RFIs_to_Paving_Solicitation_as_of_11_Jul_18.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Post-wide paving & civil works re-compete, APG, MD
Solicitation number
W56ZTN-18-R-0002
Issued by

About this file

Responses to Final RFIs

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
A07-CONTRACTOR_Line_Items_for_bid-OPTION_3_rev9July18R.xls XLS spreadsheet
A07-CONTRACTOR_Line_Items_for_bid-OPTION_1_-rev9July18R.xls XLS spreadsheet
A07-CONTRACTOR_Line_Items_for_bid-OPTION_4-rev9July18R.xls XLS spreadsheet
Amendment_No_0008_dated_11_July_2018.pdf PDF
A07-CONTRACTOR_Line_Items_for_bid-BASE_YEAR-rev9July18R.xls XLS spreadsheet
A07-CONTRACTOR_Line_Items_for_bid-OPTION_2-rev9July18R.xls XLS spreadsheet
CONTRACTOR_Line_Items_for_bid-OPTION_YEAR_2-rev3July18.xls XLS spreadsheet
W56ZTN-18-R-0002-Amendment_0007.pdf PDF
CONTRACTOR_Line_Items_for_bid-BASE_YEAR-rev3July18.xls XLS spreadsheet
CONTRACTOR_Line_Items_for_bid-OPTION_YEAR_4-rev3July18.xls XLS spreadsheet
CONTRACTOR_Line_Items_for_bid-OPTION_YEAR_3-rev3July18.xls XLS spreadsheet
A07_AMENDMENT_0006_DATED_27_JUNE_2018.pdf PDF
RFIs_to_Paving_Solicitation_as_of_27_Jun_18.docx DOCX document
A07_Amendment_No_0005_dated_21_June_2018.pdf PDF
A07_Amendment_No_0004_dated_11_June_18.pdf PDF
RFIs_to_Paving_Solicitation_as_of_11_Jun_18.docx DOCX document
A07_SITE_VISIT_SIGN-IN_SHEETS_08_MAY_2018.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT_NO_0003_DATED_5_JUNE_2018.pdf PDF
A07_-_Sample_Projects_from_Prior_Contracts_(Amendment_0002_attachment).pdf PDF
A07-W56ZTN-18-R-0002-Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
W56ZTN-18-R-0002-Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
A07-Past_Performance_Questionnaire-Attachment.docx DOCX document
02010_Unexploded_Ordnance.doc DOC document
02371_GABIONS.rtf RTF text file
01400_Contractor_Quality_Control.rtf RTF text file
03307_MISC._STRUCTURES.rtf RTF text file
02840_TRAFFIC_BARRIERS.rtf RTF text file
02618_PAVEMENT_MARKINGS.rtf RTF text file
02410_UNDERDRAINS.rtf RTF text file
02964_MILLING_ASPHALT_PAVEMENT.rtf RTF text file
16375__LOOP_DETECTORS.rtf RTF text file
02375_SOIL_STAB__MATTING.rtf RTF text file
02500_STORM_DRAINAGE__SEDIMENT_CONTROL.rtf RTF text file
01012_Excavation_Pmt_form_1247-R.doc DOC document
02800_CURBS_GUTTERS__WALKS.rtf RTF text file
01011_General_Conditions.rtf RTF text file
02315_EXCAVATION_FOR_INCIDENTAL_CONSTRUCTION.rtf RTF text file
02000_WORK_ZONE.rtf RTF text file
02241_AGGRGATES.rtf RTF text file
02223_EXCAVATION__GRADING.rtf RTF text file
03200_REINFORCING.rtf RTF text file
02485_TOPSOIL__TURF.rtf RTF text file
02230_CLEARING__GRUBBING.rtf RTF text file
02557_HOT_MIX_PATCH.rtf RTF text file
03371_WHEEL_STOPS.rtf RTF text file
02515_PORTLAND_CEMENT_CONCRETE.rtf RTF text file
02762_JOINT_SEALING.rtf RTF text file
01561_Environmental_Conditions.doc DOC document
02554_HOT_MIX_ASPHALT.rtf RTF text file
02002_STAKE_OUT.rtf RTF text file
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 58 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR INFORMTION (RFI) RESPONSES TO SOLICITATION NO. W56ZTN-18-R-0002 DATED 11 JULY 2018

No.
Question:
Response:
1
Line Items 07AF is now for Parking Area Pervious Paver with a quantity of 3000 SF and line items 07AK is the same (Parking Area Pervious Pavers) but the quantity is only for 1000 SF. Please advise.
Omit 07AK
2
Line Items 08AG has been changed to “12-21 INCH RCCP CLASS IV, 50 LF” is this change correct? There is a significant difference in the cost of 12” and 21” RCCP CLASS IV Pipe. Also, item 08AJ is for “12 INCH RCCP CLASS IV, 100 LF” please advise if this is correct.
08AG changed to 20 inch. See revised Line Items.
3
Line Items 17AM has been changed to NEW WHEEL STOPS AND PLACEMENT is this correct? Also, item 10 22AA on the new cost sheet is for PCC WHEEL STOPS PRECAST CONCRETE this seems to be the same as the New Wheel Stops and Placement, please advise of what is correct.
Omit 17AM; 10 22 AA added “New” – See revised Line Items.
4
Specifications needed to CLIN numbers 10 25 AF – 10 25 AQ fencing system, chain link, gates and wire.
Correction to previously posted in Amendment No. 0006 – dated 28 June 2018. Specifications for this fencing system are in accordance with Standard FE-7 specifications.
5
Line items 25AF through 25 AQ and 25BD through BF all contain the statement “Chain link fence, gates and post” but it does not clearly identify the size width of the gate and if it’s for a single or double gate. Please advise.
Cost should read LF = Linear Foot – See revised Line Items.

Width varies therefore LF units are used.

6
Line Items 10 08AH and 10 08AI- Descriptions say “OMIT” but quantities are 100. Is “OMIT” correct and if so quantities should be 0? Please revise all spreadsheets accordingly.

OMIT is correct. Quantities have been deleted.

7
Line Items 10 22AR thru 10 22AU- The units of measure for these items on the revised spreadsheets provided in Amendment 7 all say “LF”. In the RFI responses provided with Amendment 4 it states to change the units of measure for these items from “LF” to “EA”. All the spreadsheets should be revised to reflect the appropriate units of measure of “EA” for these items.

LF has been change to EA.

8
Line Item 10 22AV “Pole”. In the RFI responses provided with Amendment 4 it states this item is for a Pole with support base. If the RFI answer provided in Amendment 4 is correct, the current item descriptions should be changed on all spreadsheets to reflect this and for bidding purposes a pole base size needs to be provided.

Line item 10 22AV is used twice, once in the Demolition Section for Metal Traffic Barrier End Treatments and again in the Traffic Signal Section for Pole.

The other lines items for the base of Line Item 10 22AV “Pole” is to be used.

22AV in the Demolition Section has been changed.

9
Line Item 10 22AW is used twice, once in the Demolition Section for METAL TRAFFIC BARRIERS and again in the Traffic Signal Section for STREET LIGHT.

22AW in the Demolition Section has been changed.

10
Line Item 10 22 AX is used twice, once in the Demolition Section for wheel stop and again in the Traffic Signal Section for pedestrian led sign.

22AX in the Demolition Section has been changed.

11
Line Item 10 22AY is used twice, once in the Demolition Section for Fence without barbed wire or concertina and again in the Traffic Signal Section for pedestrian button.

22AY in the Demolition Section has been changed.

12
Line Item 10 22AZ is used twice, once in the Demolition Section for Fence with barbed wire and again in the Traffic Signal Section for pedestrian audio box.

22AZ in the Demolition Section has been changed.

13
Line Item 10 22AZ1 is used three times, once in the Demolition Section for Fence with concertina wire and twice more in the Traffic Signal Section for both hard wired and solar powered crosswalk sign systems.

22AZ1 in the Demolition Section has been changed.

14
Line Items 10 22AZ1 for both the solar and hard wired Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons. This work is not covered under Maryland State Highway Specifications and/or Standard Details for Construction. Please provide specifications for this work and specify a Manufacturer and Model number for what is required.

Line item has been OMIT.

15
Line Items 10 26AA, 10 26AC, 10 26AD all refer to schedule 40 pipe. Please verify that it is schedule 40 instead of schedule 80.

Line items have been corrected to Schedule 80.

16
Line Item 10 26AC – Based on the descriptions for Items 10 26AA, 10 26AB and 10 26AC it appears that the words “5 CWR SCHEDULE 40” currently in the description for Item 10 26AC are a typo and do not belong there. If this is correct please revise all the spreadsheets accordingly.

Line item has been corrected.

17
With the removal of the parking area paving items (10 07AF to AJ), there is no longer a base asphalt paving line item. Are there no full depth paving projects anticipated over the potential 5 year period on base

Other line items are to be used.

File details come from the government source that posted it.