APS _ Combined Synopsis Solicitation _ 20261023.pdf
PDF 407 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Commercial Items Agile Professional Services (APS) Department of the Army
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-26-R-A023
About this file
This is a Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for commercial items issued by Army Contracting Command - Orlando for Agile Professional Services (APS) support. Solicitation number W900KK-26-R-A023 is a 100% Total Small Business Set-Aside under NAICS code 541990 (All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services) with a small business size standard of $19.5 million. The contract vehicle is Labor Hours with a total performance period not exceeding 66 months, consisting of a 6-month base period (15-February-2027 to 14-August-2027) for Agile Development and Transition In, followed by five 12-month option periods for Enterprise Performance, plus an optional 6-month extension period.
CPE ST3 requires professional support services to augment its Military and Government Civilian workforce under a Performance-Based Services model. Services encompass full lifecycle management activities including vision statements and doctrine development, architecture development, program support (acquisition planning, budget planning, business/financial programming, modeling, simulation, training device development, documentation, fielding, system analysis, integrated logistics support, strategic planning, contingency and mission support, security cooperation, program oversight, verification/validation, test evaluation, prototype development, sustainment, operations, and analysis of emerging technologies), and subject matter expert support on military tactics, techniques, and procedures. The critical performance requirement is transitioning CPE ST3 from a traditional staffing-based model to a task-based, outcome-driven Agile delivery framework that provides flexible and scalable cleared teams, implements Agile/DevSecOps/digital engineering practices, integrates with government tools (Jira, Power BI), delivers measurable outcomes tied to mission readiness, and ensures DoD acquisition and cybersecurity compliance (CMMC, RMF). Work locations include Orlando, FL and Redstone Arsenal, AL (24/7 operations), with additional sites at Fort Campbell, KY; Fort Hood, TX; Fort Drum, NY; Fort Irwin, CA; Fort Polk, LA; Fort Rucker, AL; Fort Bragg, NC; Hohenfels, Germany; and Camp Humphreys, South Korea. Phase I proposal submission is due 25-October-2026 at 11:59pm Eastern via DoD SAFE (Department of Defense Secure Access File Exchange), with award notifications expected in January 2027 and performance start date of 15-February-2027. Offerors must submit fully burdened hourly rates for designated labor categories via the APS Pricing Workbook and complete an Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Mitigation Plan accepting a Baseline Competitive Exclusion preventing bidding on any competitive CPE ST3 product/hardware development work.
View the file
Other files
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Agile Professional Services (APS) | Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Commercial Items
Agile Professional Services ("APS”) Department of the Army
Project Name: Agile Professional Services ("APS")
Solicitation Number: W900KK-26-R-A023
NAICS Code: 541990 (All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical
Services)
Set-Aside: Total Small Business Set-Aside
Contract Type: Labor Hours
1. General Information
This combined synopsis/solicitation is issued by Army Contracting Command - Orlando to procure Agile Professional Services ("APS"). The acquisition is structured to support critical technical and professional operations under a flexible framework, to be proposed and developed by the successful offeror.
Key acquisition parameters include:
• Set-Aside Status: 100% Total Small Business Set-Aside.
• Small Business Size Standard: $19.5M, or as defined by SBA regulations.
• Primary NAICS Classification: 541990 — All Other Professional, Scientific, and
Technical Services.
• Contract Vehicle Type: Labor Hours.
2. Solicitation Details
This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. This combined synopsis/solicitation is prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice.
The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular FAC 2025-06, effective August 27, 2025 and
DFARS Publication Notice (DPN) July 2, 2026.
As described in the attached FAR 52.212-2, The Army will adopt aspects of FAR Part
15 evaluation procedures. Considering the novel, and commercial, nature of these services this is deemed necessary to balance fairness, transparency, and competition with the interests of expediency and flexibility
3. Contract Pricing Structure
Offerors must complete the pricing structure below. Ensure all fully burdened hourly rates are specified for the designated labor categories.
See Attachment 10 - APS Pricing Workbook
4. Description of Requirement
CPE ST3 has a need for Agile Professional Services (APS) support services to provide the organization with the ability to augment its Military and Government Civilian workforce in order to execute its mission. The services will be limited to providing professional support services, under a Performance Based Services model, to CPE ST3 and CPE ST3 customers for limited requirements which are related to CPE ST3’s mission. Since its inception, CPE ST3 has relied on contractor support to conduct its mission in all phases of life cycle management due to insufficient personnel within the organization to successfully perform the required services. This model of a Government footprint with a scalable contractor workforce has enabled CPE ST3 to be very flexible and agile in its mission to support the changing needs of the Army.
The services to be performed will include related activities in support of all aspects of providing responsive integrated and interoperable infrastructure for simulation, training, testing, and threat solutions. APS support services are required for effective, efficient, and responsive full lifecycle management of efforts to include, but not limited to: vision statements and doctrine, development of architectures, program support (e.g., acquisition and budget planning, business and financial programming and execution, modeling, simulation, simulator, training device, and instrumentation development, documentation, fielding and execution, system analysis and integration, integrated logistics support, strategic planning, contingency and mission support, security cooperation/international relations, program oversight, independent verification validation and test evaluation, prototype development, sustainment and operations, and analysis of emerging technologies support), and subject matter experts on military tactics, techniques, and procedures. Potential areas of growth are envisioned but not limited to be in the areas of Cyber and Information Warfare, Robotics, Unmanned
Vehicles, Home Station Training, Multi-Sensory Simulation, Artificial Intelligence, Hypersonics, Directed Energy, Electronic Warfare, Autonomous Systems, Multi-Domain
Integration, Target and Threat Systems, Environment Modeling, Human Performance
Training, Security Cooperation, Nuclear Engineering, and Medical Training.
The critical performance requirement is the successful development and transition of
CPE ST3 from a traditional, staffing-based support model to a task-based, outcome-driven Agile delivery framework that is to be developed by the Performer. Success will be measured by the contractor's ability to develop and iterate, through performance under the resultant contract, a framework that both provides the following, and is able to be replicated across future requirements:
• Provide flexible and scalable teams of cleared specialized personnel.
• Implement and mature Agile, DevSecOps, and digital engineering practices.
• Integrate with government tools, environments, and processes (Jira, Power BI, etc.).
• Deliver measurable outcomes tied to mission readiness and warfighter needs, rather than just level-of-effort.
• Ensure compliance with DoD acquisition, cybersecurity (CMMC, RMF), and data rights regulations.
Work will be performed at Government facilities, Contractor facilities, and Remote locations. Primary Government sites include Orlando, FL, and Redstone Arsenal, AL
(including 24/7 operations). Additional Government sites include: Fort Campbell, KY; Fort Hood, TX; Fort Drum, NY; Fort Irwin, CA; Fort Polk, LA; Fort Rucker, AL; Fort
Bragg, NC; Hohenfels, Germany; and Camp Humphreys, South Korea.
The contractor should take into consideration that all acquisition support activities will be executed in accordance with applicable Federal, Department of War (DoW), and Army acquisition regulations, policies, and best practices.
*****Balance of Page Left Blank*****
Current Level of Effort data is provided here as a Magnitude reference, and for offeror consideration in Proposal development:
Category Level SIM Hours Trade Hours IPO Hours
TSO_FSTS
Hours HQ Hours TSMO Hours Hours at location (none Orlando, FL) 11-1021 General and Operations Manager Senior (>10 yrs) 3840 11-3013 Facility Manager Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 480 11-3013 Facility Manager SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME) 480 11-3021 Computer and Information Systems Managers Senior (>10 yrs) 960 1920 11-3021 Computer and Information Systems Managers SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME) 1920 11-3071 Transportation, Storage, and Distribution Manager Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 1920 11-9041 Architectural and Engineering Managers** Senior (>10 yrs) 13-1041 Compliance Officers Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 1920 13-1051 - Cost Estimator** SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME) 13-1081 Logisticians Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 3840 49920 1920 1920 1920 - Huntsville, AL (TSMO) 13-1081 Logisticians Senior (>10 yrs) 9600 13-1081 Logisticians SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME) 1920 1920 - Germany (Trade) 13-1082 Project Management Specialists Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 1920 5760 7680 960
13-1082 Project Management Specialists Senior (>10 yrs) 1920 49920* 13440 7680
1920 - Fort Irwin (Trade), 1920 - Fort Polk (Trade), 1920- Fort Polk (TSO), 1920-Fort Irwin (TSO), 1920-Germany (TSO), 1920- Korea (TSO)
13-1082 Project Management Specialists SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME) 5760 1920 1920 - Fort Hood (Trade) 13-1111 Management Analysts Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 11520 1920 1920 - Huntsville, AL (TSMO) 13-1111 Management Analysts Senior (>10 yrs) 1920 24960 5760
13-1111 Management Analysts SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME) 5760 13440 1920 - Fort Bragg (TSO), 1920 - Fort Drum (TSO), 9600- Fort Rucker (TSO)
13-11199 - Business Operations Specialist Junior (<3 years) 3840 13-1151 Training and Development Specialists* Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 3840 13-1151 Training and Development Specialists* Senior (>10 yrs) 13440 1920 1920 - Fort Campbell (SIM) 13-1151 Training and Development Specialists* SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME) 11520 1920 11520 - Fort Campbell (SIM), 1920 - Fort Campbell (IPO) 13-2031 - Budget Analyst Journeyman (3-10 yrs) 1920 15-1211 Computer Systems Analysts Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 1920 15-1211 Computer Systems Analysts Senior (>10 yrs) 1920 15-1212 Information Security Analysts Senior (>10 yrs) 960 1920 15-1232 Computer User Support Specialists Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 1920 15-1231 Computer Network Support Specialists Senior (>10 yrs) 1920 15-1242 Database Administrators Senior (>10 yrs) 1920 1920 - Fort Campbell (SIM) 15-1244 Network and Computer Systems Administrators Senior (>10 yrs) 3840 15-1252 Software Developer Senior (>10 yrs) 1920 15-1253 Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 1920 15-1253 Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers Senior (>10 yrs) 3840 15-1299 Computer Occupations, All Other Senior (>10 yrs) 1920 1920 - Fort Campbell (SIM) 15-2051 Data Scientists Senior (>10 yrs) 1920 17-2072 Electronics Engineers, Except Computer Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 11520 17-2072 Electronics Engineers, Except Computer** Senior (>10 yrs) 17-2199 Engineers, All Other Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 5760 1920 17-2199 Engineers, All Other Senior (>10 yrs) 21120 17-2199 Engineers, All Other SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME) 1920 17-3029 Engineering Technologists and Technicians Senior (>10 yrs) 1920 27 3031 Public Relations Specialists** Senior (>10 yrs) 27-3042 Technical Writers Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 3840 27-3042 Technical Writers Senior (>10 yrs) 1920 33-9099 Protective Service Workers, All Others Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 5760 24960 24960 - Huntsville, AL (TSMO) 49-9071 General Maintenance Worker Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 480 49-9071 General Maintenance Worker SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME) 480 49-9099 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Workers, All Other SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME) 480 49-9099 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Workers, All Other Journeyman (3–10 yrs) 480
Total 92160 134400 36480 74880 24960 30720
* Requires military experience **Potential LCAT for future option
5. Period of Performance / Delivery Location
Period of Performance
Total Performance Period shall not exceed 66-months:
• Base Period – (15-Feb-27 to 14-Aug-27) Agile Development and Transition In
• Option Period 1 – (15-Aug-27 to 14-Aug-28) – Enterprise Performance
• Option Period 2 – (15-Aug-28 to 14-Aug-29) – Enterprise Performance
• Option Period 3 – (15-Aug-29 to 14-Aug-30) – Enterprise Performance
• Option Period 4 – (15-Aug-30 to 14-Aug-31) – Enterprise Performance
• Option Period 5 – (15-Aug-31 to 14-Feb-32) – Enterprise Performance and
Transition Out
• Option Period 6 – (15-Feb-32 to 14-Aug-32) – Option to Extend the Term of
Service under FAR 52.217-8
Place of Performance
Work will be performed at Government facilities, Contractor facilities, and Remote locations. Primary Government sites include Orlando, FL, and Redstone Arsenal, AL
(including 24/7 operations). Additional Government sites include: Fort Campbell, KY; Fort Hood, TX; Fort Drum, NY; Fort Irwin, CA; Fort Polk, LA; Fort Rucker, AL; Fort
Bragg, NC; Hohenfels, Germany; and Camp Humphreys, South Korea.
Tentative Milestone Schedule:
Sep-26 Phase I Notifications
Oct-26 Phase II Notifications
Nov-26 Phase III Notifications
Jan-27 Small Business PreAward Notifications
Jan-27 Award Notifications
15-Feb-27 Performance Start Date
6. FAR and DFARS Provisions and Clauses – SEE ATTACHMENT 7
The following provisions and clauses apply to this acquisition and are incorporated by reference or full text as applicable. The full text of the FAR and DFARS clauses may be accessed electronically at https://www.acquisition.gov/.
https://www.acquisition.gov/
7. Proposal Submission Instructions
Phase I responses to this solicitation are due by 25 October 2026 / 11:59pm (Eastern).
Submission due dates for all subsequent Phases will be issued via Advisory
Notifications / Invitations.
a. Electronic Submission Requirement
All proposals must be submitted electronically via the Department of Defense Secure
Access File Exchange (DoD SAFE) application at https://safe.apps.mil . Hardcopy submissions or proposals sent directly via standard email will not be accepted.
b. Requesting a DoD SAFE "Drop-off Request" Link
Because guest (non-government/commercial) users cannot initiate file uploads on DoD
SAFE without a government-issued invitation, all offerors must request a "Drop-off
Request" link .
• The Request Process: To receive an upload link, the offeror must send an email to ST3ProfessionalServices@army.mil.
• The Cut-off Deadline: Requests for a DoD SAFE drop-off link must be received no later 12:00pm Eastern on 22 October, 2026.
• Link Validity: Once the Government processes your request, you will receive an automated email from DoD SAFE containing a unique link and instructions. This link is valid for exactly 14 days from the date of receipt.
WARNING: The Government will not be held responsible for late proposals resulting from an offeror's failure to request a drop-off link by the established deadline.
c. Submission Protocol
Upon receipt of the automated DoD SAFE email link:
• Click the link inside the automated email to access the secure upload portal.
• Upload all required solicitation attachments, ensuring they are named clearly.
• Do not encrypt your files when you load them into DoD SAFE.
• In the "To:" recipient section of the DoD SAFE page, ensure that only the official Government Points of Contact listed in this solicitation are designated as recipients.
o Branch Chief / Contracting Officer: Lovisa D. Parks, Lovisa.d.parks.civ@army.mil o Team Lead / Contracting Officer: Troy D. Darling, troy.d.darling.civ@army.mil https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fsafe.apps.mil mailto:ST3ProfessionalServices@army.mil mailto:Lovisa.d.parks.civ@army.mil mailto:troy.d.darling.civ@army.mil o Contract Specialist: Constance Hastings, constance.k.hastings.civ@army.mil o Contract Specialist: Sophia Dasilva, sophia.g.dasilva.civ@army.mil
• Click "Submit" or "Drop-off" to complete the upload process.
d. Timeliness of Submissions
• The Submission Timeframe: For a submission to be considered timely, the completed DoD SAFE upload must be finalized, and the automated system notification must arrive in the Government recipients' inboxes on or before the official Proposal Due Date and Time.
• Upload Buffer: Depending on your network speed and the size of your proposal volumes, uploads can take time. Offerors are highly encouraged to start their upload several hours before the deadline. Technical difficulties, network latency, or Offeror delays in upload initiation will not be used as a justification to accept late submissions.
* Late Submissions: Late submissions will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.212-
1(f).
See FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors — Commercial Items; for proposal submission instructions.
8. Organizational Conflict of Interest (“OCI) Disclosure:
8.1. General Requirement: Because of the Contractor’s proximity to inherently governmental functions and access to non-public, sensitive acquisition information, the Offeror must submit an Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Mitigation Plan.
8.1.1 Definition of the Baseline Competitive Exclusion
A. Baseline Competitive Exclusion and Core Purpose: The “Baseline Competitive Exclusion” is a preventive procurement restriction established in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.5 (Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest). Its core purpose is to neutralize potential conflicts of interest— specifically “biased ground rules” and “impaired objectivity”—that naturally arise because Contractor personnel on this contract will support sensitive pre-acquisition planning, technical analysis of alternatives, and requirements-gathering adjacent to inherently governmental functions.
B. Scope of the Exclusion (The “What”): Under the Baseline Competitive Exclusion, the Contractor is strictly prohibited from bidding on, competing for, performing, or otherwise supporting any competitive program work within the U.S. Army Capability Program Executive Simulation, Training, Test and Threat (CPE ST3) portfolio. This includes, but is not limited to:
mailto:constance.k.hastings.civ@army.mil mailto:sophia.g.dasilva.civ@army.mil
• Product and hardware development;
• Tactical system integration;
• Software engineering and commercial software licensing;
• Platform testing and evaluation; and
• Fielding and sustainment hardware contracts.
C. Affected Entities (The “Who”): This exclusion applies corporately and collectively to:
• The Prime Contractor;
• All members of the Prime Contractor’s joint venture, teaming arrangement, or partnership;
• All proposed Subcontractors; and
• All parent companies, subsidiaries, sister sectors, and corporate affiliates of the Prime Contractor and its Subcontractors.
D. Duration (The “When”)
• Standard Duration: The Baseline Competitive Exclusion shall remain in effect for the entire duration of this contract (inclusive of all base years, option years, and any performance extensions or transition phases) plus an additional period of one (1) year following the final date of contract performance.
8.1.2 Baseline Acknowledgment: The Offeror must clearly state that they intend to abide by the Baseline Competitive Exclusion (preventing the Prime, Subcontractors, and Affiliates from bidding on CPE ST3 product/hardware work).
8.2 Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s OCI Mitigation Plan on a strictly “Acceptable/Unacceptable” basis. The evaluation will determine if the Offeror has successfully identified, avoided, neutralized, or mitigated all potential OCIs in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.5 and the strict criteria established in FAR 52.212-2 (Attached).
8.2.1 Evaluation Criteria: To receive a rating of “Acceptable,” the Offeror’s OCI Mitigation Plan must definitively meet both of the following two conditions:
• Condition A (Baseline Exclusion): The Offeror explicitly accepts the Baseline Competitive Exclusion for its entire team (Prime, Subs, Affiliates) without exception.
• Condition B (Firewall Exemption): The Offeror submits, as a part of their proposal, a completed and acceptable OCI mitigation Plan for any CURRENT OCI’s disclosed. Pre-existing OCI issues will NOT preclude contract award. To be rated “Acceptable” under Condition B, the plan must provide the specific documentation required for all three (3) objective firewall elements:
o Unequal Access to Information: Occurs when a contractor has access to non-public, sensitive, or proprietary information as part of its performance of a Government contract, and that information provides the contractor with an unfair competitive advantage in a later competition.
o Biased Ground Rules: Occurs when a contractor, in the course of performance, drafts or influences specifications, Statements of Objectives
(SOOs), Statements of Work (SOWs), Program Objective Memorandum
(POM), or acquisition plans for a future procurement, thereby biasing the competition in favor of its own capabilities, tools, or those of an affiliate.
o Impaired Objectivity: Occurs when a contractor’s work under one Government contract requires it to evaluate its own products, services, or performance (or those of a competitor, teammate, or affiliate) on another Government contract, thereby impairing its ability to render impartial, objective advice.
8.2.2 “Unacceptable” Rating and Ineligibility: A proposal that fails to provide a comprehensive OCI Mitigation Plan, or a plan that fails to objectively prove the isolation elements required for a Firewall Exemption, will receive a “Unacceptable” rating.
8.2.3 No Post-Award Negotiation: The Government will not make an award to an Offeror with an “Unacceptable” OCI Mitigation Plan. The Government will not conditionally approve the OCI Mitigation Plan or negotiate material firewall terms after contract award. If an Offeror receives a “Unacceptable” rating for this factor, their entire proposal will be deemed unawardable and removed from further consideration.
9. Additional Information
i. Questions: The deadline to submit questions for this RFP has passed.
ii. Security Clearance Requirements: See Attachment 9 - DD254 for specifics.
a. Probable Facility Clearance without Storage
b. Probable Secret, Top-Secret, and TS/SCI requirements for certain employees.
10. Attachments:
i. Statement of Objectives (SOO), dated 8 September 2026
ii. FAR 52.212-1 – Instructions to Offerors - Proposal Submission instructions
iii. FAR 52.212-2 – Evaluation Criteria – Evaluation Plan
iv. Wage Determinations
a. WD 2015-4377 REV 33 20260820 NC
b. WD 2015-4553 REV 31 20260730 FL
c. WD 2015-4603 REV 34 20260820 AL
d. WD 2015-4631 REV 34 20260812 AL
e. WD 2015-4675 REV 30 20260822 KY
f. WD 2015-5197 REV 33 20260812 LA
g. WD 2015-5237 REV 32 20260812 TX
h. WD 2015-5629 REV 29 20260513 CA
i. WD 2015-5775 REV 32 20260812 NY
v. PWS Template
vi. QASP Template
vii. Provisions and Clauses
viii. CDRLs
a. A001 – Contractor’s Progress and Status Report
b. A002 – Phase-Out Transition Plan
c. A003 – Agile Dashboard
d. A004 – Agile Management Plan
ix. DD 254
a. SAP Addendum (incorporated into Attachment 9 (“ix.”))
b. SCI Addendum (incorporated into Attachment 9 (“ix.”))
x. APS Pricing Workbook
xi. Army DSO JIRA Settings
xii. Compliance Matrix (Contractor’s Format in MS Excel)
Acknowledgement of Amendments:
Amendment 01:
The purpose of this amendment was to provide Attachment-
6_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan_(QASP)_Proposal_Template_-
_APS_20260903
Amendment 02:
The purpose of this amendment was to do provide responses to Industry questions, to revise the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation, to provide for revised submission dates, and to provide updated Attachments 1, 2, 3, 4.e, 5, and 10.
Amendment 03:
The purpose of this Amendment was to update the proposal submission instructions incorporating submission requirements and instructions for the use of DoD SAFE as the sole method of submission.
Amendment 04:
The purpose of this Amendment was to update the following:
a. Revise the proposal submission instructions (Attachment 2) and evaluation criteria (Attachment 3) for Phase II by removing the Live Technical
Demonstration requirement; and
b. Revise the labor hours allotted for 6-months versus 12-month performance periods within APS Pricing Workbook (Attachment 10).
*****END OF COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION*****
| 1. General Information |
| 2. Solicitation Details |
| 3. Contract Pricing Structure |
| 4. Description of Requirement |
| 5. Period of Performance / Delivery Location |
| Period of Performance |
| Place of Performance |
| 6. FAR and DFARS Provisions and Clauses – SEE ATTACHMENT 7 |
| 7. Proposal Submission Instructions |
| 8. Organizational Conflict of Interest (“OCI) Disclosure: |
| 8.1. General Requirement: Because of the Contractor’s proximity to inherently governmental functions and access to non-public, sensitive acquisition information, the Offeror must submit an Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Mitigation Plan. |
| 8.1.1 Definition of the Baseline Competitive Exclusion |
| A. Baseline Competitive Exclusion and Core Purpose: The “Baseline Competitive Exclusion” is a preventive procurement restriction established in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.5 (Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest). Its core purpose is ... |
| B. Scope of the Exclusion (The “What”): Under the Baseline Competitive Exclusion, the Contractor is strictly prohibited from bidding on, competing for, performing, or otherwise supporting any competitive program work within the U.S. Army Capability Pr... |
| C. Affected Entities (The “Who”): This exclusion applies corporately and collectively to: |
| D. Duration (The “When”) |
| 8.1.2 Baseline Acknowledgment: The Offeror must clearly state that they intend to abide by the Baseline Competitive Exclusion (preventing the Prime, Subcontractors, and Affiliates from bidding on CPE ST3 product/hardware work). |
| 8.2 Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s OCI Mitigation Plan on a strictly “Acceptable/Unacceptable” basis. The evaluation will determine if the Offeror has successfully identified, avoided, neutralized, or mitigated all po... |
| 8.2.1 Evaluation Criteria: To receive a rating of “Acceptable,” the Offeror’s OCI Mitigation Plan must definitively meet both of the following two conditions: |
| 8.2.2 “Unacceptable” Rating and Ineligibility: A proposal that fails to provide a comprehensive OCI Mitigation Plan, or a plan that fails to objectively prove the isolation elements required for a Firewall Exemption, will receive a “Unacceptable” rating. |
| 8.2.3 No Post-Award Negotiation: The Government will not make an award to an Offeror with an “Unacceptable” OCI Mitigation Plan. The Government will not conditionally approve the OCI Mitigation Plan or negotiate material firewall terms after contract ... |
| 9. Additional Information |
| 10. Attachments: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .