RFP_09-R-0044_CDC_Am0002.pdf

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

RECOVERY -- Child Development Center Hill AFB, UT This solicitation is 100% Set Aside for Small Business concerns.

1 Encl. This solicitation is 100% Set Aside for Small Business concerns.

1. Revised Pages: Delete Section 01 00 00 (Hill AFB) in its entirety, Appendices (insert at end of section 01 10 10)(additions to H.1, H.2, H.3, H.4, H.6), Section 01 45 04.00, Section 01 50 02.00

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDER

NO.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

is not, copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer tended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDG- MENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

is extended, B.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CON-

TRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

6. ISSUED BY

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) is required to sign this document and return

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

PAGE OF PAGES 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

15C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

16C. DATE SIGNED

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE CODE

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

is not ex-copies to the issuing office.

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

USAPPC V2.00

10A.

30-105-02

N/A

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922

CODE FACILITY CODE

1 61

0002 JUL 01, 2008 N/A 1706

W91238-09-R-0044

JUN 16, 2009

N/A

Appendix H.1

Amendment #2 Additions

Building 732

Asbestos Survey for Building 732 - 2 pages Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey, Building 732 - 1 page

Data Worksheet - 1 page

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

75TH CIVIL ENGINEERING (CEEV)

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH

Bldg 732 Demo

WO #48621

22 June 2009 1320 Hours

ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR BUILDING 732

DEMOLISH BUILDING

During April 2009, Mr. David Murray with 775 CES/CEPM requested an asbestos survey of Building 732 to demolish the building. The scope of this project is as follows:

Work Location: Building 732 Work Order: #48621

Statement of Work:

• Demolish the building.

• This inspection report is project specific and is not a valid report for any other project(s) associated with Building 732.

The information provided for this survey is based on samples collected by Nickolas King (Utah Certified Asbestos Inspector ASB-#2257). Samples for this survey were collected on 9 April 2009. The Science and Engineering laboratory, utilizing EPA Method 600R-93-116, analyzed all samples, which is PLM similar to NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods 9002. Civil Engineering personnel also reviewed all available asbestos survey databases of suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACM) that could potentially be encountered in this area. The information gathered from all current and previous surveys is shown below by homogenous area.

Footages are based upon the scope of work provided by the requestor.

Batt insulation white/yellow (10,000’ sq) was sampled from the northwest corner, from the northeast corner, and from the center of the south side. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093336, GM093337, and GM093338).

All Hard Thermal System Insulation encountered above ceilings, behind walls, in wall chases, in attic spaces, and in mechanical rooms is assumed to be asbestos. This includes all insulation on pipe runs, pipe saddles, tanks, and pipe fittings.

Remember that the locations of these building materials (homogenous areas) indicate where these materials were found, but do not necessarily mean that these are the only locations where these materials may be encountered during the project. When any new suspect ACM is encountered, stop work immediately and contact either 75 CES/CEEV or SGPB to identify any new suspect building materials. As per state and federal regulations, if the scope of work or the work location changes, then a new asbestos inspection and asbestos survey report will be required.

Bldg 732 Demo

WO #48621

DO NOT DISTURB ANY BUILDING MATERIALS THAT ARE SUSPECTED ACM.

CONTACT TROYE DAVIS AT 586-7094 TO ARRANGE REMOVAL OF THESE

MATERIALS IF THERE IS ANY POTENTIAL FOR THEM TO BE DISTURBED

DURING THIS PROJECT.

The project manager must post a copy of this survey at the project before this project begins, and must remain posted until the project is completed. Please contact Troye Davis at 586-7094 with any questions regarding this survey letter.

Nickolas King 75th Civil Engineering Squadron Maintenance Engineering Certified Asbestos Inspector

UDAQ #ASB-2257

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH

MEMORANDUM FOR: 775 CES/CEPM (Mr. David Murray)

FROM: 75th CES/CEOHA

SUBJECT: Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey, Building 732 (WO #48621). Demolish the building.

1. On 9 April 2009, Nickolas King (Utah Certified Lead Inspector #PB-1244) tested the painted surfaces found in Building 732 that would be impacted by demolishing the building. Building 732 was constructed in 1995. A Niton XL3t 300 XRF Analyzer (Serial # 30660) was used to test the painted surfaces of these components. Lead based paint was non-detected. Please refer to specific results of our survey; see attachment 1.

2. Limited lead-based paint identification has been completed for Building 732.

It is possible that lead based paint could be encountered during any renovation project.

Additional identification for lead based paint on other building components may be required. The facility manager should ensure that these components are surveyed for lead as well, to meet OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.62 construction requirements for lead.

3. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development defines Lead-based paint as any paint, vanish, stain, or other applied coating that has 1mg/cm2 as measured by an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzer or laboratory analysis or 0.5 percent by weight (5,000ug/g by dry weight) by laboratory analysis, or more of lead. All other components tested were less than 1 mg/cm2.

4. Any effort to disturb lead paint can create lead dust. Please ensure that appropriate abatement, cleanup, and disposal will be accomplished and that the appropriate safety measures are taken IAW 29 CFR 1926.62. If you have any questions please feel free to call Troye Davis at 586-7094.

//original signed//

Nickolas King 75th Civil Engineering Squadron Certified LBP Inspector Utah Certification #PB-1244

Attach:

Survey Results

Building: 732 Inspector: Nickolas King Date: 9-Apr-09 Insp. Number: PB-1244 Time: 14:15 Model: Niton XL3t 300 Work Order: 48621 Serial #: 30660

XL Number Room Side Structure Condition Substrate Color PbL(mg/cm2) PbL (+/-)

Pre Calibration Cal. Standard 1598 0.04 < 0.01 1599 0.27 0.31 +/- 0.02 1600 0.7 1.04 +/- 0.06 1601 1.4 1.53 +/- 0.09 1602 3 3.58 +/- 0.39 1603 Interior South Structural Steel Good Metal Red 0.02 NEG 1604 Interior East Roll-up Door Good Metal Grey 0 NEG 1605 Interior East Door Frame Good Metal Grey 0 NEG 1606 Interior West Door Jamb Good Metal White 0 NEG 1607 Interior West Door Good Metal White 0 NEG 1608 Exterior West Siding Good Metal Tan 0 NEG 1609 Exterior West Trim Good Metal Brown 0 NEG

Post Calibration Cal. Standard 1636 0 < 0.01 1637 0.3 0.31 +/- 0.02 1638 0.9 1.04 +/- 0.06 1639 1.5 1.53 +/- 0.09 1640 3.1 3.58 +/- 0.39

Appendix H.2

Building 827

Asbestos Survey for Building 827 - 2 pages Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey, Building 827 - 2 pages

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH

Bldg 827 Demo

WO #48621

15 June 2009

ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR BUILDING 827

During April 2009, Mr. Charles Lepper with 775 CES requested an asbestos survey of Building 827 to demolish the building. The scope of this project is as follows:

Work Location: Building 827 Work Order: #48621

Statement of Work:

• Demolish the building.

• This inspection report is project specific and is not a valid report for any other project(s) associated with Building 827.

The information provided for this survey is based on samples collected by Nickolas King (Utah Certified Asbestos Inspector ASB-#2257). Samples for this survey were collected on 9 April 2009. The Science and Engineering laboratory, utilizing EPA Method 600R-93-116, analyzed all samples, which is PLM similar to NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods 9002. Civil Engineering personnel also reviewed all available asbestos survey databases of suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACM) that could potentially be encountered in this area. The information gathered from all current and previous surveys is shown below by homogenous area.

Footages are based upon the scope of work provided by the requestor.

Drywall/Joint compound wall system (1500’ sq) was sampled from the northeast corner, from the northwest corner, and from the center of the south side. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093339, GM093340, and GM093341).

Fiber board white/brown (500’ sq) was sampled from the southwest corner, from the center of the building, and from the northeast corner. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093342, GM093343, and GM093344).

Batt insulation foil/pink (1500’ sq) was sampled from the northeast corner, from the northwest corner, and from the center of the south side. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093345, GM093346, and GM093347).

Sheet Flooring Red/Black was sampled from the northwest corner. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093348, GM093349, and GM093350).

Bldg 827

WO #48621

Heat wrap grey (5’ sq) was sampled from the boiler exhaust stack in the mech room. This sample was analyzed as containing 50% Chrysotile asbestos (GM093351).

All Hard Thermal System Insulation encountered above ceilings, behind walls, in wall these materials may be encountered during the project. When any new suspect ACM is encountered, stop work immediately and contact either 75 CES/CEEV or SGPB to identify any new suspect building materials. As per state and federal regulations, if the scope of work or the work location changes, then a new asbestos inspection and asbestos survey report will be required.

DO NOT DISTURB ANY BUILDING MATERIALS THAT ARE SUSPECTED ACM.

CONTACT TROYE DAVIS AT 586-7094 TO ARRANGE REMOVAL OF THESE

MATERIALS IF THERE IS ANY POTENTIAL FOR THEM TO BE DISTURBED

DURING THIS PROJECT.

The project manager must post a copy of this survey at the project before this project begins, and must remain posted until the project is completed. Please contact Troye Davis at 586-7094 with any questions regarding this survey letter.

Nickolas King 75th Civil Engineering Squadron Maintenance Engineering

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH

Bldg 827 Demo

WO #48621

1350 Hours

MEMORANDUM FOR: 775 CES/CEPD (Mr. Charles Lepper)

FROM: 75 CES/CEOHA

SUBJECT: Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey, Building 827 (WO #48621). Demolish the building.

1. On 9 April 2009, Nickolas King (Utah LBP Certification #PB-1244) tested the painted components of building 827 that would be impacted by demolishing the building.

Building 827 was constructed in 1951. A Niton XL3t 300 XRF Analyzer (Serial # 30660) was used to test the painted surfaces of these components. Please refer to specific results of our survey; see attachment 1.

2. The table below summarizes the building components in building 827 that tested positive for LBP. These components should be segregated or abated prior to renovation or demolition, and a composite TCLP taken of the waste before disposal.

(See attached results for further detail).

Component Color Lead Read Condition The metal door jamb on the interior east side of the building

White 1.5 Good

The metal door on the interior east side of the building

Grey 2.5 Good

The wood roll-up door on the interior east side of the building

White 1.7 Good

The wood roll-up door on the interior east side of the building

Green 3.3 Good

The wood roll-up door on the interior east side of the building

Yellow 4.3 Good

The concrete threshold on the interior east side of the building

Yellow 1.7 Good

The metal threshold on the interior east side of the building

Yellow 2.0 Good

The metal siding on the exterior east side of the building

Tan 1.0 Good

Bldg 827

WO #48621

1350 Hours

The metal door frame on the exterior east side of the building

Tan 3.1 Good

The metal door on the exterior east side of the building

Grey 8.5 Good

3. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development defines Lead-based paint as any paint, vanish, stain, or other applied coating that has 1mg/cm2 as measured by an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzer or laboratory analysis or 0.5 percent by weight (5,000ug/g by dry weight) by laboratory analysis, or more of lead. All other components tested were less than 1 mg/cm2.

4. Any effort to disturb lead paint can create lead dust. Please ensure that appropriate abatement, cleanup, and disposal will be accomplished and that the appropriate safety measures are taken IAW 29 CFR 1926.62. If you have any questions please feel free to call Troye Davis at 586-7094.

//original signed//

Nickolas King 75th Civil Engineering Squadron Certified LBP Inspector Utah Certification #PB-1244

Attch:

Building: 827 Inspector: Nickolas King Date: 9-Apr-09 Insp. Number: PB-1244 Time: 15:00 Model: Niton XL3t 300 Work Order: 48621 Serial #: 30660

XL Number Room Side Structure Condition Substrate Color PbL(mg/cm2) PbL (+/-)

1629 Interior East Threshold Good Metal Yellow 2 POS 1630 Exterior East Siding Good Metal Tan 1 POS 1631 Exterior East Door Frame Good Metal Tan 3.1 POS 1632 Exterior North Window Frame Good Metal Tan 0.4 NEG 1633 Exterior East Door Jamb Good Wood Grey 0.5 NEG 1634 Exterior East Door Good Wood Grey 8.5 POS 1635 Exterior West Trim Good Wood Tan 0.06 NEG

Post Calibration Cal. Standard 1636 0 < 0.01 1637 0.3 0.31 +/- 0.02 1638 0.9 1.04 +/- 0.06 1639 1.5 1.53 +/- 0.09 1640 3.1 3.58 +/- 0.39

Appendix H.3

Building 1415

Asbestos Survey for Building 1415 - 2 pages Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey, Building 1415 - 2 pages

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH

Bldg 1415 Demo

WO # 48621

1345 hours

ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR BUILDING 1415

During May 2009, Mr. David Murray with the 775 CES/CEPM requested an asbestos survey to provide information for a project to demolish the building. The scope of this project is as follows:

Work Location: Building 1415 Work Order: # 48621

Statement of Work:

• Demolish the building.

• This inspection report is project specific and is not a valid report for any other project(s) associated with Building 1415.

The information provided for this survey is based on samples collected by Nickolas King (Utah Certified Asbestos Inspector ASB-#2257). Samples for this survey were collected on 29 May 2009. Samples were analyzed by Dixon Information Inc., utilizing the EPA Method 600/M4-82- 020, which is PLM similar to NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods 9002. Civil Engineering personnel also reviewed all available asbestos survey databases of suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACM) that could potentially be encountered in this area. The information gathered from all current and previous surveys is shown below by homogenous area.

Tar and gravel roofing (11,700’sq) was sampled from the northwest corner of the roof, from the southeast corner of the roof, and from the center of the east side of the roof. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093352, GM093353, and GM093354).

Roof flashing (680’ sq) was sampled from the northwest corner of the roof, from the southeast corner of the roof, and from the center of the west side of the roof. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093355, GM093356, and GM093357).

Concrete expansion joint brown (1,500’ sq) was sampled from the southeast corner, from the center of the east side, and from the northeast corner. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093358, GM093359, and GM093360).

Concrete expansion joint black/grey (1,500 sq) was sampled from the center of the west side, from the southwest corner, and from the northwest corner. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093361, GM093362, and GM093363).

Bldg 1415

WO # 48621

1345 hours these materials were found, but do not necessarily mean that these are the only locations where these materials may be encountered during the project. When any new suspect ACM is encountered, stop work immediately and contact either 75 CES/CEEV or SGPB to identify any new suspect building materials. As per state and federal regulations, if the scope of work or the work location changes, then a new asbestos inspection and asbestos survey report will be required.

DO NOT DISTURB ANY BUILDING MATERIALS THAT ARE SUSPECTED ACM.

CONTACT TROYE DAVIS AT 586-7094 TO ARRANGE REMOVAL OF THESE

MATERIALS IF THERE IS ANY POTENTIAL FOR THEM TO BE DISTURBED

DURING THIS PROJECT.

The project manager must post a copy of this survey at the project before this project begins, and must remain posted until the project is completed. Please contact Troye Davis at 586-7094 with any questions regarding this survey letter.

Nickolas King 75th Civil Engineering Squadron

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH

Bldg 1415 Demo

WO #48621

1400 Hours

MEMORANDUM FOR: 775 CES/CEC (Mr. David Murray)

SUBJECT: Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey, Building 1415 (WO #48621). Demolish the building.

1. On 29 April 2009, Nickolas King (Utah LBP Certification #PB-1244) tested the painted components of building 1415 that would be impacted by demolishing the building.

Building 1415 was constructed in 1945. A Niton XL3t 300 XRF Analyzer (Serial # 30660) was used to test the painted surfaces of these components. Please refer to specific results of our survey; see attachment 1.

2. The table below summarizes the building components in building 1415 that tested positive for LBP. These components should be segregated or abated prior to

The wood fascia Tan 7.6 Poor The metal structural steel Tan 14.9 Fair The metal structural steel Brown 14.5 Fair The concrete footing Brown 3.1 Fair The concrete footing Yellow 4.6 Fair The metal structural beam Tan 8.1 Fair

3. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development defines Lead-based paint as any paint, vanish, stain, or other applied coating that has 1mg/cm2 as measured by an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzer or laboratory analysis or 0.5 percent by weight

Bldg 1415

WO #48621

1400 Hours

75th Civil Engineering Squadron Certified LBP Inspector Utah Certification #PB-1244

Building: 1415 Inspector: Nickolas King Date: 29-May-09 Insp. Number: PB-1244 Time: 9:10 Model: Niton XL3t 300 Work Order: 48621 Serial #: 30660

XL Number Room Side Structure Condition Substrate Color PbL(mg/cm2) PbL (+/-)

Pre Calibration Cal. Standard 2021 0 < 0.01 2022 0.26 0.31 +/- 0.02 2023 1 1.04 +/- 0.06 2024 1.6 1.53 +/- 0.09 2025 3.7 3.58 +/- 0.39 2076 Exterior West Fascia Poor Wood Tan 7.6 POS 2077 Exterior West Structural Steel Fair Metal Tan 14.9 POS 2078 Exterior West Structural Steel Fair Metal Brown 14.5 POS 2079 Exterior West Footing Fair Concrete Brown 3.1 POS 2080 Exterior West Footing Fair Concrete Yellow 4.6 POS 2081 Exterior North Structural Steel Fair Metal Red 0 NEG 2082 Exterior North Structural Beam Fair Metal Brown 0 NEG 2083 Exterior North Structural Beam Fair Metal Tan 8.1 POS 2084 Exterior East Siding Fair Metal Tan 0 NEG 2085 Exterior Center Floor Fair Concrete Yellow 0.23 NEG

Post Calibration Cal. Standard 2150 0 < 0.01 2151 0.3 0.31 +/- 0.02 2152 1 1.04 +/- 0.06 2153 1.5 1.53 +/- 0.09 2154 3.9 3.58 +/- 0.39

Appendix H.4

Building 1532

Asbestos Survey for Building 1532 - 3 pages Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey, Building 1532 - 1 page

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH

Bldg 1532 Demo

WO # 48621

23 June 2009 1330 hours

ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR BUILDING 1532

During May 2009, Mr. David Murray with the 775 CES/CEPM requested an asbestos survey to provide information for a project to demolish the building. The scope of this project is as follows:

Work Location: Building 1532 Work Order: # 48621

Statement of Work:

• Demolish the building.

• This inspection report is project specific and is not a valid report for any other project(s) associated with Building 1532.

The information provided for this survey is based on samples collected by Nickolas King (Utah Certified Asbestos Inspector ASB-#2257). Samples for this survey were collected on 29 May 2009. Samples were analyzed by Dixon Information Inc., utilizing the EPA Method 600/M4-82- 020, which is PLM similar to NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods 9002. Civil Engineering personnel also reviewed all available asbestos survey databases of suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACM) that could potentially be encountered in this area. The information gathered from all current and previous surveys is shown below by homogenous area.

Drywall/Joint compound wall system was sampled from the northeast corner of room 3, from the southwest corner of room 9, from the northeast corner of the main lobby, from the northwest corner of the south end of the building, from the northwest corner of the south entrance. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093382, GM093383, GM093384, GM093385, and GM093386).

Wall texturing was sampled from the southwest corner of the south end of the building, from the center of the south end of the building, from the southeast corner of the south end of the building, from the northeast corner of the south end of the building, and from the northwest corner of the south end of the building. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093387, GM093388, GM093389, GM093390, and GM093391).

Thermal systems pipe insulation white/yellow was sampled from the northeast corner of the east entrance. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093392, GM093393, and GM093394).

Bldg 1532

WO # 48621

Ceiling tile 2’X4’ white wormy grooves/pinholes was sampled from the southwest corner of the south end of the building, from the northeast corner of the south end of the building, from the northeast corner of the east entrance, from the center of room 15, and from the center of the south side of the janitor’s closet. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093395, GM093396, GM093397, GM093398, and GM093399).

Ceiling tile 2’X4’ white chicken tracks/pinholes was sampled from the northeast corner of the east entrance, from the northeast corner of room 11, from the southwest corner of room 15, from the center of the women’s restroom, and from the center of the north side of the janitor’s closet.

These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093400, GM093401, GM093402, GM093403, and GM093404).

Batt insulation foil/yellow was sampled from the center of the south end of the building, from the northeast corner of the south end of the building, from the center of the women’s restroom, from the southwest corner of room 15, and from the northeast corner of the east entrance. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093405, GM093406, GM093407, GM093408, and GM093409).

Duct insulation foil/yellow was sampled from the southwest corner of the south end of the building, from the center of the north side of the south hall, and from the center of room 15.

These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093410, GM093411, and

GM093412).

Floor tile 12” over sheet vinyl tan/yellow adhesive/tan/yellow adhesive (‘ sq) was sampled from the southwest corner of the women’s restroom, from the north side of the men’s restroom, and from the south side of the men’s restroom. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093413, GM093414, and GM093415).

Sheet vinyl tan/yellow adhesive was sampled from the northeast corner of the janitor’s closet, from the southwest corner of the janitor’s closet, and from the northeast corner of the comm.

room. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093416, GM093417, and GM093418).

Roof flashing black was sampled from the center of the west side of the roof. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093419, GM093420, and GM093421).

Roof flashing grey was sampled from the southeast corner of the roof. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093422, GM093423, and GM093424).

Roof decking black/brown was sampled from the center of the roof, from the southwest corner of the roof, and from the southeast corner of the roof. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093425, GM093426, and GM093427).

Bldg 1532

WO # 48621

these materials may be encountered during the project. When any new suspect ACM is encountered, stop work immediately and contact either 75 CES/CEEV or SGPB to identify any new suspect building materials. As per state and federal regulations, if the scope of work or the work location changes, then a new asbestos inspection and asbestos survey report will be required.

DO NOT DISTURB ANY BUILDING MATERIALS THAT ARE SUSPECTED ACM.

CONTACT TROYE DAVIS AT 586-7094 TO ARRANGE REMOVAL OF THESE

MATERIALS IF THERE IS ANY POTENTIAL FOR THEM TO BE DISTURBED

DURING THIS PROJECT.

The project manager must post a copy of this survey at the project before this project begins, and must remain posted until the project is completed. Please contact Troye Davis at 586-7094 with any questions regarding this survey letter.

Nickolas King 75th Civil Engineering Squadron

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH

MEMORANDUM FOR: 775 CES/CEPM (Mr. David Murray)

FROM: 75th CES/CEOHA

SUBJECT: Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey, Building 1532 (WO #48621). Demolish the building.

1. On 29 April 2009, Nickolas King (Utah Certified Lead Inspector #PB-1244) tested the painted surfaces found in Building 1532 that would be impacted by demolishing the building. Building 1532 was constructed in 1988. A Niton XL3t 300 XRF Analyzer (Serial # 30660) was used to test the painted surfaces of these components. Lead based paint was non-detected. Please refer to specific results of our survey; see attachment 1.

2. Limited lead-based paint identification has been completed for Building 1532.

It is possible that lead based paint could be encountered during any renovation project.

Additional identification for lead based paint on other building components may be required. The facility manager should ensure that these components are surveyed for lead as well, to meet OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.62 construction requirements for lead.

3. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development defines Lead-based paint as any paint, vanish, stain, or other applied coating that has 1mg/cm2 as measured by an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzer or laboratory analysis or 0.5 percent by weight (5,000ug/g by dry weight) by laboratory analysis, or more of lead. All other components tested were less than 1 mg/cm2.

4. Any effort to disturb lead paint can create lead dust. Please ensure that appropriate abatement, cleanup, and disposal will be accomplished and that the appropriate safety measures are taken IAW 29 CFR 1926.62. If you have any questions please feel free to call Troye Davis at 586-7094.

//original signed//

Nickolas King 75th Civil Engineering Squadron Certified LBP Inspector Utah Certification #PB-1244

Attach:

Building: 1532 Inspector: Nickolas King

Time: 0:00 Model: Niton XL3t 300 Work Order: 48621 Serial #: 30660

XL Number Room Side Structure Condition Substrate Color PbL(mg/cm2) PbL (+/-)

Pre Calibration Cal. Standard 2021 0 < 0.01 2022 0.26 0.31 +/- 0.02 2023 1 1.04 +/- 0.06 2024 1.6 1.53 +/- 0.09 2025 3.7 3.58 +/- 0.39 2028 Entry East Door Good Metal White 0 NEG 2029 Entry East Door Jamb Good Metal White 0 NEG 2030 Entry East Chair Rail Good Wood White 0 NEG 2031 Entry East Wall Good Drywall Pink 0 NEG 2032 Men's Restroom East Stall Dividers Good Metal Tan 0.05 NEG 2033 Outside Room 14 West Wall Good Drywall White 0 NEG 2034 Break Room South Wall Good Drywall Green 0 NEG 2035 9 West Window Trim Good Wood White 0 NEG 2036 9 West Window Sill Good Wood White 0 NEG 2037 8 North Window Sill Good Drywall Pink 0 NEG 2038 South End of Bldg North Door Jamb Good Wood White 0 NEG 2039 South End of Bldg North Door Trim Good Wood Pink 0 NEG 2040 South End of Bldg West Door Jamb Good Wood Pink 0 NEG 2041 South End of Bldg West Door Jamb Good Metal Pink 0 NEG 2042 South End of Bldg West Chair Rail Good Wood Pink 0 NEG 2043 South End of Bldg West Base Board Good Wood Pink 0.04 NEG 2044 South End of Bldg West Wall Good Drywall Blue 0 NEG 2045 South End of Bldg West Window Sill Good Drywall Blue 0 NEG 2046 South End of Bldg South Door Trim Good Wood White 0.04 NEG

Appendix H.6

Building 2201

Asbestos Survey for Building 2201 - 2 pages Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey, Building 2201 - 2 pages

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH

Bldg 732 Demo

WO #48621

ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR BUILDING 2201

During May 2009, Mr. David Murray with 775 CES/CEPM requested an asbestos survey of Building 2201 to demolish the building. The scope of this project is as follows:

Work Location: Building 2201 Work Order: #48621

Statement of Work:

• Demolish the building.

• This inspection report is project specific and is not a valid report for any other project(s) associated with Building 2201.

The information provided for this survey is based on samples collected by Nickolas King (Utah Certified Asbestos Inspector ASB-#2257). Samples for this survey were collected on 29 May 2009. The Science and Engineering laboratory, utilizing EPA Method 600R-93-116, analyzed all samples, which is PLM similar to NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods 9002. Civil Engineering personnel also reviewed all available asbestos survey databases of suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACM) that could potentially be encountered in this area. The information gathered from all current and previous surveys is shown below by homogenous area.

Footages are based upon the scope of work provided by the requestor.

Drywall/Joint compound wall system (1,000’ sq) was sampled from the center of the north side, from the center of the south side, and from the center of the west side. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093364, GM093365, and GM093366).

Ceiling tile 2’X4’ white wormy grooves/pinholes (320’ sq) was sampled from the northwest corner, from the center of the west side, and from the center of the building. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093367, GM093368, and GM093369).

Ceiling tile 2’X4’ off white wormy grooves/pinholes (100’ sq) was sampled from the northeast corner. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093370, GM093371, and GM093372).

Thermal systems pipe insulation white/yellow (100’ ln) was sampled from the southwest corner, from the center of the building, and from the center of the west side. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093373, GM093374, and GM093375).

Bldg 732

WO #48621

Thermal systems pipe insulation canvas/yellow (25’ ln) was sampled from the center of the west side, from the northwest corner, and from the center of the north side. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093376, GM093377, and GM093378).

Window putty grey (170’ sq) was sampled from the southeast corner, from the northwest corner, and from the southwest corner. These samples were analyzed as non-asbestos containing material (GM093379, GM093380, and GM093381).

Corrugated Transite roofing (3,250’ sq) was visually identified and is assumed to be asbestos containing material.

All Hard Thermal System Insulation encountered above ceilings, behind walls, in wall these materials may be encountered during the project. When any new suspect ACM is encountered, stop work immediately and contact either 75 CES/CEEV or SGPB to identify any new suspect building materials. As per state and federal regulations, if the scope of work or the work location changes, then a new asbestos inspection and asbestos survey report will be required.

DO NOT DISTURB ANY BUILDING MATERIALS THAT ARE SUSPECTED ACM.

CONTACT TROYE DAVIS AT 586-7094 TO ARRANGE REMOVAL OF THESE

MATERIALS IF THERE IS ANY POTENTIAL FOR THEM TO BE DISTURBED

DURING THIS PROJECT.

The project manager must post a copy of this survey at the project before this project begins, and must remain posted until the project is completed. Please contact Troye Davis at 586-7094 with any questions regarding this survey letter.

Nickolas King 75th Civil Engineering Squadron Maintenance Engineering

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH

Bldg 2201 Demo

WO #48621

1520 Hours

MEMORANDUM FOR: 775 CES/CEC (Mr. David Murray)

SUBJECT: Lead Based Paint (LBP) Survey, Building 2201 (WO #48621). Demolish the building.

1. On 29 April 2009, Nickolas King (Utah LBP Certification #PB-1244) tested the painted components of building 2201 that would be impacted by demolishing the building.

Building 2201 was constructed in 1941. A Niton XL3t 300 XRF Analyzer (Serial # 30660) was used to test the painted surfaces of these components. Please refer to specific results of our survey; see attachment 1.

2. The table below summarizes the building components in building 2201 that tested positive for LBP. These components should be segregated or abated prior to

The metal structural steel on the exterior south side

Grey 1.4 Fair

The metal window frame on the exterior west side

Grey 6.6 Fair

The metal door jamb on the exterior west side

Brown 5.7 Fair

The concrete wall building numbers on the exterior north side

Brown 4.9 Fair

The wood door on the exterior south side

White 6.9 Poor

The metal door jamb in the interior southeast corner

Pink 5.4 Fair

The wood door in the interior southeast corner

Green 5.5 Poor

The metal structural steel in the interior southeast corner

Red 3.5 Fair

The block wall in the interior southwest corner

Green 1.0 Fair

Bldg 2201

WO #48621

1520 Hours

The metal structural steel in the interior southwest corner

White 2.4 Fair

The metal door jamb in the interior northeast corner

Green 5.2 Fair

The metal structural steel in the interior northeast corner

Blue 2.2 Fair

3. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development defines Lead-based paint as any paint, vanish, stain, or other applied coating that has 1mg/cm2 as measured by an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzer or laboratory analysis or 0.5 percent by weight

75th Civil Engineering Squadron Certified LBP Inspector Utah Certification #PB-1244

Building: 2201 Inspector: Nickolas King

Time: 10:30 Model: Niton XL3t 300 Work Order: 48621 Serial #: 30660

XL Number Room Side Structure Condition Substrate Color PbL(mg/cm2) PbL (+/-)

Pre Calibration Cal. Standard 2021 0 < 0.01 2022 0.26 0.31 +/- 0.02 2023 1 1.04 +/- 0.06 2024 1.6 1.53 +/- 0.09 2025 3.7 3.58 +/- 0.39 2086 Exterior South Structural Steel Fair Metal Grey 1.4 POS 2087 Exterior West Window Frame Fair Metal Grey 6.6 POS 2088 Exterior West Tank Fair Metal Silver 0.02 NEG 2089 Exterior West Structural Steel Fair Metal Brown 0.04 NEG 2090 Exterior West Structural Steel Fair Metal Silver 0.07 NEG 2091 Exterior West Door Jamb Fair Metal Brown 5.7 POS 2092 Exterior West Door Poor Wood Brown 0.1 NEG 2093 Exterior North Wall Poor Concrete Brown 4.9 POS 2094 Exterior East Electrical Box Fair Metal Silver 0.12 NEG 2095 Exterior South Door Poor Wood White 6.9 POS 2096 Interior Southeast Door Jamb Fair Metal Pink 5.4 POS 2097 Interior Southeast Door Poor Wood Green 5.5 POS 2098 Interior Southeast Wall Fair Drywall White 0 NEG 2099 Interior Southeast Wall Fair Wood Green 0 NEG 2100 Interior Southeast Structural Steel Fair Metal Red 3.5 POS 2101 Interior Southwest Door Fair Metal Red 0.01 NEG 2102 Interior Southwest Wall Fair Block Black 0.01 NEG 2103 Interior Southwest Wall Fair Block Green 1 POS 2104 Interior Southwest Wall Fair Block White 0.08 NEG

Child Development Center 1706 Hill AFB, UT

01 45 04.00 10-1

INDEX

SECTION 01 45 04.00 10

CONTRACTOR QUALITY CONTROL

PARAGRAPH

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 REFERENCES

1.2 PAYMENT

PART 2 PRODUCTS (Not Applicable)

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.1 GENERAL

3.2 DESIGN QUALITY CONTROL

3.3 COORDINATION MEETING

3.4 QUALITY CONTROL ORGANIZATION

3.5 SUBMITTALS

3.6 CONTROL

3.7 TESTS

3.8 COMPLETION INSPECTION

3.9 DOCUMENTATION

3.10 SAMPLE FORMS

3.11 NOTIFICATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE

AM-02

01 45 04.00 10-2

SECTION 01 45 04.00 10

CONTRACTOR QUALITY CONTROL

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to in the text by basic designation only.

AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS (ASTM)

ASTM C 1077 (1996) Standard Practice for Laboratories Testing Concrete and Concrete Aggregates for Use in Construction and Criteria for Laboratory Evaluation

ASTM D 3666 (1996) Standard Specification for Minimum Requirements for Agencies Testing and Inspecting Bituminous Paving Materials

ASTM D 3740 (1996) Minimum Requirements for Agencies Engaged in the Testing and/or Inspection of Soil and Rock as Used in Engineering Design and Construction

ASTM E 329 (1995b) Agencies Engaged in the Testing and/or Inspection of Materials Used in Construction

SACRAMENTO DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION CONTROL MANUAL

Latest edition published by the U.S. Army Engineer District-Sacramento, Sacramento, California. Copies of this publication are available upon request from the Sacramento District Office during the bidding period. In addition, two copies of the Manual and an initial supply of test forms will be furnished to the successful bidder upon award of this contract. This Manual specifies the minimum number of tests to be made and includes forms which shall be used to report data.

SPK FORM 437 - MATERIALS TEST SUMMARY

Published by U.S. Army Engineer District - Sacramento, Sacramento, California. One set of this form (6 pages), is included in the bid package issued by the Sacramento District Office. This form will be used to summarize the minimum number of materials testing to be made during construction. The successful bidder shall submit three copies of the form to the Contracting Officer's Representative during the preconstruction meeting. To complete the form, the use of the Construction Control Manual is mandatory.

01 45 04.00 10-3

PART 2 PRODUCTS (Not Applicable)

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor is responsible for quality control and shall establish and maintain an effective quality control system in compliance with the Contract Clause titled "Inspection of Construction." The quality control system shall consist of plans, procedures, and organization necessary to produce an end product which complies with the contract requirements. The system shall cover all construction operations, both onsite and offsite, and shall be keyed to the proposed construction sequence. The project superintendent will be held responsible for the quality of work on the job and is subject to removal by the Contracting Officer for non-compliance with quality requirements specified in the contract. The project superintendent in this context shall mean the individual with the responsibility for the overall management of the project including quality and production.

3.2 DESIGN QUALITY CONTROL (DQC)

The Contractor’s DQC Plan shall provide and maintain an effective quality control program which will assure that all services required by this design-build contract are performed and provided in a manner that meets professional architectural and engineering quality standards. The responsibility for checking and coordination of all design documents cannot be overemphasized.

The Contractor is responsible for producing complete, competent, properly coordinated, and thoroughly checked design documents within agreed schedules.

The Design Quality Control process for all Structural and Blast related design shall, as a minimum, include the requirement that each page of hand calculations or spreadsheet type printouts bear the legible name of the responsible engineer along with the most recent date of calculation. Each of these sheets shall also bear the handwritten initials of the assigned reviewer, as designated in the Government approved Design Quality Control Plan, along with the date of that review. Furthermore, all analysis and/or design computer run programs shall, likewise as a minimum, identify the responsible engineer and date of execution, however the reviewer need only initial and date those pages containing the input parameters and those containing any relevant controlling results

01 45 04.00 10-4

3.2.1 Design Quality Control Plan. The Contractor will be expected to follow the approved DQC plan throughout the course of the project to assure a quality end product. Should future events dictate revisions to the approved DQC Plan, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing and submit the revised plan for approval. The plan shall be prepared in 8-1/2” x 11” format. Any charts or schedules included in the plan that are larger than this size shall be folded to conform to an 8- 1/2” x 11” format. The plan shall include a title page and table of contents. The following elements shall be included in the DQC Plan:

a. Management Approach. Define the specific management methodology to be followed during the course of the contract including such aspects as design coordination procedures, quality control, communications, managerial continuity, flexibility and the following:

1. Competent, independent reviewers identified in the DQC Plan shall technically review all documents. The same element that produced the product shall not perform the independent technical review

(ITR).

2. The following elements shall affix a personal stamp to each drawing and specification section verifying their review and general compliance with the contract documents, as well as compliance as indicated:

--Design discipline – Compliance to the RFP --Independent Technical Reviewer – Compliance to the RFP

--CQC Staff member for each discipline identified in paragraph 3.5.3 CQC Personnel – Constructability and Operability.

--Prime and Key Subcontractors – Constructability and Operability

3. The contractor shall correct errors and deficiencies in the design documents prior to submitting them to the Government.

b. Management Structure. Delineate the organizational composition of the firm to clearly show the interrelationship of the management and design team components including all consultants. Include an organization chart to identify the key design and review team members showing their specific responsibilities.

c. Planning and Scheduling. The contractor shall include the design schedule, showing the sequence of events involved in carrying out the project tasks within the specific contract period. This should be at a detailed level of scheduling sufficient to identify all major tasks including those that control the flow of work. The schedule shall include review and correction periods associated with each item.

This should be a forward planning as well as a project-monitoring tool. The schedule reflects calendar days and not dates for each activity. If the schedule is changed, the Contractor shall submit a revised schedule reflecting the change within seven calendar days.

d. Contractor Review Effort. The Design Quality Control Plan shall include, but not be limited to the following contractor performed review elements:

• Design Development Review

• Criteria Review

• Presentation of Data Review

01 45 04.00 10-5

• Editing of Guide Specification Review

• Inter-Disciplinary Review

• Final Review

e. Quality Control. The professional quality, technical accuracy and the coordination of all design documents and other services to be provided by the Architect-Engineer and any subcontractors/consultants used is of major importance. It is therefore a requirement for the contractor to have a logical and functional quality control program to assure that errors and deficiencies in all submittals are minimal.

To meet this requirement, the contractor shall perform technical and inter-disciplinary reviews and shall correct all errors and deficiencies in the design documents prior to submitting them to the COE for review. The contractor’s cover letter, which transmits the design documents for review, shall include a statement of certification, co-signed by both the Design Quality Control Manager and the Design Coordination Manager, that the contractor has performed a detailed review and coordination of the submitted documents. The contractor’s performance evaluation will be based in part on how his design package reflects conformance with his DQC Plan. The contractor’s contractual obligation to provide complete, well coordinated, and error-free documents has far-reaching consequences. Therefore, the contractor is cautioned to place special emphasis on this aspect of the DQC Plan. The contractor will be held liable for such damages. The Government’s review effort in no way relieves the contractor of his contractual responsibilities.

For this reason, an effective quality control plan is critical.

f. Design Quality Control Checklists. The DQC Plan shall include the checklist and lessons learned found ER 1110-1-12 appendix G and F.

Discipline-specific checklists and lessons learned are to be used during the design and quality control of each submittal. The purpose of these lists is to provide a useful tool for the contractor to assure a quality contract package. The lists point out numerous areas which, when appropriately considered during the design, will help ensure a quality project. The lists should not be taken as covering all aspects of the project. These completed checklists shall be submitted at each design phase as part of the project documentation. If, during COE review of the final design documents, it becomes apparent that items initialed off have in fact not been completed/coordinated, the COE will notify the Prime Contractor and appropriate action taken. Possible actions include return of the final design package to the contractor for correction, withholding of contract payments and/or completion of an interim “unfavorable” contractor evaluation.

g. Design Review Check-off Matrix. In addition to the Design Quality

Control Checklist noted above, the Contractor shall prepare a Quality Control Review Matrix. This Matrix shall be developed from Section 01 10 11 Specific Engineering and Design Criteria. Each individual paragraph shall be entered into the matrix and signed off by the Construction Design Coordination Manager, Design Quality Control Manager, and the Independent Technical Reviewer, indicating that the requirements identified have been incorporated in the design documents. See example below:

01 45 04.00 10-6

Administrative RFP Requirements Reviewing Office

90%

CDC

Manager

DQC

Independ ent

Design

Reviewer

1. NARRATIVES ON AREAS AND

FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

1.1 User Interview and

Questionnaires

1.1.1 General

1.1.2 Construction

1.1.3 …

1.2 Finishes and Materials

1.2.1 General

1.2.1 Finishes and

Materials

1.2.2 …

1.3 Landscape Features

1.4 Electrical Features

1.5 Mechanical Features

1.5.1 General

1.5.2 Materials and

Equipment

1.5.3 …

01 45 04.00 10-7

Civil RFP Requirements Reviewing Office

2. GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA

2.1 Site Layout and Design

2.1.1 General

2.1.2 Handicapped

Accessibility

2.1.3 …

2.2 Earthwork

2.2.1 General

2.2.2 Excavation

2.2.3 …

2.3 Geotechnical Support for

2.3.1 Overview

2.3.2 Geotechnical

Engineering Firm

2.3.3 …

Civil RFP Requirements Reviewing Office

Continued 90%

2.4 Utilities

2.4.1 Water Service

2.4.2 Fire Hydrant

2.4.3 …

2.5 Landscape Architectural

01 45 04.00 10-8

Architectural RFP Requirements Reviewing Office

2.6 Architectural

2.6.1 General

2.6.2 Handicapped

Accessibility

2.6.2 …

2.7 Color, Finishes and

Materials

2.7.1 Exterior Colors, Finishes and Materials

2.7.2 Interior Finishes

2.7.3 …

Structural RFP Requirements Reviewing Office

2.8 Structural Design

2.8.1 General

2.8.2 Concrete

2.8.3 …

Mechanical RFP Requirements Reviewing Office

2.9 Mechanical

2.9.1 HVAC General

2.9.2 Plumbing General

2.9.3 …

01 45 04.00 10-9

Electrical RFP Requirements Reviewing Office

2.10 Electrical Requirements

2.10.1 Engineering, Installation and Testing Standards

2.10.2 Site Considerations

2.10.3 Building Electrical

2.10.4 …

Communications…