A22 - W912EK25RA018 - Amendment 0002-SF30-SPEC _FINAL.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section 00 00 00 - Procurement and Contracting Requirements

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date 04 Aug 2025 11 Aug 2025

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

PREPROPOSAL MEETING NOTICE

A prebid meeting will be held at the Lock 19 - 525 N. Water St., Keokuk, Iowa 52632 with a date of 30 June 2025 at a

10:00 AM CT.

The meeting is to discuss the Lock 19 Nose Pier Replacement and Bulkhead Recess, W912EK25RA018 and to provide an opportunity for offerors to visit the site. This will be the only formal onsite visit with USACE during the bidding phase. Offerors are highly encouraged to attend this prebid meeting.

Lock 19 has a restricted area status. All offerors are required to pre-register via Email with Bobbi Boeh at bobbi.s.boeh@usace.army.mil by 2:00 PM CT on 27 June 2025 to attend the meeting at Lock 19. Emails are required to have the name and cell number of all attendees that will be atLock 19. Failure to provide offeror information by the submittal cut-off time will result in the offeror not being allowed to enter Lock

19. All offerors must remain with USACE representatives while at Lock 19.

Offerors are required to bring the following safety equipment for this meeting: safety hat, safety glasses, steel-toed boots, and life-vest (US Coast Guard Approved).

Questions from offerors submitted and Government responses will be documented via ProjNet Bidder Inquiry.

Please reference Questions and Answers via ProjNet for further instructions.

QUESTION AND ANSWER VIA PROJNET

W912EK25RA0180002

ALL SUBMITTED QUESTIONS FOR THIS PROJECT AND THE ANSWERS PROVIDED SHALL BE

VIEWED IN BIDDER INQUIRY IN PROJNET AT (https://www.projnet.org).

Technical inquiries and questions relating to this solicitation are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at (https://www.projnet.org) No Later Than (NLT) 22 JULY 2025, at 3:00 PM CT. To submit or review inquiry items, prospective vendors will need to use the Bidder Inquiry Key presented below and follow the instructions listed below the key for access. A prospective vendor who submits a comment /question will receive an acknowledgement of their comment/question via email. Another email to the same address will notify the prospective vendor once the reply is available for viewing.

S2ICBG-YJDM9UThe Bidder Inquiry Key is:

Specific Instructions for First Time ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

2. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

3. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

4. Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.

5. Click Continue. A page will then open saying that a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.

6. Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone.

Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.

7. Click Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.

Specific Instructions for Future ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. For future access to ProjNet, you will not be provided any type of password. You will utilize your Secret Question and Secret Answer to log in.

2. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

3. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

4. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

5. Email. Enter the email address you used to register previously in ProjNet.

6. Click Continue. A page will then open asking you to enter the answer to your Secret Question.

7. Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed you are now logged into the system.

W912EK25RA0180002

SOURCE SLECTION PLAN

1. BASIS FOR AWARD

This acquisition is a full and open, competitive procurement utilizing Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) best value continuum source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2. A single award will be made to the Offeror who provides a technically acceptable proposal with the overall lowest price.

Proposed prices will be evaluated but not scored or otherwise combined with the other aspects of the proposal evaluation.

2. FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

All three (3) evaluation factors are as follows:

Factor 1: Technical

Factor 2: Past Performance

Factor 3: Price

3. EVALUATION APPROACH

All proposals shall be subject to evaluation by the Source Selection Team (SST). In order for an offeror to be considered for award, the proposal must receive an “Acceptable” rating in every non-price factor. The two (2) non-price factors are Technical (Factor 1) and Past Performance (Factor 2).

Factor 1: Technical

The Government will evaluate the Technical Proposal on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

This factor identifies the minimum requirements that are imperative to successful contract performance.

The Source Selection Team will evaluate the Offeror’s overall technical proposal using the ratings and descriptions outlined in Table A-1. To be considered acceptable, all subfactors under the technical factor l must receive an acceptable rating. Offerors who are determined “Unacceptable” will not be eligible for award.

