Attachment_0017-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Form.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Technical Support of the Aviation and Missile Research, Development, Engineering Center's (AMRDEC) Prototype Integration Facility (PIF)
Solicitation number
W58RGZ-17-R-0001
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment_0016-_Labor_Category_Crosswalk.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0015-_Rate_Tables.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0005-_Award_Term_Plan.docx DOCX document
Attachment__0004-_Labor_Categories.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0007-_Letter_of_Commitment.docx DOCX document
DRAFT_RFP_W58RGZ-17-R-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_0016-_Labor_Category_Crosswalk.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0015-_Rate_Tables.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0002-_Document_Summary_List_(DSL).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0014_-_Proposal_Format.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_A-_Contract_Data_Requirements_List_(CDRL).doc DOC document
Attachment_0012-_AT_OPSEC_Review_Cover_Sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment_0013-_Pre-Award_Survey_of_Prospective_Contractor_Accounting_System_Checklist.pdf PDF
Attachment_0006-_DoD_Contract_Security_Classification_Specification_(DD_254).pdf PDF
Attachment__0003-_Profit_Fee_Calculation_Worksheet.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0011-_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan_(QASP).docx DOCX document
Attachment_0001-_Statement_of_Work_(SOW)_for_Technical_Support_of_the_AMRDEC_PIF.docx DOCX document
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Attachment 0017 29 November 2016

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Technical Support of the Aviation and Missile Research Development, and Engineering Center Prototype Integration Facility Solicitation Number: W58RGZ-17-R-0001

OFFEROR NAME and CAGE:

SECTION I – GENERAL GUIDANCE

Introduction: Under solicitation W58RGZ-17-R-0001, the Army Contracting Command – Redstone is obtaining past performance information. The completed Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) serves as a source of information to evaluate the Offerors recent and relevant performance of the submitted contract reference (listed in Section II B. below) as it relates to the solicitation.

Instructions:

1. Offerors shall –

· Complete Section II A. and II B., then email entire PPQ to the intended respondent.

· Instruct the PPQ respondent to complete Section III.

· Respondents to the PPQ shall –

· Complete Section III entirely, to include comments (if any)

· Send the completed PPQ to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Martin V. Patton, II, (256) 876-3842, martin.v.patton.civ@mail.mil and Contract Specialist, Whitney Alexander, (256) 876-1232, whitney.a.alexander.civ@mail.mil.

· Recommended format for email Subject: “Completed PPQ for W58RGZ-17-R-0001, [Offeror Name or Abbreviation]-[referenced contract number]”.

· Recommended PPQ electronic document filename: “[Offeror Name or Abbreviation]_PPQ_W58RGZ-17-R-0001_[contract reference number].doc” or “.docx” or “.pdf”.

· Send the completed PPQ to the PCO and Contract Specialist identified above. DO NOT send a copy of the completed PPQ to the Offeror.

In addition to the submitted PPQ email response, respondents may receive follow-up phone calls for clarification purposes from an US Government Official. This is a critical acquisition and as such comments are appreciated for all ratings as applicable. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be evaluated with a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract/order.

RATING
DESCRIPTION
NOTES
Excellent
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
To justify an Excellent rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were of benefit to the Government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Excellent rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
To justify a Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the Government. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract/order. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
To justify Marginal performance, identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter).
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an Unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency reports, or letters).

SECTION II (To be completed by the Offeror: Blocks A, 1-6 and B, 1-9)

A. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

1.
Name & Job Title:
2.
Organization:
3.
Address:
4.
Phone No:
5.
Email:
6.
Date:

B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1.
CAGE and Company (if other than a prime contract holder and first tier subcontractor)
2.
Contract Name:
3.
Contract Identification Number:
4.
Order Number(s) (if applicable):
5.
Date of Contract Award and total contract value:
6.
Average Annual value of the Contract (provide the number of years used to calculate the average):

(if any) Estimated Products Value:

(if any) Estimated Services Value:

7.
Period of Actual Contract Performance
8.
CONUS and/or OCONUS locations:
9.
Describe the products and/work the work effort performed on this referenced contract or as a subcontractor. Word count is limited to no more than 500 words maximum:

THE FOLLOWING IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PPQ RESPONDENT.

SECTION III. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE

1.
The Contractor conformed to specifications and standards of good workmanship.
Excellent ____

Good ____ Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ___

COMMENTS:

2.
The Contractor maintained program execution within cost.

Exceptional ____ Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ___

COMMENTS:

3.
The Contractor adhered to contract schedules, including administrative aspects of performance.
Exceptional ____

Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____

COMMENTS:

4.

The Contractor demonstrated ability to resolve technical and manufacturing problems quickly and effectively.
Exceptional ____

Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ___

COMMENTS:

5.
The Contractor established and maintained adequate management of subcontractors.

Exceptional ____ Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____ Unsatisfactory ___

COMMENTS:

6.
The Contractor delivered quality product(s) as reflected by returns of product for repair.
Exceptional ____

Very Good ____ Satisfactory ____ Marginal ____

COMMENTS:

7.

General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

COMMENTS:

Name
Email Address
Telephone Number

THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSES

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .