| Projnet Questions | Government Response | |
| 8948469 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| We are a WOSB highly interested to bid on this solicitation. As the solicitation involves working overseas, we would like to request considering Bank Letter of Guaranty from acceptable banks internationally as alternative form of bonding as most defense agencies allow for overseas projects. Normally for overseas projects a bank letter of assurance for 10%-30% of the project value is acceptable as alternative bonding. | Alternative bonds are not being accepted for this procurement. | |
| On: Dec 03 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8948471 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| for small business, we would like to extend specialized experience demonstration to be considered for the last 7 years instead of 5 years. "Only experience performed within the last five (5) years from the date of this solicitation will be considered." | The solicitation will not being extended at this time. | |
| On: Dec 03 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8953375 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Per Section 5.1, projects must be 100% construction complete, within five years preceding the date of this solicitation. | No extension will be granted at this time. | |
| Will the Government consider extending the requirement to 8 years/ | | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8953569 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Section 6.0 Past Performance. Will the Government allow PPQs submitted in prior proposals? Between the holidays and the COVID issues, PPQs may be challenging to acquire. | PPQs from prior requirements are acceptable for this procurement; however, please write on the PPQ the solicitation number for this requirement | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8953957 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| 6.3 Evaluation Criteria in the RFP States: | | |
| "...the prime Contractor, the Contractor's design firm, and its proposed key subcontractors will be assessed individually, and the results will then be assessed in their totality to derive the Offeror's Past Performance rating." | | |
| Are Offerors to include completed projects for the Designer? Are these included in the five project total under Volume II, or will the Offeror and Designer EACH have to submit five projects? | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8953981 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Under Volume II Factor 1, Offerors are required to identify key subcontractors and provide Letters of Commitment in their proposal. | | |
| Since the Base MATOC will include OCONUS work and the RFP does not contain any future project specifics, it will be difficult to obtain commitments from Key Subs at this juncture. | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| Recommend removing this requirement from Phase 1. | | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8954189 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| We respectfully request the following three items: | | |
| 1. Please extend the proposal deadline to Tuesday February 2, to allow our personnel to take leave to be with their families over the holidays; | 1. The Government does not intend to extend the proposal deadline. | |
| 2. Please extend the inquiry deadline to January 5, 2021; | 2. The Government does not intend to extend the inquiry deadline. | |
| 3. Please respond to all inquiries at least two weeks prior to proposal due date. | 3. Government provided timely responses | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8954288 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Would the Government please consider reducing the font size for narrative to 11-point font? | The font will remain unchanged for this requirement. | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8954290 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| 5992 | | |
| Would the Government please consider allowing 10-point font in all headers and footers? | Refer to the government response to Question #8954288 | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8954294 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| "Smaller fonts are permitted on areas of the proposal that will not easily accommodate 12 point font and limited to illustrations, organization charts, and supporting data exhibits." Would the Government consider allowing smaller font's in tables as well, limited to no less than 10-point font? | Refer to the government response to Question #8954288 | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8954296 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Will the Government accept CCASS in lieu of PPQs? | | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8954309 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Page 24 of the pdf indicates a proposal due date of January 18, 2021. However, this date doesn't appear is SF 1442. Please confirm Phase 1 proposal due date. | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8954311 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| SF 1442 states Solicitation Number as W912DY210005 as to the pages' header. However, the text refers to W912DY-20-R-0035 in places. Please confirm the solicitation number. | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8954316 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Required Bond Limit on page 27 and page 35 is $5,000,000 per task order and $25,000,000 in aggregate. However, the Surety Letter of Commitment in Attachment 8 refers to $5,000,000 per project and $10,000,000 in aggregate. Please confirm the bonding requirement. | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8954320 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| We understand that signed Joint Venture Agreements should be included in Phase 1 Volume I PROPOSAL DATA SHEET AND REQUIRED RESPONSIBILITY INFORMATION. Please confirm. | | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8954321 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| We believe that the heading of Section 3.0 on page 54 should be "PHASE 2 PROPOSAL AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS" and is not relevant to Phase 1. Please confirm. | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8954325 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Please confirm that Small Business Offerors will not be required to submit a Volume II SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION in Phase 2. | All Offerors will be required to provide a small business participation document. | |
| On: Dec 07 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8955992 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| We have 2 questions regarding this solicitation: | | |
| Would you accept CPARS in lieu of PPQs? | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| Can 1 company that is certified as an 8a AND Small Business be considered in both pools? Or would we need to submit a separate proposal for each pool? | There is only one pool. Orders may be set aside among small biz or 8(a)s. | |
| On: Dec 08 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8956707 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Can the Government please provide the Division 01 Specifications reference in the solicitation? | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 08 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8956716 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Does the Government require any further project documentation from the Architects on our team? Since the request is only for 5 total projects, how many would the Government like to see from our designers? | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 08 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8956737 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Could the Government please provide the task order range for this contract? | THE AVERAGE TO $3.2M | |
| On: Dec 08 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8956812 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Section 1.11.1.2, General Instructions states "Under this solicitation, no company or business entity may be awarded more than one contract as a prime Contractor." Does that mean all reserved pools combined within the MATOC or within each reserve pool: UR, SB & 8(a)? If a large business is pursuing the UR pool and has a SBA 8(a) Mentor-Protégé JV with another company can 2 awards occur, one to the large business in UR pool and one to the 8(a) reserve JV pool since it's likely they will not be competing against each other? | A prime contractor that is also acting as a mentor in an 8(a) mentor protégé joint venture may submit a proposal seeking a MATOC contract award as well as the joint venture with that prime contractor as an SBA recognized mentor. However, because of the mentor's role to advise and assist the joint venture, the joint venture and the mentor prime contractor if both are awarded a MATOC contract should not propose on the same task order solicitation in the future. This restriction is necessary due to the risk of anti-competitive pricing issues and collusive bidding as addressed in FAR Subparts 3.1 and 3.3. | |
| On: Dec 08 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8957185 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| The Offeror should describe its corporate qualifications relative to the paragraph titled "Contractor Qualifications" in Section C of the Solicitation. Will the government please provide Section C and the "Contractor Qualifications"? | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 08 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8958478 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| PPQs shall only be submitted for the projects identified in Volume IV, Past Performance. | | |
| Volume IV is referred to here and as the price volume on page 27 but nowhere else in the RFP. Please clarify | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8958488 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| PPQs are not included in the page limitation for Volume III Factor 2. What is the page limitation for said volume? | PPQs have no page limitations | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8958620 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | It is the Company's decision for its business strategy on which regions or countries that it desires to seek contract awards. A desired regional or country preference would not be considered a Government restriction on its ability to seek a base MATOC contract award. If awarded a base MATOC contract award, a company could decide at its own discretion whether to propose on any solicited order and could decide to limit its participation to propose on orders only for specific regions or countries. However, solicited orders in the future are not guaranteed for certain areas or countries and a MATOC awardee may experience very few or no orders solicited in their desired area or country. | |
| Greetings from BUTEC. | | |
| With regards to the subject tender, we are currently operating in Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Iraq. | | |
| Kindly specify if we are eligible to apply for these countries only. | | |
| Also, please clarify the deadline of the submission of Phase 1. | | |
| Awaiting your reply. | | |
| Thank you. | | |
| Regards, | | |
| Karim BOURAMIA | | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8958906 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Please disclose the anticipated dollar range of the task orders. | Refer to the Government Response to Question #8956737 | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8958971 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Will the Government consider projects performed within the last 8 years, if we can show the same Key Personnel performed the example project will be proposed for the FRR contract? | Please provide projects IAW the solictation | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8958976 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| The requirement is to provide 5 project examples. Does this include Design Firm projects as well as the Offeror's projects? | Refer to the Government Response to Question #8956716 | |
| Or does the Government want 5 projects from the offeror (construction) and 5 projects from the A/E fir, (design)? | | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959056 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Will some projects just be competed among the five 8(a) contractors or just be competed among the ten small business contractors? If so, approximately how much and/or what type of projects will be set aside for the 8(a) and small business contractors? | Set asides for 8(a) allow for 8(a) competition only. Set asides for small business allow small businesses and 8(a)s to compete. Depends on several factors such as, location, level of complexity, dollar value, etc. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959058 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| The first paragraph of Section 5.1 says that "The Offeror shall provide letters of commitment for all proposed key subcontractors." Key subcontractors are defined in Section 5.1 "as any subcontractor that will perform a major portion (more than 15% of the total job) of the project." Considering that this IDIQ contract covers such a broad scope of work and such a large geographical area, it is likely that many prime contractors would have no subcontractors that would perform more than 15% of the cumulative efforts on all their MATOC task orders. Please confirm that it would be acceptable to not identify any key subcontractors if an offeror does not anticipate using any subcontractor(s) to the extent that the specific subcontractor(s) would execute more than 15% of the work on the prime offeror's contract. | Offerors are to list subcontractors when applicable | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959062 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Section 5.1 includes qualifications for key personnel including a Corporate Design Manager. The Design Manager "shall have direct responsibility for the company's design quality control program." Please confirm that if the prime offeror's team includes a design firm that the corporate design manager can be an employee of that design firm. | yes IF THE prime offeror's team includes a design firm the corporate design manager can be an employee of that design firm. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959064 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| The text on Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Attachment 3 is Times New Roman 10-point font. Please confirm that when offerors should also use Times New Roman 10-point font when completing Attachment 1, Attachment 2, and Attachment 3. | RFP revised for clarity | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959158 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Some IDIQ contracts require members of the MATOC pool to bid on all released task orders, or allow offerors to decline to bid a percentage of task orders (e.g.10%) without penalty. Since the geographic scope of the Base MATOC covers a broad OCONUS area, are there such task order bidding requirements on this MATOC contract? | No. however reference on-ramping and off-ramping criteria in the solicitation | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959314 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| 1.12.5 Proof of Financial Capability And Stability. RFP States, "Offeror's, including Joint Venture partners, are required to submit copies of their most recent annual reports, audited financial statements (balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement with auditor opinion, and recent copies of Dun and Bradstreet (D&B)/Standard & Poor's (S&P) reports. Offerors are excused from meeting this requirement if the offeror includes a statement from its Chief Financial Officer that one or more of these documents are not in existence." | | |
| Question: Please advise where you want our financial statements to be provided in our proposal response? Is this required in Phase 1 or Phase 2? | The RFP has been updated for clarity. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959315 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| RFP states under header Corporate Qualification – The Offeror should describe its corporate qualifications relative to the paragraph titled "Corporate Qualifications "in Section C of the Solicitation. | | |
| Question: Upon review of the RFP a Section C is not included. Is the paragraph beginning "Specialized facilities repair renewal experience... " on the bottom of page 37 of 106 intended to provide the Section C information? If not can Section C be provided? | Refer to Question #8957185 | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959318 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| RFP States, "The Risk Management Plan should include an itemized listing of risks, challenges, perceived problems that are anticipated to threaten potential MATOC task orders in terms of schedule, budget, change orders, customer dis-satisfaction, etc. With each issue specified, the contractor shall list its proposed solution to mitigate or resolve the risk/challenge/problem. The risks and solutions developed should be grounded upon the contractor's accumulated knowledge of performing similar projects in the past. Risks and solutions, at a minimum, are to be provided in a bulletized and numbered format. The plan is limited to 3 pages in length." | RFP have been revised for clarity | |
| Question: The RFP details the page count for Volume II Factor 1 Technical and Management Approach and states that the Risk Management Plan is not to exceed 3 pages. Can you confirm the 3 pages are excluded from the 25-page count for the Technical and Management Approach? | Refer to question #8959318 | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959319 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| The RFP calls for a 3-page Risk Management Approach, however, does not detail where the plan is to go or how it will be evaluated. Can the government please clarify where the plan is to be included in the proposal and what the evaluation criteria for the plan are? | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959322 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| RFP states, "The offeror shall submit up to five (5) projects, using the templates shown in Attachments 2 and 3, that demonstrate the depth and breadth of corporate experience within the offeror's organization. Two of the five projects must show experience as a prime contractor." | | |
| Questions: | | |
| 1) Please advise if there is a page limit on the Attachments 2 and 3? | 1) There is no page limit on Attachments 2 and 3. | |
| 2) Please confirm that the Attachment 2 and 3 are excluded from the page count? | 2) Attachments 2 and 3 are not excluded from the 30-page count limit. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959329 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| RFP States, "The Program Manager shall be familiar and conversant with the various codes and standards applicable to Facilities repair/renewal tasks covered in the Division 01 Specifications" | | |
| Question: The Division 01 Specifications document are not included within this solicitation release. It is mentioned multiple times throughout the solicitation; however, the section seems to be missing. Please provide the Division 01 Specifications document. | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959333 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Regarding Qualifications for Key Personnel. The submission requirements in Section 5.1 request qualifications for key personnel, however there is no evaluation criteria associated with key personnel. How will the resumes and LOC for key personnel be evaluated? | The RFP has been updated for clarity | x |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959337 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| RFP States, "The offeror shall submit up to five (5) projects, using the templates shown in Attachments 2 and 3, that demonstrate the depth and breadth of corporate experience within the offeror's organization." | | |
| Question: Is there a page limit for the 5 required projects within Volume II Factor I? Should the offeror choose to allocate 2 pages per project per Attachments 2 and 3, this will take up a significant portion of the 25-page limit allocated toward Volume II, Factor 1. Would the client consider expanding the page limit to 35 pages or excluding the Attachment 2 and 3 projects from the page count? | The RFP has been updated for clarity | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959339 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| The RFP States, "The offeror shall submit up to five (5) projects, using the templates shown in Attachments 2 and 3, that demonstrate the depth and breadth of corporate experience within the offeror's organization." | | |
