About this file

Attachment Eight

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
2nd Round of Questions Answers.docx DOCX document
Atch 1 - Field Jackets —
Questions Answers —
Atch 5 - CLIN 0011 —
Atch 1 - Field Jackets.docx DOCX document
Atch 3 - CLIN 0009.pdf PDF
Atch 2 - CLINs 0008 0014.doc DOC document
Atch 6 - CLIN 0012.doc DOC document
Atch 4 - CLIN 0010.docx DOCX document
W56KJD-12-R-0001.doc DOC document
Atch 7 - CLIN 0013 ALP Spec.pdf PDF
Atch 5 - CLIN 0011.doc DOC document
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation Number: W56KJD-12-R-0001

Attachment 8

Past Performance Questionnaire

Multiple Award Commodities Contract

(A) Name of Offeror:

(B) Date:

(C) Respondent’s Name:

(D) Date of contract performance:

(E) Contract number (and/or title):

(F) Contract value (cumulative):

Directions: Please evaluate the contractor listed above based on the questions below.

Forward responses not later than solicitation close date to the government’s evaluation team at Christine.t.thompson@afghan.swa.army.mil.

Questions

Respondents Assessment

Did the vendor in the conduct of contract performance?

Unacceptable
Acceptable
N/A
1.
Provided adequate project supervision.
2.
Provide experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
3.
Demonstrate ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
4.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
5.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified Problems as they occurred and was responsive to changing conditions.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Met established project schedules.
13.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
14.
Paid sub-contractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
15.
How would you rate the Contractors overall performance?
16.
Was the Contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in "remarks."
17.
Would you recommend this contractor for future performance?

(G) Additional information/comments respondent may wish to provide:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .