W9127S22Q6001 AMENDMENT 0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to revise the Addendum to 52.212-1 and the evaluation criteria in 52.212-2. This amendment w ill also delete the JSN Summary Document from the solicitation attachments.

All other things remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 17

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 01-Dec-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W9127S22Q6001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

24-Nov-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01-Dec-2021

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

W9127S 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9127S22Q6001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1

Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items

1. Submission of Offers. Submit signed and dated offer at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Failure to provide all required documents or information may exclude the offeror (s) from further consideration. Emailed and faxed Quotes will not be considered.

Submit Quotes to:

https://safe.apps.mil

Before quotations can be uploaded, DoD SAFE requires guest users to receive a drop-off request from an authenticated user.

To ensure quotations are submitted in a timely manner, all offerors should request a drop-off 48 hours prior to quotation due date.

Once on the DoD SAFE website, please upload files. Once uploaded, the website requires a “send to” name and email. Please enter Timothy Pighee Timothy.A.Pighee@usace.army.mil

a. Electronic submissions via email or fax will not be accepted.

b. This is an electronic solicitation release. No hard copies will be mailed.

Amendments to the solicitation will be posted through sam.gov, the new Federal Business Opportunities website. It is the responsibility of each Offeror to review the webpage for notice of amendments, updates, or changes to current information.

c. Questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via e-mail to the Contract Specialist who is the primary point of contact Mr. Timothy Pighee at Timothy.A.Pighee@usace.army.mil.

d. Technical inquiries and questions relating to Quote procedures are to be submitted via ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet . To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page identified above please use the following directions:

Click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE; enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login.

Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue.

From this page you may view all Quotation inquiries or add inquiry.

Offerors will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

Solicitation Number: W9127S22Q6001 Bidder Key: TTY5K6-A68P28

The Review will be open from November 24, 2021, through December 1, 2021

Offerors are requested to review the solicitation in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of Quotes.

Oral explanations or instructions are not binding. Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

As this is a competitive acquisition, there is no public bid opening and no information will be given out as to the number of Offerors or the results of the competition until an award is made.

2. General Instructions. These instructions are designed to provide general guidance for preparing Quotes as well as providing specific instructions on quote organization, format, and content. Offerors shall include all documents and information requested and should be submitted in accordance with the instructions. The Offeror is cautioned to follow the instructions carefully, as the Government reserves the right to make an award based on initial Quotes received without discussion. However, the Government reserves the right to request clarifications if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

a. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, an ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the PCO in writing with supporting rationale prior to the close of the Solicitation.

b. The quote must be presented in a manner that clearly addresses the requirements, as set forth in the Statement of Work. Quotes that are overly verbose or include marketing material may distract from the evaluators’ ability to ascertain compliance with the solicitation.

3. Te am/Te am Membe r(s)/Teaming Partner (s). The Government will consider the offeror and all subcontractors a “team” when evidence of a signed Teaming Arrangement or Letter of Intent is provided. This RFQ will refer to the offeror and all identified teaming subcontractors as a “team.” This RFQ will refer to all identified teaming subcontractors as “team members” or “teaming partners.” The offeror shall identify any Team/Team Members in their Executive Summary and briefly describe how the Teaming Arrangement will support this requirement.

Offeror shall not submit any past performance questionnaires for team members. Only past performance from the Offeror shall be considered.

4. Quote Preparation Instructions. Offeror’s quote will consist of three (3) separate volumes: Price, Corporate Information, and Technical.

Quote Format. Offeror’s shall respond to the solicitation with a Quote describing the offeror’s technical approach to Government’s requirements.

All pages of each offer must be appropriately numbered and identified with the solicitation number W9127S22Q6001 in the header and/or footer of each page. If the RFQ page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit will be removed and not evaluated.

Page limitations are also annotated.

Volume Contents Format Number Of Copies

Maximum Page

Volume I

Bid Schedule

Attachment 1, Bid Schedule Worksheet

MS Excel 2007 or Later

1 Electronic

Copy

None

Volume II Corporate Information

Tab A - Introduction

Tab B - Signed SF 30

Tab C - Preaward Information

Tab D - Representations and

Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors

Adobe PDF for all documents.

None

Tab A - Executive Summary (no page limit)

Tab B – Technical Approach (12 page limit)

Tab C – Past Performance (12 page limit)

Tab D - Master Schedule (20 page limit)

Tab E – Commodity Specifications (no page limit)

Tab F - Team Qualifications (10

Tab G - Risk Assessment (6

Adobe PDF

Font Size: All font size shall be 10 pt. font or larger, with the exception of the IO Master Schedule.

Any page that contains a font size smaller than 10 pt. font, will not be reviewed and will not be considered for evaluation.

What Counts As A Page – Page Specifications? A page shall be an 8 ½ X 11” sheet of paper, with the exception of the sample integrated master schedule. Letter size and spacing requirements for illustrations and tables can be at the discretion of the offeror but must be easily readable.

Margins shall be at least 1 inch on the top and bottom and 1 inch on the side.

All pages that do not follow the above page specifications will not be reviewed and will not be considered for evaluation.

The Contractor shall number each page in order to eliminate any confusion. In the event contractor creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages.

Page Limit Includes: All Appendices, Charts, Graphs, Diagrams, Tables, Photographs, Drawings, etc.

Page Limit Does Not Include: Title Page, Table of Contents, Lists of tables and drawings and/or Cross Reference Matrix’s, covers for Volumes, Glossary of Terms/Abbreviations and Acronyms, Indices, and section dividers. Cross-references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections.

If a section exceeds the maximum page limit, the page(s) that exceed the page limit will not be reviewed and will not be considered for evaluation.

Electronic Copies.

a. All electronic copies of volumes shall be submitted in files for Volumes I, II, and III.

b. Volume I will be submitted using Microsoft Office Excel 2007 for Attachment 1, Bid Schedule Worksheet. Volume II and III shall be submitted using Adobe PDF.

c. Sound or video (e.g. MPEG) files should not be embedded into the quote files.

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Each volume will contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each.

No pricing information is to be presented in any part of the quote outside of the Volume I.

In the event pricing information is included in any part of the quote outside of Volume I, the page containing pricing information will not be reviewed and will not be considered for evaluation.

Change Pages After Initial Quotation Submission. If the Government opens discussions and requests the offeror to submit quotation revisions, during or after discussions, any changed pages that are submitted will be a different color from the original quote pages, and will have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page identifying the changed content. The date of the revision and revision number will be reflected on each changed page (preferably on, or next to, the vertical change line). Make spreadsheet revisions obvious by highlighting cells that changed. Page limitations may also be placed on responses to Evaluation Notice (ENs). The Government will identify specified page limits for ENs responses in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offeror.

a. Volume I – Bid Schedule

Contract Pricing Schedule, to include all supporting data. The Offeror shall submit pricing for this requirement on the attached bid schedule.

Evaluation Method: Price will be evaluated to determine if the price submitted by the Offeror is fair and reasonable in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b).

The pricing schedule shall be submitted fully completed and error free. It shall contain the Offeror’s prices for the established Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs). Please submit the following information to support your IO pricing and understanding:

Offerors shall propose pricing in the MS Excel spreadsheet entitled “Attachment 1 – Bid Schedule”

It is the offerors responsibility to ensure the spreadsheet calculates pricing correctly. The offeror may correct the spreadsheet as required.

b. Volume II – Corporate Information

TAB A – Provide a brief company introduction that describes the contractor’s significant attributes relevant to the solicitation and introduces the contractor’s team.

TAB B – Completed and Signed SF 30 and acknowledgement of all amendments. The contractor shall acknowledge all amendments to the RFQ in accordance with Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instruction to Offerors Commercial Items.

TAB C – Pre Award Information (e.g. Bank and Supplier References). In accordance with FAR 9.103(a), “Purchases shall be made from, and contracts awarded to, responsible prospective contractors only.” So that the Government can make a determination of Contractor responsibility, a prospective contractor must meet the standards as set forth in FAR

9.104 that requires a contractor to have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to obtain them. As an aid in assessing responsibility, the offeror shall notify their banks/suppliers that the Corps of Engineers may be contracting them, and shall authorize the banks/suppliers to release the following information regarding the Offeror’s account. If a written authorization is required by the Offeror’s bank. Offeror’s shall provide that written authorization with their quote. The following information shall be provided:

Name and Telephone Number of Bank’s Point of Contact Number of Years business has been conducted with each bank Types of open accounts (checking, savings, loans, etc.)

Balance of current accounts (the banks will provide a “range of figures” for this information such as medium five-figures range) Means by which loans are secured and if paid as agreed Point of Contact and Telephone Number for three (3) different Suppliers

Pre-award survey data will be used as it relates to the probability of the offeror successfully accomplishing the proposed effort. The Government will use pre-ward survey data provided by the Offeror and data obtained by other sources to perform this assessment.

TAB D - Representation, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors. The offeror will ensure that Representation, Certifications, and Other Statements are submitted thoroughly completed with all blocks in each certification/representation completed truthfully and completely.

c. Volume III – Technical Quotation The Technical Quotation shall not exceed the specified page limits listed in the table above.

The Government will not review any information submitted in an appendix or attachment to the quotation in excess of the establish limits. The offeror shall comply with the page limitations. The Offeror shall not submit verbatim sections of the solicitation or SOW as part of their technical quotation. Offerors that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection. The Technical Quotation shall not include any cost or price information.

TAB A – Executive Summary (no page limit) TAB B – Technical Approach (12 page limit) TAB C – Past Performance Information (12 page limit) TAB D – Master Schedule (20 page limit) TAB E – Commodity Specifications (no page limit) TAB F – Team Qualifications (10 page limit) TAB G – Risk Assessment (6 page limit)

The Technical Quotation should include, at a minimum, the following information.

TAB A – Executive Summary Provide organization structure information that describes the organization’s approach to fulfilling the requirement (internal resources, subcontractors, Joint Ventor, or Teaming Approach). This should also include a contact list (with phone numbers, fax numbers, mailing addresses, e-mail addresses, etc.) to include personnel authorized to sign for and to negotiate on behalf of their company.

TAB B – Technical Approach This tab shall address Evaluation Factor 1 in solicitation provision 52.212-2, Evaluation— Commercial Items.

Offeror’s shall submit a technical approach based on the schedule constraints outlined in the SOW, communicate how you would ensure continued operations of the facility during the project.

Provide a graphic representation of how you plan to approach phasing.

TAB C – Past Performance This tab shall address Evaluation Factor 2 in solicitation provision 52.212-2, Evaluation— Commercial Items. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included with the solicitation attachments is provided for the offeror to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its quote of all relevant (same or similar items) health- care/IO contracts of the Prime Contractor that are complete or at least 50% complete within the last 5 years.

Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your quote. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the quotation closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the quote, the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires.

If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Timothy Pighee via email at Timothy.A.Pighee@usace.army.mil prior to quotation closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their quotation, PPQs previously submitted for other RFQs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Offerors may provide details on past performance problems and corrective actions taken as a part of the quote. When an Offeror’s firm is divided into severable segments (e.g., division, group, unit) the Government will evaluate only the past performance of those segments of the firm that will actually perform the work. Additionally, if the Offeror has no relevant past performance, information may be provided for key subcontractors.

The offeror shall submit, along with the information required in this paragraph, a consent letter, executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the offeror so the offeror can respond to such information. For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter, authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the Offeror’s performance.

Recency Assessment. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past five (5) years from the date of issuance of this RFQ. Information that fails the recency assessment will not be evaluated.

Relevancy Assessment. To be relevant, the effort must be similar to the nature of work, size, magnitude, complexity and scope to the work required by this RFQ. The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information provided to determine if it is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services/products being procured under this RFQ. In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, quoted by the offeror, teaming partner, or subcontractor whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated. Relevant experience information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance data from other sources than those identified by the offeror in evaluating past performance. This includes, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency. Offerors are reminded that both independent data and data provided by Offerors in their quotations may be used by the

Government to evaluate offeror past performance. However, the burden of providing thorough, complete, and current past performance information as requested in this paragraph remains with the Offerors. Quotes that do not contain the information requested by this paragraph risk rejection or a less than acceptable performance rating by the Government.

All past performance comments received will be taken into account and could affect the overall rating. The overall past performance evaluation is a subjective decision based on the whole of all data received. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

TAB D – Master Schedule This tab shall address Evaluation Factor 3 in solicitation provision 52.212-2, Evaluation— Commercial Items.

Offeror’s shall submit an IO Master Schedule focusing on the Offeror’s ability to schedule and coordinate critical aspects of the IO process.

Submit a narrative and graphic describing the Offeror’s proposed schedule.

TAB E – Commodity Specifications This tab shall address Evaluation Factor 4 in solicitation provision 52.212-2, Evaluation— Commercial Items.

All cut sheets provided shall include JSN and product specifications.

All cut sheets shall be organized in JSN alpha/numeric order.

TAB F – Team Qualifications This tab shall address Evaluation Factor 5 in solicitation provision 52.212-2, Evaluation— Commercial Items.

Offeror’s shall submit personnel experience information for key personnel listed in the SOW.

The Contractor shall provide project names, dates, and point of contract information.

Personnel experience information should detail the roles and responsibilities of the personnel for each project.

TAB G – Risk Assessment This tab shall address Evaluation Factor 6 in solicitation provision 52.212-2, Evaluation— Commercial Items.

Offeror’s shall submit a list of risks specifically associated with this project.

(End of provision)

SOLICITATION ATTACHMENTS

Solicitation Documents

1. Bid Schedule

2. Misawa PRCL 21OCT21.pdf

3. Misawa Existing Inventory (G) 2JUN2021.xlsx

4. LVS Division 27 - DHA Specification Standard 06.14.21.pdf

5. SOW - FY21 Misawa Requirement Documents_20211029 v14.docx

6. DHA-FE Weekly Report_Template_20210524.pdf

7. DHA-ACAS Scanning Requirements Read Only 06.17.21.pdf

8. FRCS-VRA Ver 2.0.docx

9. FRCS FAT SAT Checklist.pdf

10. Example Generic ICS Med-COI Boundary Diagram v4.pdf

11. Draft DHA PM Standard Isolation Architecture for Cybersecurity of FRCS.docx

12. DHA System-Level Continuous Monitoring Plan 23MAY2018.pdf

13. DHA System-Level Continuous Monitoring Plan 23MAY2018.xlsx

14. DHA FRCS Baseline Categorization Memorandum-1 October 2020 (1)

15. Specifications Volume 1_Addendum 02.pdf

16. Specifications 2_Addm 01.pdf

17. PN99822_FP_Misawa Hospital Addition and Alteration_V2.0 (22 Feb 21).pdf

18. Misawa DHA-FE Submittal List_10.27.21.xlsx

19. MABH-SID-Package-Vol3.pdf

20. MABH-SID-Package-Vol2.pdf

21. MABH-SID-Package-Vol1.pdf

22. MABH-FFE-Package.pdf

23. BoDEquipmentCutSheets-LogCATA FIO.pdf

24. 10 MABH-Electrical.pdf

25. 07 MABH-Fire Protection.pdf

26. 06 MABH-Equipment.pdf

27. 05 MABH-Interiors.pdf

28. 04 MABH-Arch.pdf

29. 01 MABH-General.pdf

30. 10 MABH-Telecom Drawings ONLY

31. 11 71 01.pdf

32. SPD cut sheets_2019_1120.pdf

33. Misawa Furniture and Finishes Best Practices 10.29.21.pdf

34. Misawa Artwork Best Practices 10.29.21.pdf

35. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

36. GC Schedule

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(1) Technical Approach

(2) Past Performance

(3) Master Schedule

(4) Commodity Specifications

(5) Team Qualifications

(6) Risk Assessments

Technical and past performance, when combined, are approximately equal to price.

FACTOR 1: Technical Approach

Submission Requirements: Page Limit – 12 pages.

Continued Operations. Based on the schedule constraints outlined in the RFP, communicate how you would ensure continued operations of the facility during the project. Provide a graphic representation of how you plan to approach phasing.

Evaluation Criteria: The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent it demonstrates the Offeror’s understanding of:

Maintaining operations during the project with minimal impact on patients/staff as well as meet the schedule and phasing constraints outlined in the SOW. Note: Less impact to staff and patients is considered a better approach; the fewer number of departmental moves, phases and disruption is considered a better value to the government. The plan will be evaluated against the schedule constraints outlined in the SOW.

FACTOR 2: Past Performance

Submission Requirement: Page Limit – 12 Pages: Submit completed Past Performance Questionnaires from at least 3 customers demonstrating past performance completed within the past 5 years.

Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate how well the contractor performed on these contracts (See Past Performance Relevancy Ratings and Rating and Performance Confidence Assessments below). The Government may contact sources other than those provided by the Offeror for information with respect to past performance. These other sources may include, but are not limited to, Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other databases;

telephone interviews with organizations familiar with the Offeror’s performance, and

Government personnel with personal knowledge of the Offeror’s performance capability. The Government may also contact the POC’s identified in Factor 1 to obtain Past Performance Information.

FACTOR 3: Master Schedule

Submission Requirements: Page Limit – 20 Pages.

Submit a narrative and graphic describing the Offeror’s proposed schedule.

1 Narrative. In narrative form, communicate how the Offeror will address the all phases identified in the Schedule Graphic. Address how the Offeror will manage the schedule constraints outlined in the RFP to minimize impact on facility operations.

2 Schedule Graphic. Submit a schedule graphic showing the total project duration (i.e., bar chart) and identify key activities. Include:

a. Initial Outfitting & Transition. Include the schedule constraints and key milestones outlined in the RFP, include activity milestones and durations related to:

1) Personal Property Submittals

2) Transition Submittals

3) Schedule Constraints: Personal Property to include procurement, inspections, acceptance, and warranty.

4) Schedule Constraints: Transition to include inspections and acceptance.

5) Procurement of long lead Personal Property (PP) items.

6) Initial outfitting and transition with clearly defined transition periods (to include interim moves) for each phase.

Evaluation Criteria: The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it communicates and illustrates a logical and efficient total project scheduling approach in the detail needed so evaluators can evaluate Offeror’s schedule approach. Communicates required tasks, activities, deliverables, and submittals and within the schedule and operational constraints outlined in the SOW. Demonstrates a clear understanding of the outfitting and transition deliverables and activities, and project phasing requirements (including continued operations), to include inspections and acceptance.

FACTOR 4: Commodity Specifications

Submission Requirements: No page limit. Submit a cut sheet or detailed product specifications for every proposed commodity (equipment and low voltage systems) described in the Bid Schedule. Cut Sheets or product specifications must be highly specific and detail all options/accessories that will be provided.

Provide manufacturer, model, warranty information, size/capacity, and sustainability and efficiency features for each of the following systems. Provide this information in tabular form supported by catalog data and any other applicable information. Include all options and accessories reflected in the price proposal. Note: PP=Personal Property.

1 Medical Device & Equipment (MDE). For each of the below, provide material selections for PP.

a. Radiology Equipment (Division 11 Equipment) JSN X6505 2 Communication Systems For each of the below, provide material selections for PP.

a. Cybersecurity for PP FRCS (Division 25 Integrated Automation)

b. Refrigerator Monitoring System (Division 27 Communication)

c. Electronic Security System (ESS) (Division 28 Electronic and Safety Systems)

Evaluation Criteria: The quote will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed commodities meets the criteria set forth in the SOW. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed material solutions and how these solutions contribute to sustainability objectives. The Government will also evaluate whether the proposed materials meet or exceed the requirements found in the RFP.

FACTOR 5: Team Qualifications

Submission Requirements: Page Limit – 10 pages.

Submit personnel experience information for key personnel listed in the SOW. The Contractor shall provide project names, dates, and government point of contract information (name, organization, email address, and phone number) for verification of experience. Personnel experience information should detail the roles and responsibilities of the personnel for each project.

Provide the qualifications of the following personnel.

1 Project Manager 2 Communications Engineer 3 Interior Designer 4 Equipment Planner 5 Transition Planner

Evaluation Criteria: Personnel will be evaluated to determine if they meet the qualifications found in the RFP. The more qualifications personnel meet in the RFP the more the government considers it a better value to the Government.

FACTOR 6: Risk Assessments Submission Requirements: Page Limit – 6 Pages.

Submit a list of risks specifically associated with this project. Identify the degree of risk, possible impact of the risk on project (schedule, cost, safety etc.), whether it’s within or outside the Offeror’s control, and a plan to mitigate the risk(s). Note: The successful Offeror will be required to use this table to build the Weekly Report, Risk Tab.

Evaluation Criteria: The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it demonstrates the ability to:

1 Identify and mitigate risk(s) 2 Establish a degree of risk, that may impact mission, safety, quality, schedule, and cost, and

3 Identify whether risk(s) is/are within the Offeror’s control 4 Manage the impact on staff, patients, and operations as it relates to transition and occupant/FFE-LVS moves

Price

Submission Requirement: The Offeror shall submit pricing for this requirement on the attached bid schedule.

Evaluation Method: Price will be evaluated to determine if the price submitted by the Offeror is fair and reasonable in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b).

RATING ADJECTIVES AND DEFINITIONS

RATING ADJECTIVES

Outstanding - Quote meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good - Quote meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Quote contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable - Quote meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal - Quote does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The quote has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable – Quote does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies and is un-awardable.

Evaluators will assign a Past Performance Relevancy Assessment Rating and a Past Performance Confidence Assessment Rating as follows:

Past Performance Relevancy Assessment Rating

Adjectival Rating

Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Past Performance Confidence Assessment Rating

Adjectival Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)