Attachment_0003_-_Manufacturing_Maturity_Review_Checklist_(22MAR2019).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV-18-R-0174_
About this file
Attachment 0003 - Manufacturing Maturity Review Checklist
View the file
Other files
Show all 34
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1 Attachment 0003 - OMFV Manufacturing Maturity Review Checklist Solicitation Number W56HZV-18-R-0174
DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited.
| Functional, allocated and product baseline and Manufacturing documentation |
| a) CI (configuration item) performance has been verified against the allocated baseline, and integrated functional performance has been verified against the functional baseline. |
| b) Review of CI(s) and system-level test and analysis results verifies documented achievement of functional (e.g., early operational assessments, operational assessments), or live fire testing. requirements through the appropriate documented verification methods. NOTE―Verification testing may include developmental, operational |
| c) Adequately detailed requirements verification traceability documentation exists outlining the method for verification for each requirement in the CI specification. |
| d) System-level performance has been verified as satisfactory against the functional baseline. |
| e) Technologies are mature and proven in the final form, in operational environments. |
| f) System product baseline is stable and under proper configuration control to enable hardware fabrication and system software production during lowrate production. |
| g) System product baseline is maintainable per the configuration management plan (CMP). |
| h) All CSIs (critical safety item) and CAIs (critical application item) have been identified, documented and are being effectively managed. |
| i) All approved engineering change proposals (ECP), requests for deviation, and requests for waiver have been incorporated into the system product baseline. |
| j) For software, a technical understanding is reached on the validity and the degree of completeness of the software test reports and as appropriate, computer system operator’s manual, software user’s manual, and the system diagnostic manual. |
| k) Bi-directional traceability has been documented among the Purchase Description, CIs, and the system specifications. |
| l) Certification activities are sufficiently underway with all certifying agencies. |
| m) Logistics support analysis and maintenance task analysis are complete |
| n) Assessment of the documented system product baseline for the initial production system shows a low risk of operational test failure during IOT&E. |
| o) The system product baseline is producible as verified by the results of any incremental lower-level PRRs or by production modeling and analysis. |
| p) Applicable production-related DoD directives, statutory and regulatory guidance, threshold design and certification standards, and public law have been adequately represented in the manufacturing and production processes in the system product baseline. |
| q) Production processes have satisfied all TPM thresholds as verified by all available design documentation, test data, analysis, and inspection. |
| r) All identified production critical technologies have demonstrated adequate technical maturity in accordance with the technology maturation plans. |
| s) Adequate manufacturing maturity of the system product baseline has been demonstrated. |
| t) Manufacturing processes are stable; production factilies and capacity are low risk |
| u) Adequate production line processes and metrics are in place for the delivery of on-time quality products. |
| v) The audit trail from the initial product baseline established at MTA Rapid Prototyping Award accurately tracks all incorporated and unincorporated system product baseline changes that have occurred since MTA Rapid Prototyping Award. |
| Technical plans |
| a) The supplier’s SEMP have been updated as required to adequately address the production and deployment phase of acquisition. |
| b) A training plan that adequately supports OT&E is consistent with the system product baseline and has been reviewed and approved. |
| c) The CMP has been updated as required. |
| d) Prior readiness reviews are completed, action items closed, and corrective action plans successfully completed. |
| e) Supply chain is stable and adequate to support planned LRIP and FRP. |
| f) The manufacturing plan is up-to-date and reflects the planned LRIP and FRP operations. |
| g) The manufacturing plan contains sufficient planning IAW AS 6500 |
| h) A manufacturing maturation plan has been developed for any item assessed to not have the industrial capability in place to support LRIP. |
| i) Contractor has a sufficient plan to properly staff with qualified production, quality (engineering and assurance), and manufacturing personnel. |
| j) The product acceptance plan in place that includes acceptance test procedures and associated equipment |
| k) Diminishing manufacturing sources and material shortages plan is in place and mitigates the risk of obsolescence during LRIP and FRP. |
| Program execution and process control |
| a) The CCB is processing configuration changes in accordance with industry standards, supplier instructions, processes and procedures, and maintaining the proper configuration baselines. |
| b) Adequate processes and metrics are in place to ensure the system product baseline is maintained throughout the production and deployment phase of acquisition. |
| c) CPI is being adequately managed and protected |
| Program life-cycle cost estimate and schedule |
| a) The system is producible within the production budget. |
| b) The acquirer/supplier IMS is resourced at reasonable levels based on realistic performance and efficiency expectations. |
| c) IMP and IMS have sufficient details of planned tasks for production and deployment to achieve acceptable risk. |
| Verification results |
| a) Each requirement listed in the requirements verification traceability documentation has been successfully verified in accordance with the identified methodology based on all available test data, analysis, or inspection. |
| b) The CI demonstrated the capability to satisfy Purchase Description thresholds based on available test data, analysis or inspection. |
| c) The CI satisfies TPM thresholds as verified by available design documentation, test data, analysis, or inspection. |
| d) CI acceptance test reports are complete, have been reviewed, and deficiencies have been addressed. |
| e) For CIs that failed initially to pass quality assurance test provisions, analysis shows cause of failure has been determined and appropriate corrections have been made to both the CIs and the associated engineering data prior to being subjected to requalification. |
| f) All system specification qualification test requirements have been successfully completed. |
| Risk assessment |
| a) Technical risks are identified, and mitigation plans are in place. |
| b) Risk management process is in place demonstrated by documented execution results of existing mitigation plans associated with the purpose of the review. |
| Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited. |
File details come from the government source that posted it.