Subfactor 1: Experience

The Government will evaluate relevant experience of the Offeror, and/or committed sub-contractor. Relevant experience is what an Offeror, Joint Venture (JV), and/or committed sub-contractor(s), has done on past projects.

The Offeror shall submit examples of projects completed within the last ten (10) years of the closing date of this solicitation which demonstrate experience for each of the following features of work. At a minimum, the contractor must demonstrate experience on at least 2 projects for each feature. Multiple features can be captured under a single project.

1) Offeror to provide two (2) projects demonstrating experience with Floating Plant on Navigable Waterways.

2) Offeror to provide two (2) projects demonstrating experience with construction of concrete structures involving formwork over 4 feet high.

3) Offeror to provide two (2) projects demonstrating experience with construction of precast concrete structures

4) Offeror to provide two (2) projects demonstrating experience with construction of drilled shafts.

A table shall be provided that shows each feature of work with a reference to the page the work is contained on. The table shall also show the total numbers of each feature provided.

All information submitted must be accurate and complete. Project examples provided must be substantially complete. Substantially complete as defined for this solicitation is when the project is sufficient for the use of which it is intended, as of the closing date of this solicitation.

If a project is used for multiple work features, ensure that each feature is clearly described.

All project examples shall contain a Point of Contact (POC) as well as one alternate Point of Contact, to include the name, job title of the POC, address, telephone, and e-mail address. The POC and alternate shall be familiar with the scope and details of the project, and be a

Table A-1. Technical Proposal Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating Description

ACCEPTABLE Offeror’s proposal is rated acceptable under both subfactors.

UNACCEPTABLE Offeror’s proposal is rated unacceptable under one or more of the subfactors.

representative of the owner/customer/prime contractor, not affiliated with the Offeror. The POC and alternate shall be able to verify the experience cited.

For the purpose of this requirement, projects completed by a subcontractor cannot be submitted as relevant prior experience unless that subcontractor is expected to perform ten (10%) percent or more of the proposed effort.

For the purpose of this requirement, projects completed by a joint venture cannot be submitted as relevant prior experience unless that joint venture is expected to perform thirty-three (33%) percent or more of the proposed effort.

The Government will evaluate Subfactor 1: Experience on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis based on the descriptions outlined in Table A-2. Offerors who are determined “Unacceptable” will not be eligible for award

Table A-2. Subfactor 1: Experience Evaluation Ratings

Rating Description

ACCEPTABLE Offerors (in combination with experience of their JV partners or committed key subcontractors) who provide the minimum number of examples of experience with all features of work described in the experience subfactor within the past ten (10) year of the closing date of this solicitation will be determined to meet the minimum requirements of the contract and will be found Acceptable.

UNACCEPTABLE Offerors (in combination with the experience of their JV partners or committed key subcontractors) failing to provide at least the minimum number of examples of experience with the features of work described in the experience subfactor within the past ten (10) years of the closing date of this solicitation will be found Unacceptable.

Subfactor 2: Schedule

Technical Subfactor 2 evaluates the Offeror’s proposed schedule for the lock closure periods.

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed schedule to determine understanding of and compliance with the Government’s requirements.

Minimum requirements for this factor include a preliminary bar chart schedule showing the following activities as outlined in Specification Section 01 32 01, PROJECT SCHEDULE.

a. Precast concrete fabrication, delivery, and installation

b. Recess Protection plate assemblies fabrication, delivery, and installation

c. Mobilization of Floating Plant to site

d. Mechanical Dredging

e. Rock excavation for sill and bull nose foundations

f. Underwater concrete test placement

g. Placement of bull nose leveling concrete

h. Monolith 1-R Concrete Removal

i. Placement of precast segments, panels, and units.

j. Placement of bull nose infill concrete and cure times.

k. Cofferbox fabrication, delivery and installation.

l. Installation of landwall recess.

m. Temporary power for CCS building

n. Bulkhead retrieval

o. Drilled shaft mobilization, placement

p. Stay in place formwork placement

q. Sill infill concrete placement and cure time

r. Test dewatering

The Government will evaluate the schedule based on demonstration of all activities listed above being complete by the end of the lock closure periods.

The Government will evaluate Subfactor 2: Schedule on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis based on the descriptions outlined in Table A-3. Offerors who are determined “Unacceptable” will not be eligible for award.

Table A-3. Subfactor 2: Schedule Evaluation Ratings

ACCEPTABLE The proposed Schedule includes all required activities and sequences, and shows completion of all activities by the end of the contract and any specific activities as outlined in Specification Section 01 14 00, WORK RESTRICTIONS.

Based on the Schedule proposed by the Offeror, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

UNACCEPTABLE The proposed Schedule does not include all required activities and/or sequences, or does not show completion of all activities by the end of the contract and/or any specific activities as outlined in Specification Section 01 14 00, WORK RESTRICTIONS. Based on the Schedule proposed by the Offeror, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Factor 2: Past Performance

The Government will evaluate the Past Performance factor on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis based on the descriptions outlined in Table A-4. Offerors who are determined “Unacceptable” will not be eligible for award.

Table A-4. Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

ACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below)

UNACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

Evaluations of past performance shall be in accordance with this plan while utilizing the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) and forms in the appendices.

An Offeror’s past performance is a measure of the degree to which an Offeror was successful on previous projects of similar scope, size, and complexity. The Government will evaluate the information/performance data provided by Offerors in accordance with FAR 15.305.

The Offeror may submit up to five (5) PPQ’s for relevant work performed within the past 10 (ten) years of the closing date of this solicitation for construction projects with a dollar value equal to, or greater than five million dollars. Contracts shall be at least six months old to be considered. If more than five (5) are submitted, only the five (5) most recent projects will be considered. Relevant efforts are defined as construction efforts that are the same as or similar to the effort (as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 237990 required by the RFP). Examples may include contracts listed in the Technical Factor – Subfactor 1: Experience. The PPQ’s shall identify whether the contract is active or complete, whether the contract was a Government (federal, state, local, etc) or a commercial entity, and whether the Offeror was the prime contractor, a subcontractor, or member of a joint venture.

The PPQ respondent must have been a client, or client representative, with whom the Offeror/subcontractor had a contract, or subcontract (if applicable) for one or more projects.

The PPQ respondent must hold, or have held at the time, a senior position in the client organization with responsibilities for either contract administration, quality control, engineering, or technical supervision, or was otherwise in a position to evaluate the Offeror’s performance in executing the contract or subcontract. The PPQ respondent must have first-hand knowledge of the Offeror’s performance.

In addition to the above, past performance information may be obtained from established systems such as the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; and may be obtained from other sources available to the Government, such as the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

Factor 3: Price

Price will be evaluated and considered, but not scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. An award will be made to the lowest priced, technically acceptable proposal, based on values for the Base Bid and all Options. Offerors shall complete and submit the Schedule of Prices with its proposal and include a price for each line item. Failure to submit a Schedule of Prices with all of the line items filled out will render the Offeror’s proposal as ineligible for award. Offerors will only be allowed one proposal submission.

The Source Selection Evaluation Board will evaluate each Offeror’s price and verify that unbalanced pricing is not present. The Contracting Officer will evaluate each Offeror’s price in accordance with FAR 15.404-1 to determine price reasonableness. Price reasonableness will be determined by comparing all proposed prices, the Independent Government Estimate and pricing of previous work that is same or similar to the requirement.

The otherwise technically acceptable lowest priced Offeror may be required to confirm/validate their offered price. Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required;

however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award.

4. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION:

The Offeror’s proposal shall be submitted in digital (pdf) format to the Contracting Officer, Jeffrey Voss, Jeffrey.r.voss@usace.army.mil ; and Contract Specialist, Bobbi Boeh, bobbi.s.boeh@usace.army.mil as set forth below.

The Offeror’s proposal shall consist of the following four (4) factors. The factors are:

mailto:Jeffrey.r.voss@usace.army.mil mailto:bobbi.s.boeh@usace.army.mil

I - Technical II - Past Performance III - Price IV - Solicitation, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations/

JV or LLC information

Files shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in the proposals is prohibited.

Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Each factor shall be submitted electronically as a separate file. Each document within the factor submission should be clearly labeled with its title. The Offeror shall sign the first two (2) pages of the SF 1442.

All documents should be single spaced. Each paragraph should be separated by at least one (1) blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or Times New Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be landscape.

The following factors shall be submitted:

DIGITAL MAXIMUM

FACTOR TITLE COPIES PAGES

I – Technical 1 50

II – Past Performance 1 N/A

III – Price 1 N/A o Schedule of Prices

IV – Solicitation, Offer and Award 1 N/A Documents and Certification/ Representations

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government. Pages submitted for organization purpose to include cover sheets, title pages, and indexes do not count toward page limitations. Past Performance Questionnaires do not count toward page limitations.

PROPOSAL FILES

Format. Submissions must be well-organized, clearly indexed, and begin each section at the top of a page. Each volume is to be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages shall include a header and/or footer with the full company name, submission date, and RFP number. A Table of Contents, generated using word processing software (e.g., MS Word’s Table of Contents feature or equivalent), is required and must feature clickable hyperlinks for navigation in the final PDF. Each paragraph should be single spaced and shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or Times New Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be produced in landscape orientation. 11x17 sheets will be counted as two pages.

Pages shall adhere to the following layout:

• Page Size: 8.5” x 11”

• Gutter: 0”

• Margins: 1” on all sides (top, bottom, left, right)

• Header/Footer Distance: 0.5” from edge

• Page Numbering: Consistent and sequential across all sections

File Packaging. Submissions shall be delivered as a single, text-searchable PDF file. No other file formats will be accepted. The PDF must retain selectable text (not scanned). File size should be optimized for efficient sharing and storage without compromising readability. All price breakdown information to aid in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Office Excel Read/Write format and viewable in currently used Microsoft Excel formats.

Content Organization. All content must be logically grouped by proposal factor, with each volume preceded by its own Table of Contents featuring clickable links in the PDF. Detailed information shall follow the structure outlined in the RFP. Proprietary information shall be clearly identified.

FACTOR I – Technical: The volume shall consist of all information required to support the technical requirements and shall not exceed fifty (50) pages. No technical information shall be contained in any other volume. The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

Subfactor 1: Experience Subfactor 2: Schedule

FACTOR II – Past Performance: This volume shall contain past performance information.

No past performance information should be contained in any other factor of this proposal.

Past Performance Questionnaire:

The Offeror shall submit up to five (5) Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Forms which identify if the contract is active or complete; if the contract was for the Government (Federal, state, local, etc.) or commercial; and if the Offeror was the prime contractor, a teaming partner, and/or joint venture. If more than five (5) are submitted, only the five (5) most recent projects will be considered. The PPQ respondent must have been a client, or client representative, with whom the Offeror/subcontractor had a contract, or subcontract (if applicable) for one or more projects.

All submitted PPQ’s shall be for work performed with in the last 10 (ten) years of the closing date of this solicitation for construction projects with a dollar value equal to, or greater than five million dollars. Contracts shall be at least six (6) months old to be considered. Contracts with completion dates earlier than 10 years prior to the solicitation closing date shall not be considered. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Government-wide Past Performance Information Application using all CAGE/ Unique Entity ID (UEI) numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

There are no page limits for this factor.

FACTOR III – Price: The offeror shall provide a completed Schedule of Prices located in section 00100 of the RFP. Failure to provide will result in your proposal not being considered for award.

Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. No pricing information should be contained in any other volume of this proposal. Offerors shall ensure that the information presented in this volume is consistent and correlates with the information contained in the proposal volumes.

The offeror shall ensure that the information submitted in this volume is consistent with and fully supports the amounts set forth in the Standard Form1442 as well as the continuation sheets.

There are no page limits for this factor.

FACTOR IV – Solicitations, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations

This volume consists of Standard Form 1442 Solicitation, Offer and all amendments; bid bond;

Representations, Certifications, Other Statements of Offerors; and Small Business Subcontracting Plan if the offeror is a large business.

Small Business Subcontracting Plan: Each Large Business Offeror shall provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan that contains all of the elements required by FAR Clause 52.219-

9. The Subcontracting Plan is not a requirement for evaluation in source selection but rather a requirement for award to a Large Business. The approved Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be incorporated into a resultant contract.

There are no page limits for this factor.

5. DISCUSSIONS

5.1. GENERAL INFORMATION:

In accordance with FAR 15.306(d), discussion sessions with each Offeror may be held. Should discussions take place, all Offerors in the competitive range will be allowed a minimum of three (3) calendar days to submit final proposal revisions. However, award may be made without discussions.

5.2. DISCUSSION SCHEDULING:

If discussions are conducted, the Contracting Officer will schedule the discussion sessions, and each Offeror will be notified of the time and place at least three (3) business days prior to their discussion session. Appropriate security clearances should be provided by the Offerors in sufficient time to process the requests. The Contracting Officer will provide additional instructions with the notification. The discussion sessions will take place by the method of the Government’s choosing and provided to the contractor in writing.

APPENDIX C

Enclosure 1

USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: UEI Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work: High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name

Title:

Phone Numb er:

Email Addre ss:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: USACE requests that the client completes this questionnaire and submits directly back to the Offeror.

The Offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to USACE with their proposal, and may duplicate this questionnaire for future submission on USACE solicitations. Clients are highly encouraged to submit questionnaires directly to the Offeror. However, questionnaires may be submitted directly to USACE. Please contact the Offeror for USACE POC information. The Government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.

USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

Form PPQ -0

RATING DEFINITION

NOTE

(E) Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory

Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING

WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION

OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary)

APPENDIX G

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN Example

All prime contractors designated by System for Award Management SAM (www.sam.gov) as Other than Small business, that hold a construction contract over $1,500,000 are required to submit the Standard Form (SF) 294 Subcontracting Report for Individual Contract and (SF) 295, Summary Subcontract Reports, in accordance with the paragraph (l) of clause 52.219-9 using the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) at http://www.esrs.gov/.

Small Business Subcontracting Plan

To be completed by Contractors as required by FAR 19.702

Identification Data:

Company Name:

Address:

Date Prepared: Solicitation Number: ___________________________

Project Title:

Period of Plan:

Type of Plan (Check one):

Individual Plan: In this type of plan, all elements are developed specifically for this contract and apply for the full term of this contract.

Master Plan: In this type of plan, goals are separately developed for this contract in an individual plan; all other elements are standard. The master plan must be approved once every three years. Once incorporated into a contract with specific goals, it is valid for the life of the contract.

Commercial Plan: This type of plan is used when the contractor sells large quantities of off-the-shelf commodities to many Government agencies. Plans and goals are negotiated with the initial agency on a company-wide basis rather than for individual contracts.

http://www.esrs.gov/

I. Goals (percentage and dollars) Estimate dollar and percentage goals for small business, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged business, women-owned small, veteran-owned small, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business in the following format. For individual plans, goals for each option must be provided. Express all dollar goals as a percentage of total planned subcontracting dollars.

Estimated Dollar Value of All Planned Subcontracting (i.e. all types of business concerns under this contract)

Base 1st Option 2nd Option

Subcontracting to Large Business Concerns (all business concerns classified as other than small)

Base 1st Option 2nd Option

Subcontracting to Small Business Concerns (Include HUBZone Small, Small Disadvantaged, Women-owned Small, Veteran-Owned Small, and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business) Base 1st Option 2nd Option

Subcontracting to HUBZone Small Business Concerns Base 1st Option 2nd Option

Subcontracting to Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns

Subcontracting to Women-Owned Small Business Concerns

Subcontracting to Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns

Subcontracting to Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns

II. Products and/or services to be subcontracted under this contract and the types of businesses supplying them are:

III. Description of method used to develop the subcontracting goals:

IV. Description of the method used to identify potential sources for solicitation purposes:

Business Category or Size (check all that apply)

Product Service

Small HUB NAICS Large Bus. Small SDB

SDVO

WOSB VOSB SB

V. Statement of Indirect and Overhead Costs

A. Indirect and overhead costs HAVE BEEN or _ HAVE NOT BEEN included in the dollar and percentage subcontracting goals stated above.

(Check one.)

B. If indirect and overhead costs HAVE BEEN included, explain the method used to determine the proportionate share of such costs to be allocated as subcontracts to small, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged, women-owned small, veteran-owned small, and service-disabled veteran- owned small business concerns:

VI. Program Administrator FAR 19.704(a)(7) requires information about the company employee who will administer the subcontracting program. Please provide the name, title, address, phone number, position withn the corporate structure and the duties of that employee related to the Contractor’s subcontracting program.

Name:

Address:

Telephone:

Email Address:

Fax Number:

VII. Equitable Opportunity FAR 19.704(a)(8) requires a description of the efforts your company will make to ensure that small, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged, women-owned small, veteran-owned small, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns will have an equitable opportunity to compete for subcontracts. Please indicate which of the following activities your company is engaged in and describe any additional efforts.

A. Outreach efforts to obtain sources:

B. Internal efforts to guide and encourage purchasing personnel:

Presenting workshops, seminars and training programs Establishing, maintaining and using small, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged, women-owned small, veteran-owned small, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business source lists, guides and other data for soliciting subcontracts

Monitoring activities to evaluate compliance with the subcontracting plan C. Additional efforts:

VIII. Clause Inclusion and Flowdown FAR 19.704(a)(9) requires that your company provide assurances that it will include the clause at FAR 52.219-8, “Utilization of Small Business Concerns,” in all subcontracts that offer further subcontracting opportunities.

FAR 19.704(a)(9) also requires that your company agree in this plan that it will require all subcontractors, except small business concerns, that receive subcontracts in excess of $500,000 ($1,000,000 for construction) to adopt a plan that complies with the requirements of FAR 19.7, “Small Business Subcontracting Program.”__________________________ (insert company name) agrees that the clause will be included and that the plans will be reviewed against the minimum requirements for such plans. The acceptability of percentage goals for small, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged, women-owned small, veteran-owned small, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns must be determined on a case-by-case basis depending on the supplies and services involved, the availability of potential small, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged, women-owned small, veteran-owned small, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business subcontractors and prior experience.

In accordance with policy letters published by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, such assurance must describe the offer’s procedures for the review, approval and monitoring for compliance with such subcontracting plans:

Contacting minority and small business trade associations Contacting business development organizations Requesting sources from the CCR website at http://www.ccr.gov/ “Dynamic Small Business Search” Attending small, minority, and women-owned business procurement conferences and trade fairs http://www.ccr.gov/

IX. Reporting and Cooperation FAR 19.704(a)(10) requires that your company provide assurances that it will:

(1) cooperate in any studies or surveys as may be required;

(2) submit periodic reports which show compliance with the subcontracting plan;

(3) submit the Individual Subcontract Report (ISR), and the Summary Subcontract Report (SSR) using the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) (http://www.esrs.gov), following the instructions in the eSRS;

(4) ensure that its subcontractors with subcontracting plans agree to submit the ISR and/or the SSR using the eSRS;

(5) provide its prime contract number and its DUNS number and the e-mail address of the Government or Contractor official responsible for acknowledging or rejecting the reports, to all first-tier subcontractors with subcontracting plans so they can enter this information into the eSRS when submitting their reports; and

(6) require that each subcontractor with a subcontracting plan provide the prime contract number and its own DUNS number, and the e-mail address of the Government or Contractor official responsible for acknowledging or rejecting the reports, to its subcontractors with subcontracting plans. ________________________ (insert company name) agrees that it will partake in these reporting activities and ensure that its subcontractors do the same.

X. Recordkeeping FAR 19.704(a)(11) requires a description of the types of records that will be maintained concerning procedures adopted to comply with the requirements and goals in the plan, including establishing source lists; and a description of the offeror’s efforts to locate small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business concerns and to award subcontracts to them:

XI. FAR 19.704(a)(12) and (13) requires that your company provide assurances that it will:

a. make a good faith effort to acquire articles, equipment, supplies, services or materials or obtain the performance of construction work from the small business concerns that the offeror used in preparing the bid or proposal, in the same or greater scope, amount, and quality used in preparing and submitting the bid or proposal. Responding to a request for quote does not constitute use in preparing a bid or proposal.

b. provide the contracting officer with a written explanation if the contractor fails to acquire articles, equipment, supplies, services or materials or obtain the performance of construction work as described in (a) above. This written explanation will be submitted to the contracting officer within 30 days of contract completion.

(insert company name) agrees to these requirements.

http://www.esrs.gov/

XII. FAR 19.704(a)(14) requires that your company provide assurances that you will not prohibit a subcontractor from discussing with the contracting officer any material matter pertaining to payment to or utilization of a subcontractor.

_____________________________(insert company name) agrees to these requirements.

XIII. FAR 19.704(a)(15) requires that your company provide assurances that you will pay your small business subcontractors on time and in accordance with terms and conditions of the subcontract, and will notify the contracting officer if the offeror pays a reduced or untimely payment to a small business subcontractor (see

FAR 52.242-5)

___________________________ (insert company name) agrees to these requirements.

I, the undersigned, a designated Officer of (name of Company) do hereby state that the company agrees to carry out the Government's policy to provide the maximum practicable opportunity for small, veteran-owned small, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged, women-owned small business concerns, and HBCU/MIs to participate in the performance of this contract consistent with its efficient performance, in compliance with Public Laws 95-507, 99-661, Section 1207, and 100-180, Section 806 and the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 19.7) and its supplements.

This subcontracting plan was submitted by:

Signature:

Printed Name:

Date:

This subcontracting plan was accepted by:

Signature:

Printed Name:

Title: Contracting Officer

Date:

PRECONTRACT REVISIONS – AMENDMENTS

BRMRLD19202401- W912EK25RA018

AMENDMENT 0002

JULY 2025

The following changes are made to the SCHEDULE OF PRICES; PROJECT

TABLE OF CONTENTS; Section 01 14 00, Section 01 20 00, Section 01 50

02, Section 01 53 11, Section 02 21 00, Section 05 50 14, and Section

31 63 29; and listed Drawings Sheets for Amendment 0002.

a. SCHEDULE OF PRICES. ALL PAGES. Delete the Schedule of Prices in its entirety, and substitute therefor revised Schedule of

Prices, Amendment 0002.

b. PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS. ALL PAGES. Delete the PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS in its entirety, and substitute therefor revised

Project Table of Contents, Amendment 0002.

c. Section 01 14 00. ALL PAGES. Delete the Section in its entirety, and substitute therefor revised Section 01 14 00, Amendment 0002.

d. Section 01 20 00. PAGE 15. Delete the Section 01 20 00 Page 15 in its entirety, and substitute therefor revised Section 01 20 00

Page 15, Amendment 0002.

e. Section 01 50 02. PAGE 3. Delete the Section 01 50 02 Page 3 in its entirety, and substitute therefor revised Section 01 50 02

Page 3, Amendment 0002.

f. Section 01 53 11. ALL PAGES. Delete the Section in its entirety, and substitute therefor revised Section 01 53 11,

g. Section 02 21 00. ALL PAGES. Delete the Section in its entirety, and substitute therefor revised Section 02 21 00,

h. Section 03 31 30. ALL PAGES. Delete the Section in its…