B.08_ATTACHMENT_B.docx
DOCX document 69 KB Posted
- Attached to
- The Dalles Intake Gate Gantry Crane
- Solicitation number
- W9127N-19-R-0004
About this file
Attachment B
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_D_-_Small_Business_Subcontracting_Plan_Template.pdf | ||
| B.08_Amendment_0004_-_FINAL.pdf | ||
| Attachment_C_-_Small_Business_Participation_Plan_Template.pdf | ||
| IMG_1173.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_1176.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_1174.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_1175.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_1171.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_1172.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_1170.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_1177.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_1179.jpg | JPG image | |
| B.08_Amendment_0003_-_FINAL.pdf | ||
| IMG_0338.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_0331.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_0341.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_0335.jpg | JPG image | |
| IMG_0332.jpg | JPG image | |
| Attachment_C_-_Small_Business_Participation_Plan.pdf | ||
| B.08_Amendment_0002_-_FINAL_SPECS.pdf | ||
| B.07_The_Dalles_Site_Visit_PowerPoint.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Final_List.pdf | ||
| B.08_Amendment_0001_Solicitation_-_FINAL.pdf | ||
| B.08_The_Dalles_Intake_Gate_Gantry_-_FINAL_SPECS.pdf | ||
| B.07_The_Dalles_Intake_Gantry_Crane_Contract_Drawings_FINAL.pdf | ||
| B.07_19R4_draft_11082018_FIO_drawings.pdf | ||
| B.08_Attachment_A.pdf |
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
ATTACHMENT B
USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) FORM
1. The USACE Form PPQ shall be utilized for all evaluations that require a Past Performance Questionnaire.
2. Solicitations:
“Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the PPQ included in the solicitation is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Past Performance. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.
IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow- up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Jason Tanamor, via email at jason.n.tanamor@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.”
USACE Form PPQ will be made accessible on FBO website as a separate attachment.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
| 1. Contractor Information | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
| Address: | DUNs Number: |
Phone Number: Email Address: Point of Contact:
Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:
| 4. Project Description: | ||
| Complexity of Work High | Med | Routine |
How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name: Title:
Phone Number: Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
“Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.”
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. |
There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
“Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.”
File details come from the government source that posted it.