| Question: Can we make minor formatting modifications to Attachments 2 and 3 for the projects to allow better utilization of space? | The RFP has been updated for clarity. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959340 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| RFP states, "If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, the Government will only evaluate past performance of the division or unit submitting the offer, unless the proposal indicates that the offeror will be using the resources of the affiliated organizations." | | |
| Question: If the offeror submits a project performed by a division of the company that is not the entity proposing the work, do we need to include a Letter of Commitment for that division to commit the same resources to the entity proposing the work under this contract? | The RFP has been updated for clarity. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959341 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Is there a page limit for Volume III Past Performance? This is not indicated within the solicitation. | The RFP has been updated for clarity. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959343 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| RFP States, "Legibility, clarity, coherence, and content are more important than appearance. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments shall not be submitted. Footnotes on text pages shall also be in 12-point font." | | |
| Question: The RFP states that Footnotes on pages shall be 12-point font. Can the Government please define footnotes? | A footnote is an explanatory or documenting note or comment at the bottom of a page, referring to a specific part of the text on the page. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959351 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| RFP States, "Page 25 states, "Volume I PROPOSAL DATA SHEET AND REQUIRED RESPONSIBILITY INFORMATION" | | |
| Table of Contents N/A | | |
| List of Tables and Figures N/A | | |
| Tab (A) – Offeror Acknowledgment Letter (signed) SF1442 N/A | | |
| Tab (B) – Representations and Certifications N/A | | |
| Pages 33 and 35 have: | | |
| VOLUME I - STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL DATA SHEET AND REQUIRED RESPONSIBILITY INFORMATION | | |
| 4.1 STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL DATA SHEET | | |
| 4.1.1 REQUIRED RESPONSIBILITY INFORMATION | | |
| (a) Any and all documentation wherein the Offeror (including its parent, predecessors, affiliates or proposed subcontractors) has been negatively referenced in any U.S. Government report, investigation, qui tam action, civil or criminal fraud action, Flash report from Task Force SAFE or similar entity, or any other official document evidencing negative performance in U.S. Government contracting during the past six (6) years. | | |
| (b) A statement listing; a. Each contract awarded within the preceding three (3) year period exceeding $1,000,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract; and Each contract awarded within the preceding three (3) year period not already physically completed and exceeding $5,000,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract. | | |
| (c) Bankruptcy/Adverse Information - | | |
| (d) Evidence of Bondability" | | |
| Question: These two sections are asking for different requirements in Volume 1. Can the Government please clarify what information they want in the Volume 1 response and ensure that both sections of the RFP match so we provide the correct data? | The RFP has been updated for clarity. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959543 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Phase I Factor I appears to have a 25 page limit. Does this include the Risk Management Plan, which has a 3 page limit? | The RFP has been updated for clarity. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959574 | | |
| Comment Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (U) | | |
| Will you accept CPARS and PPQs received for other solicitations in lieu of making us send new PPQs to our clients to reduce the burden on our clients? | Reference paragraph 6.2.1 of the solicitation, "Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs." | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959577 | | |
| Comment Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (U) | | |
| On page 37, under Corporate Qualifications, it says, "The Offeror should demonstrate an understanding of the risk management process associated with design-build process." Is this where we should put the three page Risk Management Plan/List discussed, two paragraphs later on page 35? | The RFP has been updated for clarity. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959582 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| On page 37, under Corporate Qualifications, it says, "This information should address the Offeror's organization and intended technical approach to executing the contract and design-build task orders. How does this differ from the information requested on page36 in paragraph 5.1 Submission Requirements? Or is this where that paragraph should be addressed in this volume? | The RFP has been updated for clarity. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959590 | | |
| Comment Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (U) | | |
| On page 38, under 6.1.1, the RFP states, the Offeror can include, Performance recognition documents received within the last five years, such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition." Should we include these only for the two to five projects submitted in Volume II or can we include all performance recognition documents received in the past five years? | The RFP has been updated for clarity. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959604 | | |
| Comment Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (U) | | |
| Please consider allowing projects that are substantially complete(greater than 90%) for the 2-5 projects to demonstrate the breadth and depth of an Offeror's specialized experience. | Per Section 5.1 of the Solicitation, "Projects must be 100% construction complete, within five years preceding the date of this solicitation." This requirement shall remain. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959690 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Submission of resumes are required in both Phase I and II. Can the Government confirm that resumes are required for both Phases? | Resumes are required for both phases | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |
| Information for this report is procurement sensitive. | | |
| 8959700 | | |
| Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) | | |
| Is the Risk Management Plan page limit included in the 25 page-limit for Volume II, Factor 1? | The RFP has been updated for clarity. | |
| On: Dec 09 2020. Forward request by email. Forward request by email. | | |