation purposes if the offeror can establish that the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm will have a significant involvement in performance of this contract and describe the resources of the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm that will be utilized on project that is the subject of this procurement.

If submitting a parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm’s project for experience, it is the offeror's responsibility to effectively demonstrate and describe how the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm's resources (such as workforce, management, facilities, or other resources) will significantly contribute to the execution of the project which is the subject of this procurement; failure to effectively demonstrate and describe the planned contribution of the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm’s involvement in the subject project of this procurement will cause the past experience of the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firms to be considered not relevant for evaluation purposes in this procurement. Further, any project in which the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm performed the role of a subcontractor will not be considered relevant when evaluating the experience of the offeror.

Note (2):

A Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) or Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) alone is not considered a relevant construction project, but an individual task order project against its SATOC or MATOC may be submitted if it meets the requirements for a relevant construction project set forth above.

procured for official purposes in Japan by the United States armed forces, or its authorized procurement agencies are EXEMPT from various Japanese Taxes, including Consumption Tax.

The exemption from the Japanese Consumption Tax applies not only to Japanese prime contractors, but also to Japanese subcontractors or suppliers at every level regardless of the nationality of the prime contractor whether a Japanese or a Foreign firm. The instruments listed hereinafter have been agreed to by both governments of Japan and the U.S. as "Proof of Purchase by U.S. Forces in Japan.” Standard Form 1034 Public Voucher for Purchases and Services other than Personal DD Form 1155 Order for Supplies or Services Standard Form 44 Purchase Order- Invoice-Voucher ENG Form 93 Payment Estimate Therefore, Japanese Consumption Tax shall NOT be included in your bid, proposal or quote.

12. SAFETY STANDARDS. The successful offeror will be required to comply with the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) standards as well as the Corps of Engineers Manual 385-1-1, Safety and Health Requirements Manual.

13. COST BREAKDOWNS - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS, RFP (MAY 2013).

a. When cost or pricing data will be required from the contractor, or any subcontractor, for the pricing of a proposed contract modification with the value in excess of $2,000,000 or equivalent thereto (the sum of deletions and additions), FAR Clause 52.215-11, "Price Reduction for Defective Cost or Pricing Data - Modifications" and 52.215-13, "Subcontractor Cost or Pricing Data - Modifications", are applicable under this contract.

Cost or Pricing data shall be submitted in accordance with Table 15-2 of FAR 15.408. The contractor is required to identify the portion of the data submitted that is factual in nature and the portion that is judgmental in nature plus contingencies included in the proposal.

With regard to the judgmental factors, the contractor must identify the factual data used in arriving at the judgmental factors.

b. When the proposed price to a contract modification is at or below the cost or pricing data threshold of $2,000,000 or equivalent thereto, information other than cost or pricing data will be required for submission by the contractor in its own format. This information is not considered cost or pricing data and should not be certified by the contractor.

c. The contractor, when responding to any government's request for proposal letter for a proposed modification, shall furnish TWO (2) COPIES OF COST BREAKDOWN (IN ENGLISH) in sufficient detail to permit an analysis of all material, labor, equipment, subcontract and overhead costs for the establishment of price reasonableness or cost realism.

d. The cost breakdown shall include separately the direct cost for the use of the construction equipment, the direct cost of labor and of materials and equipment for incorporation in the work, and the indirect costs attributable to direct costs.

File details come from the government source that posted it.