Solicitation Amendment W90VN827RA0010001 SF 30.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date

15 Oct 2026 23 Oct 2026

Contract Clauses

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified from:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

Basis of Award and Evaluation Criteria Overview

1. Basis of Award

The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and is determined to represent the best value to the Government, considering price and other factors, in accordance with Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Overhaul (RFO) 12.201-1, Simplified Procedures. The Government may reject any offer not substantially in compliance with the terms and conditions of the solicitation.

The Government will evaluate offers in accordance with Addendum to FAR 52.212.2, Evaluation - Commercial Items.

The initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to request revisions if the Contracting

W90VN827RA0010001

Officer later determines the need. The Government may reject any offer not substantially in compliance with the terms and conditions of the solicitation.

The Offeror's written submission will be reviewed and evaluated on an adjectival basis for the technical evaluation factor as either Acceptable or Unacceptable. Simple statements of compliance /reiteration (i.e., "understood"; "will comply"), without a detailed description of how compliance will be met, may not sufficiently demonstrate the Offeror's ability to meet the technical requirements and may result in a rating of Unacceptable. In order to be considered for award, the proposal must receive an evaluated rating of Acceptable for the technical factor. Technical evaluations will be conducted using the following ratings scale and definitions.

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

2. Evaluation Factors

Each factor and subfactor will be rated either acceptable or unacceptable. A rating of unacceptable for any factor or subfactor will result in an overall unacceptable rating. If an offeror fails to meet the minimum requirements outlined in one of the subfactors below, the subfactor, and overall proposal will be rated "unacceptable" and will not be eligible for award.

The Government will evaluate offers based on the following factors, listed in descending order of importance. :

Evaluation Criteria:

Factor 1. Technical Capability Subfactor (1), Prime Contractor's Registration and Certifications

Subfactor (2), Key Personnel

Factor 2. Past Performance

Factor 3. Price

Factor 1. Technical Approach

Technical capability will be evaluated to assess the offeror's understanding of the requirement and its ability to successfully perform the service set forth in the Evaluation Factor 1.

Proposal submissions for this evaluation area shall demonstrate the Offeror's ability to accomplish the requirements in the PWS.

Specifically, the Government will evaluate:

a) Does the Offeror's proposed Technical Approach demonstrate a complete understanding of the requirement tasks, deliverables, and logistical details relating to PWS, including addressing potential issues that may be encountered and mitigation examples during transition and full contract performance? Additionally, the Government will evaluate their approach to meeting those requirements listed in the PWS.

(1) Subfactor 1: Prime Contractor's Registration and Certifications

The offeror shall be evaluated on submitted copies of current and valid registration issued by the ROK Government as listed below. The registration of subcontractor cannot be substituted for the prime contractor's registration.

a. Copies of the required business registration, a valid Hygiene Management Permission under the Management of Public Health Act issued by the Republic of Korea (ROK) License

Government, and a valid issued by the Korean Facility Annual Hygiene Training Certificate Hygiene Management Association (CY 2026).

NOTE: The prime contractor registration may not be satisfied by the prime contractor's proposed subcontractor is its registration.

(2) Subfactor 2: Key Personnel

a. Project Manager: The offeror shall be evaluated on their submitted resume of Project Manager (PM) with at least two (2) years of project management experience.

The PM's resume must clearly identify as required below:

- Associate degree or bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university

- Proposed position title

- A brief description of work experience

- Company name, phone number, and complete name of the employer

- Length of work experience (year/month/date - year/month/date)

- Value or size of Contract

b. Electrical Engineer: The offeror shall be evaluated on their submitted resume of Electrical Engineer. The Electrical Engineer's resume must clearly identify as required below:

- Education from a Related Two (2) or Four (4) year college program as Electrical Engineering

- One (1) year of experience with the last five (5) years from the solicitation closing date as labor for cleaning food service exhaust fans and ducts for dining facility contracts.

- Related certification for the proposed Electrical Industrial Engineer.

Factor 2. Past Performance

The offeror shall be evaluated on recent and relevant past performance. Recent past performance is at least two (2) years of experience within the last five (5) years from the solicitation closing date of the food duct cleaning service or related lines of business. Relevant past performance is in working in cleaning exhaust fans and ducts cleaning services or similar maintenance services. The past performance will be evaluated only on proposals that received a technically acceptable rating by the Contracting Officer in the following manner:

(1) Review of the detailed explanation submitted by offerors demonstrating the relevance of the references to the requirements of the solicitation.

(2) Reference will be contacted by phone to verify contents in detail explanation and to determine record of compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, technical and quality awards /certificates.

(3) The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance information from any reasonable source available, including Government database to evaluate past performance.

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. (See note below)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has substantial doubt that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort due to documented, unresolved adverse past performance on recent, relevant efforts.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, "unknown" shall be considered "acceptable (Neutral)."

Factor 3. Price

Price analysis will be conducted for each proposal to ensure completeness, reasonableness, and balance IAW RFO 12.204(a) and RFO 15.404-1(b). The following applies to that evaluation.

(1) Completeness. The offeror shall complete the pricing information for all CLINs identified for base period plus four (4) option years. Any underlying assumptions, including proposed escalation rates between the 1st and subsequent periods, shall be clearly explained.

(2) Price Reasonableness. Price should also reflect fair market value and be reasonable when compared to the independent Government estimate, current market prices for same or similar services and/or when compared to the proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(3) Unbalanced Pricing. As part of the price evaluation, proposals will be reviewed to identify any unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced Pricing, a proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

(4) Price is not scored. The Government will review the price proposal to determine the extent to which it is reasonable, and consistent with the technical proposal. The price for award purposes will be the combined total of the effective period /years from the date of award. Price shall include all CLINs as listed on the Price Schedule including option periods. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussion. Therefore, Offerors are instructed that submitted proposals should contain their best pricing

(5) FAR Clause 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services. As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.217-8 - Option to Extend Services) by adding one- half of the Offeror's final option period prices to the Offeror's total price. Thus, the Offeror's total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period, all four options.and

Offerors are required only to price the base and Offerors shall not submit a four (4) option periods.

price for the potential one-half year extension of services period. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options should not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

3. Comparative Evaluation

The Government may conduct a comparative evaluation of offers to determine which proposal represents the best value to the Government. The Government is not obligated to select the lowest priced offer if a higher-priced offer is determined to provide greater overall value under the non-price factors. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. Therefore, offerors are encouraged to submit their best terms in their initial offers.

4. Award Decision

The award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government, considering Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Price. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. Therefore, offerors are encouraged to submit their best terms in their initial offer.

5. Documentation

The rationale for the source selection decision, including any tradeoffs made between price and non-price factors, will be documented in the contract file.

Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Products and Commercial Services

1. CONTRACT AWARD:

1.1. The Government intends to execute Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) CLINs for this requirement. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government, considering price and other factors in accordance with Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Overhaul (RFO) 12.201-1, Simplified Procedures. The Government reserves the right to make an award without discussions. Therefore, offerors are encouraged to submit their best terms in their initial offer.

2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION:

Offerors' proposals shall adhere to the following instructions:

2.1. These instructions are designated to ensure submission of essential information necessary for the Government to evaluate proposals effectively.

2.2. Offerors are cautioned to submit adequate information to enable the Government team to fully ascertain each Offeror's capability to perform all of the requirements identified in the solicitation.

2.3. Offerors are required to submit a COMPLETE package via the Solicitation app in Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) by the Korea local closing time and date which can be found in Block 13 on page 1 of this solicitation.

2.4. A complete offer package includes:

(a) Signed first page of the solicitation and each amendment.

(b) All information required for Factor I - Technical, Factor II - Past Performance, and Factor III - Price as supporting documentation for the non-price factor(s) specified in Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and 52.212-2 of this solicitation. Adapted from the sample addendum structure.

3.0. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Technical Proposal Content & Instructions:

Responses shall be separated into three Volumes and organized in the following manner:

Volume I - Technical Approach

Sub-Factor 1: Prime Contractor's Registrations & Certifications

Sub-Factor 2: Key Personnel

Volume II - Past Performance

Volume III - Price

In order for the proposal to be evaluated strictly on the merit of the material submitted, the volumes shall be submitted in separate documents. Volume I and II shall not include any price information.

Pricing data is prohibited in, and shall be omitted from, the written technical Proposal.

The Offeror is advised to supply all information in the sequence and format as specified in the table below. The proposal must provide a sufficient basis for a thorough evaluation and contain the information necessary for evaluation in accordance with the evaluation factors detailed below. The Offeror shall provide the requested information within the designated evaluation factor. Any requested information placed outside of the designated factor will not be considered or evaluated under that evaluation factor, regardless of whether it is located elsewhere in the proposal.

Volume Factor Title Page Limits

I. 1 Technical Approach, Subfactor 1: Prime Contractor's Registrations & Certifications

Subfactor 2: Key Personnel

Overall Page Limit: Twenty (20) single-sided pages

Resumes: Required for all Key Personnel. Each resume is limited to Two (2) pages.

Excluded from Overall Page Limit: Table of Contents, Cover Letter, and Resumes

II. 2 Past Performance Maximum Overall Page Limit: Five (5) numbered single-sided pages

III 3 Price No Limit for the price proposal and/or any supporting narrative information

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government. The Government will not pay any expenses incurred by any Offeror for the preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this RFP.

For the evaluation of each of the technical factors, Offerors shall provide the following information:

FACTOR 1-Technical Approach

Sub-factor 1. Prime Contractor's Registrations and Certifications: The offeror shall submit documentation showing that the prime contractor is properly registered and certified to perform food service exhaust fans and ducts cleaning services required under this solicitation. At a minimum, the offeror shall provide copies of the required business registration, a valid Hygiene Management Permission License under the Management of Public Health Act issued by the Republic of Korea (ROK) Government, and a valid Annual Hygiene Training Certificate issued by the Korean Facility Hygiene Management Association (CY 2026). The registration or certification of a subcontractor shall not be substituted for that of the prime contractor.

Sub-factor 2. Key Personnel:

(1) Project Manager (PM): The offeror shall provide a qualified Project Manager (PM) who will be responsible for the overall performance of the work. The proposed Project Manager shall have an associate degree or bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university and a minimum of two (2) years of project management experience within the last five (5) years on contracts for cleaning food service exhaust systems (hoods, fans, and ducts). The offeror shall submit the PM's resume demonstrating relevant experience performing or managing food service exhaust system cleaning services. At a minimum, the resume shall include the PM's full name, description of qualifying work experience, period of experience, value or size of contract or project, company name or employer, and validating point of contact information.

(2) Electrical Industrial Engineer: The offeror shall provide one (1) qualified Electrical Industrial Engineer. The proposed Electrical Industrial Engineer shall have graduated from a related two (2) or four (4) year college program, such as Electrical Engineering. No special qualifications are required. The proposed Electrical Industrial Engineer shall have at least one (1) year of experience within the last five (5) years from the solicitation closing date as labor for cleaning food service exhaust fans and ducts for dining facility contracts. The offeror shall also provide a copy of the related certification for the proposed Electrical Industrial Engineer.

FACTOR II - PAST PERFORMANCE

The past performance factor considers the Offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance that meets the contract requirements. Past performance will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. Offerors are required to identify contracts, either commercial or Government contracts, for the same or similar services. The Government may ascertain past performance information on the Offeror from sources other than the contracts/references provided.

In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see RFO 15.203(c)(1). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, "unknown" shall be considered "acceptable (Neutral)."

The offeror shall have recent and relevant past performance in food duct cleaning service or similar services. Recent past performance is at least two (2) years of experience within the last five

(5) years from the solicitation closing date of the food duct cleaning service or related lines of business. Relevant past performance is that which is the same or similar based on size, scope, complexity, and contract type. TE-04 identifies food duct cleaning service or related lines of business as the relevant experience base.

(a) Contract references. For each Past Performance submission, provide:

The title of the contract/project

A description of work completed

Name of the Client Organization or Requiring Activity

Length of contract/project (year/month/date - year/month/date)

Value of contract/project

Complete name, e-mail, and phone number of point of contact (POC) at Client Organization

(b) The Government may send a Past Performance Questionnaire to the POC listed by the Offeror for each relevant contract, who will subsequently be requested to submit information to the Government no later than 14 days after Government issuance of the questionnaire. This language is adapted from the sample addendum.

NOTE: Offerors are reminded that while the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in the proposals. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror. Evaluation of past performance will be done only on proposals that receive a technically acceptable rating on all previous evaluation factors.

FACTOR III - PRICE

The offeror shall provide complete price proposal to include:

(a) Schedule of Services (CLINs) of the RFP for all five (5) years;

(b) Prices shall be in local currency (Korean Won);

(c) Any escalation in option year pricing shall be identified.

Pricing shall be included for all CLINs. The offeror(s) shall round all unit prices to the nearest whole Korean Won (KRW), thereby eliminating the use of any decimal points. This pricing structure is consistent with the sample addendum.

4.0 SITE VISIT/PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE:

4.1. Offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the price of contract performance, to the extent that the information is reasonably obtainable. In no event shall failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after contract award. The site orientation schedule is as follows:

Date Time: 29 September 2026 at 1300 Hrs (KST)

Meeting Location: Gate #1, Camp Casey, Dongducheon (Near Bosan Train Station, Line 1)

4.2. Offeror shall submit the following information to Ms. So, Chong Ok at chongok.so.ln@army.mil by 22 September 2026 at 1500. After sending e-mail, offerors shall confirm with Ms. So, Chong Ok at 0503-322-6311 (Commercial) if the e-mail is delivered to her e-mail account.

Company Name

Name(s) (Maximum of 2 individuals per offeror) Korean Identification Number

Phone or Cell-phone number

If already have post pass which is available to access Camp Casey (Yes/No)

4.3. The attendee must bring a photo identification card ( ).

4.4. For Escort, Offeror shall submit the following information to the POC whether your email has been delivered.

Name individual per offeror (Maximum 2 person may be escorted) Korean Identification Number

The attendee must bring a photo identification card ().

Vehicle Registration ()

Vehicle Insurance Record ()

Driver's License ()

Korean Identification Card ()

NOTE: Questions will be addressed to the Contract Specialist at seyong.kwon.ln@army.mil and Contracting Officer at susie.m.lee3.civ@army.mil. All questions must be received no later than 11:

00 hours on 1 Oct 2026 (Korea Standard Time). Late questions may not be answered.

End of ADDENDUM to FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS - COMMERCIAL ITEMS

Addendum to 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions - Commercial Products and Commercial Services

5152.229-4012 TAX EXEMPTION CUSTOMS, REPUBLIC OF KOREA

Pursuant to Article IX of the Status of Forces Agreement between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, the United States and its contractors are exempt from Republic of Korea customs duties and other related charges. By submission of its offer or quote, the Contractor certifies that the price for all material, supplies, and equipment to be imported for the performance of this contract do not include any otherwise applicable customs duties. To obtain an exemption or reimbursement for customs duties paid pursuant to performance of the contract, the contractor must provide the Contracting Officer with the total amount of customs duties that have been excluded from the contract price. The Contracting Officer will return USFK Form 75 to the contractor for filing with the Republic of Korea Customs Office at the time of import declaration or later if the customs duties were paid before award of the contract.

5152.229-4013 TAX EXEMPTION SPECIAL EXERCISE TAX, REPUBLIC OF KOREA

This clause is in implementation of Article XVI of the Status of Forces Agreement between the Republic of Korea and the United States, granting Contractors exemption from Republic of Korea Special Excise Taxes. At the time this contract is awarded the Contractor shall indicate to the Contracting Officer which items will be purchased for the contract that are subject to Special Excise Tax. It shall indicate the name of the item, the number of units to be purchased, the cost per unit without tax, the percentage of tax, the tax amount per unit, the total tax, and the manufacturer of the item. The Contracting Officer will verify the reasonableness of the quantities claimed and ensure that the Contractor has certified that the contract price excludes Special Excise Tax on those items subject to the tax. The Contractor shall purchase the special-excise-taxed items from the manufacturer, tax-inclusive. For construction and single-delivery type supply and service contracts, the Contractor shall employ the following procedure: At the time it purchases the items it shall present the manufacturer with a notification letter requesting refund of the Special Excise Tax. (Copies of this letter can be obtained from the 411th CSB, Korea Contracting Officer.) The manufacturer will endorse the letter to the manufacturer's District Tax Office which will make refund to the manufacturer. The manufacturer will make subsequent refund to the Contractor. Requests for refund under requirements-type contracts will be submitted monthly and will be accompanied by copies of the USFK delivery orders issue.

5152.229-4014 TAX EXEMPTION VALUE ADDED TAX (VAT), REPUBLIC OF KOREA

This clause implements Article XVI of the Status of Forces Agreement between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, which exempts contractors from paying the Republic of Korea Value-Added Taxes. When the contractor submits an offer, it shall certify to the Contracting Officer that all the costs in the offer will be exclusive of any Value-Added Tax; and further, that the proposed contract price includes no Value-Added Tax. The contractor shall also indicate the amount and type of Value-Added Taxes excluded from the contract price. If supplies and/or services which the contractor purchases for this contract include Value-Added Taxes, it can obtain a full refund for the amount of the Value-Added Tax by submitting to the ROK District Tax Office tax invoices which the contractor receives when it purchases materials and/or services for this contract. The contractor must submit a copy of the USFK contract with its first tax invoice submission. Subsequent tax invoice submissions must be accompanied by a letter which references the USFK contract submitted with the first tax invoice submission.

5152.229-4015 - Tax Exemption POL Products, Republic of Korea As prescribed in 29.402-1.d, insert the following clause:

TAX EXEMPTION Petroleum, Oil and Lubricant (POL) PRODUCTS, REPUBLIC OF KOREA

(a) This clause is an implementation of Article XVI of the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, granting Contractors exemption from Republic of Korea taxes for petroleum products (POL) utilized on USFK acquisitions in the Republic of Korea.

(b) At the time this contract is awarded, the Contractor shall make a final nomination in writing of its point of purchase for POL products to be used on this contract. The Contractor shall also state the estimated quantity and amount of POL to be purchased from each refinery/gas station. The USFK Contracting Officer will verify the amounts claimed for use on the contract and, based on this verification, the USFK Issuing Officer will issue USFK POL Tax Exemption Coupons.

(c) If the Contractor elects to purchase directly from an oil company refinery, it may nominate any of the three ROK oil companies below which have agreed to sell to Contractor at a fixed exempt price. Pre-selected oil company refineries will sell their POL products at the fixed exempted prices upon presentation of coupons by the contractor.

List of Oil Companies and their Respective Tax Offices

Hyundai Oil Refinery Co., Ltd.: Seo San District Tax

ATTN: POL Tax Administrator Seo San City, Korea

SK Energy: Ulsan District Tax Office

S-Oil ATTN: POL Tax Administrator

Ulsan City, Kyongsang Nam Do, Korea

GS Caltex: Yosu District Tax Office ATTN: POL Tax Administrator

Yosu City, Chonla Nam Do, Korea

(d) If the contractor elects to purchase POL products from an individual gasoline station, the Contracting Officer will advise the contractor as to which stations will sell at the fixed exempt price.

The contractor shall specify from which of those stations it will purchase and will be required to make advance payment for the amount of POL covered by the coupons. Advance payment will be at the fixed-exempt price and will be made to the station previously nominated. Representatives from the chosen gas station shall be present at the issuing session to collect the advance payment, mark "paid" on the back of the original copy of the issued coupons, and provide the Contractor with tax invoices by which to obtain a refund from the governing ROK District Tax Office. Having collected POL payment in advance, the gas station will accept pre-paid USFK POL Tax Exemption Coupons from the contractor and provide the POL amount reflected on tendered coupons without further charge.

(e) All coupons for construction contracts shall be issued at the time of award. Coupons for requirements-type contracts shall be issued on a delivery order incremental basis or on a monthly basis.

5152.233-4703 AMC-LEVEL PROTEST PROGRAM

NOTE: This clause does not apply to contracts awarded under the Logistics Cost Sharing (LCS) program.

If you have complaints about this procurement, it is preferable that you first attempt to resolve those concerns with the responsible contracting officer. However, you can also protest to Headquarters, AMC. The HQ, AMC-Level Protest Program is intended to encourage interested parties to seek resolution of their concerns within AMC as an Alternative Dispute Resolution forum, rather than filing a protest with the General Accounting Office or other external forum. Contract award or performance is suspended during the protest to the same extent, and within the same time periods, as if filed at the GAO. The AMC protest decision goal is to resolve protests within 20 working days from filing. To be timely, protests must be filed within the periods specified in FAR 33.103. If you want to file a protest under the AMC-Level Protest Program, the protest must request resolution under that program and be sent to the address below. All other agency-level protests should be sent to the contracting officer for resolution.

Headquarters U.S. Army Materiel Command Office of Command Counsel

4400 Martin Road Rm: A6SE40.001

Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5000 Facsimile number (256) 450-8840

The AMC-level protest procedures are found at:

https://www.amc.army.mil/Connect/Legal-Resources/

If Internet access is not available, contact the contracting officer or HQ, AMC to obtain the AMC- Level Protest Procedures.

To:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

Basis of Award and Evaluation Criteria Overview

1. Basis of Award

The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and is determined to represent the best value to the Government, considering price and other factors, in accordance with Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Overhaul (RFO) 12.201-1, Simplified Procedures. The Government may reject any offer not substantially in compliance with the terms and conditions of the solicitation.

The Government will evaluate offers in accordance with Addendum to FAR 52.212.2, Evaluation -

Commercial Items.

The initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to request revisions if the Contracting Officer later determines the need. The Government may reject any offer not substantially in compliance with the terms and conditions of the solicitation.

The Offeror's written submission will be reviewed and evaluated on an adjectival basis for the technical evaluation factor as either Acceptable or Unacceptable. Simple statements of compliance /reiteration (i.e., "understood"; "will comply"), without a detailed description of how compliance will be met, may not sufficiently demonstrate the Offeror's ability to meet the technical requirements and may result in a rating of Unacceptable. In order to be considered for award, the proposal must receive an evaluated rating of Acceptable for the technical factor. Technical evaluations will be conducted using the following ratings scale and definitions.

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

2. Evaluation Factors

Each factor and subfactor will be rated either acceptable or unacceptable. A rating of unacceptable for any factor or subfactor will result in an overall unacceptable rating. If an offeror fails to meet the minimum requirements outlined in one of the subfactors below, the subfactor, and overall proposal will be rated "unacceptable" and will not be eligible for award.

The Government will evaluate offers based on the following factors, listed in descending order of importance. :

Evaluation Criteria:

Factor 1. Technical Capability Subfactor (1), Prime Contractor's Registration and Certifications

Subfactor (2), Key Personnel

Factor 2. Past Performance

Factor 3. Price

Factor 1. Technical Approach

Technical capability will be evaluated to assess the offeror's understanding of the requirement and its ability to successfully perform the service set forth in the Evaluation Factor 1.

Proposal submissions for this evaluation area shall demonstrate the Offeror's ability to accomplish the requirements in the PWS.

Specifically, the Government will evaluate:

a) Does the Offeror's proposed Technical Approach demonstrate a complete understanding of the requirement tasks, deliverables, and logistical details relating to PWS, including addressing potential issues that may be encountered and mitigation examples during transition and full contract performance? Additionally, the Government will evaluate their approach to meeting those requirements listed in the PWS.

(1) Subfactor 1: Prime Contractor's Registration and Certifications

The offeror shall be evaluated on submitted copies of current and valid registration issued by the ROK Government as listed below. The registration of subcontractor cannot be substituted for the prime contractor's registration.

a. Copies of the required business registration, a valid Hygiene Management Permission under the Management of Public Health Act issued by the Republic of Korea (ROK) License

Government, and a valid issued by the Korean Facility Annual Hygiene Training Certificate Hygiene Management Association (CY 2026).

NOTE: The prime contractor registration may not be satisfied by the prime contractor's proposed subcontractor is its registration.

(2) Subfactor 2: Key Personnel

a. Project Manager: The offeror shall be evaluated on their submitted resume of Project Manager (PM). The proposed PM must be a current employee of the offeror's company at the time of proposal submission. The proposed PM shall demonstrate at least a minimum of two (2) years of project management experience within the last five

(5) years on contracts for cleaning food service exhaust systems (hoods, fans, and ducts). The PM shall also submit a copy of a valid Annual Hygiene Training Certificate issued by the Korean Facility Hygiene Management Association for CY26. The PM's resume must clearly identify as required below:

- Proposed position title

- A brief description of work experience

- Company name, phone number, and complete name of the employer

- Length of work experience (year/month/date - year/month/date)

- Value or size of Contract

b. Electrical Engineer: The offeror shall be evaluated on their submitted resume of Electrical Engineer. The Electrical Engineer's resume must clearly identify as required below:

- Education from a Related Two (2) or Four (4) year college program as Electrical Engineering

- One (1) year of experience with the last five (5) years from the solicitation closing date as labor for cleaning food service exhaust fans and ducts for dining facility contracts.

- Related certification for the proposed Electrical Industrial Engineer.

Factor 2. Past Performance

The offeror shall be evaluated on recent and relevant past performance. Recent past performance is at least two (2) years of experience within the last five (5) years from the solicitation closing date of the food duct cleaning service or related lines of business. Relevant past performance is in working in cleaning exhaust fans and ducts cleaning services or similar maintenance services. The past performance will be evaluated only on proposals that received a technically acceptable rating by the Contracting Officer in the following manner:

(1) Review of the detailed explanation submitted by offerors demonstrating the relevance of the references to the requirements of the solicitation.

(2) Reference will be contacted by phone to verify contents in detail explanation and to determine record of compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, technical and quality awards /certificates.

(3) The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance information from any reasonable source available, including Government database to evaluate past performance.

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. (See note below)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has substantial doubt that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort due to documented, unresolved adverse past performance on recent, relevant efforts.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, "unknown" shall be considered "acceptable (Neutral)."

Factor 3. Price

Price analysis will be conducted for each proposal to ensure completeness, reasonableness, and balance IAW RFO 12.204(a) and RFO 15.404-1(b). The following applies to that evaluation.

(1) Completeness. The offeror shall complete the pricing information for all CLINs identified for base period plus four (4) option years. Any underlying assumptions, including proposed escalation rates between the 1st and subsequent periods, shall be clearly explained.

(2) Price Reasonableness. Price should also reflect fair market value and be reasonable when compared to the independent Government estimate, current market prices for same or similar services and/or when compared to the proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(3) Unbalanced Pricing. As part of the price evaluation, proposals will be reviewed to identify any unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced Pricing, a proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

(4) Price is not scored. The Government will review the price proposal to determine the extent to which it is reasonable, and consistent with the technical proposal. The price for award purposes will be the combined total of the effective period /years from the date of award. Price shall include all CLINs as listed on the Price Schedule including option periods. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussion. Therefore, Offerors are instructed that submitted proposals should contain their best pricing

(5) FAR Clause 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services. As part of price evaluation, the Government will evaluate its option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.217-8 - Option to Extend Services) by adding one- half of the Offeror's final option period prices to the Offeror's total price. Thus, the Offeror's total price for the purpose of evaluation will include the base period, all four options.and

Offerors are required only to price the base and Offerors shall not submit a four (4) option periods.

price for the potential one-half year extension of services period. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options should not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

3. Comparative Evaluation

The Government may conduct a comparative evaluation of offers to determine which proposal represents the best value to the Government. The Government is not obligated to select the lowest priced offer if a higher-priced offer is determined to provide greater overall value under the non-price factors. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. Therefore, offerors are encouraged to submit their best terms in their initial offers.

4. Award Decision

The award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government, considering Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Price. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. Therefore, offerors are encouraged to submit their best terms in their initial offer.

5. Documentation

The rationale for the source selection decision, including any tradeoffs made between price and non-price factors, will be documented in the contract file.

Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Products and Commercial Services

1. CONTRACT AWARD:

1.1. The Government intends to execute Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) CLINs for this requirement. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government, considering price and other factors in accordance with Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Overhaul (RFO) 12.201-1, Simplified Procedures. The Government reserves the right to make an award without discussions. Therefore, offerors are encouraged to submit their best terms in their initial offer.

2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION:

Offerors' proposals shall adhere to the following instructions:

2.1. These instructions are designated to ensure submission of essential information necessary for the Government to evaluate proposals effectively.

2.2. Offerors are cautioned to submit adequate information to enable the Government team to fully ascertain each Offeror's capability to perform all of the requirements identified in the solicitation.

2.3. Offerors are required to submit a COMPLETE package via the Solicitation app in Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) by the Korea local closing time and date which can be found in Block 13 on page 1 of this solicitation.

2.4. A complete offer package includes:

(a) Signed first page of the solicitation and each amendment.

(b) All information required for Factor I - Technical, Factor II - Past Performance, and Factor III - Price as supporting documentation for the non-price factor(s) specified in Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and 52.212-2 of this solicitation. Adapted from the sample addendum structure.

3.0. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Technical Proposal Content & Instructions:

Responses shall be separated into three Volumes and organized in the following manner:

Volume I - Technical Approach

Sub-Factor 1: Prime Contractor's Registrations & Certifications

Sub-Factor 2: Key Personnel

Volume II - Past Performance

Volume III - Price

In order for the proposal to be evaluated strictly on the merit of the material submitted, the volumes shall be submitted in separate documents. Volume I and II shall not include any price information.

Pricing data is prohibited in, and shall be omitted from, the written technical Proposal.

The Offeror is advised to supply all information in the sequence and format as specified in the table below. The proposal must provide a sufficient basis for a thorough evaluation and contain the information necessary for evaluation in accordance with the evaluation factors detailed below. The Offeror shall provide the requested information within the designated evaluation factor. Any requested information placed outside of the designated factor will not be considered or evaluated under that evaluation factor, regardless of whether it is located elsewhere in the proposal.

Volume Factor Title Page Limits

I. 1 Technical Approach, Subfactor 1: Prime Contractor's Registrations & Certifications

Subfactor 2: Key Personnel

Overall Page Limit: Twenty (20) single-sided pages

Resumes: Required for all Key Personnel. Each resume is limited to Two (2) pages.

Excluded from Overall Page Limit: Table of Contents, Cover Letter, and Resumes

II. 2 Past Performance Maximum Overall Page Limit: Five (5) numbered single-sided pages

III 3 Price No Limit for the price proposal and/or any supporting narrative information

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government. The Government will not pay any expenses incurred by any Offeror for the preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this RFP.

For the evaluation of each of the technical factors, Offerors shall provide the following information:

FACTOR 1-Technical Approach

Sub-factor 1. Prime Contractor's Registrations and Certifications: The offeror shall submit documentation showing that the prime contractor is properly registered and certified to perform food service exhaust fans and ducts cleaning services required under this solicitation. At a minimum, the offeror shall provide copies of the required business registration, a valid Hygiene Management Permission License under the Management of Public Health Act issued by the Republic of Korea (ROK) Government, and a valid Annual Hygiene Training Certificate issued by the Korean Facility Hygiene Management Association (CY 2026). The registration or certification of a subcontractor shall not be substituted for that of the prime contractor.

Sub-factor 2. Key Personnel:

(1) Project Manager (PM): The offeror shall provide a qualified Project Manager (PM) who will be responsible for the overall performance of the work. The proposed PM must be a current employee of the offeror's company at the time of proposal submission. The proposed PM shall have a minimum of two(2) years of project management experience within the last five (5) years on contracts for cleaning food service exhaust systems (hoods, fans, and ducts). The offeror shall submit the PM's resume demonstrating relevant experience performing or managing food service exhaust system cleaning services and a copy of valid Annual Hygiene Training Certification issued by the Korean Facility Hygiene Management Association for Cy26. At a minimum, the resume shall include the PM's full name, description of qualifying work experience, period of experience, value or size of contract or project, company name or employer, and validating point of contact information.

(2) Electrical Industrial Engineer: The offeror shall provide one (1) qualified Electrical Industrial Engineer. The proposed Electrical Industrial Engineer shall have graduated from a related two (2) or four (4) year college program, such as Electrical Engineering.