AM08.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

W91278-16-R-0030-0008 7 DEC 2017

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY(If other than item 6)

CODE

Corps of Engineers 109 St. Joseph St.

Mobile, AL 36602

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

W91278-16-R-0030

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

18 OCT 2017

10A. MODIFICATION OF

CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE

FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority)

THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible)

The subject solicitation for: IDIQ/MATOCS FOR FULL SERVICE OPERATON AND MAINTENANCE (O&M), INCIDENTAL REPAIR AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION TO SUPPORT THE U.S. ARMY MEDICAL COMMAND (MEDCOM) FACILITIES

PROGRAM

Is modified in the following: REFER TO THE ENCLOSED REVISED SPECIFICATIONS FOR AMENDMENT NO. 0008

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document reference in item 9A or 10A, as Heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICE (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of contracting officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

Indefinite Delivery Type Contract for Operations, Maintenance W91278-16-R-0030 & Incidental Repair and Minor Construction to Support MEDCOM

SF 30 Page 2 W91278-16-R-0030-0008

PART I - REVISIONS MADE BY ADDED AND/OR REPLACEMENT PARAGRAPHS/PAGES/SECTIONS

The items listed below are to be replaced by the corresponding added and/or revised paragraphs/pages or sections. Added and/or revised paragraphs/pages or sections are indicated by a note in bottom right hand corner of each paragraph or page. Added sections are hereby made a part of the contract and are to be inserted in the specification in the proper numerical/alphabetical sequence.

Within the specifications, deletions from the specifications are indicated by strikethrough, e.g.: deletions are marked with strikethrough and additions to the specifications including revisions/substitutions are indicated in bold, italic and underlined, e.g.: additions are indicated thus.

Corresponding Added or Revised Paragraph SECTION Page, and/or Section

Table of Contents Revised as indicated herein.

Bidding Schedule No. 2 – Sample Project Revised to change the name from “Seed Project” to “Sample Project”

00 11 00 Revised Paragraphs 1.3, 4.1, 4.5 and 4.5.1

00 12 00 Revised Paragraphs 2.2.3.2, 2.2.4, 3.1 and 3.5

Deleted Paragraph 6.4

Encl as stated Revised pages of the specifications as indicated in Part I.

TABLE OF CONTENTS – PAGE 1

Revised by Amendment No. W91278-16-R-0030-0008

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHECKLIST FOR PREPARATION OF OFFERS

BIDDING REQUIREMENTS

Contract Clauses

STANDARD FORM 1442 - SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD

BIDDING SCHEDULE NO. 1 – IDIQ MATOC

BIDDING SCHEDULE NOTES

BIDDING SCHEDULE NO. 2 – SEED SAMPLE PROJECT

STANDARD FORM 24 - BID BOND

STANDARD FORM LLL - DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES

00100 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

00 11 00 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

00 12 00 PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCESS AND CRITERIA, SELECTION PROCEDURES,

AND BASIS OF AWARD

00600 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

00700 CONTRACT CLAUSES

00800 SPECIAL CLAUSES

CESAM FORM 1151, PROMPT PAYMENT CERTIFICATION AND SUPPORTING DATA

FOR CONTRACTOR PROGRESS PAYMENT INVOICE

SPECIFICATIONS

DIVISION 01 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 00 01 GENERAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

01 00 02 STATEMENT OF WORK/DESCRIPTION

01 00 03 SEED SAMPLE PROJECT STATEMENT OF WORK/DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS

01 00 04 OUTLINE OF THE TASK ORDER PROCESS

END OF TABLE OF CONTENTS

This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.

Bidder's Name:

Project Name: Operation and Maintenance (O&M) services for Building 36065 Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center (CRDAMC) and associated Medical Facilities Location: Ft Hood, TX Description Base Year Option Year One Option Year Two Option Year Three Total

Base:

Sustainment Price SOW paragraphs as individual line items as shown below:

3.1.1.16 3.1.1.17 3.1.1.18 3.1.1.19

Price Buildings in 3.2.1 -3.2.3 table as individual line items as shown below:

36001 36015 36062 36072 36073 92066 12019 18010 18010 36000 36031 36040 36044 36048 36050 36053 36063 36067 36068 36069 36070 36074 36075 36076 36077 36078 36079 36080 36081 36082 36083

Price SOW paragraphs as individual line items as shown below:

3.2.4 a.

3.2.4 b.

3.2.4 c.

3.2.4 d.

Non Sustainment Price SOW paragraphs as individual line items as shown below:

2.1.1.a.

2.1.1.b.

2.1.1.c.

2.1.1.d.

2.1.1.e.

2.1.1.f.

2.1.1.g

Price attachment A Grounds Maintenance as a separate line item

Price Attachment B Pest Control as a separate line item

IJO

Parts and Spares

Total Base

Option 1 Dining equipment

BID SCHEDULE

SAMPLE PROJECT - BID SCHEDULE NO. 2

Revised and reissued by Amendment No. W91278-16-R-0030-0008

Option 2 Gates, garages, etc.

Option 3 Irrigation

Option 4 bldg. 4661

Option 5 bldg. 36001

Option 6 bldg. 36015

Grand Total (Base and Option):

SAMPLE PROJECT - BID SCHEDULE NO. 2

Revised and reissued by Amendment No. W91278-16-R-0030-0008

00 11 00

AMENDMENT NO. W91278-16-R-0030-0008

1.3 In this source selection, a non-priced proposal and a price proposal are submission requirements. The seed sample project scope is as provided in this solicitation to perform Operations and Maintenance at Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center, Fort Hood, Texas (CRDAMC). The seed project is advertised subject to availability of funds per the Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS) 5132.702(a)(ii) and the FAR part 52.232-18. The Government is not obligated to award an IDIQ contract to all Offerors competing and the Government reserves the right to reject any and/all offers.

4.1 There are two separate Volumes required for this proposal. Volume I has five rated non-priced factors: Past Performance Information of the Prime Contractor, Technical Approach, Management Approach, Seed Sample Project Performance Information, and Small Business Participation Plan. Volume II will include certain administrative requirements and pricing that are not rated.

EVALUATION FACTORS AND ORDER OF RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

Volume Factor - Description Relative Importance

Volume I

– Tab A

Factor 1 – Past Performance Information of the Prime Contractor

1st in relative importance

Volume I

– Tab B

Factor 2 – Technical Approach

2nd in relative importance; less important than Factor 1 and more important than Factor 3

Volume I

– Tab C

Factor 3 – Management Approach

3rd in relative importance; less important than Factor 2 and more important than Factor 4

Volume I

– Tab D

Factor 4 – Seed Sample Project Performance Information

4th in relative importance; less important than Factor 3 and more important than Factor 5

Volume I

– Tab E

Factor 5 – Small Business Participation Plan

Last in relative importance;

less important than Factor 4

Volume II Administrative Requirements (Including Price)

Not Rated. Evaluated through Price Analysis.

The non-priced factors combined are considered significantly more important than price in relative importance.

4.5 Volume I - Tab D, Factor 4 – Seed Sample Project Performance Information.

4.5.1 In Factor 4, the Offeror must submit Seed Sample Project Performance Information to explain their company’s application of proposed staffing practices, management processes, and technical approach to an actual operation and maintenance requirement. The seed sample project scope is as provided in this solicitation to perform Operations and Maintenance at CRDAMC. Factor 4 narrative shall not exceed fifteen (15) written pages. Address each of the following items, in a narrative format:

(a) Site-specific Management Plan. The Offeror shall provide a description of the proposed plan to manage the operations and maintenance for CRDAMC, specific to the site’s requirements and operating conditions. Include site-specific plans for meeting required emergency maintenance and demand maintenance response-times based on the staffing and management processes proposed for this specific requirement. Provide identification by name of the proposed personnel who will be responsible for each aspect of on-site safety, with a description of the proposed safety manager’s safety-related training.

Applicable OSHA training is required and must be demonstrated. Provide a site-specific plan for meeting Joint Commission accreditation requirements, detailing the contractor’s role in that process.

(b) Key Management Personnel Experience and Qualifications. The Offeror shall include only resumes for the Key Management Personnel listed as follows:

On-Site Superintendent, Quality Control Manager, and Safety Manager. Key Management Personnel shall provide a resume to demonstrate project experience for their assigned role for the contract, clearly demonstrating duties performed supporting their assignment for operation and maintenance management for medical facilities. Key Management Personnel shall emphasize experience similar to that described and anticipated by the requirements of this solicitation. Specific minimum requirements for the Key Management Personnel are as described in Section 01 00 02. To demonstrate the minimum years of experience requirement, ensure that project durations, when totaled, meet or exceed the minimum years of experience required. Time worked may be attributed to only one project, notwithstanding the fact that a person may have been working on more than one project at the same time. Attachment 4 at the end of this section may be used. At a minimum provide, all the information listed on these forms.

(c) Site Staffing Plan. The Offeror shall provide a staffing plan for CRDAMC covering all trades and all shifts, with a summary total number of proposed full and/or part time personnel and a subtotal by shift of the number and type of personnel proposed for each shift. The plan shall clearly identify the number and type of all trades required to provide operation and maintenance services, by shift, in accordance with the Scope of Work.

Identification of specific personnel is not required. Include key subcontractors and specialty subcontractors to support the work for CRDAMC.

(NOTE: The remainder of the section is unchanged by the amendment.)

00 12 00

2.2.3.2 Price Evaluation of Bid Schedule No. 2 (Task Order No. 0001). Bid Schedule No. 2 is the seed sample project, Task Order No. 0001. The seed project is advertised subject to availability of funds per the AFARS 5132.702(a)(ii) and the FAR part 52.232-18. The price team will initially evaluate this price (base bid and all options) independent from the Volume II. This price will be evaluated through price analysis and checked for appearance of unbalancing of prices. The price will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness using price analysis. The Government may reject an offer for appearance of unbalancing of prices. The Government may reject an offer as nonresponsive if it is materially unbalanced as to prices. The price evaluations will document, for the offers evaluated, the fairness and reasonableness of the proposed evaluated price. The SSA may request a price breakdown at any time during the evaluation process.

2.2.4 Non-Price/Price Tradeoff Analysis. In determining the awardees for the MATOC pool, all non-price factor ratings (Factor 1 – Past Performance Information of the Prime Contractor, Factor 2 – Technical Approach, Factor 3 – Management Approach, Factor 4 – Seed Sample Project Performance Information, and Factor 5 – Small Business Participation Plan) will be used during the non-price/price tradeoff analysis. After price analysis of the Bid Schedules and the factor evaluations are completed, the Government will then consider the price of Bid Schedule No. 2 in connection with Factor 1-5 ratings for the MATOC pool, comparing the relative advantages and disadvantages of the proposals and prices. After the determination of the MATOC pool, the non-priced Factor 4 – Seed Project Performance Information rating will be used during the non-price/price tradeoff analysis to determine the awardee within the MATOC Pool to be awarded the Seed Project. After price analysis of the Bid Schedules and the factor evaluations are completed, the Government will then consider the price of Bid Schedule No. 2 in connection with the Factor 4 – Seed Project Performance Information rating for the Seed Project, comparing the relative advantages and disadvantages of the proposals and prices. If the SSA determines discussions are not required, the SSA, relying on the Board’s report, pricing analysis, and independent business judgment, will decide which Offerors are to be awarded a MATOC. This decision, reflected in the Source Selection Decision Document (SSDD) will be based on the proposals that offer the best value to the Government in terms of their combined non-priced technical ratings and price. This may result in awards being made to higher rated, yet higher priced Offerors where the decision is consistent with the solicitation’s evaluation factors and the SSA reasonably determines that the superiority of the non-priced factor ratings of the higher priced Offeror justifies the additional costs.

If discussions are required, a competitive range will be established. At the conclusion of discussions, and receipt of Final Proposal Revisions, additional evaluation will be conducted by the SSEB, and the SSA will conduct a final trade-off analysis to determine the awardees.

3.1 There are two separate Volumes required for this proposal. Volume I has five rated non-priced factors: Past Performance Information of the Prime Contractor, Technical Approach, Management Approach, Seed Sample Project Performance Information, and Small Business Participation Plan. Volume II will include certain administrative requirements and pricing that are not rated.

EVALUATION FACTORS AND ORDER OF RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

Volume Factor - Description Relative Importance

Volume I

– Tab A

Factor 1 – Past Performance Information of the Prime Contractor

1st in relative importance

Volume I

– Tab B

Factor 2 – Technical Approach

2nd in relative importance; less important than Factor 1 and more important than Factor 3

Volume I

– Tab C

Factor 3 – Management Approach

3rd in relative importance; less important than Factor 2 and more important than Factor 4

Volume I

– Tab D

Factor 4 – Seed Sample Project Performance Information

4th in relative importance; less important than Factor 3 and more important than Factor 5

Volume I

– Tab E

Factor 5 – Small Business Participation Plan

Last in relative importance;

less important than Factor 4

Volume II Administrative Requirements (Including Price)

Not Rated. Evaluated through Price Analysis.

The non-priced factors combined are considered significantly more important than price in relative importance.

3.5 Evaluation of Tab D, Factor 4 – Seed Sample Project Performance Information. The SSEB will evaluate the seed sample project performance information narrative to assess the Offeror’s understanding of the requirements for CRDAMC, particularly the Site-specific Management Plan, Key Management Personnel, and the Site Staffing Plan to successfully execute the work order requirements as stated in this solicitation. The SSEB will determine the strengths, weaknesses and deficiencies, in any, in the approach presented, and then assign an overall combined factor rating/risk rating as listed below. The combined rating reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum solicitation requirements.

(NOTE: The remainder of Paragraph 3.5 is unchanged by the amendment.)

6.4 Selection for the Seed Project (Task Order No. 0001). After the MATOC Pool has been established, the Government will then consider the award of the seed project. The seed project is advertised subject to availability of funds per the AFARS 5132.702(a)(ii) and the FAR part 52.232-18. The Government will award a firm fixed-priced contract to that one Offeror awarded a MATOC contract that has been determined to be the most advantageous to the Government through trade-off analysis, non-price, price, and other factors considered.

(NOTE: The remainder of the section is unchanged by the amendment.)

This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.