Attachment_0101_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(12MAR2019).doc

Attachment 0101 – Past Performance Questionnaire

W56HZV-18-R-0174

Attachment 0101

Past Performance Questionnaire for

RFP Number W56HZV-18-R-0174 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

UNITED STATES ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND-WARREN

6501 EAST 11 MILE ROAD

WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE OPTIONALLY MANNED FIGHTING VEHICLE (NGCV-OMFV) SOLICITATION W56HZV-18-R-0174

1. This information, when filled in, shall be treated as Source Selection Information in accordance with FAR 2.101 and 3.104-3 and shall not be disclosed to anyone outside the Government Source Selection Team.

Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by email to Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center (AMRDEC) Safe Access File Exchange (SAFE), which can be accessed at the following link: https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/SAFE. When submitting to AMRDEC, individuals need to specifically authorize access to the following:

Contract Specialists:

James Giacchina, james.j.giacchina.civ@mail.mil Thomas Zavela, thomas.c.zavela.civ@mail.mil Contracting Officer:

Michael R. Chaney, michael.r.chaney.civ@mail.mil

2. Under the NGCV-OMFV Request for Proposal, offerors will propose a new combat vehicle that will be designed for and used by military forces to maneuver Soldiers in the future operating environment (FOE) to a position of advantage, in order to engage in close combat and deliver decisive lethality during the execution of combined arms maneuver. The NGCV-OMFV must exceed current capabilities while overmatching similar threat class systems. It must be optimized for dense urban areas while also defeating pacing threats on rural (open, semi-restricted and restricted) terrain and be characterized by the ability to spiral in advanced technologies as they mature.

3. Offerors interested in proposing on this solicitation have been requested to send the attached Past Performance Questionnaire to point(s) of contact on past and present contracts, which the offeror deems relevant to this effort. In this regard, Army Contracting Command – Warren (ACC-WRN) is conducting a past performance assessment in anticipation of possible contract award.

4. ACC-WRN is requesting your assistance in completing this questionnaire so that it may evaluate the offerors in the area of past performance. The attached questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract in accordance with the instructions on the questionnaire. If a question on the questionnaire is not applicable, please so indicate.

5. Please complete and submit via email the questionnaire as soon as possible, but no later than the solicitation closing date of 01 October 2019 with the subject heading PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FOR [Contractor name]. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Please provide your candid response to the following questions. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by email to usarmy.detroit.peo-gcs.mbx.ngcv-omfv-contracting@mail.mil. Thank You.

PART I. (To be Completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number/Task Order:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Contract Period of Performance End Date at time of contract award:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion End Date:

Place of Performance:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

Rating Scale

In each of the following sections you will find questions where you are asked to rate some aspect of performance on a scale in the below ranges. PLEASE INCLUDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE RATING SELECTED. The criterion for each rating is described below:

Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements to the end user or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some contractual requirements to the end user or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-elements being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were, not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Too Soon To Tell: No significant or meaningful contract performance has taken place to apply a rating.

Not Applicable: Does not apply to this contract.

PART II. EVALUATION (To be Completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

Instructions: For each of the following questions: (1) mark an “X” in the appropriate column for your rating of the offeror performance, and (2) provide supporting rationale or details for your rating. For any adverse issues, please give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and your assessment of the extent to which Government actions/direction (e.g., requirements changes, unrealistic requirements, etc.) or other factors not in the control of the contractor contributed to the adverse issues.

1. Overall, to what extent was the contractor effective in managing the program for Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) or equivalent of a comparable complexity to the NGCV-OMFV, including its employees and subcontractors?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Supporting Rationale for Rating:

2. Overall, to what extent was the quality of contract deliverables for EMD or equivalent of a comparable complexity to the NGCV-OMFV?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

3. Overall, to what extent did the contractor adhere to the delivery schedule for EMD or equivalent of a comparable complexity to the NGCV-OMFV?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

4. Overall, to what extent did the contractor adhere to the contracted cost for EMD or equivalent of a comparable complexity to the NGCV-OMFV?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

5. Overall, to what extent was the contractor effective in managing the program for Logistics Support Activity (LOGSA) authenticated Operator and Maintenance Technical Manual for a military vehicle, including its employees and subcontractors?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

6. Overall, to what extent did the contractor adhere to the delivery schedule for LOGSA authenticated Operator and Maintenance Technical Manual for a military vehicle in accordance with the terms of the cited contract?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

7. Overall, to what extent was the quality of delivered LOGSA authenticated Operator and Maintenance Technical Manual for a military vehicle?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

8. Overall, to what extent was the contractor effective in Program Management of a software and vehicle electronics system that followed Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) and Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Level 3 standards, including its employees and subcontractors?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

9. Overall, to what extent did the contractor adhere to the delivery schedule for a software and vehicle electronics system that followed MOSA and CMMI Level 3 standards in accordance with the terms of the cited contract?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

10. Overall, to what extent was the quality of the delivered software and vehicle electronics system that followed MOSA and CMMI Level 3 standards?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

11. Overall, to what extent did the contractor adhere to the contracted cost for software and vehicle electronics system that followed MOSA and CMMI Level 3 standards?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

12. Overall, to what extent did the contractor follow MOSA for development and delivery of their architecture and updates to address issues as they arose?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

13. Overall, to what extent did the contractor follow the process for CMMI standards and what certification level did the contractor achieve?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

14. Overall, to what extent did the contractor develop, integrate, qualify, and deliver software to ensure alignment to system requirements?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

15. Overall, to what extent did the contractor utilize high fidelity of Test Environments for software integration?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

16. Overall, to what extent did the contractor manage a defects/issues tracking and closure system during software integration?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

17. Overall, to what extent did the contractor follow a process for vulnerability/defect management, corrective actions, and deliver validated software patches/fixes to address issues as they arose (safety, Mission Essential and Critical Functions related issues)?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

PART III. Other Information Sources

Please provide the following information:

1. Please describe any problems or special accomplishments noted regarding the Offeror’s performance for the contract requirements.

Comments:

2. Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company with your agency/company? If yes, please provide the name, telephone number and email of a point of contact, and contract number.

Comments:

PART IV. Respondent Identification

Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

Fax Number:

E-mail Address: