A07_Attachment_0005_Past_Performance_Evaluation_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 12 KB Posted

Attached to
Platform Mission Equipment Software Branch Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W56JSR-17-R-0005
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground

About this file

A07 Attachment 0005 Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire, Microsoft Word Version.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Platform Mission Equipment Software Branch, newest first.
File Type Posted
W56JSR17R0005-0004.pdf PDF
W56JSR17R0005-0003.pdf PDF
RFP_Questions_&__Answers_(W56JSR170005)_7_June_2017.pdf PDF
RFP_Questions_&_Answers_(W56JSR170005)_5_June_2017.pdf PDF
W56JSR17R0005-0002.pdf PDF
W56JSR17R0005-0001.pdf PDF
RFP_Questions_&_Answers_(W56JSR170005)_25_May_2017.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0009_Contract_Security_Classification_Specification_Form_DD_254.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0002__QASP.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0007_Memo_on_Delivery_and_Acceptance_of_Equipment.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0010_GFE_W56JSR_17_R_0005.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0001_Task_Order_0001.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0006_Memo_on_ITMP_and_Goal_1.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0004_System_descriptions.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0003_Base_IDIQ_Travel_Estimate.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0011_Proposal_Dated_TBD.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0008_Configuration_Management_Process_Description.pdf PDF
W56JSR-17-R-0005.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0005_Past_Performance_Evaluation_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0012_Cost_Element_Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A01_Attachment_0002__QASP.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0006_Memo_on_ITMP_and_Goal_1.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0003_Base_IDIQ_Travel_Estimate.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0008_Configuration_Management_Process_Description.pdf PDF
W56JSR17R0005.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0005_Past_Performance_Evaluation_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0010_GFE_W56JSR_17_R_0005.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0007_Memo_on_Delivery_and_Acceptance_of_Equipment.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0001_Task_Order_0001.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0004_System_descriptions.pdf PDF
A01_Attachment_0009_Cost_Element_Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0008_Configuration_Management_Process_Description.pdf PDF
Attachment_0006_Memo_on_ITMP_and_Goal_1.pdf PDF
Attachment_0001_Task_Order_0001.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0007_Memo_on_Delivery_and_Acceptance_of_Equipment.pdf PDF
Attachment_0005_Past_Performance_Evaluation_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0003_Base_IDIQ_Travel_Estimate.doc DOC document
Exhibits_CDRLs.docx DOCX document
W56JSR17R0005___DRAFT.pdf PDF
Attachment_0004_System_descriptions.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0002__QASP.doc DOC document
Attachment_0009_Cost_Element_Workbook_6_Apr_2017.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT_IDIQ__Base_PWS_Platform_Mission_Equipment_Software_Branch_(PMESB)_06_Feb_2017.doc DOC document
DRAFT_Task_Order_0001_PWS_Platform_Mission_Equipment_Software_Branch_(PMESB)__06_Feb_2017.docx DOCX document
Show all 44

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:

Contract No.:

Subcontract No. (If applicable): POC: Title: (Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A.

CONTRACT

IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division: Address:

Program Identification/Title: Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B.

IDENTIFICATION

OF

OFFEROR’S

REPRESENTATIVE

Name: Title: Date:

Telephone Number: Address:

E- mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A.

Compliance of

Products, Services, Documents, and Related

Deliverables to

Specification

Requirements and Standards of Good

Workmanship

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B.

Effectiveness of

Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

C.

Timeliness of

Performance for Services and

Product

Deliverables.

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

D.

Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling

Estimated

Costs (Use this

Question on

Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts

Only).

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

E.

Commitment to

Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its

Customers’

Interest

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

F.

General

Comments.

Provide any other relevant performance information.

G.

Other Information

Sources.

Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H.

Respondent Identification.

Please provide the following information:

Organization: Name:

Title: Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .