W912HN19R3004.pdf

PN 88724 SCI Training, Research & Netw ork Center (MCA1), Fort Gordon, GA

A. This acquisition w ill be aw arded utilizing a Low est Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Source Selection Process in accordance w ith

FAR 15.101-2.

B. This solicitation is being solicited on an unrestricted basis as full and open competition, but contains a HUBZone Price Evaluation Preference.

C. The North American Industry Classif ication System (NAICS) code is 236220.

D. Per DFARS 236.204 Disclosure of Magnitude: the Magnitude of this project is betw een $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

E. The proposal of the successful offeror shall be incorporated by reference into the aw arded contract.

***Please note that failure to f ill out ALL clauses/provisions in Section 00 45 00 may result in your proposal being found Non-Responsive***

Amendment may be issued to revise the Erosion Control Draw ings if required upon approval and receipt of the Land Disturbance Permit.

ANDREW K PAGE 912-652-5900

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

31-May-2019

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________780 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________ copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________02 Jul 2019 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

USACE - SAVANNAH DISTRICT

100 W. OGLETHORPE AVE

SAVANNAH GA 31401

W912HN

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

W912HN19R3004 61

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Section 00 01 15 - List of Drawing Sheets

WAGE DETERMINATION

General Decision Number: GA190153 02/15/2019 GA153

Superseded General Decision Number: GA20180165

State: Georgia

Construction Type: Building

County: Richmond County in Georgia.

http:www.wdol.gov/dba.aspx

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Job Primary Facility Construction SCI Training, Research & Network Center, within the 5' line, complete, inclusive of all materials, plant, labor, equipment and site.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

0002 1 Job Supporting Facilities Site Preparation and Development Including Utilities, Paving

Outside the 5' line, complete, inclusive of all materials, plant, labor, equipment and site.

0003 1 Job OPTION Additional Parking See Section 01 03 00 for further details related to the option.

0004 1 Job OPTION Roof Mechanical Equipment Screen Wall See Section 01 03 00 for further details related to the option.

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

Section 00 20 00 - Instructions for Procurement

1. Technical inquiries are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at:

www.projnet.org\projnet Bidder Inquiry Key: VJ3634-G6KGS2

All questions regarding this solicitation must be submitted in writing through ProjNet no later than 10 calendar days prior to the date established for receipt of proposals as shown in this solicitation. The Government reserves the right to not respond to questions/inquiries received after this date. To submit and review bid inquiry items, offerors will need to be a current registered user or self-register in the system. To self-register, go to the web page, click bid tab, select bidder inquiry, select agency USACE, enter the key for this solicitation below, and your email address, then click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue. Offerors will receive an acknowledgement of their question(s) via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

2. If an Offeror believes the requirements in this solicitation contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the Offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer in writing, to include supporting rationale. Such communication may be submitted to the Contracting Officer through the contracting POC identified in this solicitation.

3. Supplemental Price Breakdown. If deemed necessary to evaluate the price proposals in response to the RFP, the Government may request a price breakdown of the Contract Line items.

The Government will provide details on where and how to send the breakdown if required. This information will not be needed sooner than three working days after the proposal submission due date. This information is not an opportunity for a firm to revise its non-price or price proposal.

Firms are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor equipment, subcontracts, etc., and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the appropriate contract line items. Both parties shall presume that field overhead costs through the proposed contract duration are inclusive in the offered price for the contract. If deemed necessary, the supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluations.

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

PROPOSAL & BID BOND SUBMISSION:

CD-ROM PROPOSAL SUBMISSION IS REQUIRED AS SPECIFIED BELOW.

ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION SENT VIA EMAIL OR FACSIMILE WILL NOT BE

ACCEPTED. HAND CARRIED PROPOSAL SUBMISSION, EXCEPT THROUGH U.S.

EXPRESS MAIL, FEDERAL EXPRESS OR UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, IS NOT

AUTHORIZED.

Proposals must be delivered by U.S. Mail, including U.S. Express Mail, Federal Express or United Parcel Service.

DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS

In an effort to reduce paperwork and reduce cost, all proposals shall be submitted via a CD-ROM Proposal. All proposals must be clearly identified with the contractor’s name and address. To ensure timely and proper handling, the lower left corner of the outermost wrapper should indicate the following:

Request For Proposal No: W912HN19R3004 Due Date of Proposal: See Block 13 of the SF1442 Time by which Proposals are Due: 2:00 PM (EDT) Title of Contract: MCA1, Fort Gordon, GA

Proposals must be addressed as indicated below:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Savannah District ATTN: CECT-SAS-E (Daniel Helmig) 100 West Oglethorpe Avenue Savannah, GA 31401

Proposals can only be received from the respective carrier through the main front entrance of the Juliette Gordon Federal Building located at the above address, the main entrance is found on the W. York Street side of the building. The date and time of delivery established by commercial carriers is not the official time of receipt by the Government. Security Guards posted at the entry do not receive proposals and will contact Mailroom personnel. Once Mailroom personnel are available, the proposal will be processed by the Security Guards using established security procedures and subsequently picked up by Mailroom personnel. After receipt by the Mailroom personnel, a record will be made of the receipt of the proposal. Completion of these actions will constitute delivery of the proposal by the date and time designated for receipt of proposals in Block 13 of the SF 1442. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be processed for receipt and are cautioned that sufficient time may be as much as 24 hours prior to the date and time designated for receipt of proposals.

The Government will not be responsible for proposals delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated to receive proposals on its behalf. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that proposals are submitted so as to reach the office designated for receipt of proposals.

Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be physically received and processed by Mailroom personnel in accordance with the information provided.

All submissions included in the CD-ROM shall be in the Adobe PDF format. The Price Proposal and Technical Proposal shall be submitted as “separate” single files on the CD-ROM. Offerors may use compressions utility software such as WinZip or PKZip to reduce file size and facilitate transmission.

Title the file(s) in the following format:

W912HN19R3004_COMPANY NAME_VOLUME I

W912HN19R3004_COMPANY NAME_VOLUME II

For this solicitation, the recipient will be the Contract Specialist, Mr. Daniel Helmig.

Proposal Due Date and Time:

Due Date of Proposal: See Block 13 of the SF1442 Time by which Proposals are Due: 2:00 PM (EST) Title of Contract: MCA1, Fort Gordon, GA

The date and time of delivery will be established by the time of receipt of the Proposal package by the Mailroom personnel, not by the date and time that the proposal was sent via mail. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be received. Please make allowances for delays in transmittal. If a submission is mailed before the deadline, but is not actually received by the Mailroom personnel until after the deadline, the submission will be considered late.

DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTING BID BOND:

In accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee in the solicitation, Offerors are required to submit an original bid bond in accordance with these instructions and by the time and date established for the receipt of proposals. The Bid Guarantee shall be 20% of the bid price or $3 Million, whichever is less. Bid bonds must be submitted in original form and contain original signatures. Photocopied, facsimile, scanned or otherwise mechanically reproduced bid bonds will not be accepted. Failure to submit a proper bid bond shall be cause for rejection of an Offeror’s proposal. Bid Bonds must be delivered by U.S. Mail, including U.S. Express Mail, Federal Express or United Parcel Service. All Bid Bonds must be clearly identified with the contractor’s name and address. To ensure timely and proper handling, the lower left corner of the outermost wrapper should indicate the following:

Title of Project: MCA1, Fort Gordon, GA

Bid Bonds must be addressed to:

U.S, Army Engineer District, Savannah ATTN: CECT-SAS-E (Daniel Helmig) 100 West Oglethorpe Avenue Savannah, Georgia 31401-3640

Bid bonds should be submitted by following the “Directions for Submitting Proposals’ above. The same procedure and precautions should be applied when submitting the Bid Bond as the Proposal.

The date and time of delivery established by commercial carriers is not the official time of receipt by the Government. Security Guards posted at the loading dock and main entry for the building do not receive bid bonds and will contact Mailroom personnel. Once Mailroom Personnel are available, the bid bonds will be processed by the Security Guards using established security procedures and subsequently picked up by Mailroom personnel. After receipt by the Mailroom personnel, a record will be made of the receipt of the bid bonds.

Completion of these actions will constitute delivery of the bid bonds by the date and time designated for receipt.

Offerors that use U.S. Mail or U.S. Express Mail must allow sufficient time for the bid bonds to be received by Mailroom personnel by the time specified. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the bid bonds to be processed for receipt and are cautioned that sufficient time may be as much as 24 hours prior to the date and time designated. The Government will not be responsible for bid bonds delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated.

Offerors are responsible for ensuring that bid bonds are submitted so as to reach the office designated for receipt. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the bid bonds to be physically received and processed by Mailroom personnel in accordance with the information provided.

The Government will not be responsible for proposals delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated to receive proposals on its behalf. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that proposals are submitted so as to reach the designated recipient of proposals.

Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be received in accordance with the instructions provided.

PART II

SECTION V

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

1. OVERVIEW.

1.1 This Request for Proposal (RFP) solicits for the construction of a Training, Research & Network Center at Fort Gordon, GA. This will be a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) contract.

1.2 The purpose of the Source Selection Plan is to establish a uniform evaluation procedure for the technical evaluation of proposals by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the development of the Best Value Decision by the Contracting Officer (KO) using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection Process (See Federal Acquisition Regulation 15.101-2.)

2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Who May Submit a Proposal? The requirement will be advertised under full and open competition; any legally organized firm may submit a proposal. Offerors submitting as a joint venture must provide the agreement forming the joint venture.

2.2 Notwithstanding the specific requirements of any other area of the RFP, information submitted about any company other than the Offeror, whether a predecessor company, affiliated company, subsidiary (including wholly owned subsidiaries), or subcontractors WILL NOT be evaluated for any factor. Information about firms that are part of a joint venture will be considered when the joint venture is the Offeror.

2.3 Offerors shall submit their proposal to the address shown Proposal and Bid Bond Submission Instructions in Section 00 21 00.

3. GENERAL PROPOSAL FORMAT:

3.1 Title Page. Include the title of the solicitation, solicitation number, Offeror name, and date of the submittal.

3.2 Table of Contents. Each volume of the proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents.

Any materials submitted but not required by this solicitation (such as company brochures) shall be relegated to appendices.

3.3 Electronic Submissions.

3.3.1 Written material shall be on 8 ½ x 11 inch paper size, using no smaller than a 10 pitch or 10 font. Page limitations, where specified in the RFP, shall be considered a maximum. Pages in excess of any specified limitation shall not be evaluated.

3.3.2 Offerors SHALL submit an electronic version (PDF Format) of the original Volume I and Volume II. Offerors SHALL submit only two files in PDF format (i.e. Volume I and Volume II). These two files should be named in a specific format: Solicitation Number, Offeror’s Company name and the volume (i.e. W912HN19R3004 USACE_Volume_I.pdf). Given the limited time and resources of the evaluation board, failure to provide proposal in the correct format may hinder the board's ability to evaluate the Offeror's proposal.

3.4 Tabs. Proposal shall be organized and tabbed as follows:

VOLUME I Price/Representations/Certifications

TAB A – Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by authorized individual(s) of the Offeror.

Offers submitted in the name of a Joint Venture must be signed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the joint venture agreement as evidenced in the proposal.

TAB B – Section 00 10 00 – Proposal Pricing Schedule (Factor 3 – Price)

TAB C - Section 00 45 00– Representations and Certifications

TAB D – Proposal Data Sheet – See Attachment 1 provided at the end of this section.

Offerors should ensure telephone number; fax number, e-mail address and DUNS number are all included. The DUNS number provided will be used to access Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) data. Offerors should also provide any other assigned number that identifies them in the PPIRS database. If a separate DUNS has been created for a joint venture, it must be submitted. The Offeror should also submit its Tax ID number on the proposal data sheet.

TAB E – Bid Bond – See Clause 52.228-1 and any other notes, for required bond information.

The Offeror is required to submit a bid bond. Photocopied or electronically scanned bid bonds are not acceptable and may lead to the rejection of the proposal as non-responsive. Offerors shall use the most recent form SF24 (REV. 8/2016).

TAB F – Financial Information (the last three years financial statements, Annual Reports, Dun and Bradstreet ratings and/or number, etc.) Provide a list of all current contracts held, total dollar value, award date, anticipated completion, performance and payment bond amount. The Offeror shall also provide a Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR Clause 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.

TAB G – Joint Venture Agreement, if applicable. See paragraph 2.1

VOLUME II Technical Submittal

TAB H – Past Performance Questionnaires Summary Sheet (Attachment 2) and Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment 3). These forms will be used to evaluate both FACTOR 1 Corporate Relevant Specialized Experience and FACTOR 2 Past Performance.

4. FACTOR 1 – CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

4.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

4.1.1 Using the Past Performance Questionnaire Summary Sheet (Attachment 2) and the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment 3), the Offeror shall demonstrate experience in performing projects meeting the requirements described in paragraphs below. If the Offeror is a joint venture, the projects did not have to have been performed by the joint venture submitting the offer. These projects could have been performed by either company in the joint venture.

Offerors are advised to submit projects wherein the Offeror, or proposed joint venture members, were the prime contractor and played a significant role and to clearly define those roles. If any Offeror has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer. Ensure that the PPQs and continuation sheet, if used, submitted for this Factor clearly describe the relevant characteristics of the project.

4.1.2 Offerors shall submit a minimum of three (3) recent, relevant projects. If an Offeror submits more than three (3) total project examples, only the first three (3) will be evaluated. The projects submitted for consideration in Factor 1 shall be the same projects submitted for evaluation in Factor 2.

4.1.3 Recent, relevant projects:

4.1.3.1 Renovation or a combination of renovation and new construction of any of the following facilities: administrative/office buildings, training/classroom buildings, headquarters/operational facilities, hospitals, or schools; and, a minimum contract value of $50 million. Projects must be \ successfully complete, or fully designed and at least 50% construction progress complete within six (6) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

The Government will not consider multiple projects, such as individual task orders, combined to meet the minimum contract value.

4.1.3.2 New vertical construction of any of the following facilities: administrative/office buildings, training/classroom buildings, headquarters/operational facilities, hospitals, or schools; and, a minimum contract value of $50 million. Project must be \ successfully complete, or fully designed and at least 50% construction progress complete within six

(6) years preceding the date of this solicitation. The Government will not consider multiple projects, such as individual task orders, combined to meet the minimum contract value.

4.1.3.3 Of the recent and relevant projects submitted, one (1) project that contains sensitive compartmentalized information facility (SCIF).

4.1.3.4 Of the recent and relevant projects submitted, one (1) project that was built on a Department of Defense property/installation or other Federal Government location that required all of the following: controlled access to the property or the installation; background checks or clearances by the Government of the contractor and subcontractor personnel; and controlled access to a secured construction site.

4.1.3.5 It is permissible for a project to count toward each set of requirements as long as the entity that performed the work meeting each set of requirements will be performing that work under this solicitation. If the Offeror is a joint venture, the projects do not have to be performed by the joint venture submitting the offer. Those projects could have been performed by either company in the joint venture. Teaming arrangements are NOT acceptable.

4.1.4 The project description on the PPQ shall clearly describe the projects. The Government will not assume any project characteristics that are not specifically identified and described.

The Offeror may attach a continuation sheet to the PPQ if needed consisting of one (1) page to describe how the project contained the elements described above and meets the requirements of this factor. The submission must contain sufficient information for the government to determine whether the project meets the requirements of 4.1.3.

4.1.5 The PPQ must provide a Point of Contact for the Client. If the Government is unable to verify the information provided on the PPQs with the client Point of Contact, or by other sources available (e.g. CPARS), the Government reserves the right to disregard that project when evaluating the Offeror’s experience.

4.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

4.2.1 The Offeror’s submission will be evaluated to determine whether the Offeror has experience performing recent, relevant projects. To meet the minimum requirements for this Factor:

A minimum of one (1) project must meet the requirements of 4.1.3.2 and a minimum of two

(2) additional projects must meet the requirements of either paragraph 4.1.3.1 or 4.1.3.2.

The requirements of 4.1.3.3 and 4.1.3.4 shall be met within at least one of the three (3) minimum projects discussed above.

4.2.2 Rating Methodology for Factor 1. Factor 1 will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions:

ACCEPTABLE - Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE – Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

5. FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.1.1 The Offeror shall demonstrate a record of performance on each project submitted for Factor 1.

The information submitted through the Past Performance Questionnaire Summary Sheet (Attachment 2) and the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 3) for Factor 1 and relevant CCASS or CPARS evaluations will be evaluated for this factor. The PPQ is provided for the Offeror to submit to the client (Point of Contact) for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal. Offeror must ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client Point of Contact. Completed PPQs must be submitted with your proposal by the specified closing date and time. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. While it is important to submit a PPQ signed by the client, if the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a point of contact for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete blocks 1 – 5 of the PPQ which will contain contract and client information and submit it with the proposal.

The Government will call and confirm information provided by the Offeror on the PPQs with the points of contact, to the extent necessary to verify the information in the PPQ or to obtain additional information. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals if the point of contact is not available. If the Government is unable to verify the information in the PPQ, it may be disregarded. Offerors are cautioned that the PPQ must contain sufficient information for the government to determine whether the project contains the elements of work similar to this requirement as described in Factor 1.

Offerors may submit PPQs submitted on other procurements provided they are on the NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire Form—Offerors may attach one additional single-sided page (per PPQ) to further describe how the project meets the RFP requirements.

CCASS or CPARS will be obtained by the Government for the projects submitted.

Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into the proposal, PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. The Government will consider any available CCASS or CPARS information on the relevant projects submitted. In addition, the Government may consider available past performance information on projects not submitted by Offerors’ in response to this solicitation.

5.1.2 Offerors may provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and the Offeror’s corrective actions.

5.1.3 Using PPQs as described above or CCASS/CPARS evaluations, Offerors shall demonstrate the quality of performance information on projects determined by the government to be recent and relevant from Factor 1.

5.1.4 While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the offeror must provide detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information for evaluation by the Government.

5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

5.2.1 Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the probability that the Offeror will meet the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each Offeror’s demonstrated record of performance on recent and relevant projects that involve a similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities as this solicitation requires. The projects submitted for Factor 1 will be evaluated to assess the Government’s confidence in the ability of the Offeror to meet the solicitation requirements.

5.2.2 Performance Evaluation. The Government will evaluate the quality of the Offeror’s past performance using the sources available to it including but not limited to the projects identified by the Offeror and submitted on the PPQs and any additional information about those projects received from references and CPARS. The Government will consider any available CCASS or CPARS information on the relevant projects submitted by the Offeror under this factor. The Government reserves the right to determine an Offeror’s past performance to be Unacceptable if negative past performance information on relevant projects performed by the Offeror but not submitted in response to this solicitation is discovered.

5.2.3 The Government will consider past performance of the offeror and the past performance information submitted on members of a joint venture.

5.2.4 Rating Methodology for Factor 2. The Government will consider the recent and relevant past performance information to assign a past performance evaluation rating. To be rated “Acceptable” in this factor, Offerors must receive ratings of Satisfactory or better in each Rating Methodology for Factor 2. The Government will consider the recent and relevant past performance information to assign a past performance evaluation rating. To be rated “Acceptable” in this factor, Offerors must receive ratings of Satisfactory or better in each Section of all recent, relevant PPQs submitted by the Offeror and on recent, relevant CPARs reviewed by the government. Sections in a CPARS evaluation are Quality, Schedule, Cost Control (if applicable), Management, Utilization of Small Business, Regulatory Compliance, and Other Areas such as but not limited to Safety. The elements within each Section are not considered in determining whether an offeror is Acceptable for this factor. Projects for which an evaluation was performed under the older CCASS system, only the Overall Rating will be considered. Sections in a PPQ is the individual element within each Section. For example Quality Section is not rated however each question/statement such as a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts; b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance; c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance; d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) is rated and will be considered individually in the evaluation of this factor. This factor will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions:

Past Performance Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

5.2.5 If no recent and relevant performance record is available or information is so sparse that no meaningful rating can be reasonably assigned, this factor will be assigned a rating of “Unknown” (FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable”.

6. EVALUATION FACTORS

6.1 NON-COST FACTORS:

FACTOR 1 Corporate Relevant Specialized Experience

FACTOR 2 Past Performance

6.2 FACTOR 3 PRICE. Price analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b), to determine fairness and reasonableness. Reasonableness will be established using available pricing tools such as historical price information, price competition information, or the Independent Government Estimate. Proposals will be reviewed to determine price submission errors or omissions and areas requiring clarification.

7. OVERALL PROPOSAL EVALUATION

7.1 The evaluation will be based on the content of the proposal, and any information obtained from other sources, e.g. past performance information. The SSEB will not consider any documents incorporated by reference, except as expressly allowed by this solicitation.

7.2 Each member of the SSEB will independently consider all information provided in the proposal. Once these individual analyses are completed, the SSEB will assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor. It is the responsibility of each member of the SSEB to provide and document whether the Offeror meets or does not meet the minimum requirements in order to support the assigned rating for each factor. Comments are required for all ratings.

7.3 The Government will evaluate the proposals beginning with the lowest price to the highest price until it reaches the first responsive and responsible Offeror who achieves Acceptable ratings in both factors. That Offeror will be selected for award-- unless necessary to assist with price analysis, the remainder of the proposals will not be evaluated.

8. EXCEPTIONS. Exceptions to the contractual terms and conditions of the solicitation (e.g., standard company terms and conditions) may result in a determination to reject a proposal.

9. RESTRICTIONS. Failure to submit all the data in the format indicated in this section may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and, therefore, not considered for evaluation, and for subsequent award.

10. BASIS FOR AWARD

10.1 Proposals must meet the criteria stated in the RFP in order to be eligible for award, to include responsiveness, and technical acceptability. A responsibility determination will be made in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 9.1.

10.2 In order to determine which proposal(s) represent the best value, proposals will be evaluated against all source selection criteria in this RFP.

10.3 Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. In order for a proposal to be considered awardable, there must be an “acceptable” rating in all non-price factors. The Government will make award to the lowest priced Offeror who is deemed responsive and whose price has been determined fair and reasonable. Reasonableness will be established by using price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b), to determine fairness and reasonableness. Pricing tools such as historical price information, price competition information, or the Independent Government Estimate will be used to determine reasonableness.

10.4 The Government reserves the right to reject any and all offers.

10.5 Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial offer.

ATTACHMENT 1

PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

PROJECT TITLE: Training, Research & Network Center

PROJECT LOCATION: Fort Gordon, GA

1. Name of Firm: Address:

Phone:

Fax:

E-mail:

DUNS # (used for accessing CCASS, PIPRS)

2. AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11

The Offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Proposals (RFP).

Name of Person Authorized to Negotiate: ________________________________________ Negotiator’s Address: ________________________________________________________ Negotiator’s Telephone: __________________________________ Negotiator’s E-mail:______________________________________

ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SUMMARY SHEET

Training, Research & Network Center, Ft Gordon, GA

The Offeror’s proposal shall include the Past Performance Questionnaire Summary Sheet to provide a summary of the PPQs included in this proposal. The summary sheet shall include information for all columns.

No.

Project Name

Contractor

Contract #

Construction % Complete @ Time of Solicitation

Scheduled

Completion Date

ATTACHMENT 3

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: ___ Prime Contractor ___Sub Contractor __Joint Venture ___ Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: ___ Firm Fixed Price ___Cost Reimbursement ___ Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work: ___High ___ Med ___ Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Organization:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE

OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH

THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE

SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE.

PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner.

A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E

VG

S

M

U

N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes

No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

W912HN19R3004

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

252.215-7008 Only One Offer OCT 2013

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-14 NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, AND ENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be DO C2 rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the Contractor will be required to follow all of the requirements of this regulation. [Contracting Officer check appropriate box.]

(End of provision)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a Firm Fixed Price contract resulting from this solicitation.

52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.

(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Goals for minority participation for each trade

Goals for female participation for each trade

Richmond County; GA 27.2%

Nationwide Goal 6.9%

These goals are applicable to all the Contractor's construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and these notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office.

(c) The Contractor's compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on (1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause, (2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled "Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,'' and (3) its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Contractor to Contractor, or from project to project, for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a violation of the contract, Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.

(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification…