Atch 6_Past Performance Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 118 KB Posted

Attached to
Fort Greely Base Operations Support
Solicitation number
W9126009R0001
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 6 to RFP - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 0006.zip ZIP file
W91260-09-R-0001 0005.doc DOC document
Solicitation QA 18JUNE09 —
Solicitation W91260-09-R-0001 Amendment 0004.zip ZIP file
W91260-09-R-0001 0003.doc DOC document
Attachment 1_FGA_PWS_06122009Rev 1.doc DOC document
Solicitation QA 12JUNE09.docm DOCM document
W91260-09-R-0001 0002.doc DOC document
Publicity Book for BASOPS Site Visit.pdf PDF
W91260-09-R-0001 0001.doc DOC document
Final Itinerary BASEOPS Industry Dayrev4.docx DOCX document
Solicitation QA 08JUNE09.doc DOC document
Attachment 1 MOD P00026.doc DOC document
AR 200-1.pdf PDF
Bidders Library Items Outline - FY 10 as of 3-26-09.xls XLS spreadsheet
AR 190-14.pdf PDF
Fort Greely —
2007-2012 FGA INRMP.pdf PDF
IPM 37 - Recycling.pdf PDF
A001 -- Contingency Plan CDRL.pdf PDF
Attach 2_SCA_WD2005-2017R10.pdf PDF
Installation Policy 16.pdf PDF
Appendix 8 - Government Equipment.doc DOC document
Construction and Demolition Debris Disposal Memo.pdf PDF
Final RFP 26 May 09.rtf RTF text file
AR 190-11 —
SSP...Provide Basic Cleaning Services.pdf PDF
A009 -- Monthly Solid Waste Data CDRL.pdf PDF
Atch 10 - Calculation of 50 percent for small business concern.doc DOC document
Attachment 11 Rate Request Information.doc DOC document
Installation Policy 15.pdf PDF
DOD INSTRUCTION 4150.07.pdf PDF
Chapter 10 - Attachment N.pdf PDF
A005 -- Monthly Lodging Report CDRL.pdf PDF
Statement of Work.pdf PDF
Chapter 4 Wastewater - Jan 2009.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Pesticide Use Proposal form.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment A —
Attachment 1_FGA_PWS_05222009.doc DOC document
Chap 2 - Haz Mat Waste - Jan 2008.pdf PDF
Chapter 9 - Integrated Pest Management Plan - March 2008.pdf PDF
Pesticide Reports 2006-2008.pdf PDF
A008 -- Monthly Pesticide Application Record CDRL.pdf PDF
AR 608-10.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - OSG-AK Facilities Frequency.xls XLS spreadsheet
Appendix 5 - GSA Vehicle Assignments.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
AAAF Frequency Schedule.xls XLS spreadsheet
Appendix 3 - Definitions.doc DOC document
Chapter 24 - Ozone-Depleting Chemical Elimination Plan.pdf PDF
AR 190-13.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 231 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire

A.
CONTRACTOR
B.
CONTRACT NUMBER
C.
CONTRACT TYPE
D.
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
E.
INITIAL CONTRACT COST
F.
CURRENT CONTRACT COST
G.
PRODUCT/SERVICE DESCRIPTION
H.
COMPLEXITY OF WORK
DIFFICULT

ROUTINE

I.
AGENCY NAME

Please mark the appropriate box which corresponds to the assessment of the performance element with an X.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable/Unknown

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

1a Rate the contractor’s overall contract management

1b Rate the contractor’s overall quality control and quality assurance program

1c Creative improvements in work flow and processes

1d Conformance with technical requirements (technical performance)

1e Compliance with labor laws/standards

1f Rate the contractor’s safety awareness/performance

1g Compliance with environmental standards

1h Overall compliance with contract terms and conditions

1i Accuracy & completeness of submitted reports/documentation

1j Rate the internal quality control methods used to meet or exceed base operations requirements

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable/Unknown

2. SCHEDULE

2a Timely submission of reports/documents

2b Adherence to contract performance schedule

2c Responsiveness to change orders

2d Responsiveness to short suspenses

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable/Unknown

3. BUSINESS RELATIONS

3a Subcontract management

3b Interface with Government staff

3c Effectiveness of identifying user requirements

3d Extent maintenance and problem reporting/tracking documentation produced was satisfactory to customer

3e Application of total quality management concept and process improvements

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable/Unknown

4. MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL AND MATERIALS

4a Rate the contractor’s ability to handle staff integrity issues

4b Ability to hire and retain a stable workforce

4c Rate level of the contractor’s employees in terms of knowledge and experience

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable/Unknown

5. COST CONTROL

5a Rate the contractor’s cost control

5b Rate performance in providing accurate proposals (timely, reliable, and realistic) for both awards and modifications

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable/Unknown

6. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

6a Rate contractor’s ability to solve contract performance problems without guidance from the organization

6b User Expectations/Requirement were met

6c Rate contractor’s professionalism and courtesy with organization staff

6d How well did the contractor identify and mitigate risks?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable/Unknown

7. TRANSITION

7a Rate contractor’s ability in performing a non-disruptive transition of operations

7b Rate accomplishment of timely milestones of phase-in plan

7c Rate the contractor’s performance standard at time of contract start. Was the goal 100% capability at contract start date met?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable/Unknown

8. OVERALL RATING

8a How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance?

Would you award to this contractor again?
YES

NO

MAYBE

Reason:

What do you think was the contractor’s greatest strengths?

What do you think was the contractor’s greatest weakness?

Remarks if exceptional performance has occurred (provide actual data supporting this observation)

Remarks if marginal and/or unsatisfactory performance has occurred (provide actual data supporting this observation)

Did the contractor request contract relief/modifications? If so, why? What was the impact (i.e. cost, schedule performance)?

EVALUATED BY:

NAME & TITLE
ORGANIZATION

SIGNATURE

DATE

The completed questionnaire is SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION and should be handled accordingly.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .