Attachment 0011 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 77 KB Posted

Attached to
Solicitation for G15 Cargo Parachute, Bag, Cargo Aerial Delivery A-24, Parachute, Cargo Extraction Assembly
Solicitation number
W912CH-24-R-0026
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity related to the solicitation for G15 Cargo Parachute, Bag, Cargo Aerial Delivery A-24, and Parachute, Cargo Extraction Assembly. The questionnaire is to be completed by the respondent's point of contact and will be used to evaluate the contractor's past performance for a forthcoming contract award.

The key details of the federal contract opportunity include: a 100% Small Business set-aside for approximately three 5-year, Firm Fixed Price, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contracts; a requirement for First Article Testing; application of the Berry Amendment for domestic source requirements; and the use of NAICS code 314999 for Other Miscellaneous Textile Product Mills. The contract specialist, Daniel Shallal, should be contacted for any questions related to the solicitation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W912CH24R0026-0006 AMENDMENT.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Conference QA W912CH24R0026.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Questions and Answers Solicitation W912CH-24-R-0026.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W912CH24R0026-0003 AMENDMENT.pdf PDF
W912CH24R0026-0005 AMENDMENT.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers Solicitation W912CH-24-R-0026.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W912CH-24-R-0026-0004 amendment.pdf PDF
Pre Proposal Conference W912CH-24-R-0026 R1 - 7-1-2024.pptx PPTX presentation
Pre Proposal Conference W912CH-24-R-0026 R1 - 7-1-2024.pdf PDF
Attachment 0018 TDPL 11-1-9546-1 7-8-24.pdf PDF
Attachment 0017 11-1-9535S002.pdf PDF
Pre Proposal Conference W912CH-24-R-0026 R1 - 7-1-2024.pdf PDF
W912CH-24-R-0026 Pre-proposal conference meeting details.pdf PDF
Pre Proposal Conference W912CH-24-R-0026 R1 - 7-1-2024.pptx PPTX presentation
W912CH24R0026-0002 AMENDMENT.pdf PDF
Attachment 0015 Revised TDPL 11-1-9546-1.pdf PDF
Attachment 0016 11-1-9534S002.pdf PDF
W912CH24R0026-0001 Amendment.pdf PDF
Attachment 0008 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS 58J6100 DEPLOYMENT BAG PARACHUTE-15 FT.pdf PDF
Attachment 0003 SPECIFICATION CONVERSION TABLE AND DEVIATION PACKAGE.pdf PDF
Attachment 0001 - Pricing Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TPP for NSN 1670-01-647-2680 PN 11-1-9548-1.zip ZIP file
Attachment 0007 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS 11-1-9548-1 PARACHUTE CARGO EXTRACTION 110 INCH.pdf PDF
Attachment 0005 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS 11-1-8455-1 BAG CARGO AERIAL DELIVERY A-24.pdf PDF
Attachment 0006 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS 11-1-2801 CLEVIS ASSEMBLY.pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 First Article Waiver Worksheet.pdf PDF
Attachment 0004 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS 11-1-9546-1 G-15 CARGO PARACHUTE.pdf PDF
Attachment 0010 SPECIAL PACKAGING INSTRUCTIONS AB16472680 110 IN PARACHUTE CARGO EXTRACTION.pdf PDF
W912CH24R0026.pdf PDF
Attachment 0009 SPECIAL PACKAGING INSTRUCTIONS AB16473116 G-15 CARGO PARACHUTE.pdf PDF
TPP for NSN 1670-01-650-5347 PN 11-1-8455-1.zip ZIP file
TPP for NSN 1670-01-647-3116 PN 11-1-9546-1.zip ZIP file
Show all 32

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CUI

Attachment 0011: Past Performance Questionnaire

W912CH-24-R-0026 G-15 Cargo Parachute and Supplies Please provide your candid response to the following questions. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by email to Daniel Shallal, daniel.m.shallal.civ@army.mil by [01 July 2024 at 5pm EST]. Thank you for your assistance.

PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. RELEVANT CONTRACT

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract/Task Order Number:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor’s name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Contract Period of Performance End Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:

Place of Performance:

Brief Description of the Relevant Contract Scope:

B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

FAX Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II - EVALUATION (To be completed by Respondent’s Point of Contact)

RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS

Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.

Table 1

A. Quality

1. Assess the contractor’s quality and workmanship of the parachutes in accordance with the contract terms and conditions. (i.e. to Government technical data package, technical specifications, testing).

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues, give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

B. Project Schedule:

1. Assess the timeliness of contractor performance for Product Deliverables: To what extent did the contractor adhere to the original contract delivery schedules (unless the delivery schedule was revised due to fault of the Government) on an overall basis. Please include the contractor’s efforts that contributed negatively or Positively to the delivery schedule and provide comments if any Delivery extensions were granted, and why the extensions were needed.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

C. Management / Business Relations:

1. Program Management: Assess the contractor’s timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), or other UCAs), the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction. Consider the contractor’s responsiveness to the program as it relates to meeting contract/order requirements during the period covered by the report.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

2. Subcontract Management: Assess the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts. What efforts were taken to ensure early identification of subcontract problems and the timely application of corporate resources to preclude subcontract problems from impacting overall prime contractor performance.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

D. General Comments:

Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, is welcome by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.

PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

Please provide a point of contact who compiled or completed this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire.

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

CUI Source Selection Information, FAR 2.101 and 3.104 image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .