Attachment (2) Past Performance Rating Form.pdf

PDF 229 KB Posted

Attached to
Mission Training Complex Capabilities Support (MTCCS) II Solicitation Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W900KK23R0006
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Orlando Contracting Center

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Mission Training Complex Capabilities Support (MTCCS) II Solicitation, newest first.
File Type Posted
MTCCS_II_MA_IDIQ_Contract_Task_Order_Acquisition_Timelines.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MTCCS II Solicitation QandA_Part2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MTCCS II Solicitation QandA.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment (1) MASTER MTCCS II LCATsv4.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment (6) III Corps MTCCS II CDRLv5.docx DOCX document
Attachment (8d) III Corps MTCCS II TE 4 (Historical Workload)CUI.pdf PDF
Attachment (19) MTCCS II Base PWS 03NOV22_v4.docx DOCX document
List of Changes to MTCCS II Solicitation.docx DOCX document
MTCCS_II_Solicitation_W900KK23R0006_Amendment0001_08NOV22.pdf PDF
Attachment (4) MTCCS_Preaward_Survey.pdf PDF
Attachment (7) III Corps MTCCS II QASP.docx DOCX document
Attachment (8b) III Corps MTCCS II TE 2 (Est Workload)v2.docx DOCX document
Attachment (8e) III Corps MTCCS II TE 5 (Event Definitions) CUI.pdf PDF
Attachment (8f) III Corps MTCCS II TE 6 (Customer Hot Buttons).docx DOCX document
Attachment (9a) III Coprs MTCCS II Fort Carson WD Table 2015-5417.pdf PDF
Attachment (9b) III Corps MTCCS II Fort Hood WD Table 2015-5237.pdf PDF
Attachment (9d) III Corps MTCCS II Fort Sill WD Table 2015-5313.pdf PDF
Attachment (11) III Corps MTCCS II Draft DD Form 254v2.pdf PDF
Attachment (13) Leesville MTCCS II Sample CDRL CUI_signed_V2.pdf PDF
Attachment (16) Leesville MTCCS II Sample WD DOL_CUI.pdf PDF
Attachment (9c) III Corps MTCCS II Fort Riley WD Table 2015-5343.pdf PDF
Attachment (9e) III Corps MTCCS II Fort Bliss WD Table 2015-5229.pdf PDF
Attachment (9f) III Corps MTCCS II JBSA WD Table 2015-5253.pdf PDF
Attachment (12) Leesville MTCCS II Sample PWS_CUI.pdf PDF
Attachment (9f) III Corps MTCCS II JBSA WD Table 2015-5253.pdf PDF
Attachment (9c) III Corps MTCCS II Fort Riley WD Table 2015-5343.pdf PDF
Attachment (8a) III Corps MTCCS II TE 1 (PRS) CUI.pdf PDF
Attachment (5) III Corps MTCCS II PWSv4.docx DOCX document
Attachment (11) III Corps MTCCS II Draft DD Form 254v2.pdf PDF
Attachment (3)_Tech_Experience_Project_Examples_and_Guidance.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment (8c) III Corps MTCCS II. TE 3 (Hub and Spoke)v3.docx DOCX document
Attachment (1) MASTER MTCCS II LCATsv3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MTCCS_II_Solicitation_W900KK23R0006_21_Oct_22.pdf PDF
Attachment (4) MTCCS_Preaward_Survey.pdf PDF
Attachment (13) Leesville MTCCS II Sample CDRL CUI_signed.pdf PDF
Attachment (16) Leesville MTCCS II Sample WD DOL_CUI.pdf PDF
Attachment (9e) III Corps MTCCS II Fort Bliss WD Table 2015-5229.pdf PDF
Attachment (9d) III Corps MTCCS II Fort Sill WD Table 2015-5313.pdf PDF
Attachment (9a) III Coprs MTCCS II Fort Carson WD Table 2015-5417.pdf PDF
Attachment (5) III Corps MTCCS II PWSv5.docx DOCX document
Attachment (6) III Corps MTCCS II CDRLv4.docx DOCX document
Attachment (2) Past Performance Rating Form.pdf PDF
Attachment (8e) III Corps MTCCS II TE 5 (Event Definitions) CUI.pdf PDF
Attachment (20) MTCCS II SAMPLE Task Order 0001.docx DOCX document
Attachment (8b) III Corps MTCCS II TE 2 (Est Workload)v2.docx DOCX document
Attachment (15) Leesville MTCCS II Sample TE CUI.pdf PDF
Attachment (10) III Corps MTCCS II_Price_Worksheetv3 CUI.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment (7) III Corps MTCCS II QASP.docx DOCX document
Attachment (19) MTCCS II Base PWS 14Jul21_v4.docx DOCX document
Attachment (8f) III Corps MTCCS II TE 6 (Customer Hot Buttons).docx DOCX document
Show all 50

Mission Training Complex Capabilities Support (MTCCS) II Solicitation has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CUI

ATTENTION

Use this space to indicate categories, limited dissemination controls, special instructions, points of contact, etc., if needed.

ATTENTION

All individuals handling this information are required to protect it from unauthorized disclosure.

Handling, storage, reproduction, and disposition of the attached document(s) must be in accordance with 32 CFR Part 2002 and applicable agency policy.

allowed as necessary and permissible to any individual(s), organization(s), or grouping(s) of users, provided such access or dissemination is consistent with or in furtherance of a Lawful Government Purpose and in a manner consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Government-wide policies.

Standard Form 901 (11-18) Prescribed by GSA/ISOO | 32 CFR 2002

CUI

Controlled by: Army Controlled by: ACC-ORL CUI Category: General Procurement and Acquisition Distribution/Limited Dissemination Control: FEDCON POC: Daniel Steinhauer, 407-208-5820

MTCCS

SOLICITATION NO. W900KK-22-R-0035

AMENDMENT NO.: 00

CUI//FEDCON Section X.X., Attachment (2)

CUI//FEDCON

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):

CONTRACTOR NAME: Click here to enter text.

CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER: Click here to enter text.

PROJECT TITLE: Click here to enter text.

TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE,

INCLUDING OPTIONS

Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):

NAME: Click here to enter text.

TITLE: Click here to enter text.

AGENCY or CUSTOMER: Click here to enter text.

PHONE: Click here to enter text.

E-MAIL Click here to enter text.

For each of the Six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control of Utilization of Small Business is N/A, Please explain why. Rater: Please submit completed form to usarmy.orlando.peo-stri.mbx.mtccs@mail.mil In the subject line, please include “PP ‘Contractor Name’”.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

mailto:usarmy.orlando.peo-stri.mbx.mtccs@mail.mil

CUI//FEDCON

SOLICITATION NO. W900KK-22-R-0035

AMENDMENT NO.: 00

Section X.X., Attachment (2)

CUI//FEDCON

Click here to enter text.

2. SCHEDULE

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

3. COST CONTROL

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

SOLICITATION NO. W900KK-22-R-0035

AMENDMENT NO.: 00

Section X.X., Attachment (2)

CUI//FEDCON

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

SOLICITATION NO. W900KK-22-R-0035

AMENDMENT NO.: 00

Section X.X., Attachment (2)

CUI//FEDCON

5. MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS

RATING Adjectival

Rating Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SOLICITATION NO. W900KK-22-R-0035

AMENDMENT NO.: 00

Section X.X., Attachment (2)

CUI//FEDCON

Not Applicable

Click here to enter text.

CUI_Coversheet
Attachment (2) Past Performance Rating Form

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .