sf30-19r2-am6.pdf

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

AM-0006 30 Oct 2019

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

CECT – Contracting Division USACE, Honolulu District Bldg 252 (CECT-POH) Ft Shafter, HI 96858-5440

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State, and Zip Code) (x) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

W9128A-19-R-0002 X

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08/23/2019

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[ X ]The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [ X ] is extended, [ ] is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __1__ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(x) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [ ] is not, [ ] is required to sign this document and return _ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

$300M Small Business Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) For Design-Bid-Build Construction Services for the State of Hawaii

See Page 2 of 2 Pages

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Am-0006 Standard Form 30

RFP No. W9128A-19-R-0002 Page 2 of 2 Pages

Item No. 14 (Continued)

1. CHANGES TO SPECIFICATIONS. Attached hereto are new, revised and deleted sections to the specifications. Revised pages replace like-numbered pages. The revision mark (Am-0006) is shown on each revised page.

A. REVISED SECTIONS. The following sections were revised and changes are in bold and red colored font.

Section 00 22 16, paragraphs 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.2.1, and 6.2.2

B. ADDITIONS TO SECTION: The following was added to a section:

N/A

C. REPLACED SECTION: The following section is to be replaced in its entirety:

N/A

D. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS / CLAUSES: The following provisions / clauses were added to the following sections:

N/A

E. REVISED PROVISIONS / CLAUSES: The following provisions / clauses were revised and changes are in bold and red colored font.

N/A

2. The proposal due date remains unchanged. See Am-0005, SF 1442, Block 13.

Section 00 22 16 – Page 14

(Am-0006) responsibilities and how well it clearly demonstrates an understanding of the organizational structure and relationships required for successful execution of the contract, and execution of simultaneous task order requirements within the scope of the MATOC.

b. Multiple projects The Government will evaluate how well the Offeror will manage and administer resources required to perform multiple task orders under the contract at the same time.

When assessing an Offeror’s relevant experience, the Government intends to give greater weight to the following:

Contractor’s staff that have on-site decision making authority to include, but not limited to, negotiations, resolution of issues, resources, and the level of authority delegated to address issues.

Organizational relationships which have been used on other projects (such as those presented in Factor 1) that are same or similar to the scope of this MATOC.

Proposals that provide a description of relationship/contractual agreement with proposed subcontractors.

Depth and breadth of technical experience and training as it relates to the responsibilities of proposed key personnel.

Key personnel experience working for the Prime contractor and with other key personnel

Prime Contractor Key personnel and key subcontracting team experience working in the area of responsibility covered under the RFP.

See paragraph 7.0.d for the evaluation rating system for Volume 1, Factor 3, Organization and Management Plan.

5.4 VOLUME 1 – TAB E, FACTOR 4: TECHNICAL APPROACH

5.4.1 Submission Requirements

a. The Offeror shall describe the resources and teaming arrangements that will be utilized specifically for the sample project. The Offeror shall explain how resources will be utilized and any contractual teaming arrangements that have been established. Resources include, but are not limited to: personnel, equipment, and any other resources necessary to execute the sample project. The Offeror shall describe how it will manage the sample project, how it will mobilize to prepare for and execute the sample project, and the authorities and delegations of authorities within the team. The Offeror shall describe its management process and how the process will lead to the successful execution of the sample project. The Offeror shall explain how it will address logistical, personnel, material sourcing, and transportation challenges of executing the sample project.

b. For execution of the sample project, any subcontractors and outside associates or consultants will be limited to the firms that were identified under paragraph 5.3.

5.4.2 Evaluation

The Government will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, and any deficiencies in the technical approach. The

Government will evaluate the Offeror’s resources and teaming arrangements proposed for the sample project to determine how well the Offeror demonstrates and understanding of the resources and relationships requirements required for successful execution of the sample project. The Government will evaluate how well the Offeror demonstrates a thorough understanding of the management processes required for successful execution and quality of the contractor’s plan to overcome the logistical, personnel, material sourcing, and transportation challenges to execute the sample project.

See paragraph 7.0.d for the evaluation rating system for Volume 1, Factor 4, Technical Approach.

6.0 VOLUME 2 - FACTOR 5: PRICE

Adjectival rating shall not be used of the Offeror’s price proposal. The Government will fully evaluate and negotiate (if applicable) all priced Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) for the proposal schedule and for the sample task order. The evaluation of all option ordering period CLINs will not obligate the Government to exercise any option nor place more than the minimum guarantee of the IDC MATOC. The Offeror’s Price proposal will be evaluated as follows:

Section 00 22 16 – Page 15

The solicitation has two (2) price subfactors (Subfactor 1 - proposal schedule and Subfactor 2 - sample project) which will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness as described herein. Also the sample project price will be evaluated of whether or not the price is too low (price realism analysis) and represent a risk for successful performance.

The contract will be a firm fixed priced construction MATOC. The Price Factor includes both solicitation Proposal

Schedule and the Sample Project Proposal Schedule. The solicitation has two (2) price subfactors: Subfactor 1 -

Proposal Schedule, which will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness, and Subfactor 2 – Sample Project, which will be evaluated for price realism.

The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition.

Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the

Contracting Officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition, the

Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, Offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the Contracting Officer to determine the reasonableness of the price.

6.1 Subfactor 1 – Proposal Schedule

The Proposal Schedule requires an Offeror to propose daily rates for 5 disciplines (Project Manager, Project

Superintendent, CQC System Manager, Quality Control Representative, and Site Safety and Health Officer); the escalation rate, if any, for the Base Period and Option Periods; and the a Home Office Overhead Rate, if any;

and a General Administrative Rate, if any. Daily rates will remain in effect through the current ordering period of the contract and will be applied to any contract changes unless (in the case of Home Office Overhead or

General and Administrative rates) the a contractor’s request for an equitable adjustment is approved by the

Contracting Officer.

6.2 Subfactor 2 – Sample Project

The Offeror will be required to provide a price proposal for the Sample Project. The proposed daily rates proposed under Subfactor 1 must be used when pricing the sample task order Sample Project.

Using the drawings and specifications provided as a Sample Project, complete the Sample Project Proposal

Schedule in Section 00 10 00. Instructions are provided in the notes to the Sample Project Proposal Schedule. As stated above, a price realism analysis will be performed on the lump sum price for the Contract Line item

(CLIN).

6.2.1 Basis for Evaluation

The Government’s price evaluation will be an integrated price analysis, as further detailed below, which will require complete information. Failure to provide all information requested may be cause to eliminate an

Offeror from consideration in the evaluation.

The information provided in the Price Proposal will be used in the tradeoff analysis. For purposes of award, a determination will be made on the reasonableness of the Price Proposal rates and the realism of the

Sample Project price.

The RFP requires firm-fixed price contract line items. The Proposal Schedule (Subfactor 1) - A price reasonableness approach will be utilized by the Government to determine that the proposed prices offered are fair and reasonable. Offers found to be unreasonably high or unbalanced, may be considered unacceptable and may be rejected on that basis.

The Sample Project Proposal Schedule (Subfactor 2). As noted above, may be subject to Proposal

Analysis techniques in accordance with FAR 15.404 to determine fairness and reasonableness of prices contained in the Sample Project Proposal Schedule. a price realism analysis will be applied to the Sample

Project Proposal, to determine (1) whether a low price indicates that the Offeror does not understand the work; and (2) whether the low price poses a risk to the Government of poor performance. in order http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/15.htm#P429_79027

Section 00 22 16 – Page 16 to measure the Offeror’s understanding of the requirements and/or to assess the risk inherent in an Offeror’s proposal. This includes the comparison of cost/price information from other proposals, information relative to market research, historical procurement data, and/or the Independent Government Estimate and, if necessary, further evaluation to determine fairness and reasonableness.

6.2.2 Evaluation Criteria

In accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b), a price analysis will be performed to determine that the Subfactor 1’s

Proposal Schedule proposed contract line items are price is fair and reasonable. The price analysis will be performed by utilizing one or more of the following techniques to ensure the prices are fair and reasonable:

- Comparison of proposed prices with those received from other Offerors in response to the solicitation

- Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information

- Comparison of proposed prices with the Government Estimate

Evaluation criteria for this price factor Subfactor 1 will include data from the Sample Project Proposal

Schedule. If deemed necessary, the Government will request price breakdown information to assist in price evaluation.

The Sample Project Proposal Schedule (Subfactor 2) shall be provided as if it were a real project. As noted above, a price realism analysis and/or price realism will be conducted and Offerors should be prepared to provide price breakdown information upon Contracting Officer’s request.

The Offeror’s Cost / Price proposal will be reviewed for errors. The Offeror may be given an opportunity to clarify certain aspects of its proposal at the sole discretion of the Contracting Officer.

Any tradeoffs among price and technical will be based on the total price proposed for the Sample Project.

6.3 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME 2)

6.3.1 Price Proposal.

Submit the Price Proposal in read-only PDF format. The only documents that can be scanned are the

SF1442, acknowledgement of amendments, and a letter from the surety for bonding capability. Sections of the proposal shall be bookmarked (linked to the index) in logical order.

Offerors shall submit the price proposal in a second envelope that is clearly marked, “PRICE

PROPOSAL, VOLUME 2, RFP NO. W9128A-19-R-0002.”

Offerors shall submit the price proposal documentation on:

Five (5) hard copies (1 original and 4 copies) One (1) hard copy; and

One (1) CD ROM as one separate PDF file titled:

W9128A-19-R-0002_COMPANY NAME_PRICE PROPOSAL

6.3.1.1 Size Restrictions and Page Limits. The following are established for each factor:

Factor 5 Price: Proposal Schedule and Sample Project (no page limit)

Proposal material shall be submitted in PDF format. Do not use a font size smaller than 10 pitch, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page. Sheet size of the proposal contents shall be 8-

1/2 inches x 11 inches.

6.3.1.2 Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs.

The Price Proposal shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of

Contents, as indicated in the following chart below.