SOLICITATION.pdf

- Project Title: Relocate ICU to 4 East

- Project Location: William Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, SC

- Project Description: Demolition and renovation to relocate the existing ICU to Bldg 400, 4th Floor East

- This acquisition is a 100% Service Disabled Veteran Onw ed Small Business Set-Aside.

- The NAICS Code is 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

LISA S SIMMONS 843-329-8086

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

30-Jul-2010

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______30 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________365 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________4 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________30 Aug 2010 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______60 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, CHARLESTON

DISTRICT, CONTRACTING DIVISION

69-A HAGOOD AVENUE

CHARLESTON SC 29403

W912HN

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

843-329-2322FAX:TEL: 843-329-8060 TEL: FAX:

W912HN-10-R-0046 39

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

W912HN-10-R-0046

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Lot RELOCATE ICU TO 4 EASTBid Item 1, Base Bid as required by Drawings and

Specifications FOB: Destination

NET AMT

0002 1 Lot RELOCATE ICU TO 4 EASTLCD glazing in lieu of standard glazing for sliding doors as indicated in Drawings and Specifications

0003 1 Lot RELOCATE ICU TO 4 EASTLCD glazing in lieu of standard glazing for type "A" storefront windows as indicated in Drawings and Specifications.

0004 1 Lot RELOCATE ICU TO 4 EASTProvide alpha style swing out chair with padded seat by Suspend it or equal as indicated in drawings and specifications.

0005 1 Lot RELOCATE ICU TO 4 EASTProvide video surveillance system as indicated in

Drawings and Specifications.

0006 1 Lot RELOCATE ICU TO 4 EASTSubstitute alternate flooring pattern as indicated in

Drawings and Specifications.

0007 1 Lot RELOCATE ICU TO 4 EASTSubstitute LCD glazing in lieu of standard glazing for type "B" storefront windows as indicated in Drawings and Specifications.

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

PART II

Section 00100

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICE TO OFFERORS

Relocate ICU to 4 East William Jennings Bryan Dorn VAMC

Columbia, SC

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OVERVIEW: Demolition, renovation, and new construction as indicated on drawings and specifications to relocate existing ICU to Building 100, 4th floor East at the VAMC, Columbia, SC.

1.1 The contract will be Firm-Fixed Price (FFP). For the evaluation of proposals, the government has developed a Source Selection Plan. The purpose of the Source Selection Plan is to establish a uniform evaluation procedure for the technical evaluation of proposals by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the development of the Best Value Decision by the Source Selection Authority (SSA) using the Trade-Off Process (See Federal Acquisition Regulation 15.101-1). In as much as the proposal shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform any resulting contract, the proposal should be specific and complete in every detail. The proposal should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the contract. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

1.2 Proposal Submissions and the Best Value Tradeoff Process. This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal.

Offerors submit their Corporate Relevant Specialized Experience and past performance information for review and consideration by the Government. Following the review, evaluation, and rating of these proposals, the Government will evaluate price proposals for contractors that have acceptable technical proposals. The technical information contained in the proposals shall be reviewed and evaluated by the Government in accordance with the evaluation criteria provided in paragraph 5, Evaluation and 8, Rating Methodology. The SSEB reviews, evaluates, and rates the proposals against the source selection criteria in the RFP. Price information will not be rated, but will be evaluated in accordance with FAR Part 15, funding limitations set out in Section Section B – Bid Schedule, and in comparison to other Offerors’ price proposals.

2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Who May Submit. Any legally organized Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) may submit a proposal.

2.2 Where to Submit. Offerors shall submit their proposals to the Charleston District Contracting Office at the address shown in Block 7 of the Standard Form 1442.

2.3 Submission Deadline. Proposals shall be received no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442.

2.4 General Requirements.

2.4.1 In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror's evaluation. Offerors should provide sufficient detail and clearly define all items required in this section.

2.4.2 Tabs. Proposal shall be organized and tabbed as shown in paragraph 2.5 Submission Format.

2.4.3 Size of Printed Matter Submissions.

2.4.3.1 Written materials shall be prepared on 8-1/2" x 11" paper.

2.4.4 Number of Copies. Offerors shall submit one (1) hard copy of Volume I and four (4) hard copies of Volume II of their Proposal. Volume II shall also be submitted on a CD-ROM.

2.5 Submission Format.

2.5.1 The proposals shall contain a detailed table of contents. If more than one binder is used, the complete table of contents shall be included in each. Any materials submitted but not required by the solicitation, (such as company brochures), shall be relegated to appendices. The Proposal will be tabbed and submitted in three ring binders in the following format:

3. VOLUME I: CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS AND PRICE PROPOSAL

3.1. TAB A – SF 1442, completed and signed by an authorized person from the company or team

3.2. TAB B – Section 00010 – Supplies or Services and Price/Costs Schedule

3.3. TAB C – Section 00600 – Representations and Certifications

3.4. TAB D – PROPOSAL DATA SHEET – See the format provided in this Section. Ensure to include Offeror’s telephone number, FAX number, e-mail address, Tax ID Number, and DUNS number. Duns number will be used to accesses CCASS data. Joint Ventures (J-V) must submit a DUNS number for each member of the J-V. If a separate DUNS has been created for the J-V it must be submitted as well. Offeror may use Attachment I at the end of this of this section to provide this information.

3.5. TAB E – Bid Bond

3.6. TAB F – Financial Information (e.g. Latest Financial Statement, Annual Reports, Dun and Bradstreet ratings and/or number, etc.). A bank reference and a letter from your company on company letterhead authorizing the release of financial information from your bank, with point of contact and telephone number for verification.

3.7. TAB G – Not Used.

4. VOLUME II – Technical Proposal

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY COST INFORMATION.

TAB I - FACTOR 1: CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

TAB J - FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE

4.1. FACTOR 1: CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE:

Example Projects: Provide examples of three projects for which the Offeror has been responsible. The examples should be as similar as possible to this solicitation in project type and scope. Similar means Demolition and Construction projects with a value greater than $2 Million within a hospital environment. If the Offeror represents the combining of two or more companies for the purpose of this RFP, each company should list project examples.

Example projects must have been completed or substantially completed (at least 60% complete) within the last five years.

The examples should include at a minimum the following information:

Company’s name and profile Company’s Safety history Contact names and telephone numbers for all Project(s) General character of the project(s) Scope of the Project(s) Location of the project(s) Cost of the project(s) Date of completion of the project(s)

Work Execution Plan: Provide a summary-level work execution plan that demonstrates how the Offeror plans to execute the proposed project to successful completion, with reference to specific processes that support project management, safety management, and quality control management during project execution. The Offeror should relate the work execution plan to examples of three projects for which the Offeror has been responsible.

Organizational Chart: The chart should identify the key personnel and individuals on the project team that show clear lines of authority, responsibility, and communication between corporate staff, key on-site staff, and subcontractor interface. Offerors should propose a logical flow of authority and demonstrate that assigned responsibilities and experience of proposed on-site personnel will enhance the operation of the project.

Schedule: The Offerors shall provide a schedule that demonstrates the offeror’s knowledge of appropriate sequencing and duration of work activities. The schedule should identify all major tasks expected during project performance recognizing the appropriate sequence and realistic duration of each task.

4.2 FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE

4.2.1. Past Performance Information. The Offeror shall submit past performance information on three (3) completed, or substantially completed (60% or more) projects in the past five (5) years that are relevant in scope, complexity, and size to the work identified in the SOW.

4.2.2. Projects should demonstrate work similar to that described in the RFP. Below is a list of project information that needs to be identified for the projects submitted.

Project name, location and description Type of facility Nature of firm’s responsibility (design, construction or both) Project owner’s name and address and project manager’s (point of contact) name, telephone number, fax, and email address (if known) Original scheduled completion date Actual completion date

Overall size of project (in square feet or square meters) Construction cost Duration of construction Problems encountered and corrective actions taken Copies of recent performance evaluations for similar projects Performance rating of that project Letters of Appreciation or Awards

4.2.3. If the Offeror is made up of separate construction companies that have combined for this project, then Past Performance Information must be completed for each company.

4.2.4. Contractor Team Arrangements. Contractor Team Arrangements are considered an arrangement in which (1) two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor; or (2) a potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program.

4.2.5 Offeror proposed teaming arrangements, as defined above, and company relationships shall be fully disclosed in the proposal. All prospective Joint Ventures must comply with Part 13 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

124.513. For reference and evaluation purposes the Offeror shall identify the major or critical aspects to be performed by those identified in the Contractor Team Arrangement.

4.2.6 Other Sources. The Government may contact sources other than those provided by the Offeror for information with respect to past performance. These other sources may include CCASS (Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System), telephone interviews with organizations familiar with the Offeror’s performance, and Government personnel with personal knowledge of the Offeror’s performance capability.

5. EVALUATION FACTORS

5.1. FACTOR 1: CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE. The Government will review the example projects provided by the Offeror to evaluate and rate the recent experience of the Offeror in similar projects. Similar means Demolition and Construction projects with a value greater than $2 Million within a hospital environment. Projects should include experience in working within a phased schedule within a hospital environment. Offerors are encouraged to provide descriptive analysis of why they feel their example projects meet the criteria for corporate relevant specialized experience. If the Offeror cannot provide suitable relevant experience and the evaluators consider that the information provided indicates that the Offeror has no relevant experience, a determination will be made as to the risk this lack of corporate experience presents to the Government and the proposal may be rated UNACCEPTABLE

5.2. FACTOR 2: OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's past performance using the sources available to it including the example projects identified by the Offeror, and information available from CCASS. Offerors may be provided an opportunity to address any negative past performance information about which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. The Government treats an Offeror's lack of past performance as neutral that is, having no positive or negative evaluation significance. The Government will evaluate past performance based on the elements listed below:

Quality of Work. Based on information provided in the example projects provided by the offeror and other information, the Government will assess the quality of the actual construction undertaken and the standards of workmanship exhibited by the Offeror’s team.

Timeliness of Performance. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the Offeror completing past projects within the scheduled completion times.

Documentation. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the timeliness and quality of the documentation, reports, and other written materials completed by the Offeror on past projects.

Customer Satisfaction. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the

Offeror’s past customer satisfaction, cooperation with customers, and interaction on past projects.

Subcontractor Management. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the Offeror’s management of subcontractors on past projects.

5.3. Contractor Team Arrangements Evaluation. In accordance with FAR Part 9, the Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements; provided, the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in the offer. Past Performance evaluation will not take into account the past performance information regarding predecessor companies; or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, unless identified in Contactor Team Arrangements. The submission must contain a narrative that clearly explains the relevance of the submitted information concerning a company that is part of a Contract Team Arrangement. The Government will consider the adequacy of this explanation in deciding the relevance and weight of the information to this procurement.

5.4. The Government treats an Offeror's lack of past performance as having no positive or negative evaluation significance. Past performance, which is considered by the Government to be similar in size and scope to this project, as defined in paragraph 4.1 of this section, may be considered by the Board to be more advantageous. The Government will evaluate past performance based on the elements listed below:

6. INDIVIDUAL PROPOSAL RATING WORKSHEETS

6.1. A Proposal Rating Worksheet is provided as Attachment 4 that the evaluators will use to review and rate the individual proposals.

6.2. During the consensus evaluation, a single “consensus rating” worksheet shall be completed for each proposal and signed by all the evaluators. Comments and supporting rationale for the rating assigned will be included on the consensus sheet.

7. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

7.1. The Government will evaluate the information submitted in response to the evaluation factors listed in Para. 5.1 Corporate Relevant Experience, and 5.2. Offeror Past Performance.

7.2. Corporate Relevant Experience (Factor 1) and Past Performance (Factor 2) when combined are approximately equal to price. Both Factors are considered to be equally important.

8. EVALUATION STANDARDS.

8.1 Evaluation criteria (factors) will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions. Evaluators will apply the appropriate adjective to each criterion rated. The evaluator’s narrative explanation must clearly establish that the Offeror’s submittal meets the definitions established below. As each criterion is evaluated an assessment of Performance Risk will be made. Performance Risk relates to the assessment of an Offeror's present and past work and accomplishments to determine the Offeror's ability to successfully perform as required.

8.2 OUTSTANDING - Information submitted demonstrates Offeror's potential to significantly exceed performance or capability standards. The Offeror's qualifications meet the fullest expectations of the Government. The Offeror has clearly demonstrated an understanding of all aspects of the requirements to the extent that timely and highest quality performance is anticipated. The Offeror has convincingly demonstrated that the RFP requirements have been analyzed, evaluated, and synthesized into approaches, plans, and techniques that, when implemented, should result in highly effective and efficient performance under the contract which represents very low risk to the Government. An assigned rating of “Outstanding” indicates that, in terms of the specific factor, the submittal contains no significant weaknesses, deficiencies or disadvantages and presents very low risk that it will not be successful. The Offeror possesses exceptional strengths that will significantly benefit the Government. Offeror very significantly exceeds most or all solicitation requirements. Very high probability of success. Very low risk to the Government.

8.3 ABOVE AVERAGE - Information submitted demonstrates Offeror's potential to exceed performance or capability standards. The Offeror's qualifications are responsive with minor weaknesses, but no major weaknesses noted, and some strengths. The Offeror has clearly demonstrated an understanding of all aspects of the requirements to the extent that timely and high quality performance is anticipated. Offeror demonstrates that the requirements of the RFP are well understood and the approach will likely result in a quality of performance which represents low risk to the Government. An assigned rating of “Above Average” indicates that, in terms of the specific factor, any weaknesses noted are minor and should not seriously affect the Offeror’s performance and presents low risk that it will not be successful. The Offeror possesses one or more strengths that will benefit the Government. Offeror fully meets all RFP requirements and significantly exceeds many of the RFP requirements.

Response exceeds a "Satisfactory" rating. High probability of success. Low risk to the Government.

8.4 SATISFACTORY - Information submitted demonstrates Offeror's potential to meet performance or capability standards. The Offeror's qualifications are responsive with weaknesses in several areas that are offset by strengths in other areas. The Offeror understands most aspects of the requirements and presents an acceptable solution to the extent adequate performance is anticipated. Offeror demonstrates an understanding of the RFP requirements, presents a complete and comprehensive proposal that will likely result in adequate performance which represents moderate risk to the Government. A rating of “Satisfactory” indicates that, in terms of the specific factor, the Offeror may satisfactorily complete the proposed tasks, but there is at least a moderate risk that it will not be successful. The Offeror possesses few or no advantages or strengths. Offeror meets all RFP requirements, presents a complete and comprehensive proposal. No significant advantages or disadvantages. Offeror’s response exceeds a "Marginal" rating. Moderate risk to the Government. In the case of no past performance on the part of the Offeror, the Offeror must so state in the proposal. A “Neutral” rating will be assigned for Past Performance.

8.5 MARGINAL - Information submitted demonstrates Offeror's potential to marginally meet performance or capability standards necessary for minimal contract performance. The Offeror's qualifications are generally responsive but weaknesses exist that are not offset by strengths. The Offeror does not understand most aspects of the requirements; the submittal is not adequately responsive or does not address a specific factor to the extent adequate performance is not anticipated. Offeror does not understand the requirements of the RFP and although the submittal has a reasonable chance of becoming at least acceptable, it requires modification to likely result in adequate performance which represents high risk to the Government. The assignment of a rating of “Marginal” indicates that, in terms of a specific factor, mandatory corrective action would be required to prevent significant deficiencies from affecting the overall project with high risk it will not be successful. The Offeror possesses no advantages or strengths and some disadvantages. Offeror does not meet all the requirements of the RFP. Offeror displays low probability of success, although the submittal has a reasonable chance of becoming at least acceptable.

Offeror’s response exceeds an "Unsatisfactory" rating. Significant disadvantages. High risk to the Government.

8.6 UNSATISFACTORY - Information submitted fails to meet performance or capability standards necessary for acceptable contractor performance. The Offeror's qualifications have many deficiencies and/or gross omissions.

The Offeror’s understanding of the Government’s requirements is so superficial, incomplete, vague, incompatible, incomprehensible, or incorrect as to make adequate performance very unlikely, or inconceivable. The Offeror does not demonstrate an understanding of the RFP requirements and the submittal fails to provide a reasonable, logical approach to fulfilling much of the Government's requirements. The Offeror fails to meet the minimum requirements of the RFP and the requirements could only be met with major changes to the submittal. There is no expectation of minimal performance which represents unacceptably high risk to the Government. The assignment of a rating of “Unsatisfactory” indicates that, in terms of a specific factor, the Offeror fails to meet the minimum requirements and there is unacceptably high risk that the overall project will not be successful. The Offeror possesses no advantages or strengths and many disadvantages. The Offeror's does not meet most of the requirements of the RFP and the proposal is so unacceptable that it would have to be completely revised in order to attempt to make it acceptable.

Unacceptably high risk to the Government.

9. RATING METHODOLOGY - OVERALL PROPOSAL RATING

9.1 The Government evaluation team will consider all information provided in the proposal individually. Once these individual analyses are completed, the team will meet and determine a rating by consensus decision.

9.2 As a result of the consensus rating, each proposal will be assigned a single overall rating, This final overall rating will be provided to the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Authority.

9.3 It is the responsibility of the Source Selection Evaluation Board to document reasons for the Acceptable or Unacceptable rating for the overall rating.

10. EXCEPTIONS. Exceptions to the contractual terms and conditions of the solicitation (e.g., standard company terms and conditions) may result in a determination to reject a proposal.

11. RESTRICTIONS. Failure to submit all the data in the format indicated in this section may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and, therefore, not considered for evaluation, and for subsequent award.

12. PRICE.

12.1 The Government will perform a price analysis on all proposals received. Price analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, to determine completeness, reasonableness, and understanding of the work. The evaluation will determine the adequacy of the offer in fulfilling the requirements of the proposal. Completeness addresses the extent to which the elements of the price proposal are consistent with the requirements of the RFP.

Reasonableness will be established using historical price information, price competition information, the IGE, and any other pricing tools necessary.

12.2 Price will not be scored, but will be a factor in establishing the competitive range prior to discussions (if held) and in making the final best value determination for award.

13. BASIS FOR AWARD

13.1 BASIS

13.2. Award will be made to the best overall proposal, which is determined to be the “best value” to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the two factors: Relevant Corporate Experience and Past Performance. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than “Satisfactory” must be achieved for all factors. Offerors are cautioned that the award may not necessarily be made to the lowest priced offeror.

13.3. Best value will be determined by a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in this RFP. In order to determine which proposal represents the best overall value, the Government will conduct a tradeoff analysis, comparing the strengths and weaknesses of the competing proposals to determine which proposal(s) represent(s) the best value to the Government and thus shall received contract award.

13.4. As technical ratings and relative advantages and disadvantages become less distinct, differences in price between proposals are of increased importance in determining the most beneficial proposal. Conversely, as differences in price become less distinct, differences in scoring and relative advantages and disadvantages between proposals are of increased importance to the determination.

13.5. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer. The right is also reserved to reject any and all offers. The basis of award will be a conforming offer, the price or cost of which may or may not be the lowest. If other than the lowest offer, it must be sufficiently more advantageous than the lowest offer to justify the payment of additional amounts.

13.6. Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial offer and not to automatically assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or be asked to submit a revised offer. The Government may make award of a conforming proposal without discussions, if deemed to be within the best interests of the Government.

ATTACHMENT 1

VOLUME I – TAB D

PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

1. Name of Firm:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

E-mail:

Duns # (used for accessing CCASS)

If a joint venture or contractor-subcontractor association of firms, list the individual firms and briefly describe the nature of the association and provide a DUNS number for each firm.

Firm 1:

Firm 2:

Firm 3:

Nature of Association:

2. AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11

The Offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Proposals (RFP).

Name of Person Authorized to Negotiate:

Negotiator's Address:

Negotiator's Telephone:

Negotiator’s E-mail:

ATTACHMENT 2

VOLUME II – TAB J

FACTOR 1: CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

(Offerors should submit at least three projects).

On an attached sheet, provide information for projects demonstrating : Demolition, renovation, and new construction projects within a hospital environment with a value of $2 Million or greater. For each project provide the following information:

Project Title:

Location:

Contract number:

Nature of involvement in this project, i.e. General Contractor, subcontractor, designer:

Procuring activity:

Procurement point of contact and telephone number:

List date construction began and was completed:

If construction is not complete, give current percentage of completion.

Address of building(s):

Address and telephone number of owner:

Indicate type of project (private sector, Government, etc.):

General character of work:

Total cost:

ATTACHMENT 3

VOLUME II – TAB I

FACTOR 2: OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

1. On an attached sheet, provide information for three (3) projects completed, or substantially completed in the past five years of similar scope and complexity to this project to be used for reference and evaluation purposes. If the offeror is made up of separate construction companies that have combined for this project, then this item must be completed twice (once for each company). For each project provide the information shown. Failure to provide this minimum information may result in lower ratings.

2. For each project provide the following information:

Project Title:

Location:

Contract number:

Procuring activity:

Procurement point of contact and telephone number:

List date of construction completion or percent completion if construction is underway:

Address of building(s):

Address and telephone number of owner:

Indicate type of project (private sector, Government, planned unit development, etc.):

General character:

Total cost:

Total cost of all modifications:

3. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. On an attached sheet, list any projects within the last five years that have been assessed liquidated damages. Provide an explanation.

4. TERMINATED PROJECTS. On an attached sheet, list any projects within the last five years that have been terminated. Provide an explanation.

5. GOVERNMENT PROJECTS. On an attached sheet, list all contracts with the Government within the last five years. Indicate Government contract number and contracting agency (with contact names and telephone numbers).

ATTACHMENT 4

PROPOSAL RATING WORKSHEET

FACTOR - 1

CORPORATE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

1. Does the offeror have a minimum of three relevant projects working on demolition and construction projects in a hospital environment with a value of $2Mil or more, within five years from the date of the solicitation? ____ YES

___NO

2. Did the offeror submit a Work Execution Plan IAW Para 4.1. Factor 1: Technical Capabilities?

3. Evaluate the Offerors provided example projects. Do the projects involve working within a phased schedule within a hospital environment? YES____ NO _____

4.Did the offeror submit a sequenced schedule IAW the requirements of Paragraph 4.1., Corporate Relevant Experience; Schedule? Yes ______ No _____

5.Did the offeror submit an organizational chart IAW the requirements of Paragraph 4.1., Corporate Relevant Experience; Organizational Chart? Yes_____ No_____

Include comments to support the rating with respect to the example projects included in the proposal

OFFEROR:__________________________

OTHER COMMENTS.

ATTACHMENT 5

PROPOSAL RATING WORKSHEET

FACTOR - 2

PAST PERFORMANCE

General: Evaluators will use this item to document receipt of Past Performance Information.

1. Does the offeror have a minimum of three relevant projects working on a Hospital Construction and renovation projects within five years from the date of the solicitation? ____ YES ___NO

2. Evaluate the Offerors provided example projects. Were all example projects completed or substantially completed (60% or more) within the last five years from the date of the solicitation? ____YES ____ NO

Include comments to support the rating with respect to the example projects included in the proposal.

OFFEROR:__________________________

OTHER COMMENTS.

ATTACHMENT 6

CONSENSUS RATINGS

FACTOR 1 – CORPORATE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

/__/ ACCEPTABLE

/__/ UNACCEPTABLE

COMMENTS TO SUPPORT RATING

Attach additional sheets to this rating summary if necessary to provide supporting rationale for assignment of the rating.

Offeror: __________________ Board Chairperson _________________

ATTACHMENT 7

CONSENSUS RATINGS

FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

/__/ ACCEPTABLE

/__/ UNACCEPTABLE

COMMENTS TO SUPPORT RATING

Attach additional sheets to this rating summary if necessary to provide supporting rationale for assignment of the rating.

Offeror: __________________ Board Chairperson _________________

Section 00600 - Representations & Certifications

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-2 Certificate Of Independent Price Determination APR 1985 252.209-7001 Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of a

Terrorist Country

JAN 2009

252.225-7031 Secondary Arab Boycott Of Israel JUN 2005 252.247-7022 Representation Of Extent Of Transportation Of Supplies By

Sea

AUG 1992

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (FEB 2009)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is -------------- [insert NAICS code].

(2) The small business size standard is -------------- [insert size standard].

(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b)(1) If the clause at 52.204-7, Central Contractor Registration, is included in this solicitation, paragraph (d) of this provision applies.

(2) If the clause at 52.204-7 is not included in this solicitation, and the offeror is currently registered in CCR, and has completed the ORCA electronically, the offeror may choose to use paragraph (d) of this provision instead of completing the corresponding individual representations and certifications in the solicitation. The offeror shall indicate which option applies by checking one of the following boxes:

(__) Paragraph (d) applies.

(__) Paragraph (d) does not apply and the offeror has completed the individual representations and certifications in the solicitation.

(c)(1) The following representations or certifications in ORCA are applicable to this solicitation as indicated:

(i) 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination. This provision applies to solicitations when a firm-fixed-price contract or fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment is contemplated, unless--

(A) The acquisition is to be made under the simplified acquisition procedures in Part 13;

(B) The solicitation is a request for technical proposals under two-step sealed bidding procedures; or

(C) The solicitation is for utility services for which rates are set by law or regulation.

(ii) 52.203-11, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions. This provision applies to solicitations expected to exceed $100,000.

(iii) 52.204-3, Taxpayer Identification. This provision applies to solicitations that do not include the clause at 52.204-7, Central Contractor Registration.

(iv) 52.204-5, Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business).This provision applies to solicitations that--

(A) Are not set aside for small business concerns;

(B) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and

(C) Are for contracts that will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(v) 52.209-5, Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters. This provision applies to solicitations where the contract value is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

(vi) 52.214-14, Place of Performance--Sealed Bidding. This provision applies to invitations for bids except those in which the place of performance is specified by the Government.

(vii) 52.215-6, Place of Performance. This provision applies to solicitations unless the place of performance is specified by the Government.

(viii) 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations (Basic & Alternate I). This provision applies to solicitations when the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(A) The basic provision applies when the solicitations are issued by other than DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard.

(B) The provision with its Alternate I applies to solicitations issued by DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard.

(ix) 52.219-2, Equal Low Bids. This provision applies to solicitations when contracting by sealed bidding and the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(x) 52.222-22, Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports. This provision applies to solicitations that include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.

(xi) 52.222-25, Affirmative Action Compliance. This provision applies to solicitations, other than those for construction, when the solicitation includes the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.

(xii) 52.222-38, Compliance with Veterans' Employment Reporting Requirements. This provision applies to solicitations when it is anticipated the contract award will exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and the contract is not for acquisition of commercial items.

(xiii) 52.223-1, Biobased Product Certification. This provision applies to solicitations that require the delivery or specify the use of USDA-designated items; or include the clause at 52.223-2, Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts.

(xiv) 52.223-4, Recovered Material Certification. This provision applies to solicitations that are for, or specify the use of, EPA-designated items.

(xv) 52.225-2, Buy American Act Certificate. This provision applies to solicitations containing the clause at 52.225- 1.

(xvi) 52.225-4, Buy American Act--Free Trade Agreements—Israeli Trade Act Certificate. (Basic, Alternate I, and Alternate II) This provision applies to solicitations containing the clause at 52.225-3.

(A) If the acquisition value is less than $25,000, the basic provision applies.

(B) If the acquisition value is $25,000 or more but is less than $50,000, the provision with its Alternate I applies.

(C) If the acquisition value is $50,000 or more but is less than $67,826, the provision with its Alternate II applies.

(xvii) 52.225-6, Trade Agreements Certificate. This provision applies to solicitations containing the clause at 52.225-5.

(xviii) 52.225-20, Prohibition on Conducting Restricted Business Operations in Sudan--Certification.

(xix) 52.226-2, Historically Black College or University and Minority Institution Representation. This provision applies to--

(A) Solicitations for research, studies, supplies, or services of the type normally acquired from higher educational institutions; and

(B) For DoD, NASA, and Coast Guard acquisitions, solicitations that contain the clause at 52.219-23, Notice of Price Evaluation Adjustment for Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns.

(2) The following certifications are applicable as indicated by the Contracting Officer:

(Contracting Officer check as appropriate.)

----(i) 52.219-19, Small Business Concern Representation for the Small Business Competitiveness Demonstration Program.

------(ii) 52.219-21, Small Business Size Representation for Targeted Industry Categories Under the Small Business Competitiveness Demonstration Program.

------(iii) 52.219-22, Small Disadvantaged Business Status.

------(A) Basic.

------(B) Alternate I.

------(iv) 52.222-18, Certification Regarding Knowledge of Child Labor for Listed End Products.

------(v) 52.222-48, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Act to Contracts for Maintenance, Calibration, or Repair of Certain Equipment Certification.

------(vi) 52.222-52 Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Act to Contracts for Certain Services-- Certification.

------(vii) 52.223-9, with its Alternate I, Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for EPA- Designated Products (Alternate I only).

------(viii) 52.223-13, Certification of Toxic Chemical Release Reporting.

------(ix) 52.227-6, Royalty Information.

------ (A) Basic.

------ (B) Alternate I.

------(x) 52.227-15, Representation of Limited Rights Data and Restricted Computer Software.

(d) The offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically via the Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) website at http://orca.bpn.gov. After reviewing the ORCA database information, the offeror verifies by submission of the offer that the representations and certifications currently posted electronically that apply to this solicitation as indicated in paragraph (c) of this provision have been entered or updated within the last 12 months, are current, accurate, complete, and applicable to this solicitation (including the business size standard applicable to the NAICS code referenced for this solicitation), as of the date of this offer and are incorporated in this offer by reference (see FAR 4.1201); except for the changes identified below (offeror to insert changes, identifyingchange by clause number, title, date). These amended representation(s) and/or certification(s) are also incorporated in this offer and are current, accurate, and complete as of the date of this offer.

FAR Clause Title Date Change

Any changes provided by the offeror are applicable to this solicitation only, and do not result in an update to the representations and certifications posted on ORCA.

(End of Provision)

52.204-4005 Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA).

Beginning January 1, 2005, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requires the use of ORCA in Federal solicitations as a part of the proposal submission process. ORCA is a web-based system that centralizes and standardizes the collection, storage and viewing of many of the representations and certifications required by the Federal Acquisition Regulations and previously found in solicitations. Prospective contractors must complete the electronic representations and certifications through ORCA at http://orca.bpn.gov. The representations and certifications submitted to ORCA must be updated as necessary but at least annually to maintain an active status. In addition to the use of ORCA as required by other clause or clauses in this solicitation, prospective contractors must complete the representations and certifications included in this solicitation.

Section 00700 - Contract Clauses

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions JUL 2004 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-6 Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government SEP 2006 52.203-7 Anti-Kickback Procedures JUL 1995 52.203-8 Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or Improper Activity

JAN 1997

52.203-10 Price Or Fee Adjustment For Illegal Or Improper Activity JAN 1997 52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal

Transactions

SEP 2007

52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Recycled Paper AUG 2000 52.204-7 Central Contractor Registration APR 2008 52.214-34 Submission Of Offers In The English Language APR 1991 52.214-35 Submission Of Offers In U.S. Currency APR 1991 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2004 52.215-13 Subcontractor Cost or Pricing Data--Modifications OCT 1997 52.215-14 Integrity of Unit Prices OCT 1997 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns MAY 2004 52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting DEC 1996 52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003 52.222-4 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act - Overtime

Compensation

JUL 2005

52.222-5 Davis-Bacon Act--Secondary Site of the Work JUL 2005 52.222-6 Davis Bacon Act JUL 2005 52.222-7 Withholding of Funds FEB 1988 52.222-8 Payrolls and Basic Records JUN 2010 52.222-9 Apprentices and Trainees JUL 2005 52.222-10 Compliance with Copeland Act Requirements FEB 1988 52.222-11 Subcontracts (Labor Standards) JUL 2005 52.222-12 Contract Termination-Debarment FEB 1988 52.222-13 Compliance with Davis-Bacon and Related Act Regulations. FEB 1988 52.222-14 Disputes Concerning Labor Standards FEB 1988 52.222-15 Certification of Eligibility FEB 1988 52.222-21 Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities FEB 1999 52.222-26 Equal Opportunity MAR 2007 52.222-27 Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for

Construction

FEB 1999

52.222-35 Equal Opportunity For Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans

SEP 2006

52.222-37 Employment Reports On Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans Of The Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans

SEP 2006

52.223-6 Drug-Free Workplace MAY 2001 52.223-14 Toxic Chemical Release Reporting AUG 2003 52.225-9 Buy American Act--Construction Materials FEB 2009 52.225-10 Notice of Buy American Act Requirement--Construction

Materials

FEB 2009

52.226-1 Utilization Of Indian Organizations And Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises

JUN 2000

52.227-1 Authorization and Consent DEC 2007

52.227-2 Notice And Assistance Regarding Patent And Copyright Infringement

DEC 2007

52.227-4 Patent Indemnity-Construction Contracts DEC 2007 52.228-2 Additional Bond Security OCT 1997 52.228-11 Pledges Of Assets SEP 2009 52.228-14 Irrevocable Letter of Credit DEC 1999 52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds--Construction NOV 2006 52.229-3 Federal, State And Local Taxes APR 2003 52.232-5 Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts SEP 2002 52.232-17 Interest OCT 2008 52.232-23 Assignment Of Claims JAN 1986 52.233-1 Disputes JUL 2002 52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004 52.236-2 Differing Site Conditions APR 1984 52.236-3 Site Investigation and Conditions Affecting the Work APR 1984 52.236-5 Material and Workmanship APR 1984 52.236-6 Superintendence by the Contractor APR 1984 52.236-7 Permits and Responsibilities NOV 1991 52.236-8 Other Contracts APR 1984 52.236-9 Protection of Existing…